Harriet Tubman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For the musical group, see Harriet Tubman (band).

Harriet Tubman
Tubman in 1895
BornAraminta Ross
c. March 1822[1]
Dorchester County, Maryland, U.S.
DiedMarch 10, 1913 (aged 90–91)
Auburn, New York, U.S.
Resting placeFort Hill Cemetery,
Auburn, New York, U.S.
42.9246°N 76.5750°W
Other namesMintyMoses
OccupationsCivil War scoutspynursesuffragistcivil rights activist
Known forGuiding enslaved people to freedom
SpousesJohn Tubman​​(m. 1844; div. 1851)​Nelson Davis​​(m. 1869; died 1888)​
RelativesSee Harriet Tubman’s family
Military career
AllegianceUnited States
AffiliationU.S. Department of War
RankBrigadier General (posthumous) of the Maryland National Guard
Battles / warsAmerican Civil WarRaid on Combahee FerrySecond Battle of Fort Wagner

Harriet Tubman (born Araminta Ross, c. March 1822[1] – March 10, 1913) was an American abolitionist and social activist.[2][3] After escaping slavery, Tubman made some 13 missions to rescue approximately 70 enslaved people, including her family and friends,[4] using the network of antislavery activists and safe houses known collectively as the Underground Railroad. During the American Civil War, she served as an armed scout and spy for the Union Army. In her later years, Tubman was an activist in the movement for women’s suffrage.

Born into slavery in Dorchester County, Maryland, Tubman was beaten and whipped by enslavers as a child. Early in life, she suffered a traumatic head wound when an irate overseer threw a heavy metal weight, intending to hit another slave, but hit her instead. The injury caused dizziness, pain, and spells of hypersomnia, which occurred throughout her life. After her injury, Tubman began experiencing strange visions and vivid dreams, which she ascribed to premonitions from God. These experiences, combined with her Methodist upbringing, led her to become devoutly religious.

In 1849, Tubman escaped to Philadelphia, only to return to Maryland to rescue her family soon after. Slowly, one group at a time, she brought relatives with her out of the state, and eventually guided dozens of other enslaved people to freedom. Tubman (or “Moses“, as she was called) travelled by night and in extreme secrecy, and later said she “never lost a passenger”.[5] After the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was passed, she helped guide escapees farther north into British North America (Canada), and helped newly freed people find work. Tubman met John Brown in 1858, and helped him plan and recruit supporters for his 1859 raid on Harpers Ferry.

When the Civil War began, Tubman worked for the Union Army, first as a cook and nurse, and then as an armed scout and spy. For her guidance of the raid at Combahee Ferry, which liberated more than 700 enslaved people, she is widely credited as the first woman to lead an armed military operation in the United States. After the war, she retired to the family home on property she had purchased in 1859 in Auburn, New York, where she cared for her aging parents. She was active in the women’s suffrage movement until illness overtook her and was admitted to a home for elderly African Americans, which she had helped establish years earlier. Tubman is commonly viewed as an icon of courage and freedom.

Birth and family

Map marking locations
Map of key locations in Tubman’s life

See also: Harriet Tubman’s birthplace and Harriet Tubman’s family

Tubman was born Araminta “Minty” Ross to enslaved parents, Harriet (“Rit”) Green and Ben Ross. Rit was enslaved by Mary Pattison Brodess (and later her son Edward). Ben was enslaved by Anthony Thompson, who became Mary Brodess’s second husband, and who ran a large plantation near the Blackwater River in the Madison area of Dorchester County, Maryland.[6]

As with many enslaved people in the United States, neither the exact year nor place of Tubman’s birth is known. Tubman reported the year of her birth as 1825, while her death certificate lists 1815 and her gravestone lists 1820.[7] Historian Kate Larson‘s 2004 biography of Tubman records the year as 1822, based on a midwife payment and several other historical documents, including her runaway advertisement.[1] Based on Larson’s work, more recent biographies have accepted March 1822 as the most likely timing of Tubman’s birth.[8][9][10]

Tubman’s maternal grandmother, Modesty, arrived in the U.S. on a slave ship from Africa; no information is available about her other ancestors.[11] As a child, Tubman was told that she seemed like an Ashanti person because of her character traits, though no evidence has been found to confirm or deny this lineage.[12] Her mother, Rit (who may have had a white father),[12][13] was a cook for the Brodess family.[14] Her father, Ben, was a skilled woodsman who managed the timber work on Thompson’s plantation.[12] They married around 1808, and according to court records, had nine children together: Linah, Mariah Ritty, Soph, Robert, Minty (Harriet), Ben, Rachel, Henry, and Moses.[15]

Rit struggled to keep her family together as slavery threatened to tear it apart. Edward Brodess sold three of her daughters (Linah, Mariah Ritty, and Soph), separating them from the family forever.[16] When a trader from Georgia approached Brodess about buying Rit’s youngest son, Moses, she hid him for a month, aided by other enslaved people and freedmen in the community.[17] At one point she confronted Brodess about the sale. Finally, Brodess and “the Georgia man” came toward the slave quarters to seize the child, where Rit told them, “You are after my son; but the first man that comes into my house, I will split his head open.”[18] Brodess backed away and abandoned the sale. Tubman’s biographers agree that stories told about this event within the family influenced her belief in the possibilities of resistance.[19][20]

Childhood

Part of a series on
Forced labour and slavery
showContemporary
showHistorical
showBy country or region
showReligion
showOpposition and resistance
showRelated
vte

Tubman’s mother was assigned to “the big house”[21][7] and had scarce time for her own family; consequently, as a child Tubman took care of a younger brother and baby, as was typical in large families.[22] When she was five or six years old, Brodess hired her out as a nursemaid to a woman named “Miss Susan”. Tubman was ordered to care for the baby and rock the cradle as it slept; when the baby woke up and cried, Tubman was whipped. She later recounted a particular day when she was lashed five times before breakfast. She carried the scars for the rest of her life.[23] She found ways to resist, such as running away for five days,[24] wearing layers of clothing as protection against beatings, and fighting back.[25]

Also in her childhood, Tubman was sent to work for a planter named James Cook.[26] She had to check his muskrat traps in nearby marshes, even after contracting measles. She became so ill that Cook sent her back to Brodess, where her mother nursed her back to health. Brodess then hired her out again. She spoke later of her acute childhood homesickness, comparing herself to “the boy on the Swanee River”, an allusion to Stephen Foster‘s song “Old Folks at Home“.[27] As she grew older and stronger, she was assigned to field and forest work, driving oxen, plowing, and hauling logs.[28]

As an adolescent, Tubman suffered a severe head injury when an overseer threw a two-pound (1 kg) metal weight at another slave who was attempting to flee. The weight struck Tubman instead, which she said “broke my skull”. Bleeding and unconscious, she was returned to her enslaver’s house and laid on the seat of a loom, where she remained without medical care for two days.[29] After this incident, Tubman frequently experienced extremely painful headaches.[30] She also began having seizures and would seemingly fall unconscious, although she claimed to be aware of her surroundings while appearing to be asleep. Larson suggests she may have had temporal lobe epilepsy, possibly as a result of brain injury;[31] Clinton suggests her condition may have been narcolepsy or cataplexy.[32] A definitive diagnosis is not possible due to lack of contemporary medical evidence, but this condition remained with her for the rest of her life.[33]

