When a Physicist Follows the Data Somewhere He Didn’t Want to Go

Thom Hartmann

Sep 12, 2026 (Thom.TV)

Share

It’s not often that you encounter a book that can flip your entire view of the world on its side, which is why I’m taking a moment to share this incredible work by an old friend with you.

A physicist by training, Professor Richard Silberstein spent four decades as a working neuroscientist at Swinburne University in Melbourne, Australia. He was the Chairman of the Physics Department, founder of the Brain Sciences Institute, and the inventor of a brain imaging method (Steady State Topography) that’s now used to study everything from memory to ADHD. The author of more than 110 peer-reviewed published scientific papers, he is, by temperament and profession, a scientist and skeptic.

Those credentials — he’s literally among the world’s top brain scientists — is what makes his new book, Stranger and Stranger: The Neuroscience of How Mind and Cosmos Communicate (Park Street Press, out this October) so astonishing and life-changing.

He started out trying to make sense of one well-known stubborn anomaly, precognition (seeing the future), and ended up going down the rabbit hole that his book lays out in astonishing detail.

In the first half of the book, Richard takes us on a tour of the tens of thousands of replicated, solid, usually peer-reviewed science that suggests the existence of something parapsychologists call psi. They include:

— The Ganzfeld telepathy protocol, where a meta-analysis of 108 studies published between 1987 and 2010 produced odds against chance of roughly one in ten quadrillion that such a thing could be possible, yet it keeps getting reaffirmed over and over again.
— He digs into quantum random number generators that are influenced by human thought, the double-slit experiments run by Dean Radin’s team at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, and a body of presentiment studies in which people’s skin conductance rises a few seconds before a disturbing image appears on a screen, and, confounding all expectations and “rational” explanations, before the computer has even selected it.
— He revisits the CIA’s infamous remote viewing program (and its considerable and well-documented successes) and the 1995 evaluation in which statistician Jessica Utts and professional skeptic Ray Hyman, asked to assess the same data, ended up largely in agreement.

Silberstein’s own research also appears in the book and its mind-boggling. In 2024 he and a colleague published a study of identical twins placed in separate rooms, sensorily isolated from each other, as one viewed a series of random images while the other stared at a blank screen.

Changes in the “receiver” twin’s brain lined up with the moments the “sender” saw a “meaningful” picture and happened at a frequency that should have been four times in a hundred million trials. Even more fascinating, when these twins were, essentially, telepathically connected hroughout the experiment, the receiving twins reported feeling nothing at all. Whatever was going on, it was happening well below the threshold of human awareness.

It’s that observation that’s at the heart of Richard’s book’s most interesting argument, one that has massive implications for humanity, religion, politics, and science.

Silberstein proposes that our brains don’t so much “create” consciousness as connect to some vast universal source that our brains then filter. Evolution, he argues, built our nervous systems to prioritize necessities like food, sex, and survival, while it built elaborate inhibitory circuits to suppress everything else the universe is giving us access to but that our brains consider “not necessary.”

Recent studies he cites include patients with left frontal lobe damage, showing that they can affect random number generators in ways “normal” people can’t. Interestingly, when that same region of the brain is temporarily quieted by transcranial magnetic stimulation, normies can also influence random number generators.

Turn off the brain’s “gatekeeper,” in other words, and you let both creativity and the intelligence and experience of the universe, psi, leak through.

And then the book gets even stranger, as the title promises.

Silberstein shares the details of Michael Levin’s work at Tufts showing that bioelectric fields, not just genes, direct how animal (and, presumably, plant) bodies develop, including the now-famous tadpole grown with a working eye on its flank because of bioelectric stimulation.

He tells the stories of the heart transplant recipients who reported acquiring their donors’ tastes, from food to motorcycles.

He engages seriously, and with genuine intellectual courage, with Ian Stevenson’s decades of case files on children who describe past lives in detail.

And he posits that probable futures exists in a nested hierarchy of what he calls Temporal Causal Levels, shaped by consciousness itself through what he terms retrocausal loops.

