The 48 Laws of Power

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AuthorRobert Greene
SubjectSelf-help
Published1998 (Viking Press) (HC); 2007 (HighBridge Audio) CD
Publication placeUnited States
Pages452
ISBN0670881465 (HC); ISBN 978-1598870923 (CD)
OCLC39733201
Dewey Decimal303.3 21
LC ClassBD438 .G74 1998
Followed byThe Art of Seduction 

The 48 Laws of Power (1999) is a self-help book by American author Robert Greene.[1] The book is a New York Times bestseller,[2][3] selling over 1.2 million copies in the United States.[4][5]

Background

Greene initially formulated some of the ideas in The 48 Laws of Power while working as a writer in Hollywood and concluding that today’s power elite shared similar traits with powerful figures throughout history.[6][7] In 1995, Greene worked as a writer at Fabrica, an art and media school, and met a book packager named Joost Elffers.[8][9] Greene pitched a book about power to Elffers and six months later, Elffers requested that Greene write a treatment.[8]

Although Greene was quite unhappy in his job, he was comfortable and thought that writing a proper book proposal was too risky in his situation.[10] However, at the time Greene was rereading his favorite biography about Julius Caesar and took inspiration from Caesar’s decision to cross the Rubicon River and fight Pompey, thus inciting Caesar’s civil war.[10] Greene wrote the treatment, which would later become The 48 Laws of Power.[10] He would note this as the turning point of his life.[10]

Reception

Popularity

The 48 Laws of Power has sold over 1.2 million copies in the United States and has been translated into 24 languages.[8] Fast Company called the book a “mega cult classic”, and the Los Angeles Times noted that The 48 Laws of Power turned Greene into a “cult hero with the hip-hop set, Hollywood elite and prison inmates alike”.[8][11]

The book has been reported to be much requested in American prison libraries.[7][12] Rapper 50 Cent stated that he related to the book “immediately”, and approached Greene with the prospect of a potential collaboration, which would later become The 50th Law, another New York Times bestseller.[13] Busta Rhymes and Derrius Jackson used The 48 Laws of Power to deal with problematic movie producers.[9] The 48 Laws of Power has also been mentioned in songs by UGKJay-Z (Primetime), Kanye WestCentral CeeMF Doom, and Drake.[14][15][16][17] Dov Charney, founder and former CEO of American Apparel who would be terminated by that company in 2014, frequently quoted the laws during board meetings, has given friends and employees copies of the book, and appointed Greene to the board of the now defunct American Apparel.[8][18][19] Greene claimed that Cuban President Fidel Castro has also read the book.[8] The book has been banned by several US prisons.[20]

The 48 Laws of Power has been referenced or bought by 50 Cent, Jay-Z, Busta Rhymes, Michael Jackson (who wrote in the margins)[21]Courtney Love (who was photographed carrying it on the way to court when facing a drug charge)[22] and Will Smith.[7][23][24][25] The 48 Laws of Power has also had a major influence on various music producers, such as DJ Premier and Calvin Harris, both of whom have tattoos inspired by Robert Greene’s book.[26][27]

In response to the popular reputation of his work as an unethical book, Greene himself responded by saying that he “could count maybe four or five laws that are overtly manipulative” and there are “44 others that are not manipulative at all”. He then continues by saying that people cherry pick the “chapters that are most egregious”.[28]

Greene has also stated that he takes most of his own laws “with a healthy pinch of salt,” saying, “When I say ‘Crush your enemy,’ I don’t literally mean it. […] I’m talking about the way large companies deal with each other, for example in technology it’s a dog-eat-dog environment. These laws are not for Joe Schmo who’s got a colleague he doesn’t like.”[5]