After her injury, Tubman began experiencing visions and vivid dreams, which she interpreted as revelations from God. These spiritual experiences had a profound effect on Tubman’s personality and she acquired a passionate faith in God.[34] Although Tubman was illiterate, she was told Bible stories by her mother and likely attended a Methodist church with her family.[35][36] Mystical inspiration guided her actions.[37] She rejected the teachings of white preachers who urged enslaved people to be passive and obedient victims to those who trafficked and enslaved them; instead she found guidance in the Old Testament tales of deliverance. This religious perspective informed her actions throughout her life.[38]

Family and marriage

Anthony Thompson promised to manumit Tubman’s father at age 45. After Thompson died, his son followed through with that promise in 1840. Tubman’s father continued working as a timber estimator and foreman for the Thompson family.[39] Later in the 1840s, Tubman paid a white attorney five dollars (equivalent to $170 in 2024) to investigate the legal status of her mother, Rit. The lawyer discovered that Atthow Pattison, the grandfather of Mary Brodess, indicated in his will that Rit and any of her children would be manumitted at age 45, and that any children born after she reached age 45 would be freeborn. The Pattison and Brodess families ignored this stipulation when they inherited the enslaved family, but taking legal action to enforce it was an impossible task for Tubman.[40][41]

Around 1844, she married John Tubman, a free black man.[42] Although little is known about him or their time together, the union was complicated because of her enslaved status. The mother’s status dictated that of children, and any children born to Harriet and John would be enslaved. Such blended marriages – free people of color marrying enslaved people – were not uncommon on the Eastern Shore of Maryland, where by this time, half the black population was free. Most African-American families had both free and enslaved members. Larson suggests that they might have planned to buy Tubman’s freedom.[43]

Tubman changed her name from Araminta to Harriet soon after her marriage, though the exact timing is unclear. Larson suggests this happened right after the wedding,[42] and Clinton suggests that it coincided with Tubman’s plans to escape from slavery.[44] She adopted her mother’s name, possibly as part of a religious conversion, or to honor another relative.[42][44]

Escape from slavery

Printed text of reward notice
Notice offering a reward of US$100 (equivalent to $3,780 in 2024[45]) each for the capture and return of “Minty” (Harriet Tubman) and her brothers Henry and Ben

In 1849, Tubman became ill again, which diminished her value to slave traders. Edward Brodess tried to sell her, but could not find a buyer.[46] Angry at him for trying to sell her and for continuing to enslave her relatives, Tubman began to pray for God to make Brodess change his ways.[47] She said later: “I prayed all night long for my master till the first of March; and all the time he was bringing people to look at me, and trying to sell me.” When it appeared as though a sale was being concluded, Tubman changed her prayer: “First of March I began to pray, ‘Oh Lord, if you ain’t never going to change that man’s heart, kill him, Lord, and take him out of the way’.”[48] A week later, Brodess died, and Tubman expressed regret for her earlier sentiments.[49]

As in many estate settlements, Brodess’s death increased the likelihood that Tubman would be sold and her family broken apart.[50] His widow, Eliza, began working to sell the family’s enslaved people.[51] Tubman refused to wait for the Brodess family to decide her fate, despite her husband’s efforts to dissuade her.[52] She later said that “there was one of two things I had a right to, liberty or death; if I could not have one, I would have the other”.[53]

Tubman and her brothers, Ben and Henry, escaped from slavery on September 17, 1849. Tubman had been hired out to Anthony Thompson (the son of her father’s former owner), who owned a large plantation in an area called Poplar Neck in neighboring Caroline County;[54] it is likely her brothers labored for Thompson as well.[55] Because they were hired out, Eliza Brodess probably did not recognize their absence as an escape attempt for some time. Two weeks later, she posted a runaway notice in the Cambridge Democrat, offering a reward of up to US$100 each (equivalent to $3,780 in 2024[45]) for their capture and return to slavery.[55] Once they had left, Tubman’s brothers had second thoughts. Ben may have regretted leaving his wife and children. The two men went back, forcing Tubman to return with them.[56][57]

Sometime in October or November, Tubman escaped again, this time without her brothers.[53][58] Before leaving she sang a farewell song to hint at her intentions, which she hoped would be understood by Mary, a trusted fellow slave: “I’ll meet you in the morning”, she intoned, “I’m bound for the promised land.”[59] While her exact route is unknown, Tubman made use of the network known as the Underground Railroad. This informal system was composed of free and enslaved black people, white abolitionists, and other activists. Most prominent among the latter in Maryland at the time were Quakers (members of the Religious Society of Friends). The Preston area near Poplar Neck contained a substantial Quaker community and was probably an important first stop during Tubman’s escape.[60] From there, she probably took a common route for people fleeing slavery – northeast along the Choptank River, through Delaware, and then north into Pennsylvania.[61] A journey of nearly 90 miles (145 km) by foot would have taken between five days and three weeks.[62]

Tubman had to travel by night, guided by the North Star and trying to avoid slave catchers eager to collect rewards for fugitive slaves.[63] The “conductors” in the Underground Railroad used deceptions for protection. At an early stop, the lady of the house instructed Tubman to sweep the yard so as to seem to be working for the family. When night fell, the family hid her in a cart and took her to the next friendly house.[64] Given her familiarity with the woods and marshes of the region, Tubman likely hid in these locales during the day.[61] The particulars of her first journey are unknown; because other escapees from slavery used the routes, Tubman did not discuss them until later in life.[65] She crossed into Pennsylvania with a feeling of relief and awe, and recalled the experience years later:

When I found I had crossed that line, I looked at my hands to see if I was the same person. There was such a glory over everything; the sun came like gold through the trees, and over the fields, and I felt like I was in Heaven.[66]

Nicknamed “Moses”

Photo of Tubman sitting
Tubman sitting (1868 or 1869)

After reaching Philadelphia, Tubman thought of her family. “I was a stranger in a strange land,” she said later. “[M]y father, my mother, my brothers, and sisters, and friends were [in Maryland]. But I was free, and they should be free.”[67] While Tubman saved money from working odd jobs in Philadelphia and Cape May, New Jersey,[68] the U.S. Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which forced law enforcement officials to assist in the capture of escaped slaves – even in states that had outlawed slavery – and heavily punished abetting escape.[69] The law increased risks for those who had escaped slavery, more of whom therefore sought refuge in Southern Ontario, where slavery had been abolished.[70][a] Racial tensions were also increasing in Philadelphia as poor Irish immigrants competed with free blacks for work.[71]

In December 1850, Tubman was warned that her niece Kessiah and Kessiah’s children would soon be sold in Cambridge, Maryland. Tubman went to Baltimore, where her brother-in-law Tom Tubman hid her until the sale. Kessiah’s husband, a free black man named John Bowley, made the winning bid for his wife. While the auctioneer stepped away to have lunch, John, Kessiah and their children escaped to a nearby safe house. When night fell, Bowley sailed the family on a log canoe 60 miles (97 km) to Baltimore, where they met with Tubman, who brought the family to Philadelphia.[72]

Early next year she returned to Maryland to guide away other family members. During her second trip, she recovered her youngest brother, Moses, along with two other men.[73] Word of her exploits had encouraged her family, and she became more confident with each trip to Maryland.[73][74]

In late 1851, Tubman returned to Dorchester County for the first time since her escape, this time to find her husband John. When she arrived there, she learned that John had married another woman named Caroline. Tubman sent word that he should join her, but he insisted that he was happy where he was. Suppressing her anger, she found some enslaved people who wanted to escape and led them to Philadelphia.[75][b]

Photo of Frederick Douglass
Frederick Douglass worked for slavery’s abolition alongside Tubman.

