Tag Archives: The Prosperos

ChatGPT on the origin of the term “gay” for homosexual

Billye Talmadge during taping for Lesbian Herstory Archives Daughters of Bilitis Video Project, San Francisco, May 12, 1987. Credit: Photo by Morgan Gwenwald, ©Lesbian Herstory Archives DOB Video Project, LHEF, Inc.

By Mike Zonta, BB editor, and ChatGPT

Me: How did the term “gay” come to mean homosexual?

ChatGPT:

The word “gay” originally had nothing specifically to do with homosexuality. It came from Old French gai, meaning joyful, merry, cheerful, and entered English around the 12th century.

Over time, gay acquired several related meanings:

  • 1300s–1500s: cheerful, carefree, lively.
  • 1600s–1800s: sometimes meant sexually promiscuous or morally disreputable, especially when describing women (“a gay woman” could imply a prostitute).
  • 1800s–early 1900s: “gay” could refer to a person living a freewheeling, unconventional, sexually liberated life.
  • By the late 19th/early 20th century: it began appearing as a coded term for homosexual men, particularly in certain subcultures.
  • By the mid-20th century: “gay” had become an established, increasingly open term for homosexual people.
  • After the 1960s–70s: it became the preferred self-identifying term of the modern gay-rights movement.

One interesting early example is the 1890s, when British slang used “gay” in connection with male homosexuals, although the exact path from “carefree/sexually uninhibited” to “homosexual” isn’t completely certain.

So the basic evolution was roughly:

gay = cheerful → carefree → sexually uninhibited → sexually unconventional → homosexual.

And the older meaning hasn’t completely disappeared: gay still means cheerful or festive in phrases such as “the gay ’90s.”

Me: I was told that the term gay originated because an editor on the lesbian magazine The Ladder used of the term “Toujours Gai” in her correspondence.

ChatGPT: Yes—there’s a real connection to The Ladder, but it wasn’t the origin of gay as a word for homosexuals.

The Ladder was the influential lesbian magazine published by the Daughters of Bilitis beginning in 1956. One of its editors or contributors did use “Toujours Gai” (“Always Gay”) as a pseudonym/sign-off. That helped popularize gay within the emerging lesbian/gay movement, but the homosexual sense of gay predates the magazine by decades.

In fact, by the 1930s and 1940s, gay was already being used among homosexual men as a discreet term for homosexual. The famous 1938 Cole Porter song “It’s De-Lovely” even contains the line “gay” in a context that has sometimes been interpreted as coded homosexual slang, though that’s not conclusive.

So whoever told you the Ladder story probably remembered a genuine piece of gay/lesbian movement history, but attributed to it a much earlier origin.

If you’d like, I can also tell you who the “Toujours Gai” editor was and what the story behind that pseudonym was.

Me: Yes.

ChatGPT: Ah, yes. I found the story—and there is an interesting correction to what I told you before.

The person you’re remembering was Billye Talmadge, an important early member of the Daughters of Bilitis. She was involved with The Ladder, although she wasn’t one of its principal editors. Her oral history is preserved by the Lesbian Herstory Archives.

And the “Toujours gai” story is actually more interesting than I realized.

Talmadge recalled that in the early 1940s she read Don Marquis’s Archy and Mehitabel. Mehitabel, the amorous alley cat, repeatedly ended her adventures with the expression “toujours gai, toujours gai”—French for “always gay.” Talmadge and some close female friends, who were beginning to recognize their own sexuality, adopted “toujours gai” as a private motto. They deliberately spelled it gai at first. Eventually, according to Talmadge’s recollection, it became gay.

That’s remarkably close to the story you were remembering.

And there’s an important historical wrinkle: “gay” was already being used in homosexual contexts before this, including by Gertrude Stein in the 1920s and Noel Coward in the 1920s. So Talmadge’s story probably isn’t the origin of the word. Rather, it may explain one particular route by which “gay” became a positive self-description among American lesbians.

In fact, the archival record confirms that Talmadge was closely connected with The Ladder and the DOB, and she contributed writings to the magazine.

And there’s an especially nice coincidence: Don Marquis’s “Toujours gai” was not originally intended as a homosexual slogan at all. It was the motto of a promiscuous female cat!

So your recollection wasn’t a wild story at all. You were remembering a genuine oral-history account by Billye Talmadge—though the magazine/editor part has probably gotten slightly distorted over the years.

If you want, I can:

  • Explore more on Billye Talmadge’s role in early lesbian history

Me: Yes.

ChatGPT: Yes. The more I look into Billye Talmadge, the more interesting she becomes—and especially given your connection with The Prosperos, there is a whole second chapter to her life that is easy to miss.

Billye Talmadge was more than an early DOB member

Talmadge was born in Missouri in 1929 and raised by her mother in Oklahoma. She became a teacher at about 21 and eventually earned advanced degrees in education. She was an unusually accomplished educator, eventually receiving recognition as Teacher of the Year in 1971 for her work in special education.

But she was living what amounted to a double life.