Reviews by critics and scholars

People’s Magazine referred to it as “a wry primer for people who desperately want to be on top.” Allure described the book as “satisfyingly dense”, and “literary”, and continued that it is filled “with fantastic examples of genius power-game players.”[29] Quincy Jones III, reviewing the book, states that he views Greene’s work as “more as an empowerment tool than as a way to screw people.”[30] Jerry Adler, writing in Newsweek, lists ways the laws contradict one another and states, “Intending the opposite, Greene has actually produced one of the best arguments since the New Testament for humility and obscurity.”[31] Kirkus Reviews said Greene offers no evidence to support his world view, that his laws contradict each other, and that the book is “simply nonsense”.[32] Craig Pinder has stated that the book “has practical tips for the use of power” and that while they may seem deceptive, “actually have reasonable explanations”.[33]

The 48 Laws of Power has been studied at Millsaps College and Ramapo College.[34][35] Jeffrey Pfeffer of Stanford University said that Greene’s so-called laws are based on isolated examples, and not on solid research.[7]

See also

Translation Saturday Meeting August 1

(Image courtesy of Steve Hines and AI)

August 1:  11:00 AM – 12:00 PM PST

Mike Zonta, H.W., M.

In a crisis — any crisis — The Prosperos offers Translation.  Translation Saturday Meetings is a weekly series of Translation presentations by veteran Translators, live and up to date on the issues of the day.

It is not a Translation workshop,  It is not a Translation class.  It is not a group Translation in the usual sense, though group participation is encouraged.

It is, however, restricted to those who have taken Translation class. So if you have never taken Translation class, check the calendar tab on The Prosperos website (TheProsperos.org) or get in touch with us and we will schedule a class.

Last week our sense testimony was:  On the political landscape of America we see nothing but the intolerance of opposing opinions. As kids we soak up ideas without thinking about them. And our conclusion was:   Truth tolerates everything.  

Then we asked ChatGPT to Translate the same sense testimony.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – See you there!!! – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Here’s the link:  https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81749347119

For more info and link to join please email Mike Zonta at:

zonta1111@aol.com

Weekly Translation:  I have tennis elbow syndrome due to improper or over use of my arms.

By Mike Zonta, BB editor

Translation is a 5-step process of “straight thinking in the abstract” comparing and contrasting what seems to be truth with what you can syllogistically, axiomatically and mathematically (using word equations) prove is the truth. It is not an effort to change, alter or heal anything other than our consciousness.

The claims in a Translation should be outrageous and mind-blowing, but they are always (or should always be) based on self-evident syllogistic reasoning. Here is one Translation from this week. 

1)    Truth is that which is so.  That which is not truth is not so.  Therefore Truth is all that is.  Truth being all is therefore total, therefore whole, therefore complete, therefore perfect.  Truth being all that is, there is nothing other than Truth, therefore Truth is one.  I think therefore I am.  Since I am and since truth is all that is, therefore the beingness of me is Truth. Since I, being, am Truth and since I am mind (self-evident), therefore Truth is Mind/Consciousness.

2)    I have tennis elbow syndrome due to improper or over use of my arms.

Word-tracking:
tennis elbow syndrome:  lateral epicondylitis, overuse of muscles
muscles:  body tissue that tightens and relaxes in order to get something done, strength, power, brawn
tendon:  attaches the muscle to the bone
use:  to act, to take action, perform, to do, to finish
arm:  to type, to communicate

3)    Truth being one and truth being mind and truth being all, therefore Truth is all one mind OR Truth is omniscient.  Truth being one mind therefore Truth communicates with itself instantly and automatically.  Truth being all that is, there can be no power or force other than Truth, therefore Truth is omnipotent.  Since Truth is all that is, therefore Truth is all that can be used.  Since Truth is all that is and since Truth is all that can be used, therefore Truth cannot use itself untruthfully.  Therefore Truth uses Itself truthfully (properly).  Truth being omnipotent, cannot be overused since there is no limit to omnipotence.  Therefore limitless power is the proper use of Truth.  Truth being whole, complete and perfect, nothing really needs to be done.  Therefore action is redundant.  Truth being all that is, therefore limitless, there can be on redundancy in Truth.  Therefore No action required in Truth.