Because the Fugitive Slave Law had made the northern United States a more dangerous place for those escaping slavery to remain, many escapees began migrating to Southern Ontario. In December 1851, Tubman guided an unidentified group of 11 escapees, possibly including the Bowleys and several others she had helped rescue earlier, northward. There is evidence to suggest that Tubman and her group stopped at the home of abolitionist and former slave Frederick Douglass.[77] Douglass and Tubman admired one another greatly as they both struggled against slavery. Years later he contrasted his efforts with hers, writing:

Most that I have done and suffered in the service of our cause has been in public, and I have received much encouragement at every step of the way. You, on the other hand, have labored in a private way. I have wrought in the day – you in the night. … The midnight sky and the silent stars have been the witnesses of your devotion to freedom and of your heroism. Excepting John Brown – of sacred memory – I know of no one who has willingly encountered more perils and hardships to serve our enslaved people than you have.[78]

From 1851 to 1862, Tubman returned repeatedly to the Eastern Shore of Maryland, rescuing some 70 slaves in about 13 expeditions,[4] including her other brothers, Henry, Ben, and Robert, their wives and some of their children. She also provided specific instructions to 50 to 60 additional enslaved people who escaped.[4] Because of her efforts, she was nicknamed “Moses”, alluding to the biblical prophet who led the Hebrews to freedom from Egypt.[79] One of her last missions into Maryland was to retrieve her aging parents. Her father purchased her mother from Eliza Brodess in 1855,[80] but even when they were both free, the area was hostile. In 1857, Tubman received word that her father was at risk of arrest for harboring a group of eight people escaping slavery. She led her parents north to St. CatharinesCanada, where a community of formerly enslaved people, including other relatives and friends of Tubman, had gathered.[81]

Routes and methods

Tubman’s dangerous work required ingenuity. She usually worked during winter, when long nights and cold weather minimized the chance of being seen.[79] She would start the escapes on Saturday evenings, since newspapers would not print runaway notices until Monday morning.[82] She used subterfuges to avoid detection. Tubman once disguised herself with a bonnet and carried two live chickens to give the appearance of running errands. Suddenly finding herself walking toward a former enslaver, she yanked the strings holding the birds’ legs, and their agitation allowed her to avoid eye contact.[83] Later she recognized a fellow train passenger as a former enslaver; she snatched a nearby newspaper and pretended to read. Tubman was known to be illiterate, and the man ignored her.[84]

In an 1897 interview with historian Wilbur Siebert, Tubman named some people who helped her and places she stayed along the Underground Railroad. She stayed with Sam Green, a free black minister living in East New Market, Maryland; she also hid near her parents’ home at Poplar Neck. She would travel from there northeast to Sandtown and Willow Grove, Delaware, and to the Camden area where free black agents, William and Nat Brinkley and Abraham Gibbs, guided her north past DoverSmyrna, and Blackbird, where other agents would take her across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal to New Castle and Wilmington. In Wilmington, Quaker Thomas Garrett would secure transportation to William Still‘s office or the homes of other Underground Railroad operators in the greater Philadelphia area. Still is credited with helping hundreds escape to safer places in New York, New England, and Southern Ontario.[85]

Tubman’s faith was another important resource as she ventured repeatedly into Maryland. The visions from her childhood head injury continued, and she saw them as divine premonitions. She spoke of “consulting with God”, and trusted that He would keep her safe.[86] Garrett once said of her, “I never met with any person of any color who had more confidence in the voice of God, as spoken direct to her soul.”[86] Her faith also provided immediate assistance. She used spirituals as coded messages, warning fellow travelers of danger or to signal a clear path. She sang versions of “Go Down Moses” and changed the lyrics to indicate that it was either safe or too dangerous to proceed.[87] As she led escapees across the border, she would call out, “Glory to God and Jesus, too. One more soul is safe!”[88]

She carried a revolver as protection from slave catchers and their dogs. Tubman also threatened to shoot anyone who tried to turn back since that would risk the safety of the remaining group, as well as anyone who helped them on the way.[89][90] Tubman spoke of one man who insisted he was going to go back to the plantation. She pointed the gun at his head and said, “Go on or die.”[91] Several days later, the man who wavered crossed into Canada with the rest of the group.[86]

By the late 1850s, Eastern Shore slaveholders were holding public meetings about the large number of escapes in the area; they cast suspicion on free blacks and white abolitionists. They did not know that “Minty”, the petite, disabled woman who had run away years before, was responsible for freeing so many enslaved people.[92] Though a popular legend persists about a reward of $40,000 (equivalent to $1,400,000 in 2024[45]) for Tubman’s capture, this is a manufactured figure: in 1867, in support of Tubman’s claim for a military pension, an abolitionist named Sallie Holley wrote that $40,000 “was not too great a reward for Maryland slaveholders to offer for her”.[93] If it were real, such a high reward would have garnered national attention. A reward of $12,000 has also been claimed, though no documentation has been found for either figure.[94][95]

Tubman and the fugitives she assisted were never captured.[96] Years later, she told an audience: “I was conductor of the Underground Railroad for eight years, and I can say what most conductors can’t say – I never ran my train off the track and I never lost a passenger.”[5]

John Brown and Harpers Ferry

Main article: John Brown’s raid on Harpers Ferry

Photo of John Brown
Tubman helped John Brown plan and recruit for the raid at Harpers Ferry.

In April 1858, Tubman was introduced to the abolitionist John Brown, an insurgent who advocated the use of violence to destroy slavery in the United States.[97] Although she was not previously involved in armed insurrection, she agreed with his course of direct action and supported his goals.[98] Like Tubman, he spoke of being called by God, and trusted the divine to protect him from the wrath of slavers. She, meanwhile, claimed to have had a prophetic vision of meeting Brown before their encounter.[99]

Thus, as he began recruiting supporters for an attack on slaveholders, Brown was joined by “General Tubman”, as he called her.[100] Her knowledge of support networks and resources in the border states of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware was invaluable to Brown and his planners. Although other abolitionists like Douglass did not endorse his tactics, Brown dreamed of fighting to create a new state for those freed from slavery, and made preparations for military action. He believed that after he began the first battle, the enslaved would rise up and carry out a rebellion across the slave states.[101] He asked Tubman to gather former slaves then living in Southern Ontario who might be willing to join his fighting force, which she did.[102]

On May 8, 1858, Brown held a meeting in Chatham, Canada, where he unveiled his plan for a raid on Harpers Ferry, Virginia.[103] When word of the plan was leaked to the government, Brown put the scheme on hold and began raising funds for its eventual resumption. Tubman aided him in this effort and with more detailed plans for the assault.[104]