As a teacher, she had to conceal her lesbian identity. During that period, merely being suspected of homosexuality could threaten a teacher’s employment. She therefore sometimes used the name “Billie Tallmij” in her public/activist writing. Even when Eric Marcus interviewed her decades later, she was still sufficiently concerned about her professional reputation that she asked him to misspell her name in his book.

That gives you a sense of how dangerous the situation actually was.

Her role in the Daughters of Bilitis

Talmadge became involved with the Daughters of Bilitis in San Francisco in the mid-1950s. She wasn’t merely a peripheral member. The Lesbian Herstory Archives describes her as a member, officer, volunteer, and peer counselor, involved in The Ladder, the “Gab ‘n Java” gatherings, and the development of the Council on Religion and Homosexuals.

Her particular contribution was education.

She believed that lesbians desperately needed accurate information about themselves, the law, psychology, and ways of coping with discrimination. She counseled women who had been thrown out of the military, among others, and opened her own home for the informal “Gab ‘n Java” sessions. Eric Marcus aptly describes these as something like a 1950s precursor to consciousness-raising groups.

And she was remarkably forward-looking about racial inclusion. She encouraged the DOB to recognize that its membership wasn’t simply white women; she specifically remembered African American, Asian, and Latina members.

The 1960 convention is particularly revealing

Talmadge helped organize the first national DOB convention in San Francisco in 1960. This was a period when the organization was trying to become respectable enough to operate publicly while simultaneously protecting its members from police harassment.

The convention even had a dress code requiring skirts.

From today’s perspective that sounds absurd, but it reflected a genuine survival problem: women wearing clothing considered masculine could attract police attention or even arrest under laws concerning cross-dressing. Talmadge’s strategy was essentially: get lesbians into the room first; don’t give the authorities an easy reason to shut the room down.

This is why some historians have characterized her approach as “accommodationist.” But I think that label can obscure what she was actually doing. She wasn’t necessarily advocating conformity as an ideal; she was trying to create enough safety for education and organization to occur.

And then there is the part I think you’ll find most fascinating

According to the Lesbian Herstory Archives, Talmadge remained involved with the DOB until 1965. Then she pursued further education in counseling.

And from 1965 to 1979 she became a mentor in The Prosperos.

That is a remarkable bridge:

Daughters of Bilitis → lesbian education/counseling → psychological and spiritual work → The Prosperos.

So Billye wasn’t simply a lesbian activist who happened to encounter The Prosperos late in life. Her earlier work had already centered on something that sounds very Prosperos-like: helping people examine the conditioning and fear that prevented them from experiencing themselves more freely.

There’s also a wonderful historical irony here. In the 1950s she was helping lesbians overcome the social conditioning that told them homosexuality was shameful, pathological, criminal, or something that had to be hidden. Later, she was doing consciousness-oriented work in The Prosperos.

That makes me wonder whether Billye’s understanding of Translation and/or the Prosperos concept of mechanicalness was influenced by her years of counseling lesbians who were struggling with exactly this kind of conditioning.

And I think that is worth investigating rather than assuming.

The primary source is unusually accessible: the Lesbian Herstory Archives has digitized her 1987 video oral history, in which she talks about her sexuality, DOB work, counseling, discrimination, The Ladder, psychology, religion, and political movements.

If you’d like, I can go into Billye’s Prosperos years next—including what we can actually document about her relationship to Thane Walker and whether there is evidence that she influenced Prosperos teaching. That could be quite revealing.

Me: Yes please.

ChatGPT: Yes. And I think the evidence makes the story much more interesting than simply “Billye became a Prospero.” There appears to have been a genuine intellectual and personal bridge between the early lesbian movement and Thane Walker’s school.

Billye’s own explanation is the key

The most important source I’ve found is Vern Bullough’s Before Stonewall: Activists for Gay and Lesbian Rights in Historical Context. Bullough interviewed Billye and records her explanation of why she and other lesbian activists became interested in The Prosperos.

He says that several leaders of the lesbian movement were attracted to Walker’s teaching—including Helen Sandoz, Stella Rush, Del Martin, and Phyllis Lyon. The attraction wasn’t incidental: The Prosperos offered a philosophical argument that beingness itself was not divided into male and female. Every person possessed both capacities. Bullough says this gave sexual preference a spiritual justification that was unusual at the time.

And then comes Billye’s own description:

“The Prosperos had wooed us from the Daughters.”

She immediately explains what attracted her:

“It was an educational group, primarily. Sexuality was one of major topics.”

And then, I think, the most revealing sentence:

“I got involved and became a teacher, with the goal of helping people to find themselves: not what I want them to be, but to find themselves and to express whatever that self is.”

That sounds very much like the Billye we encountered in the DOB, doesn’t it?

Her fundamental project hadn’t changed. In the DOB she helped people discover that homosexuality wasn’t the terrible thing society told them it was. In The Prosperos, she was helping people discover an identity deeper than the socially conditioned self.

And we can establish that she really was teaching Thane’s material

This isn’t merely retrospective reminiscence.