While the science is amazing, the possible implications for society and politics are equally astonishing. Studies done by hardcore scientists working under the umbrella of the Global Consciousness Project found that when a certain threshold of people in a community regularly meditate, the crime rate and rate of general violence drops.

But what about the opposite? What happens when billionaires like Musk and Zuckerberg use their social media platform algorighms to feed hate, bigotry, fear, and rage directly into people’s minds? Whether they’re doing it to “increase engagement” to crank up time-spent-scrolling and advertisement exposure to make more billions, or to influence politics and political perspectives, the result could well be the same.

He argues that these billionaires have built a global machine for generating exactly the kind of massed, focused, hostile intent that his science finds actually affects the physical world around us as well as the minds of those around us.

Citing Peter Turchin’s work on Cleodynamics that charts cycles of political disintegration, Richard closes his book by calling for coordinated, large-scale group meditations focused on making a better and more peaceful world for us all.

This book will both astonish you and change how you view much of what we’re confronting today, from our psychology to our religion to our politics. Don’t miss it!

(Contributed by John Atwater, H.W.)

New Moon In Virgo – A Swimming Race

(Astrobutterfly.com)

On September 10th/11th, 2026, we have a New Moon at 18° Virgo.

This is one of the most auspicious lunations of this year, and a much-needed breather after the intense Eclipse season.

If the eclipses shook things up, this New Moon gives us the RESET button. Life goes back on track – which is a very Virgo thing to say. 

But there’s a logic in nature, and a reason for why we need Virgo now.

Just like Leo follows Cancer because too much feeling eventually needs expression, Virgo follows Leo because all that fire can get exhausting and needs some grounding.

In the past month, we’ve been running on high Yang energy – big events, big breakthroughs, big decisions, thinking, overthinking, weighing options, reacting, adjusting, moving.

New Moon In Virgo – Yin And Earth

That’s why now we need some Yin energy to ground all this motion and bring us back to ourselves.

Virgo sometimes gets associated with anxiety and overthinking – probably because of its Mercury rulership – but essentially, Virgo is an Earth sign.

Earth signs ground us. They bring us back to nature, to the body, to what is tangible and real. Whenever we move through an Earth season, we tend to reconnect with ourselves and with the world at a very immediate, common-sense, I-can-feel-this-in-my-body level.

Virgo is the mutable Earth sign, so there’s always that impulse to refine and improve – but not in some abstract way. Virgo works with what is actually here.

Virgo is the adjustments that make life work better. You may not realize how badly you needed to get out of the house, feel the sun on your face, take a walk, and eat something proper – until Virgo makes it obvious.

But Virgo energy is much more than yoga, rituals, or decluttering your desk. Virgo intelligence can be applied to pretty much anything – big decisions, complex problems, the question of what to do next.

Virgo Vs Gemini Vs Leo

Ruled by Mercury, Virgo gives us access to a very different kind of intelligence than Gemini. 

Gemini Mercury is fast, mental, and conceptual. Virgo Mercury is practical, embodied, reality-based. It doesn’t just ask “What does this mean?” – it asks “What actually works?”

If Gemini Mercury rules the brain, Virgo Mercury rules the gut – our so-called second brain. And this is where some of our most important decisions are made, before the mind starts to build a whole story around them.

And most importantly, with Virgo, we don’t just know something. We know what to do about it.

Because we could look at the exact same problem from a Leo, existential-crisis perspective: “Where am I going?” “Is this aligned with my purpose?” “Am I living my truth or betraying my divine essence?”

OR we can simply take the next most Virgo, common-sense step and deal with what’s actually in front of us. BAM – problem solved.

The Moon In Virgo – The Aspects

And knowing what to do about it is especially relevant at this New Moon, because the New Moon in Virgo is sextile Mars, the planet of action. 

The ruler of this New Moon, Mercury, has just switched signs and entered Libra, and is now part of a very nice Grand Air Trine with Uranus in Gemini and Pluto in Aquarius. This means the New Moon itself plugs into a much larger story of change and new possibilities.