Tubman was busy during this time, giving talks to abolitionist audiences and tending to her relatives. In early October 1859, as Brown and his men prepared to launch the attack, Tubman was ill in New Bedford, Massachusetts.[105] It is not known whether she still intended to join Brown’s raid or if she had become skeptical of the plan,[106][107] but when the raid on Harpers Ferry took place on October 16, Tubman had recovered from her illness and was in New York City.[108]

The raid failed; Brown was convicted of treason, murder, and inciting a rebellion, and he was hanged on December 2. His actions were seen by many abolitionists as a symbol of proud resistance, carried out by a noble martyr.[109] Tubman herself was effusive with praise. She later told a friend: “[H]e done more in dying, than 100 men would in living.”[110]

Auburn and Margaret

In early 1859, Frances Adeline Seward, the wife of abolitionist Republican U.S. Senator William H. Seward, sold Tubman a seven-acre (2.8 ha) farm in Fleming, New York,[111][112] for $1,200 (equivalent to $45,400 in 2024[45]).[113][c] The adjacent city of Auburn was a hotbed of antislavery activism, and Tubman took the opportunity to move her parents from Canada back to the U.S.[118] Her farmstead became a haven for Tubman’s family and friends. For years, she took in relatives and boarders, offering a safe place for black Americans seeking a better life in the north.[76]

Shortly after acquiring the farm, Tubman went back to Maryland and returned with an eight-year-old light-skinned black girl named Margaret, who Tubman said was her niece.[118] She also indicated the girl’s parents were free blacks. According to Margaret’s daughter Alice, Margaret later described her childhood home as prosperous and said that she left behind a twin brother.[118][119] These descriptions conflict with what is known about the families of Tubman’s siblings, which created uncertainty among historians about the relationship and Tubman’s motivations.[120] Alice called Tubman’s actions a “kidnapping”,[119] saying, “she had taken the child from a sheltered good home to a place where there was nobody to care for her”.[121] After speculating in her 2004 biography of Tubman that Margaret might have been Tubman’s own secret daughter,[122] Kate Larson found evidence that Margaret was the daughter of Isaac and Mary Woolford, a free black couple who were neighbors of Tubman’s parents in Maryland and who had twins named James and Margaret.[123][124]

In November 1860, Tubman conducted her last rescue mission. Throughout the 1850s, Tubman had been unable to effect the escape of her sister Rachel, and Rachel’s two children Ben and Angerine. Upon returning to Dorchester County, Tubman discovered that Rachel had died, and the children could be rescued only if she could pay a bribe of $30 (equivalent to $1,050 in 2024[45]). She did not have the money, so the children remained enslaved. Their fates remain unknown.[125] Never one to waste a trip, Tubman gathered another group, including the Ennalls family, ready and willing to take the risks of the journey north.[126] It took them weeks to get away safely because of slave catchers forcing them to hide out longer than expected. The weather was unseasonably cold and they had little food. The Ennalls’ infant child was quieted with paregoric while slave patrols rode by.[127] They safely reached the home of David and Martha Wright in Auburn on December 28, 1860.[128]

American Civil War

Sketch of Tubman standing with a rifle
A woodcut of Tubman in her Civil War clothing

When the Civil War broke out in 1861, Tubman had a vision that the war would soon lead to the abolition of slavery.[129] More immediately, enslaved people near Union positions began escaping in large numbers. General Benjamin Butler declared these escapees to be “contraband” – property seized by northern forces – and put them to work, initially without pay, at Fort Monroe in Virginia.[130][131] The number of “contrabands” encamped at Fort Monroe and other Union positions rapidly increased.[132][133] In January 1862, Tubman volunteered to support the Union cause and began helping refugees in the camps, particularly in Port Royal, South Carolina.[134]

In South Carolina, Tubman met General David Hunter, a strong supporter of abolition. He declared all of the “contrabands” in the Port Royal district free, and began gathering formerly enslaved people for a regiment of black soldiers.[135] U.S. President Abraham Lincoln was not yet prepared to enforce emancipation on the southern states and reprimanded Hunter for his actions.[135] Tubman condemned Lincoln’s response and his general unwillingness to consider ending slavery in the U.S., for both moral and practical reasons:

God won’t let master Lincoln beat the South till he does the right thing. Master Lincoln, he’s a great man, and I am a poor negro; but the negro can tell master Lincoln how to save the money and the young men. He can do it by setting the negro free.[136]

Tubman served as a nurse in Port Royal, preparing remedies from local plants and aiding soldiers suffering from dysentery and infectious diseases. At first, she received government rations for her work, but to dispel a perception that she was getting special treatment, she gave up her right to these supplies and made money selling pies and root beer, which she made in the evenings.[137]

Scouting and the Combahee River Raid

Main article: Raid on Combahee Ferry

When Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, Tubman considered it a positive but incomplete step toward the goal of liberating all black people from slavery. She turned her own efforts towards more direct actions to defeat the Confederacy.[138][139] In early 1863, Tubman used her knowledge of covert travel and subterfuge to lead a band of scouts through the land around Port Royal.[140] Her group, working under the orders of Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, mapped the unfamiliar terrain and reconnoitered its inhabitants. She later worked alongside Colonel James Montgomery and provided him with intelligence that aided in the temporary capture of Jacksonville, Florida in March 1863.[141]

Sketch of the raid on Combahee River
Illustration of the Combahee River Raid from Harper’s Weekly

Later that year, Tubman’s intelligence gathering played a key role in the raid at Combahee Ferry. She guided three steamboats with black soldiers under Montgomery’s command past mines on the Combahee River to assault several plantations.[142] Once ashore, the Union troops set fire to the plantations, destroying infrastructure and seizing thousands of dollars worth of food and supplies.[143] Forewarned of the raid by Tubman’s spy network, enslaved people throughout the area heard steamboats’ whistles and understood that they were being liberated.[144] Tubman went ashore to assist them onto the boats, ruining her dress in the process,[145] and she sang lyrics from “Uncle Sam’s Farm” encouraging them to “come along, come along”.[146] She later described a scene of chaos with women carrying still-steaming pots of rice, pigs squealing in bags slung over shoulders, and babies hanging around their parents’ necks.[147] Armed overseers tried to stop the mass escape, but their efforts were nearly useless in the tumult.[148] As Confederate troops raced to the scene, the steamboats took off toward Beaufort with more than 750 formerly enslaved people.[149][150]

Newspapers heralded Tubman’s “patriotism, sagacity, energy, [and] ability” in the raid,[151] and she was praised for her recruiting efforts – more than 100 of the newly liberated men joined the Union army.[151] Reports about her involvement in the raid led to a revival of the “General Tubman” appellation previously given to her by John Brown.[152] Although her contributions have sometimes been exaggerated,[d] her role in the raid led to her being widely credited as the first woman to lead U.S. troops in an armed assault.[153]

In July 1863, Tubman worked with Colonel Robert Gould Shaw at the assault on Fort Wagner, reportedly serving him his last meal.[155] She later described the battle to historian Albert Bushnell Hart:

And then we saw the lightning, and that was the guns; and then we heard the thunder, and that was the big guns; and then we heard the rain falling, and that was the drops of blood falling; and when we came to get the crops, it was dead men that we reaped.[156]

For two more years, Tubman worked for the Union forces, tending to newly liberated people, scouting into Confederate territory, and nursing wounded soldiers in Virginia, a task she continued for several months after the Confederacy surrendered in April 1865.[157]