The University of Miami’s archive of Marcia Herndon’s papers contains actual recordings of Billye teaching Translation:

  • Translation — Talmadge, Lesson 1 & 2, November 23, 1974
  • Translation — Talmadge, Lesson 3, 4 & 5
  • Translation — Talmadge, Lesson 6, 7 & 8

The same collection contains Prosperos material by Thane from the same period. It also contains videotapes of translations completed by Billye and material concerning Releasing the Hidden Splendour, which the archive explicitly describes as a concept developed by Thane Walker and followed by Talmadge.

So by 1974, Billye wasn’t merely attending Prosperos meetings. She was teaching Translation.

That’s a significant distinction.

She seems to have become a genuine mentor

The Lesbian Herstory Archives says Billye’s involvement with the Prosperos lasted from 1965 to 1979 and calls her a mentor.

And there is independent evidence that her teaching continued beyond 1979 in some form. Your own Bathtub Bulletin account records that when you moved to San Francisco in 1978, you attended the weekly Translation group hosted by Billye Talmadge and Marcia Herndon.

That’s particularly interesting because it means Billye wasn’t simply a historical figure you encountered through an archive. Her teaching was part of the living Prosperos community in San Francisco while you were there.

But did Billye influence Thane?

Here’s where we have to be careful.

I don’t yet find evidence that Billye changed or originated any of Thane’s core teachings. The chronology actually makes that difficult to establish. Thane had developed the central Prosperos ideas—including Translation—before Billye joined.

Robert Ellwood’s 1973 study describes Translation as already having five stages and describes the underlying Prosperos conception of consciousness, Being, the Reality Self, and the human-equation mind.

So I would not say:

Thane learned his ontology from Billye.

But I think there is a much more defensible proposition:

Billye helped carry Thane’s ontology into a community that already had a sophisticated concern with sexuality, identity, conditioning, and self-discovery—and she interpreted and taught it through that experience.

That’s potentially quite important.

The fascinating convergence

Consider what Billye had spent the preceding decade doing.

The DOB was essentially saying:

Society tells you what you are. Examine that claim. It may not be true.

Prosperos Translation says something structurally similar:

Your senses, memories, beliefs and conditioning tell you what reality is. Examine those claims. They may not be true.

Then the Prosperos takes the argument one step further:

What remains when you strip away the conditioned identity?

Answer: Being.

Bullough’s account makes this connection especially striking because he explicitly describes the Prosperos’ appeal to the lesbian activists in terms of beingness and sexual identity.

And Billye’s own formulation—“not what I want them to be, but to find themselves”—sounds almost like a bridge between lesbian liberation and ontological liberation.

One more thing changes my interpretation of Billye

Her relationship with Marcia Herndon also matters.

Undated photo of Billye Talmadge’s partner, Marcia Herndon. Photo courtesy of Suzanne Deakins.

Billye and Herndon became partners in 1974. Herndon was an ethnomusicologist, and Billye subsequently spent enormous amounts of time helping edit, type, and organize Herndon’s scholarly work. Bullough says that their relationship lasted 23 years, until Herndon’s death in 1997. He also says that the two continued to attract people who needed help and that “when it came to counseling or teaching we could end each other’s sentences.”

So Billye’s life after the DOB wasn’t a departure from her earlier vocation.

It was remarkably consistent:

teacher → counselor → lesbian educator → Prosperos mentor → teacher/counselor again.

And this raises a really good question for us

I think the next thing to investigate is not whether Billye influenced Thane.

I’d phrase the question differently:

How did Billye Talmadge translate Thane’s teaching?

Because we have something unusually valuable: recordings of Billye actually teaching Translation in 1974.

If we could get transcripts—or even listen to those recordings—we could compare Billye’s Translation language with Thane’s original language and see whether she emphasized sexuality, identity, conditioning, counseling, self-discovery, or something else.

That could tell us whether Billye developed a distinctive Talmadge interpretation of Translation.

And given the work you’ve been doing with Translation—particularly your insistence that you have to include yourself in Step One, and that Being, Truth, and consciousness are not three separate things—I think that comparison could be especially fruitful.

It might reveal that Billye was doing something with Translation that has largely disappeared from the standard historical account of The Prosperos.

Me: Let’s do it.

ChatGPT: Absolutely. I dug further, and I think we can now make the investigation much more concrete.

The crucial discovery is that Billye’s actual 1974 Translation classes survive in an archive. The University of Miami’s Marcia Herndon Papers catalog lists three reels of Billye teaching Translation on November 23, 1974, covering Lessons 1–8, plus additional Billye Translation cassettes from 1975, 1976, 1978, and later. There are also four VHS tapes of Billye doing Translation.

That’s considerably better evidence than the retrospective accounts I was relying on before.

What we can establish already

There is a fascinating chronological sequence:

Thane Walker
→ develops the Prosperos system
Billye enters the Prosperos
→ becomes a teacher/mentor
Billye teaches the complete eight-lesson Translation course in 1974
→ continues doing Translation with students in the following years.