4)    Truth is all one mind OR Truth is omniscient.  
        Truth communicates with itself instantly and automatically. 
        Truth is omnipotent. 
        Truth is all that can be used. 
        Truth uses Itself truthfully (properly). 
        Limitless power is the proper use of Truth.  
        Nothing really needs to be done. 
        Action is redundant.  
        No action required in Truth.

5)    No action required for Truth to be omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent.

And now I’ll ask ChatGPT:

Me:  Please Translate the following sense testimony: I have tennis elbow syndrome due to improper or over use of my arms.

ChatGPT: 

I’d be delighted. This sense testimony resembles the one we did on scoliosis. It contains both an observation and a causal explanation. Your Translation asks whether the explanation establishes the nature of Being or simply describes an appearance.


Translation

Sense Testimony

“I have tennis elbow syndrome due to improper or overuse of my arms.”


1. Statement of Being

Truth is that which is so.

That which is not Truth is not so.

Therefore, Truth is all that is.

Truth being all is therefore only.

Truth being only is therefore one.

Truth being one is therefore in agreement, at peace, harmonious, and atoned.

I think, therefore I am.

Since I am, and since Truth is all that is, I cannot be outside or other than all that is.

Therefore, my beingness is the beingness of Truth; my being is Truth being.

Since I am consciousness (self-evident), and since my being is the being of Truth, therefore the being of Truth is consciousness (Mind).

Truth is whole, harmonious, limitless, self-consistent, undefeated, and infinite Intelligence.


2. Uncovering the Sense Testimony

The senses report:

I have tennis elbow syndrome due to improper or overuse of my arms.

The statement implies:

  • I possess a condition.
  • My body has been damaged.
  • Improper or excessive use is the cause.
  • My present condition is determined by past physical activity.
  • My body defines my present experience.

These are conclusions drawn from observation.


2½. Word-Tracking

Have

To have means:

  • possess
  • hold
  • experience

To have something is not necessarily to be it.

The distinction between having and being is important.

Tennis

Originally referring to the game of tennis.

Here it merely labels a common location of the condition.

Elbow

The elbow is a joint—a place of connection and movement.

The word identifies a location, not the essence of Being.

Syndrome

From the Greek syndromē:

  • running together
  • concurrence

A syndrome is a collection of signs and symptoms.

It is a descriptive label.

It is not itself an explanation of ultimate reality.

Improper

Improper means:

  • unsuitable
  • incorrect
  • inappropriate

It is a judgment based upon a standard.

Overuse

Overuse means:

  • excessive use
  • more than is considered beneficial

It describes quantity.

It does not establish the nature of Being.


3. Argument

Truth is whole and harmonious.

Infinite Intelligence cannot become divided against itself.

The senses may observe pain, inflammation, or limitation.

Medicine may reasonably describe patterns associated with those observations.

Such descriptions can be useful for care and healing.

However, a description of bodily appearance does not define the nature of Being.

Since my being is the being of Truth, my essential identity cannot be reduced to a syndrome.

Nor does the phrase “due to overuse” establish an ultimate cause.

It describes an observed relationship within the realm of appearances.

The body may require rest, treatment, or wiser use.

Yet no appearance of limitation can diminish the wholeness of Truth.

Therefore I distinguish between the experience reported by the senses and the Reality of Being.


4. Summing Up Results

Truth remembers everything.

Being is whole and harmonious.

Having an experience is not the same as being that experience.

A syndrome is a description, not an identity.

Apparent causes do not define ultimate Cause.

Truth is infinite Intelligence.


5. Establishing the Absolute

Truth is whole, harmonious, limitless, undefeated Intelligence; therefore no bodily condition, descriptive label, or apparent cause can define or diminish the beingness and consciousness that I truly am.


One observation

I noticed something in the word-tracking that I think may become valuable in future Translations.

The sentence begins:

“I have…”

Not:

“I am…”

That distinction may seem small, but philosophically it is profound.

You have thoughts, but you are not your thoughts.

You have memories, but you are not your memories.

You have a body, but your method asks whether your essential being is identical with the body.