Later life

Photo of Tubman standing
Formal portrait of Tubman taken after the Civil War and circulated as a carte de visite[158]

Tubman had received little pay for her Union military service. She was not a regular soldier and was only occasionally compensated for her work as a spy and scout; her work as a nurse was entirely unpaid.[159][160] For over three years of service, she received a total of $200 (equivalent to $4,110 in 2024[45]).[161][162] Her unofficial status caused great difficulty in documenting her service, and the U.S. government was slow to recognize any debt to her.[163] Meanwhile, her humanitarian work for her family and the formerly enslaved kept her in a state of constant poverty.[164]

When a promised appointment to an official military nursing position fell through in July 1865, Tubman decided to return to her home in New York.[165] During a train ride to New York in October 1865, Tubman traveled on a half-fare ticket provided to her because of her service. A conductor told her to move from a regular passenger car into the less-desirable smoking car. When she refused, he cursed at her and grabbed her. She resisted, and he summoned additional men for help. They muscled her into the smoking car, injuring her in the process. As these events transpired, white passengers cursed Tubman and told the conductor to kick her off the train.[166][167]

Tubman spent her remaining years in Auburn, tending to her family and other people in need. In addition to managing her farm, she took in boarders and worked various jobs to pay the bills and support her elderly parents.[76][168] One of the people Tubman took in was a farmer named Nelson Davis. Born enslaved in North Carolina, he had served as a private in the 8th United States Colored Infantry Regiment from September 1863 to November 1865.[169] He began working in Auburn as a bricklayer, and they soon fell in love. Though he was 22 years younger than she was, on March 18, 1869, they were married at the Central Presbyterian Church.[170][171] They adopted a baby girl named Gertie in 1874.[172]

Group photo of eight African-Americans
Tubman in 1887 (far left), with her husband Davis (seated, with cane), their adopted daughter Gertie (beside Tubman), Lee Cheney, John “Pop” Alexander, Walter Green, “Blind Aunty” Sarah Parker, and her great-niece Dora Stewart at Tubman’s home in Auburn, New York

Tubman’s friends and supporters from the days of abolition, meanwhile, raised funds to support her. One admirer, Sarah Hopkins Bradford, wrote an authorized biography entitled Scenes in the Life of Harriet Tubman. The 132-page volume was published in 1869 and brought Tubman some $1,200 in income (equivalent to $28,300 in 2024[45]).[161] Even with this assistance, paying off the mortgage on her farm in May 1873 exhausted Tubman’s savings.[173] That October, she fell prey to swindlers. Two black men claimed to know a former slave who had a trunk of gold coins smuggled out of South Carolina, which they would sell for cash at less than half the coins’ value.[173][174][175] She knew white people in the South had buried valuables when Union forces threatened the region, and black men were frequently assigned to digging duties, so the claim seemed plausible to her.[173] She borrowed money from a wealthy friend and arranged to receive the gold late one night. Once the men had lured her into the woods, they knocked her out with chloroform and stole her purse. Tubman was found dazed and injured; the trunk was filled with rocks.[173][176][177]

The crime brought new attention from local leaders to Tubman’s precarious financial state and spurred renewed efforts to get compensation for her Civil War service.[178] In 1874, Representatives Clinton D. MacDougall of New York and Gerry W. Hazelton of Wisconsin introduced a bill to pay Tubman a $2,000 (equivalent to $55,600 in 2024[45]) lump sum “for services rendered by her to the Union Army as scout, nurse, and spy”,[179] but it was defeated in the Senate.[180] In February 1880, Tubman’s wood-framed house burned down, but with the help of her supporters it was quickly replaced with a new brick home.[181]

Nelson Davis died of tuberculosis on October 14, 1888.[182] The Dependent and Disability Pension Act of 1890 made Tubman eligible for a pension as his widow. After she documented her marriage and her husband’s service record to the satisfaction of the Bureau of Pensions, in 1895 Tubman was granted a monthly widow’s pension of $8 (equivalent to $300 in 2024[45]), plus a lump sum of $500 to cover the five-year delay in approval.[183][184][185] In December 1897, New York Congressman Sereno E. Payne introduced a bill to grant Tubman a soldier’s monthly pension of $25 (equivalent to $940 in 2024[45]).[185][186] Although Congress received documents and letters to support Tubman’s claims, some members objected to a woman being paid a full soldier’s pension.[184][187][188] In February 1899, Congress approved a compromise amount of $20 (equivalent to $760 in 2024[45]) per month (the $8 from her widow’s pension plus $12 for her service as a nurse), but did not acknowledge her as a scout and spy.[184][189][e]

Suffragist activism

Photo of Tubman seated
Tubman in 1911

In her later years, Tubman worked to promote the cause of women’s suffrage. A white woman once asked Tubman whether she believed women ought to have the vote, and received the reply: “I suffered enough to believe it.”[191] Tubman began attending meetings of suffragist organizations, and was soon working alongside women such as Susan B. Anthony and Emily Howland.[5][192]

Tubman traveled to New York, Boston and Washington, D.C., to speak in favor of women’s voting rights. She described her actions during and after the Civil War, and used the sacrifices of countless women throughout modern history as evidence of women’s equality to men.[193] When the National Federation of Afro-American Women was founded, Tubman was the keynote speaker at its first conference in 1896.[194] When the Federation was merged into the National Association of Colored Women, Tubman attended that organization’s second conference in 1899.[195]

This wave of activism kindled a new wave of admiration for Tubman among the press in the United States. A publication called The Woman’s Era launched a series of articles on “Eminent Women” with a profile of Tubman.[194] An 1897 suffragist newspaper reported a series of receptions in Boston honoring Tubman and her lifetime of service to the nation. However, her endless contributions to others had left her in poverty, and she had to sell a cow to buy a train ticket to these celebrations.[196]

Church, illness, and death

In the 1870s, Tubman became active in the Thompson Memorial African Methodist Episcopal (AME) Zion Church in Auburn.[197] In 1895, she began discussions with AME Zion leaders and others to create a Harriet Tubman Home for the Aged that would care for “indigent colored people”.[198] Despite her financial limitations, in 1896 Tubman bid $1215 (equivalent to $45,900 in 2024[45]) at auction for a 25-acre (10 ha) farm adjacent to the one she already owned, to use for the new facility.[199] She designated one of the farm’s buildings as its primary residence and named it “John Brown Hall” to honor her late abolitionist ally.[200] However, raising funds for the project was difficult, and attempts to donate the property were complicated by the multiple mortgage loans used to pay for it. After Tubman almost lost the property because of her financial difficulties, AME Zion agreed to take it over in 1903.[201]

The home did not open for another five years, and Tubman was dismayed when the church ordered residents to pay a $100 entrance fee (equivalent to $3,500 in 2024[45]). She said: “[T]hey make a rule that nobody should come in without they have a hundred dollars. Now I wanted to make a rule that nobody should come in unless they didn’t have no money at all.”[202] She was frustrated by the new rule but was the guest of honor nonetheless when the home celebrated its opening on June 23, 1908.[203]