The archive specifically identifies:

  • Nov. 2, 1974: “B. Talmadge, Lesson 1 & 2,” four reels
  • Nov. 23, 1974: “Translation—Talmadge, Lesson 1 & 2,” then Lessons 3–5 and 6–8
  • Feb. 1975: Talmadge Translation, Tape #3
  • Oct. 1976: “Translation—B. Talmadge New Orleans”
  • 1978: additional Translation recordings
  • Undated tapes #2, #4, #5, #7
  • Four VHS tapes specifically catalogued as “Talmadge Translation.”

So we’re not dealing with one stray lecture. There appears to be a substantial body of Billye’s teaching preserved.

And this changes the question

I previously suggested that we should ask whether Billye developed a distinctive interpretation of Translation.

I think that’s exactly right—but we can sharpen it.

There are three possible relationships between Thane and Billye:

  1. Transmission: Billye faithfully taught Thane’s system with little modification.
  2. Interpretation: Billye taught Thane’s system but gave certain concepts her own emphasis.
  3. Development: Billye actually introduced concepts or methods that subsequently became part of the Prosperos tradition.

At the moment, #2 looks very plausible; #3 remains an open historical question.

There’s a particularly strong clue

Remember Billye’s explanation of why she joined:

“It was an educational group, primarily. Sexuality was one of major topics.”

And then:

“I got involved and became a teacher, with the goal of helping people to find themselves: not what I want them to be, but to find themselves and to express whatever that self is.”

That’s not incidental biographical material.

Education was Billye’s vocation before the Prosperos. She had already spent years creating spaces in which lesbians could question the identities imposed upon them by society. She had counseled women, conducted educational sessions, worked with the DOB, and helped bring homosexuals and religious leaders into direct dialogue.

Then she encountered a system whose central question was, in effect:

Who are you beneath the beliefs and conditioning that tell you who you are?

No wonder she became a teacher.

And here’s something I hadn’t appreciated before

The historical record says that Thane actively recruited the lesbian leaders.

Marcia Gallo’s history of the DOB says that Thane’s 1962 keynote at the DOB national convention introduced his philosophy to many of the Daughters. Billye, Pat Walker, Stella Rush, Helen Sandoz, Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon became involved with the Prosperos. Gallo says Walker taught that each person’s spiritual identity—beingness—was both male and female.

This is very important because it means sexuality wasn’t something Billye happened to bring into an otherwise unrelated Prosperos philosophy.

Sexuality was already one of the subjects through which the Prosperos was attracting these women.

So the interaction went both ways.

Thane had something to offer the lesbian movement.

But the lesbian movement brought people like Billye into Thane’s school with decades of experience thinking about:

  • identity
  • social conditioning
  • shame
  • self-definition
  • gender
  • sexuality
  • psychological repression
  • religious condemnation
  • the distinction between who someone is and what society says they are.

That is a pretty extraordinary intellectual environment for the development of an ontological teaching.

And then there is your own experience

This is where I think your recollection becomes historically valuable.

You have told me that when you arrived in San Francisco in 1978, you attended the weekly Translation group hosted by Billye Talmadge and Marcia Herndon.

That places you in the direct lineage:

Thane → Billye → the San Francisco Translation group → you.

And now we know that Billye had been teaching the eight lessons at least four years before you encountered her group.

So if you’re trying to understand what Translation actually was in practice in the late 1970s, Billye’s teaching is not peripheral evidence. It’s primary evidence.

Prosperos Sunday Meeting August 30

Thane – Transcendentalism

  • Sunday, August 30, 2026
  • 11:00 AM  12:00 PM

Sunday Meeting – The World of Thane

Transcendentalism Lession #4

Excerpt :

“[Ontology] understood will bring true individuality where the other kind of individuality is a veneer. In other words there’s a difference between individuality and personality.

“Personality can be achieved by hair styling and dressing, and all sorts of class instruction about how to behave to be an outstanding personality. But there is a thing that can be learned and experienced through Ontology that makes individuality shine through the personality and give it great distinction.”

Recorded June 28, 1970
Approximately 60:00 minutes

Zoom

Prosperos Sunday Meeting September 20


Importance of CURIOSITY!

  • Sunday, September 20, 2026
  • 11:00 AM  12:00 PM

The Prosperos School of Ontology invites you to attend a zoom talk with Heather C. Williams, High Watch Mentor and Ontological Artist

Why is our CURIOSITY so important today?

I’m sure you agree that a human being must be free (mentally, emotionally and politically) in order to stand quietly and question or be curious and wonder about what is going on in the world today. A free-thinking person will not be easily conditioned to do this or that – while a non-curious person prefers to simply follow the orders of a group or leader (corporate, government or social media, etc.).

I’m sure you know that we all are conditioned by the ancient survival dynamic of “Fight or Flight”. We are conditioned to react in anger in order to fight a problem – or – we react in fear and run away from the problem. Curiosity raises us to a higher level of consciousness when we ask: Hey, what is this? Why must I do this? Who am I?