You have a diagnosis, but the diagnosis does not establish your identity.

I think this could become one of the recurring insights in your Translation method:

What I have does not establish what I am.

That simple distinction seems entirely consistent with the first principle you’ve developed and provides a powerful antidote to identifying oneself with labels, conditions, or experiences.

Me:   

For information about Translation or other Prosperos classes go to: https://www.theprosperos.org/teaching.

Or, if you have taken Translation class, join us each Saturday for Translation Saturday Meeting at 11 a.m. Pacific time for current, up-to-the-minute Translations on the issues of the day.  Email zonta1111@aol.com for the Zoom link.

m.z.

William Blake on the doors of perception

William Blake

If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is – infinite.”

― William Blake

William Blake was a British poet, painter, printmaker, and engraver. A visionary artist and nonconformist, Blake expressed his radical views on society, politics, and religion through his poetry, paintings, watercolors, and illuminated books. His work often hid criticism within complex mythology to avoid persecution from the British government. Wikipedia.org

Born November 28, 1757, Soho, London, United Kingdom

Died August 12, 1827 (age 69 years), London, United Kingdom

ChatGPT on Hitler’s artistic talent

By Mike Zonta, BB editor (and ChatGPT)

Me:

Is it true that Hitler had difficulty drawing the human body?

ChatGPT:

Yes, that is generally true, although it needs some nuance.

Before entering politics, Adolf Hitler aspired to become an artist. He applied twice to the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna (1907 and 1908) and was rejected both times.

One of the reasons cited by the admissions committee was that his work showed greater aptitude for architectural subjects than for the human figure.

His surviving paintings and drawings support that assessment.

https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/W6hhnEK0AOuvReBOCmml_GyQD9p1gTFma7p3daKpxLNuxdNk0ViglRTUKn1bvD6EB7GBFMUm-TNw4vADfzH7zVjzLvib9CjVx2HtIDWDEnRZXknD6j-Ce8E5CSgLGL8PlQuFudjfEQBnsgJbq2ubGQcK6a40AECgoOmN0eliDBTEzsevRY4152g5LK58ko9N?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/l4IgjjGdykc_waVj_WVs8nelIrAhkwu-2uwaTq7F_ZJ4CBV6m1aOCYZ43liaEN3_sdgtAqgMOLwJ7zht0rLSl4PdbKT0Ioff6EnqGgrkN-M1lES0so08uiIeELC59h3eDhzAqnpLvxKZPmVaCDNoB4KPfzDTkhKW3cEFv1UB5oci1eHNAqZ6uviDm2KsT7z5?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/MEm_iE7PArEzA10PepF-fwTFcq6qRRs6JshIIUYg0QZiWuoaxS4_pWUVC3Xyk888boi_B5lcgSr6DcwCC2njgaUySGXETmJMfkGIFsFZCegAnFEZ-JZlB7MyLMMv26VBbxhT6Ako_Pj7AzG2NFs8kH6bnSdJB37r-TqIoplGsGEP25pcBMu0J70oYkgl4mt-?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/VtPOmf6BqDtqVfPO-mMPWerhaFccc5ThArZXreQoSOwuiqqONnJjWKtgeMGukbuDHldyNruMn0_tMWLGGgQtWqYB0PO7Ls0ZvtUs1YrEUogoBv2tFN-WMFYNzF6zhbq3DSwmi4WHUkEK2hNcJqCJPSfRIE6QpyMU1I1_tr4Od_YffhWvWQ40d8L03YM9mPm1?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/7nLlY_KMAiw8SrWbv7dyL5CZ1kXJF9gSyJWw_cxRNnb6ma1CoeTiaioJ0Nvw0MLycu7DZnZI-UeODU6a7VPJSW_8ZYge0pWgORc37yyqEEqfMowR-FB4eR4A6DNfe9JyWvB8v93njcWYQm_4Ei3wi0HWkkItzefrQ5VfqItvnWNtHW78d6TopqNM_ymTGrDv?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/-KsIOg9hSdZOV9ziRihO2OxTa1G9wVXux_EoP5x5hM75cQIzIZLSw1hwbR8oSuMhqtVlNcVBC_RQYf6BRW7Ch-JXFRDlZYU49F-TDDTvle5zGl3DFLo14UX7KaS4tWgdSgwwJ2fYuLKH-ZteXcrl5MMTTAeM-DgnmDAlpT_aEwfkljU43x7U3tmTSNXMgBVu?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/7p6ECe1kxsIgeEwq8S0Sa716VDAtKdDAEBwOvnuLZT8cuv16wvirTn1xEZ_EEmQTffPZDX4MduC_RABznziWM-umPjsFcNrgbCxcWH8103WGTsd5CNT9eFZJ-OBG0UcDF_q4CHgymN1EvD6zQP22kmRH2xHbPgkfw23yIH75-M5hin5mWuf_nBr29nwoaPIn?purpose=fullsize
https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/izmn0rU6n590-C4zhTQU41-7-wSx8oBbpp4rCf3ug08l0XamCMDJ5eT6CLzcphd7tnfQtS5QeuYxJtbS1go7vk-KliNTzPLIFeULaO1L6yNS-m_CeedG7y4yVu-u5C67O1gWlahlwem3xXkoYQgnZNYUVrnhu9zrMCoNXkWZs2rvAlKwYKAmbHEackIdg4eM?purpose=fullsize