As Tubman aged, her childhood head trauma continued to trouble her. Unable to sleep because of pain and “buzzing” in her head, in the late 1890s she asked a doctor at Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital to operate. In her words, he “sawed open my skull, and raised it up, and now it feels more comfortable”.[204] She reportedly received no anesthesia and instead bit down on a bullet, as she had seen Civil War soldiers do when their limbs were amputated.[205][206]

By 1911, Tubman’s body was so frail that she was admitted into the rest home named in her honor. A New York newspaper described her as “ill and penniless”, prompting supporters to offer a new round of donations.[207] Surrounded by friends and family members, she died of pneumonia on March 10, 1913.[207] Just before she died, she quoted the Gospel of John to those in the room: “I go away to prepare a place for you.”[208] Tubman was buried with semi-military honors at Fort Hill Cemetery in Auburn.[209]

Legacy

Main article: Legacy of Harriet Tubman

Woman smashing a bottle on the bow of a ship
Tubman’s great-niece, Eva Stewart Northrup, launching the SS Harriet Tubman[210]

Widely known and well-respected while she was alive, Tubman became an American icon in the years after she died.[211] By the 1980s, Tubman had become one of American history’s most famous figures.[212] She inspired generations of African Americans struggling for equality and civil rights; she was praised by leaders across the political spectrum.[213]

More at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Tubman

Christopher Wren’s tombstone at St. Paul’s Cathedral, London

Christopher Wren

Here in its foundations lies the architect of this church and city, Christopher Wren. Reader, if you seek his monument – look around you.”

Epitaph on Wren’s tomb in St. Paul’s Cathedral

Sir Christopher Wren (October 20, 1732 – February 25, 1723) was an English architect, astronomer, mathematician and physicist who was one of the most highly acclaimed architects in the history of England. Wikipedia

Can Humans Truly Perceive the Future?

What seems certain is that the boundary between “impossible” and “unexplained” continues to shift as science advances.

THOM HARTMANN

MAR 26, 2025 (wisdomschool.com)

Share

Can humans predict the future? For centuries, the idea of precognition—knowing what will happen before it occurs—has been dismissed as mere superstition or wishful thinking. Yet a growing collection of scientific studies suggests there might be more to this phenomenon than skeptics have assumed.

Precognition research began in earnest back in 1901 when scientists Vaschide and Piéron conducted experiments asking people to predict random events like dice rolls. Surprisingly, some participants consistently scored above what chance would predict. While their methods weren’t as refined as today’s standards, they started a scientific conversation that continues more than a century later.

The evidence became more compelling in 2012 when researchers Julia Mossbridge, Patrizio Tressoldi, and Jessica Utts published an extensive review of previous studies. They focused on something called “predictive physiological anticipatory activity” or PAA—essentially, how our bodies might react to future events before they happen.

In these experiments, participants were connected to instruments measuring heart rate, skin conductance, and brain activity while viewing random images. Some images were emotionally neutral, like landscapes, while others were emotionally charged—disturbing or exciting pictures designed to provoke a reaction.

What the researchers discovered was surprising: participants’ bodies often reacted seconds before they saw emotional images, even though the sequence was completely random and unknown to both the participants and the researchers. A follow-up analysis in 2017 confirmed these findings.

Consider what this means: your heart rate might increase slightly before you see a scary picture, even though there’s no way you could consciously know what’s coming. It’s as if your body senses the future.

In 2011, psychologist Daryl Bem published “Feeling the Future,” a paper detailing nine experiments with over 1,000 participants. In one test, participants studied a list of words and later tried to recall as many as possible. After the recall test, a computer randomly selected some words for additional practice.

The strange result? People were better at remembering words that would later be selected for practice—as if the future practice session somehow reached backward in time to enhance memory.

In another experiment, participants chose between two curtains on a computer screen, one hiding an erotic image. The computer randomly placed the image after the choice was made. Yet participants selected the correct curtain more often than chance would predict.

These findings provoked intense debate. While some replication attempts failed, others succeeded, keeping the scientific conversation alive.

Take the case of Malcolm Bessent, a participant in dream precognition studies at the Maimonides Dream Laboratory in the 1960s. Researchers asked Bessent to dream about a randomly selected image that would only be chosen the next day. His dream reports included detailed elements that later appeared in the target images at rates far exceeding chance.

In one notable instance, Bessent dreamed of “something to do with a volcano” and “some men working on something in a pit.” The next day’s random target was a painting depicting Mount Vesuvius erupting—a volcanic scene with people working in the foreground.

Our everyday lives occasionally provide compelling anecdotes too. On the morning of September 11, 2001, numerous people reported having vivid, disturbing dreams the night before that seemed to predict the attacks. While such reports are impossible to verify scientifically, they mirror countless historical accounts of seemingly precognitive dreams.

The U.S. government took these possibilities seriously enough to fund the “Stargate Project,” investigating whether people could describe future locations and events. Participants were asked to visualize places they had never seen, with the targets sometimes selected only after their descriptions were recorded.

In one documented case, a remote viewer accurately described a distinctive crane at a Soviet shipyard before satellite photos confirmed its existence. When the target location was determined after the viewing session, results remained statistically significant.

Remarkably, these findings align with certain interpretations of quantum physics. In quantum mechanics, particles can become “entangled,” influencing each other instantaneously across vast distances—what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance.” Some theoretical physicists propose that time might work similarly, with future events potentially influencing the present.

A 2022 experiment at the University of Geneva tested quantum entanglement across time, finding evidence that particles can be connected not just across space but also between past and future states. While highly technical, such research offers potential mechanisms for how precognition might work at a fundamental level of reality.

Critics point out limitations in precognition research. Most fundamentally, precognition challenges our basic understanding of cause and effect—how can something that hasn’t happened yet influence the present?

Yet proponents respond that the overall pattern across multiple studies remains compelling. Meta-analyses that combine results from many experiments consistently find small but significant effects. And new theoretical frameworks in physics increasingly suggest our conventional understanding of time may be incomplete.

Consider your own experiences. Have you ever had a strong feeling about something that later came true? Or dreamed about an event before it happened? While individual anecdotes don’t constitute scientific proof, they do reflect the kind of experiences that prompted scientific investigation in the first place.

The pioneering psychiatrist Carl Jung documented numerous cases of seeming precognition among his patients. In one famous example, a patient described a dream about a golden scarab beetle. During their session discussing this dream, an actual scarab beetle—extremely rare in that location—tapped on Jung’s window. Jung saw such “synchronicities” as meaningful connections transcending conventional causality.

Today, researchers continue refining their methods to test precognition. Modern studies use sophisticated equipment like functional MRI scanners to detect subtle brain activity that might indicate unconscious awareness of future events.

What’s particularly compelling is how precognition effects appear strongest for emotional or significant events. Your body might react before randomly seeing any emotional image, but the effect seems strongest for the most emotionally charged pictures—suggesting a possible evolutionary advantage to anticipating important events.

The question remains open: can humans truly perceive the future? While definitive proof remains elusive, the accumulating evidence suggests this question deserves serious scientific consideration rather than immediate dismissal.

As research continues, we may discover that consciousness interacts with time in ways we’re only beginning to understand. Perhaps our minds exist not just in the present moment but reach subtly into both past and future—challenging our fundamental assumptions about reality itself.