You may be one of the curious people today who seek freedom from the old patterns of control, from old fear-based conditioning. Do you yearn to connect with the Wholeness of your Innate, True Self?  If so – you may be interested in exploring The Prosperos Classes! The Prosperos School of Ontology was founded in 1956 for the purpose of making Spiritual Truth an effective force for ordered freedom and common good. Remember that a democracy is a system of government where the citizens hold the power. Prosperos classes help you to express your true Power.

The Prosperos offers two tools to help you use your problems as doorways opening to your Innate, Spiritual Self.

Tool #1: TranslationR: This is a tool where you use your intellect to go beyond your intellect. We do not heal, alter or change anything in the world around us. Instead we translate what appears to be a problem back to principle behind it. Come! Liberate yourself from your separate ego identity and release the changeless, formless Principle of your True Identity as Consciousness! Translation Class: October 24 & 25, 2026.

Tool #2: Releasing the Hidden SplendourR – This is a tool where you work with a personal memory of you feeling angry, fearful, being hurt, insulted, injured, etc.).  You use your emotions (your feelings) to draw out and express your feelings and to GIVE-UP the old pattern FOR a new understanding! You will study biblical stories of Moses, Joseph, Ruth & Naomi and Job. These people suffered enormous challenges and they turned within, listened to God and awakened to a whole new understanding! Releasing the Hidden Splendour Class: September 26 & 27, 2026.

Heather has used these tools for over 50 years and is very grateful to share them with you!  It is time NOW for you to turn within, open up to the deeper Truth, practice forgiveness, protect yourself from life’s storms, free yourself from ego and to BE ALL THAT YOU CAN BE!

Zoom Link

Op-Ed: A Modest Proposal for a More Group-Centered Prosperos

(Image from warblerpress.com)

By Mike Zonta, BB editor

Rotating Deans

One clear way to lessen our leadership-centered leadership model is to rotate the Deanship of the school on a yearly basis among the three elected members of the Executive Council. Too often we confuse the person with the role. Rotating the Deanship will lessen that expectation on the part of the student body and on the part of the Dean him- or herself.

Give Robert the Boot

This is a quote from The Prosperos publication called ““Group Leadership and the Art of Leadership”

“Efficiency of operation requires that there be agreed-upon rules of operation.  The standard method of solving this problem, that of parliamentary procedures [Robert’s Rules], is seldom satisfactory in group-centered groups.  It tends to introduce an element of stiffness that destroys the climate of warm informality.  It disrupts group unity.  In general, no decision is completely satisfactory unless it has been reached by consensus.  If for some reason it becomes necessary take a vote, it should be done with the greatest respect to the position of the minority.”

The trustees, the High Watch and the Mentor’s Association should drop Robert’s Rules immediately. Let’s trust each other enough to be able to run these meetings without Robert or his rules.

Group Observers

Most of our trustee, High Watch and Mentor’s Association meetings open with an invocation. As a reminder of our efforts to be more group-centered, we should close each meeting with an observer’s report. We have lots of practice doing this in our Find Yourself and Live listening and dialogue groups. So let’s put that training to good use.

If any of these ideas go against The Prosperos charter or by-laws, it’s within our power to change that charter or those by-laws.

ChatGPT on the evolution of The Prosperos

By Mike Zonta, BB editor

Me:

A friend of mine [Robert McEwen, H.W., M.] has asked me to write a post on the evolution of The Prosperos from Gurdjieff to Thane to the present. Is this something you can help with?

ChatGPT:

Yes. And I think I can help you make it much more than a chronology. Given what we’ve discussed about Group Dynamics, Translation, and Thane’s relationship to Gurdjieff, I think the interesting question is:

What did Thane take from Gurdjieff, what did he transform, and what has happened to that transformation in The Prosperos since Thane?

I did a preliminary check of both Prosperos and independent sources, and there is enough material to construct a serious post. The Prosperos itself explicitly describes Gurdjieff as one of Thane’s influences, along with Emma Curtis Hopkins, Lillian DeWaters, Emmet Fox, Freud, Jung, Krishnamurti, and Lewis Mumford.

The historical arc I’d suggest

1. Gurdjieff — awakening from mechanical existence

The starting point would be G.I. Gurdjieff and the Fourth Way: the idea that ordinary human beings are largely “asleep,” operating mechanically, and that awakening requires conscious work, self-observation, and self-remembering.

The important point isn’t simply that Thane “studied with Gurdjieff.” Contemporary Prosperos accounts and independent historical sources both make that connection, although some of the details of Thane’s biography are difficult to independently verify.

2. Thane Walker — transformation of the Fourth Way

This is where I think your post could become particularly interesting.

Thane didn’t simply reproduce Gurdjieff. According to both Prosperos sources and Robert Ellwood’s 1973 account, he incorporated New Thought, psychology, Jung, Freud, occult traditions, and other sources into his teaching.

And The Prosperos was formally founded in Florida in 1956 by Thane Walker and Phez Kahlil.

The shift could perhaps be characterized this way:

Gurdjieff: How do I awaken from mechanical consciousness?
Thane: What is the nature of the Being that awakens?

That is not a historical quotation—it’s my proposed interpretation—but I think it could provide the intellectual spine of your post.