Most of his surviving works depict:

  • buildings,
  • churches,
  • bridges,
  • streets,
  • interiors,
  • landscapes.

When people do appear, they are often:

  • very small,
  • stiff,
  • sketchily rendered,
  • or turned away from the viewer.

Art historians have often remarked that Hitler’s strengths lay in perspective and architectural detail, while his weaknesses included:

  • anatomy,
  • proportion of the human body,
  • expressive faces,
  • movement,
  • and the emotional vitality of figures.

This doesn’t mean he couldn’t draw people at all. Rather, compared with his architectural rendering, his figure drawing was noticeably weaker.

Interestingly, the Vienna Academy’s evaluators reportedly suggested that he might be better suited to architecture. However, Hitler lacked the secondary-school qualifications required to enter an architectural program.


A psychological caution

Because of Hitler’s later role in history, there has been a temptation to read symbolic meaning into his artistic limitations—for example, suggesting that his inability to depict human beings reflected an inability to value humanity.

That’s an intriguing idea, but it remains speculative. Many capable architectural artists are simply more interested in buildings than people, and artistic weaknesses by themselves don’t predict moral character.

What can be said with confidence is that Hitler’s surviving artwork reveals a clear preference and stronger technical ability for architecture over the human figure, and that this likely contributed to the Academy’s decision not to admit him.

Robert Anton Wilson’s Quantum Psychology with Gabriel Kennedy

New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove Jul 30, 2026 Psychology and Psychotherapy Gabriel Kennedy (aka Prop Anon) is the author of Chapel Perilous: The Life & Thought Crimes of Robert Anton Wilson. He is also a visual artist and musician. Gabriel Kennedy explores Robert Anton Wilson’s Quantum Psychology, revealing how Wilson synthesized quantum physics, psychology, philosophy, linguistics, and general semantics into a practical guide for questioning certainty and expanding awareness. The discussion examines Wilson’s ideas on language, perception, observer participation, E-Prime, nonlocality, systems thinking, and the pursuit of greater psychological flexibility and joy. Together with Jeffrey Mishlove, Kennedy reflects on Wilson’s enduring influence as a philosopher, trickster, and visionary whose work remains strikingly relevant in today’s information-rich world. 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:07 Robert Anton Wilson’s vision 00:08:01 Language and semantic noise 00:14:20 Observer and reality 00:20:30 Nonlocality and deep reality 00:27:00 Mind, body and systems 00:34:51 E-Prime and perception 00:40:26 Eight systems of intelligence 00:47:00 Joy, healing and consciousness 00:56:01 Conclusion (Recorded on **** 00, 2026)

The Four Buddhist Mantras for Turning Fear into Love

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

“Fearlessness is what love seeks,” Hannah Arendt wrote in her magnificent early work on love and how to live with fear. “Such fearlessness exists only in the complete calm that can no longer be shaken by events expected of the future… Hence the only valid tense is the present, the Now.”