Venus has also just changed signs and is now at 0° Scorpio, so around the lunation, we have 2 of the most personal planets changing signs. Talk about New Moon, new beginnings energy.

And the Venus shift carries even more weight – not only because Venus enters Scorpio, a sign where she will spend approximately 3 months (3 times more than her usual sojourn) due to her upcoming retrograde…

… but ALSO because the upcoming Sun-Venus conjunction, also called the Venus Star Point, will happen at the same 0° Scorpio on October 23rd.

So there’s something about this New Moon in Virgo that goes beyond just a monthly reset – it activates the very essence of a story that will continue to unfold over the next 18 months.

The Moon In Virgo – A Swimming Race 

And while all of this larger background astrology is happening, the aspect the New Moon makes to Mars gives us the practical essence of the lunation.

The New Moon at 18° Virgo applies a tight sextile to Mars at 19° Cancer. Virgo’s ability to master the material world meets Cancer’s intuitive, instinctive intelligence.

The Sabian Symbol of the New Moon in Virgo is an almost literal description of this: “A Swimming Race.”

A swimming race demands discipline, but you also have to read the water, read the other swimmers, adjust your pace, your breath, your next move – in real time. You can’t disappear into your head. The race keeps pulling you back into the moment.

The race here is not about competition for the sake of winning – but the kind of total presence where you are fully ON – responding to what’s happening, making constant micro-adjustments, and giving the moment everything you’ve got.

If you reflect back on moments when you were in a race or a competition, you may remember how naturally you began to function at a much higher caliber – not necessarily because you wanted to win, but because the setup required total focus and presence.

But what would our life be like if we lived in that state of flow – and applied that presence and mastery to every little thing we do?

If we were intentional about what we do, fully present, fully engaged, fully ON? Chances are, our lives would be much more aligned with our full potential.

Zooming out again at the astrology of the New Moon – the Grand Air Trine, Venus at 0° Scorpio activating the upcoming Star Point, and a New Moon in Virgo sextile Mars:

This is a time to get serious about what it is that we truly, truly want.

0° Scorpio is the point zero of desire and truth. These are not the superficial things in life, not the things we think we want because they sound good, or because other people want them.

0° Scorpio is not about being popular, or making more money. It’s about something that touches the very core of our desire – the thing underneath all the other things we say we want.

And from there, from that seed of desire and truth – what can you practically do – not affirmations, not wishful thinking, not waiting for the right circumstances – but practically – to actually get closer to what you want?

One real, practical step.

Once the race is on, there’s no turning back. And when desire meets presence, commitment, and action, you don’t just want it anymore. You go get it.

The Myth of Democratic Resilience

How to Save Democracy

This week, the Journal of Democracy is sharing our July 2025 issue — free to read through the end of September.

Can capitalism save democracy? What does Poland’s escape from illiberal rule teach the rest of the world? Why do hopes for democratic resilience keep falling short? And how do autocrats use the language of democracy to destroy it?

Can Capitalism Save Democracy?
While capitalism is often cast as democracy’s enemy, the free market fosters the pluralism — a strong private sector, robust opposition, and independent civil society — on which democratic resilience depends; yet even wealthy private sectors can fall to state capture.
Semuhi Sinanoglu, Lucan Way, and Steven Levitsky

The Myth of Democratic Resilience
Countries that have gone from democracy to authoritarianism and back again since 1994 almost never sustain their recoveries — the lasting damage of authoritarian episodes and the incentives to keep inherited powers make “U-turns” far more fragile than hoped.
Matías Bianchi, Nic Cheeseman, and Jennifer Cyr

Democracy After Illiberalism: A Warning from Poland
Poland’s attempt to restore liberal democracy after populist rule reveals the “institutional traps” that backsliding leaves behind — traps so deep that undoing them risks resorting to the very decisionist methods that illiberal governments used.
Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley

The Islamic Republic’s War on Iranians
The Woman, Life, Freedom movement posed a direct ideological challenge to the Islamic Republic — and Tehran’s escalating hybrid war on its own people has followed, marking a new phase in the regime’s estrangement from Iranian society.
Ladan Boroumand

The Authoritarian Argument
Authoritarian legality does more than wield force: it claims authority, offering public reasons to justify the turn away from democracy — a discursive strategy visible in both populist and military regimes.
Madhav Khosla

Tanzania’s Autocratic Reform-Washing
Tanzania’s president has been celebrated as a democratic reformer, but her real strategy is performing reform rather than delivering it — promising, delaying, and styling herself a “good governance” leader while muzzling criticism.
Dan Paget and Aikande Clement Kwayu

Secularism, Islamism, and the Future of Turkey
The jailing of Istanbul’s mayor on the very day he won the opposition’s presidential primary by 15 million votes redefines Turkey’s Islamist-secularist divide — and offers a model for resisting authoritarian populism as Erdoğan’s support erodes.
Ahmet T. Kuru

How to Fight Turkey’s Authoritarian Turn
With İmamoğlu’s arrest, Turkey risks sliding from competitive politics into the hegemonic authoritarianism of Russia and Venezuela — yet the regime’s material and coercive limits, and the opposition’s electoral strength, may still prevent it.
Berk Esen and Sebnem Gumuscu

Turkey’s Hard Road to Democratic Renewal
Turkey’s 2024 local elections show democratic resilience under authoritarian rule: the opposition’s grassroots victories disrupted Erdoğan’s patronage networks — and provoked the intensified repression that followed.
Ayça Alemdaroğlu, Toygar Sinan Baykan, Ladin Bayurgil, and Aytuğ Şaşmaz

Bolivia’s Silent Destruction
Bolivia’s authoritarian governments have used fire as a political and economic weapon — burning land for patronage and land grabs while silencing dissent, in a model other authoritarian regimes worldwide are following.
Jhanisse Vaca Daza

The Philippines’ Dynastic Democracy
The May 2025 elections pitted the Duterte and Marcos dynasties against each other — and, indirectly, the world’s two superpowers — with historic turnout led by Gen Z voters shaping the country’s emerging political landscape.
Richard Javad Heydarian

What Kind of State for Syria?
After Assad’s fall, Syria faces the challenge of building a new state rooted in Islamic legitimacy: the essay explores the ideological and constitutional tensions — Islamic jurisprudence, executive power, and civil society — emerging from the transitional Constitutional Declaration.
Andrew F. March

Image credit: Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images
The Journal of Democracy is published quarterly in January, April, July, and October. Subscribe now for full access to the Journal of Democracy archives.

‘Gambling with our lives’: Anthropic researcher quits, warns against self-improving AI 

Image Credits:Getty Images

AI

Rebecca Bellan

September 9, 2026 (techcrunch.com)

An Anthropic researcher has resigned over fears that unrestrained development of self-improving AI models will end up killing us all.

Jacob Coxon, a researcher who said in a social media post Tuesday evening that he spent the last three years working on pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic, accused the firms of failing to act responsibly. He said the people racing to build this technology “earnestly believe it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

“They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives,” Coxon wrote in a thread on X.

Coxon joins a growing chorus in the industry calling for a slowdown before AI technology learns to improve itself — a milestone many believe would end human control over AI. 

The public resignation comes amid growing pressure from policymakers and industry insiders to slow down AI development, following several incidents involving AI agents breaking out of their sandboxes and accessing the open internet.

The most serious so far have been OpenAI systems breaching Hugging Face’s servers, an event that researchers say remains poorly understood, due in part to the limited nature of the independent investigations into the incident. Around the same time, Anthropic’s AI agents also reached systems outside their test environments after misconfigurations in safety evaluations conducted by a third party inadvertently gave them paths to the internet.

Anthropic did not immediately return a request for comment on the resignation.

Here is the rest of Coxon’s warning and call to action: 

Do not underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.