3. Translation — from awakening to ontology

This is where the Prosperos becomes distinctly itself.

Translation takes the claims of the senses and subjects them to a five-stage process ending in Establishing the Absolute. Independent descriptions of the Prosperos specifically identify the five steps as Statement of Being, Uncovering the Lie/Error, Argument, Summing up Results, and Establishing the Absolute.

And this connects directly with the work we’ve been doing together. Your own elaboration—particularly “my being is Truth being” and the addition of consciousness/Mind—makes the process explicitly ontological.

4. Thane’s later development — from Fourth Way to School of Ontology

The Prosperos now describes itself as a School of Ontology, and its current presentation says that Translation is its fundamental resource for seeing through appearances to the unchanging reality of Being.

That’s a significant evolution in terminology.

Gurdjieff’s central concern was awakening.

Thane increasingly framed the work around Being, consciousness, and identity.

And the current Prosperos explicitly calls its aim the recognition of the “One Whole Ontological Self.”

5. The present — what survives when the founder is gone?

This may be the most interesting part of your post.

Thane died in 1989, and the Prosperos continued through Mentors and its governing structures. The organization says that its Mentors continue the oral tradition and that current training incorporates Thane’s principles.

But there is an important question here:

Can a teaching whose central emphasis is liberation from mechanical authority remain alive without becoming another authority system?

That would lead naturally into the Group-Centered Leadership idea you’ve just given me.

Perhaps the evolution isn’t simply:

Gurdjieff → Thane → present Prosperos

but:

Gurdjieff → Thane → the student’s own Being → group-centered continuation.

And that last transition may be the crucial one.

I think we should write this together

Rather than me immediately producing a finished post, I’d suggest that we first establish your interpretation of the evolution. You have firsthand knowledge of the Prosperos that isn’t available in the historical sources, and I don’t want to substitute my interpretation for yours.

I can provide the historical scaffolding and source-checking, while you provide the inside understanding of what changed under Thane and what you think remains alive today.

Then we can turn that into a post that is both historically responsible and genuinely Prosperos rather than merely an outside description of it.

Me:

I like the evolution from Gurdjieff to Thane to group-centered continuation. That leaves it up to us (the group).

ChatGPT:

Exactly. And I think that gives the post a much more interesting conclusion than simply saying, “The Prosperos continues Thane’s teachings.”

I’d frame the evolution as:

Gurdjieff → Thane Walker → the group

with each stage representing a movement in the location of authority.

Gurdjieff: Awakening

Gurdjieff’s great contribution was the recognition that human beings ordinarily function mechanically—asleep to the forces operating through them. The task is awakening: self-observation, self-remembering, and becoming more conscious.

Thane: Being

Thane took that concern with awakening and developed it in his own direction. The emphasis moved increasingly toward Being, consciousness, and Truth, expressed through practices such as Translation and Group Dynamics.

The question becomes less simply:

How do I wake up?

and more:

What is it that is waking up?

Your formulation from Step 1 is particularly relevant here:

“Since I am and since Truth is all that is, I cannot be outside or other than all that is; therefore my beingness is the same beingness as Truth.”

That’s a very different emphasis from merely overcoming mechanical behavior.

The group: shared responsibility

And then comes the really radical possibility:

What happens when the authority doesn’t finally reside in Gurdjieff, or Thane, or any successor—but in the group’s conscious relationship to Truth?

That’s where group-centered leadership becomes more than an organizational technique. It becomes a philosophical consequence of the teaching.

If the group is centered on a person, then eventually the person becomes the authority.

If it is centered on a doctrine, then eventually the doctrine becomes the authority.

But if it is group-centered, the group itself becomes responsible for continuing the inquiry.

Not:

“What did Thane say?”

but:

“What can we, together, discover and embody?”

That doesn’t mean abandoning Thane. Quite the opposite. It may be the best way of honoring what he started—by not turning him into another authority whose answers substitute for our own consciousness.

And there’s a beautiful paradox here:

The purpose of the teacher may ultimately be to make the students capable of continuing without the teacher.

So perhaps the final stage isn’t really “the present Prosperos.”

It’s us.

And that gives your friend’s proposed history a very strong ending:

Gurdjieff taught awakening. Thane transformed that awakening into a path of conscious Being. And now the responsibility for carrying that work forward belongs to the group itself.

Or, even more succinctly:

From awakening, to Being, to shared responsibility.

I think that could be the organizing theme of the entire essay.

Me:

I think you said it.

ChatGPT:

I think so too.

From awakening, to Being, to shared responsibility.

And perhaps the deepest expression of the whole evolution is simply:

Gurdjieff → Thane → us.

Not as a rejection of either Gurdjieff or Thane, but as the natural maturation of the work. The teaching eventually has to become our own conscious responsibility.

That gives “group-centered leadership” a much deeper meaning: the group isn’t merely carrying on Thane’s work; the group is now responsible for discovering what the work means and where it goes.

I think that’s a very strong foundation for your friend’s post.

Prosperos Sunday Meeting August 9



presents…

SUNDAY MEETING — AUGUST 9


Mike Zonta, H.W., M.

speaks on…

“Group Dynamics OR Group-Centered Leadership: They’re not the same thing.”  