What seems certain is that the boundary between “impossible” and “unexplained” continues to shift as science advances. Yesterday’s paranormal often becomes tomorrow’s frontier science. Precognition, once dismissed entirely, now occupies that intriguing borderland between mystery and emerging scientific understanding.

Do Your Worst; We’ll Do Our Best

“We shall never turn from our purpose, however sombre the road, however grievous the cost, because we know that out of this time of trial and tribulation will be born a new freedom and glory for all mankind.”

–Winston Churchill

(nationalchurchillmuseum.org)

Audio: https://www.nationalchurchillmuseum.org/do-your-worst-well-do-our-best.html

I am very glad to come here today to pay my tribute and to record in the name of the Government our gratitude to all the civil authorities of London who, first under Sir John Anderson, and through the darkest moments under the courageous and resourceful leadership of Mr. Herbert Morrison so long master of the London County Council, and now acting in an even higher sphere to all who carried out their duties faithfully, skilfully, and devotedly, so that at last we made our way through the tempest, and came for the time being, at any rate, into a calm spell.

During her long ordeal London was upheld by the sympathy and admiration of the other great cities of our Island and let us not forget here loyal Belfast, in Northern Ireland and when after the enemywearied of his attack upon the capital and turned to other parts of the country, many of us in our hearts felt anxiety lest the weight of attack concentrated on those smaller organisms should prove more effective than when directed on London, which is so vast and strong that she is like a prehistoric monster into whose armoured hide showers of arrows can be shot in vain. But a frightful measure of cruelty of the enemy’s assault; and I say here that, while we are entitled to speak particularly of London, we honour them for their constancy in a comradeship of suffering, of endurance, and of triumph. That comradeship in this hideous, unprecedented, novel pressure has united us all, and it has proved to the world the quality of our Island life.

I have no doubt whatever, as I said to the civil defence forces in Hyde Park this morning, that the behaviour of the British people in this trial gained them conquests in the mind and spirit and sympathy of the United States of America which swept into an igDominious comer all the vilest strokesof Goebbels propaganda.

We have to ask ourselves this question: Will the bombing attacks of last autumn and winter come back again? We have proceeded on the assumption that they will. Some months ago I requested the Home Secretary and Minister of Home Security and his principal colleagues, the Minister of Health and others, to make every preparation for the autumn and winter war as if we should have to go through the same ordeal as last year, only rather worse. I am sure that everything is being done in accordance with those directions. The shelters are being strengthened, improved, lighted and warmed. All arrangements for fire-control and fire-watching are being improved perpetually.

Many new arrangements are being contrived as a result of the hard experience through which we have passed and the many mistakes which no doubt we have made for success is the result of making many mistakes and learning from experience. If the lull is to end, if the storm is to renew itself, London will be ready, London will not flinch, London can take it again.

We ask no favours of the enemy. We seek from them no compunction. On the contrary, if to-night the people of London were asked to cast their vote whether a convention should be entered into to stop the bombing of all cities, the overwhelming majority would cry, “No, we will mete out to the Germans the measure, and more than the measure, that they have meted out to us.” The people of London with one voice would say to Hitler: “You have committed every crime under the sun. Where you have been the least resisted there you have been the most brutal. It was you who began the indiscriminate bombing. We remember Warsaw in the very first few days of the war. We remember Rotterdam. We have been newly reminded of your habits by the hideous massacre of Belgrade. We know too well the bestial assault yon are making upon the Russian people, to whom our hearts go out in their valiant struggle. We will have no truce or parley with you, or the grisly gang who work your wicked will. You do your worst and we will do our best.” Perhaps it may be our turn soon; perhaps it may be our turn now.

We live in a terrible epoch of the human story, but we believe there is a broad and sure justice running through its theme. It Is time that the Germans should be made to safer in their own and cities something of the torment they have twice in our lifetime let loose upon their neighbours and upon the
world.

We have now intensified for a month past our systematic, scientific, methodical bombing on a lazge scale of the German cities, seaports, industries, and other military objectives. We believe it to be in our power to keep this process going, on a steadily rising tide, month after month, year after year, until the Nazi regime is either extirpated by us or, better still, torn to pieces by the German people themselves.

Every month as the great bombers are finished in our factories or sweep hither across the Atlantic Ocean we shall continue the remorseless discharge of high explosives on Germany. Every month will see the tonnage increase, and, as the nights lengthen and the range of our bombers also grows, that unhappy, abject, subject province of Germany which used to be called Italy will have its fair share too.

In the last few weeks alone we have thrown upon Germany about half the tonnage of bombs thrown by the Germans upon our cities during the whole course of the war. But this is only the beginning, and we hope by next July to multiply our deliveries manifold.

It is for this reason that I must ask you to be prepared for vehement counter-action by the enemy. Our methods of dealing with the German night raiders have steadily improved. They no longer relish their trips, to our shores. It is not true to say they did not come this last moon because they were all engaged in Russia. They have a bombing force in the West quite capable of making very heavy attacks. I do not know why they did not come, but, as I mentioned in Hyde Park, it is certainly not because they have begun to love us more. It may be because they are saving up, but even if that be so, the very fact that they have to save up should give us confidence by revealing the truth of our steady advance from an almost unarmed position to a position at least of equality, and soon of superiority to them in the air.

But all engaged in our civil defence forces, whether in London or throughout the country, must prepare themselves for further heavy assaults. Your oiganization, your vigilance, yoor devotion to duty, your zeal for the cause must be raised to the highest intensity.

We do not expect to hit without being hit back, and we intend with every week that passes to hit harder. Prepare yourselves, then, my friends and comrades in the Battle of London, for this renewal of your exertions. We shall never turn from our purpose, however sombre the road, however grievous the cost, because we know that out of this time of trial and tribulation will be born a new freedom and glory for all mankind.

Winston Churchill
July 14, 1941

The “hot shot rule” to help you become a better leader

\

Kat Cole | TEDNext 2024

• October 2024

Confidence doesn’t come before action — it comes from taking action, says business leader Kat Cole, who worked her way up from waitress to CEO of a global health company. She presents a simple yet powerful practice called the “hot shot rule” to help you step into a leadership mindset, break free from inertia and take decisive action when it matters most.

About the speaker

Kat Cole

CEO of AG1

20 Signs of Tyranny

ROBERT REICH MAR 26, 2025

Friends,

I wrote the following more than seven years ago, on February 8, 2018. It pains me to read it.

If I were to write it today I’d change the title from “20 Signs of Impending Tyranny” to “20 Signs of Tyranny.”

We are in a deepening national emergency.

***

20 Signs of Impending Tyranny

As tyrants take control of democracies, they typically:

1. Demand personal loyalty from all appointees.

2. Organize military parades and other choreographed shows of force.

3. Threaten to fire independent prosecutors who get too close to the truth.

4. Spread conspiracy theories about “deep state” forces seeking to oust the tyrant.

5. Refer to top-ranking military leaders as “my” generals.

6. Threaten to jail political opponents.

7. Claim to have won an election by a landslide even after losing the popular vote.

8. Stoke tensions abroad, even the specter of nuclear war, to distract from the tyrant’s efforts to consolidate power at home.

9. Circumvent the independent press and communicate directly with followers.

10. Vilify legislators and judges who are critical of the regime.

11. Repeatedly claim massive voter fraud in the absence of any evidence, in order to restrict voting in subsequent elections.