This notion of presence as the antidote to fear and the crucible of love is as old as the human heart, as old as the consciousness that first felt the blade of anticipatory loss pressed against the exposed underbelly of the longing for connection. It is at the center of millennia-old Buddhist philosophy and comes alive afresh, in a splendidly practical way, in Fear: Essential Wisdom for Getting Through the Storm (public library) by the great Vietnamese Buddhist teacher and peace activist Thich Nhat Hanh, who continued to enrich, ennoble, and empower with his teachings well into his nineties.

Thich Nhat Hanh

In the general Buddhist style of befriending complexity through simplicity and with his particular gift for simple words strung into a rosary of immense wisdom radiating immense kindness, Thich Nhat Hanh writes:

We have a great, habitual fear inside ourselves. We’re afraid of many things — of our own death, of losing our loved ones, of change, of being alone. The practice of mindfulness helps us to touch nonfear. It’s only here and now that we can experience total relief, total happiness… In the practice of Buddhism, we see that all mental formations — including compassion, love, fear, sorrow, and despair — are organic in nature. We don’t need to be afraid of any of them, because transformation is always possible.

Such transformation is possible only through deliberate practice — none more challenging, or more rewarding, than the practice of transforming fear into love. In consonance with his teaching that “to love without knowing how to love wounds the person we love,” he anchors this transmutation practice in four mantras “effective for watering the seeds of happiness in yourself and your beloved and for transforming fear, suffering, and loneliness.”

Red poppy from Elizabeth Blackwell’s pioneering 18th-century encyclopedia of medicinal plants. (Available as a print and as a face mask.)

Unlike a prayer — which channels a hope at some imagined entity capable of interceding in favor of that hope and has only as a side benefit (though arguably its only real and robust benefit) the psychological self-clarification that comes from honing our hopes in language — a mantra is not addressed at anything or anyone external and is entirely devoted to distilling the object of hope to its clearest essence. This, in and of itself, transforms the hope into an intent, making it more actionable — but also saving it from the particular complacency against which Descartes admonished as he considered the vital relationship between fear and hope. A mantra is therefore not a form of magical thinking, for while there is a sense of magic to how such distillation seems to shift the situation by its very utterance, it is an entirely practical sort of magic, for a mantra simply clarifies, concentrates, and consecrates intent, and all meaningful transformation springs from purposeful, devoted intent.

Thich Nhat Hanh writes:

A mantra is a kind of magic formula that, once uttered, can entirely change a situation. It can change us, and it can change others. But this magic formula must be spoken in concentration, with body and mind focused as one. What you say in this state of being becomes a mantra.

Within this conceptual framework, he offers four mantras for transforming fear into love, beginning with “Mantra for Offering Your Presence.” A generation after Simone Weil insisted that “attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity,” he writes:

The most precious gift you can give to the one you love is your true presence. So the first mantra is very simple: “Dear one, I am here for you.”

Simple though this mantra might seem, he reminds us that actually cultivating the capacity for it — the capacity for presence, which is where our capacity for love resides — is intensely difficult against the tidal wave of demand and distraction that sweeps everyday life and sweeps us along with it, leaving us always on the brink of drowning, bereft of what Emerson celebrated as “the power to swell the moment from the resources of our own heart until it supersedes sun & moon & solar system in its expanding immensity.”

Solar System quilt by Ellen Harding Baker, 1876. Available as a print and a face mask.