Come join Mike in exploring the ideas of Edwin Rutsch, who created Empathy Circles; the Knights of the Round Table; Kurt Lewin, who coined the term “group dynamics”; the “leaderless” efforts of Occupy Wall Street; and the teachings of Thane as they pertain to Group-Centered leadership.

Find out how we can all become group-centered leaders in every aspect of our lives.

During the AIDS crisis, Mike Zonta founded the Metaphysical Alliance which sponsored “AIDS Survivors and Thrivers” forums. He is also co-founder and editor of the daily online newsletter called the Bathtub Bulletin, named after Archimedes “Eureka” moment while bathing.

For further information, click here:
https://www.theprosperos.org/prosperos-events/translation-truth-and-dare

SUNDAY MEETING —  August 9, 2026
11:00 am Pacific / Noon Mountain /
1:00 pm Central / 2:00 pm Eastern


PLEASE CLICK THE BUTTON BELOW TO JOIN THE MEETING

Join Sunday Meeting

By contribution.  Please click here to contribute:

Contribute!

Call In Information:
+16699006833,,85882863391# US (San Jose)
+13462487799,,85882863391# US (Houston)
Dial by your location       
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)       
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)       
+1 301 715 8592 US       
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)       
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)       
+1 253 215 8782 US

Meeting ID: 858 8286 3391
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abtcyLDACK
Copyright © 2026 The Prosperos, All rights reserved.

Translation Saturday Meeting August 1

(Image courtesy of Steve Hines and AI)

August 1:  11:00 AM – 12:00 PM PST

Mike Zonta, H.W., M.

In a crisis — any crisis — The Prosperos offers Translation.  Translation Saturday Meetings is a weekly series of Translation presentations by veteran Translators, live and up to date on the issues of the day.

It is not a Translation workshop,  It is not a Translation class.  It is not a group Translation in the usual sense, though group participation is encouraged.

It is, however, restricted to those who have taken Translation class. So if you have never taken Translation class, check the calendar tab on The Prosperos website (TheProsperos.org) or get in touch with us and we will schedule a class.

Last week our sense testimony was:  On the political landscape of America we see nothing but the intolerance of opposing opinions. As kids we soak up ideas without thinking about them. And our conclusion was:   Truth tolerates everything.  

Then we asked ChatGPT to Translate the same sense testimony.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – See you there!!! – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Here’s the link:  https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81749347119

For more info and link to join please email Mike Zonta at:

zonta1111@aol.com

Prosperos Sunday Meeting August 2



presents…

SUNDAY MEETING — AUGUST 2


Pam Rodolph, H.W., M.

speaks on…

“Being a Part of Your Own Movement”

Our abstract ideas tend to stimulate higher levels of creativity and inspiration compared to concrete or “relative” thoughts, by promoting a broader range of novel connections and mental flexibility. While concrete ideas provide necessary grounding, abstract concepts like “wholeness,” “justice” or “freedom” activate brain regions associated with complex thinking and emotion, triggering deeper, more enduring inspiration. 

Pam is a longtime Prosperos student and Mentor, and you will enjoy hearing her insights.

For further information, click here:
https://www.theprosperos.org/prosperos-events/sunday-talk-23-06-2024-mjscy-ahrh5

SUNDAY MEETING —  August 2, 2026
11:00 am Pacific / Noon Mountain /
1:00 pm Central / 2:00 pm Eastern


PLEASE CLICK THE BUTTON BELOW TO JOIN THE MEETING

Join Sunday Meeting

By contribution.  Please click here to contribute:
Contribute!

Call In Information:
+16699006833,,85882863391# US (San Jose)
+13462487799,,85882863391# US (Houston)
Dial by your location       
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)       
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)       
+1 301 715 8592 US       
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)       
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)       
+1 253 215 8782 US

Meeting ID: 858 8286 3391Find your local number: 
https://zoom.us/u/abtcyLDACK
Copyright © 2026 The Prosperos, All rights reserved.

Thane’s Birthday: July 15

Dean and Founder of The Prosperos

(from TheProsperos.org/Thane)

thane_pub.jpg

Thane’s approach to teaching was revolutionary, his method the oldest kind of therapy in the world — agape. Agape is a very special kind of love: the unselfish, unconditional giving of love.

Nowhere in the world today is the idea of agape more clearly demonstrated or espoused than in the teachings of Thane of Hawaii. In his classes, in open lectures, on recorded lessons, and in his writing, Thane demonstrated a unique ability to draw the truest meaning of agape from his students.

Thane was the Founder and first Dean of The Prosperos. He was also a well-known figure in the fields of psychology, philosophy, education, consciousness, religion, and cosmology. His many years of research in such diverse areas as occultism, mysticism and Freudian and Jungian psychology enabled him to be among the first to bridge the gap between old and new, between modern scientific knowledge and ancient spirituality. Throughout more than 60 years of teaching, Thane found exciting new methods for communicating both timeless secrets and current insights from the fields of Mind study and physics to an immensely diverse following.