12. Turn the public against journalists or media outlets that criticize the regime, calling them “deceitful” and “scum.”

13. Repeatedly tell big lies, causing the public to doubt the truth and to believe fictions that support the tyrants’ goals

14. Blame economic stresses on immigrants or racial or religious minorities, and foment public bias and hatred against them.

15. Threaten mass deportations, registries of religious minorities, and the banning of refugees.

16. Attribute acts of domestic violence to “enemies within,” and use such events as excuses to beef up internal security and limit civil liberties.

17. Appoint family members to high positions of authority.

18. Draw no distinction between personal property and public property, profiteering from public office.

19. Make personal alliances with foreign dictators, but express indifference if not defiance toward leaders of democracies.

20. Maintain a powerful propaganda arm that claims to be “fair and balanced” but only amplifies the tyrant’s lies and accusations.

The Healing Power of Gardens: Oliver Sacks on the Psychological and Physiological Consolations of Nature

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

“I work like a gardener,” the great painter Joan Miró wrote in his meditation on the proper pace for creative work. It is hardly a coincidence that Virginia Woolf had her electrifying epiphany about what it means to be an artist while walking amid the flower beds in the garden at St. Ives. Indeed, to garden — even merely to be in a garden — is nothing less than a triumph of resistance against the merciless race of modern life, so compulsively focused on productivity at the cost of creativity, of lucidity, of sanity; a reminder that we are creatures enmeshed with the great web of being, in which, as the great naturalist John Muir observed long ago, “when we try to pick out anything by itself, we find it hitched to everything else in the universe”; a return to what is noblest, which means most natural, in us. There is something deeply humanizing in listening to the rustle of a newly leaved tree, in watching a bumblebee romance a blossom, in kneeling onto the carpet of soil to make a hole for a sapling, gently moving a startled earthworm or two out of the way. Walt Whitman knew this when he weighed what makes life worth living as he convalesced from a paralytic stroke: “After you have exhausted what there is in business, politics, conviviality, love, and so on — have found that none of these finally satisfy, or permanently wear — what remains? Nature remains; to bring out from their torpid recesses, the affinities of a man or woman with the open air, the trees, fields, the changes of seasons — the sun by day and the stars of heaven by night.”

Illustration by Emily Hughes from Little Gardener.

Those unmatched rewards, both psychological and physiological, are what beloved neurologist and author Oliver Sacks (July 9, 1933–August 30, 2015) explores in a lovely short essay titled “Why We Need Gardens,” found in Everything in Its Place: First Loves and Last Tales (public library) — the wondrous posthumous collection that gave us Sacks on the life-altering power of libraries. He writes:

As a writer, I find gardens essential to the creative process; as a physician, I take my patients to gardens whenever possible. All of us have had the experience of wandering through a lush garden or a timeless desert, walking by a river or an ocean, or climbing a mountain and finding ourselves simultaneously calmed and reinvigorated, engaged in mind, refreshed in body and spirit. The importance of these physiological states on individual and community health is fundamental and wide-ranging. In forty years of medical practice, I have found only two types of non-pharmaceutical “therapy” to be vitally important for patients with chronic neurological diseases: music and gardens.

Oliver Sacks at the New York Botanical Garden. (Photograph by Bill Hayes from How New York Breaks Your Heart.)

Having lived and worked in New York City for half a century — a city “sometimes made bearable… only by its gardens” — Sacks recounts witnessing nature’s tonic effects on his neurologically impaired patients: A man with Tourette’s syndrome, afflicted by severe verbal and gestural tics in the urban environment, grows completely symptom-free while hiking in the desert; an elderly woman with Parkinson’s disease, who often finds herself frozen elsewhere, can not only easily initiate movement in the garden but takes to climbing up and down the rocks unaided; several people with advanced dementia and Alzheimer’s disease, who can’t recall how to perform basic operations of civilization like tying their shoes, suddenly know exactly what to do when handed seedlings and placed before a flower bed. Sacks reflects:

I cannot say exactly how nature exerts its calming and organizing effects on our brains, but I have seen in my patients the restorative and healing powers of nature and gardens, even for those who are deeply disabled neurologically. In many cases, gardens and nature are more powerful than any medication.

Art by Violeta Lopíz and Valerio Vidali from The Forest by Riccardo Bozzi

More than half a century after the great marine biologist and environmental pioneer Rachel Carson asserted that “there is in us a deeply seated response to the natural universe, which is part of our humanity,” Sacks adds:

Clearly, nature calls to something very deep in us. Biophilia, the love of nature and living things, is an essential part of the human condition. Hortophilia, the desire to interact with, manage, and tend nature, is also deeply instilled in us. The role that nature plays in health and healing becomes even more critical for people working long days in windowless offices, for those living in city neighborhoods without access to green spaces, for children in city schools, or for those in institutional settings such as nursing homes. The effects of nature’s qualities on health are not only spiritual and emotional but physical and neurological. I have no doubt that they reflect deep changes in the brain’s physiology, and perhaps even its structure.

Illustration by Ashleigh Corrin from Layla’s Happiness by Mariahadessa Ekere Tallie.

Complement this particular fragment of the altogether delicious Everything in Its Place with naturalist Michael McCarthy on nature and joy, pioneering conservationist and Wilderness Act co-composer Mardy Murie on nature and human nature, and bryologist and Native American storyteller Robin Wall Kimmerer on gardening and the secret of happiness, then revisit Oliver Sacks on nature and the interconnectedness of the universethe building blocks of identitythe three essential elements of creativity, and his stunning memoir of a life fully lived.

Tarot Card for March 27: The Empress

The Empress

The Empress is the embodiment of womanhood. She covers all aspects of love, beauty and female strength. Her throne is one built of endurance, tenacity, loyalty and sheer determination. She stands for the mother, and for the daughter… who will in turn become mother.And at her highest level, the Empress also represents the Great Mother in her aspect of protector, nurturer, teacher, lover, and friend. Here are all the elements of compassion, unconditional love and acceptance that comes from a pure and unadulterated relationship with the Goddess.In recent times we have tended to overlook the importance of the innate strength in womanhood. We can get blinded by the dynamic power inherent in male strength, and completely forget the necessity for the counter-balancing influence of female power.There’s nothing mushy about this power – it’s no accident that many Goddesses are regarded as destroyers – but it is infinitely different to male strength. The entire dynamic of its expression is unique and enduring.On a day ruled by the Empress, we need to be trying to touch the Goddess – either within or without. You’ll see Her gentle beauty in a thousand places if you look for it.We also need to be considering love, and the ways in which we express love and receive love in our lives. It’s a good exercise to try out every now and again, anyhow. When we run a quick check on the level of love in our lives as a regular thing, we find it much harder to make the mistake of taking it for granted.On a more mundane level, this is a time to think of mothers – you, if you are one; your mother; the concept of motherhood. And finally, again we need to take that back to whatever we regard as the highest principle of mothering in our lives.And by the way – just because I have talked a lot about women, and mothers, I am not excluding men. You have many of these same qualities within your nature too. So get in touch with them!

Affirmation: “Love and beauty flow through my life in a limitless stream.”

(Angelpahts.com)

Consciousness, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more