A century after Tolstoy insisted that “love is a present activity only,” Thich Nhat Hanh gently reminds us that the greatest resource of our own heart — our greatest source of power, our mightiest antidote to fear — is the quality of love we give through the quality of our presence:

When you love someone, the best thing you can offer that person is your presence. How can you love if you are not there? Come back to yourself, look into [their] eyes, and say, “Darling, you know something? I’m here for you.” You’re offering [them] your presence. You’re not preoccupied with the past or the future; you are there for your beloved. You must say this with your body and with your mind at the same time, and then you will see the transformation.

Such crystalline presence is the prerequisite for the next mantra — “Mantra for Recognizing Your Beloved”:

The second mantra is, “Darling, I know you are there, and I am so happy.”

To be there is the first step, and recognizing the presence of the other person is the second step. Because you are fully there, you recognize that the presence of your beloved is something very precious. You embrace your beloved with mindfulness, and he or she will bloom like a flower. To be loved means first of all to be recognized as existing.

In a sentiment of especial relevance and consolation in these disembodied times, he reminds us that these mantras can be performed across distance, across wires and cables and screens, not requiring the physical presence of the beloved — however they are articulated, they are at bottom meditations containing all four elements of true love as described by the Buddha: love, compassion, joy, and freedom.

Illustration by Marianne Dubuc from The Lion and the Bird

While the third mantra, “Mantra for Relieving Suffering,” could be magnified and deepened by the atomic rewards of Thich Nhat Hanh’s “hugging meditation,” it too can be extended across the digital distance:

Even before you do anything to help, your wholehearted presence already brings some relief, because when we suffer, we have great need for presence of the person we love. If we are suffering and the person we love ignores us, we suffer more. So what you can do — right away — is to manifest your true presence to your beloved and say the mantra with all your mindfulness: “Dear one, I know you are suffering. That is why I am here for you.” And already your loved one will feel better.

Your presence is a miracle, your understanding of his or her pain is a miracle, and you are able to offer this aspect of your love immediately. Really try to be there, for yourself, for life, for the people you love. Recognize the presence of those who live in the same place as you, and try to be there when one of them is suffering, because your presence is so precious for this person.

Art by Jean-Pierre Weill from The Well of Being

The fourth and final mantra, “Mantra for Reaching Out to Ask for Help,” seems on the surface to be self-concerned, but is in fact the crucible of self-care from which all unselfish love and presence spring. It is also, Thich Nhat Hanh observes, the most difficult of the four, for it dwells in the place of our greatest vulnerability and at the same time pushes us to lean on our most crippling crutch:

This mantra is for when you are suffering and you believe that your beloved has caused you suffering. If someone else had done the same wrong to you, you would have suffered less. But this is the person you love the most, so you suffer deeply, and the last thing you feel like doing is to ask that person for help… So now it is your pride that is the obstacle to reconciliation and healing. According to the teaching of the Buddha, in true love there is no place for pride.

When you are suffering like this, you must go to the person you love and ask for his or her help. That is true love. Do not let pride keep you apart. You must overcome your pride. You must always go to him or her. That is what this mantra is for. Practice for yourself first, to bring about oneness of your body and mind before going to the other person to say the fourth mantra: “Dear one, I am suffering; please help.” This is very simple but very hard to do.

Complement this particular fragment of the wholly soul-salving Fear: Essential Wisdom for Getting Through the Storm with Seneca on overcoming fear and Audre Lorde on turning fear into fire, then revisit the great Buddhist teacher Pema Chödrön on transformation through difficult times.

James Michener on work and play

“The master in the art of living makes little distinction between his work and his play, his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his information and his recreation, his love and his religion. He hardly knows which is which. He simply pursues his vision of excellence at whatever he does, leaving others to decide whether he is working or playing. To him he’s always doing both. ”

~ James A. Michener.

James Albert Michener was an American writer. He wrote more than 40 books, most of which were long, fictional family sagas covering the lives of many generations, set in particular geographic locales and incorporating detailed history. Many of his works were bestsellers and were chosen by the Book of the Month Club. Wikipedia

Born February 3, 1907, Doylestown, PA

Died October 16, 1997 (age 90 years), Austin, TX