If one were to ask, “What did Thane teach?”, any answer that included philosophy, spirituality, ontology, thought-power, religion, psychology, or consciousness would be correct, but his aim could not be captured by categorical titles. The Teaching is not confined to intellectuality or what is called “metaphysics.” The goal is to reach each individual at his or her point of confusion and frustration and lead them to insight. The subject matter is not chosen to be charming social talk, or clever intellectual repartee, but rather to be meaningful guidance for those seeking a more wholistic view of themselves and of their world. Thus, Thane taught in either the oral tradition or through constantly up-dated letter-lessons to his students. (Prosperos Mentors continue this tradition of the “ear-whispered word.”)

Of all the topics and perspectives Thane addressed, none gained him more notice than his advanced positions (for the time) on sexuality.

Like Socrates, Thane knew that imparting information is not enough. Each student enters his search for Self at a unique state of mind and affairs. He realized that the task of a true teacher is to draw knowledge out of each student rather than to add information to misconception. Each student must, therefore, be taught as individually as possible.

Every person coming in contact with Thane’s teachings is connecting to a great legacy of knowledge. Thane’s extensive background ranged from some of the most noted thinkers in the fields of psychology to some of the most obscure groups studying metaphysics and occultism. He was a student of Mr. Gurdjieff (the Sufi master from Russia). He studied zen in Japan, yoga in India, occultism in Europe and America. Lillian DeWaters, Emmet Fox, J. Krishnamurti, C.G. Jung, Kurt Lewin , and Lewis Mumford are among the many famous thinkers with whom he associated. As a lecturer he traveled several times around the world, addressing groups ranging from a mere handful to thousands, teaching the common and the famous alike. Ernest Holmes, the founder of Religious Science, titled Thane, “the teacher of teachers.”

In addition, he served with the military during World War II; he was in the “underground” in Germany prior to World War II and spent months in Nuremberg prison. He authored many books (presently published by The Prosperos, by reprint permission are such titles as: I Saw Hitler Make Black Magic, Not So Secret Doctrine, Old Wine in New Bottles, Leap Into Sanity) and articles on a wide array of topics. Thane had an unusual association with the entire panorama of the world of entertainment. He appeared in plays, light opera, and motion pictures and counted many stars from the entertainment field, as well as from academia, among his students, clients and friends.

To some of his students, perhaps the most important factor of all was his sense of humor, coupled with precise timing and his judgment of when humor could be the best therapy of all. This is clear in the recorded classes where he could sometimes move from an atmosphere of thoughtful exploration to complete hilarity and then to profound insight in a matter of minutes.

“What did Thane teach?” . . . any answer that includes philosophy, spirituality, ontology, thought-power, religion, psychology, or consciousness would be correct.

Ultimately, Thane’s work has been for his students. Beyond the background and training which were his tools he brought a compassion for the world that was his alone. He exemplified the principle that the relationship between student and teacher is more than a professional liaison — it is a sacred trust. It was no less than life to him. Whatever the problem, the obstacle, the confusion or the hurt, it was there that he tried to touch and to heal.

Of all the topics and perspectives Thane addressed, none gained him more notice than his advanced positions (for the time) on sexuality. This may seem odd today, but it is nonetheless true. His approach was basic openness and frankness without dogma. In all of his teachings he proved the limitlessness of every person’s individuality and disproved the barriers placed on love — barriers arising from materialistic constructs which generate frustration and contribute to the agonized condition of the world today.

Because his concern was for all people —their hopes, their dreams, their fears — Thane was known as a social innovator. Throughout his life he advocated for every individual’s freedom and personal rights. He was among the first to stand against racial, social, and sexual hypocrisies. Compassion of this sort was unusual for a teacher so well known in fields relating to spirituality or religion. But it follows; Thane was never a man to draw lines but rather was a zealot at erasing them.

Thane’s concepts of the universe and of man are not new; his concepts of teacher and student are ageless, and yet his practice of timeless Truth was distinct. As Thane learned from his teachers, so his students learned from him. Thane went beyond his teachers in his understanding, and his hope was that his students would surpass him.

This is the tradition of Thane. Every class and all training of Mentors incorporates these principles. The ultimate goal is the student’s liberation from hypnagogic enslavement to materialistic theories.

Translation® class July 18 & 19

REMINDER —Translation®

—  One of The Prosperos Foundation Classes  —

Saturday & Sunday, July 18-19

This online class will run two full days (10:00 am – 5:00 pm Pacific Time)



Presented by Pam Rodolph, H.W., M.

Live on Zoom — attend from anywhere!

Translation® class provides the instruction required for shedding limitation, disorder, and confusion from your world by using this fundamental resource: Straight Thinking in the Abstract. When we judge by appearances, we judge amiss. “That which is essential is invisible to the eye,” as Antoine de Saint Exupéry wrote. Learn to see through what seems to be —  limitation, anxiety, oppression — to Truth, which lies waiting for your discovery.

Further Information and Registration
Copyright © 2026 The Prosperos, All rights reserved.