The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt. If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible — but I hear the same people express fear privately. No other human activity poses this level of danger.

A common response is “if they truly believe this, why are they still building it?” At OpenAI, many have not deeply internalized the civilizational stakes. At Anthropic, the stakes are well-understood, but they are locked in a race to get there first — they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves, despite the risk.

Accepting this race and entering the “endgame” is a hubristic gamble that should not be launched from a private company’s Slack. Attempting to speedrun alignment should require extraordinary confidence that there are no better trajectories available.

I am optimistic about the potential for coordination. Warning shots like the Hugging Face attack have made pacing agreements between U.S. labs more viable. I don’t feel like we’re on track to prevent a global race, which may require costly actions such as a temporary ban on improving model capabilities.

If you are a lab researcher, I urge you to consider what the next few years will actually feel like. Do you want to kick off a superintelligent RL run without a rigorous understanding of its mind? Should you put your head down because “it’s happening anyway” — or take this moment to call for different conditions?

One of Coxon’s colleagues at Anthropic, Evan Hubinger, echoed the sentiment, saying his team does “earnestly believe AI could kill all humans!” He tempered his argument, though, saying the likelihood is greater than 10% within the next decade and admitted that Anthropic doesn’t “have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.” 

A recent report from Guidelight AI Standards, an organization that promotes safe frontier AI development practices, found that few of the top AI labs have published containment response plans for shutting down AI that tries to subvert human control. 

In his social media posts, Hubinger added that the risk from current models is low, but the fear compounds with “superintelligence arising from recursive self-improvement,” which is “happening faster than we thought.”

While half of the AI industry believes this sort of self-improvement will lead to humanity’s downfall, the other half hopes it will eventually help us solve all the seemingly far-fetched problems AI proponents say it will one day eliminate — cancer, climate change, and even world peace.

Anthropic and OpenAI aren’t the only companies actively chasing recursive self-improvement. A wave of startups has launched this year, with pedigreed founders and fat checks, to be the first to achieve this goal. Ricursive Intelligence raised $335 million at a $4 billion valuation in February; three months later, Recursive Superintelligence raised $650 million at a $4 billion valuation; and former Google DeepMind veteran Jeff Dean launched Discovery Loop last month.

“The creation of recursive self-improving loops, so an AI system that can build the next generation of AI system, which itself can build an even more powerful AI, which can build a more powerful AI, et cetera, et cetera, is the most likely candidate for the point we lose control,” Connor Leahy, U.S. executive director of AI safety nonprofit ControlAI, told TechCrunch. “It’s very hard to imagine shutting that down before it’s too late.”

Recent legislation has emerged in the U.S. and the U.K. to ban the development and deployment of superintelligence. Last week, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, and on Tuesday, British Labour MP Alex Sobel introduced the Artificial Superintelligence Security Bill in Parliament. 

Leahy, who advised on both bills, noted that the U.K.’s legislation points to recursive self-improvement as a precursor to superintelligence that “must be regulated and prevented.”

“Superintelligence is not a tool,” Leahy said. “It’s not a weapon, even. It’s an adversary.”

Rebecca Bellan

Rebecca Bellan, Senior Reporter

Rebecca Bellan is a senior reporter at TechCrunch where she covers the business, policy, and emerging trends shaping artificial intelligence. Her work has also appeared in Forbes, Bloomberg, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, and other publications.

You can contact or verify outreach from Rebecca by emailing rebecca.bellan@techcrunch.com or via encrypted message at rebeccabellan.491 on Signal.

View Bio 

Remembering the Amazing Jean Houston with Margaret Nash Rubin

New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove Sep 10, 2026 New Thinking Allowed Audio Podcast Margaret Nash Rubin is affectionately referred to as Peggy. Since 1987 she has also been the principal teaching associate of Jean Houston. Working with Jean Houston, Peggy Rubin has presented classes, workshops and trainings throughout the United States, and in Australia, New Zealand, England, Ireland, Sweden, Greece, Egypt, The Netherlands, India, West Africa, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Jamaica, and on behalf of the United Nations Development Programme, in Albania, St. Lucia, Barbados, Kenya, and the Philippines. Margaret, reflects on her decades as principal teaching associate to the legendary Jean Houston, sharing intimate stories of Houston’s transformative encounters with the goddess Athena in Athens, her rejection of a theatrical career, and the subsequent path into sacred psychology. She recounts their joint mystery schools, guided journeys, social artistry work, and Houston’s gift for evoking human magnificence through myth, archetypes, and the body. Drawing on personal memories, Peggy celebrates Houston’s lifelong devotion to the possible human in a possible world, her relationships with figures like Joseph Campbell and Buckminster Fuller, and the enduring legacy that continues through students and programs worldwide. 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:30 Welcome and Peggy’s background 00:09:09 Jean’s theater offer and Athena’s call 00:16:08 Mystery school and mystical gifts 00:20:16 Influences of Campbell and Fuller 00:25:43 Archetypes and Proclus 00:33:39 Dromenon and the labyrinth 00:42:03 Gratitude and Stanislavski roots 00:53:17 Psychedelic research and Bob Masters 01:01:11 Conclusion New Thinking Allowed host, Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD, is author of The Roots of Consciousness, Psi Development Systems, and The PK Man. Between 1986 and 2002 he hosted and co-produced the original Thinking Allowed public television series. He is the recipient of the only doctoral diploma in “parapsychology” ever awarded by an accredited university (University of California, Berkeley, 1980). He is also the Grand Prize winner of the 2021 Bigelow Institute essay competition regarding the best evidence for survival of human consciousness after permanent bodily death. He is Co-Director of Parapsychology Education at the California Institute for Human Science. (Recorded on Thursday, August 13, 2026)

Translation Saturday Meeting September 12

(Image courtesy of Steve Hines and AI)

September 11:  11:00 AM – 12:00 PM PST

Mike Zonta, H.W., M.

In a crisis — any crisis — The Prosperos offers Translation.  Translation Saturday Meetings is a weekly series of Translations, live and up to date on the issues of the day, personal or national.

It is not a Translation workshop,  It is not a Translation class.  But it is restricted to those who have taken Translation class. So if you have never taken Translation class, check the calendar tab on The Prosperos website (TheProsperos.org) or get in touch with us and we will schedule a class.

Last week our sense testimony was:  Misinformation can lead to false beliefs which can lead to manifestation according to those beliefs. All beliefs are false. And our conclusion was:   Information is the awareness of what is clear, pure, obvious.

Then we asked ChatGPT to Translate the same sense testimony. Here’s ChatGPT’s conclusion: Truth is what is, not what is believed.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – See you there!!! – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Here’s the link to the Translation group:  https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81749347119

For more info and link to join please email Mike Zonta at:

zonta1111@aol.com

Weekly Translation:  Every story has to have a denouement.

By Mike Zonta, BB editor

Translation is a 5-step process of “straight thinking in the abstract” comparing and contrasting what seems to be truth with what you can syllogistically, axiomatically and mathematically (using word equations) prove is the truth. It is not an effort to change, alter or heal anything other than our consciousness.

The claims in a Translation should be outrageous and mind-blowing, but they are always (or should always be) based on self-evident syllogistic reasoning. Here’s my Translation this week. 

1)    Truth is that which is so.  That which is not truth is not so.  Therefore truth is all that is.  Truth being all, there is nothing other than all, therefore Truth is one.  Truth being one is therefore whole, therefore complete, therefore perfect.  I think therefore I am.  Since I am and since truth is all that is, therefore I, being, am Truth.  Since I am Truth and I am mind (self-evident), therefore Truth is Mind/Consciousness.

2)    Every story has to have a denouement.

Word-tracking:
denouement:  to untie, undo
story:  history, includes exposition, rising action, climax, falling action, resolution; hero’s journey, hero ventures into unknown world and returns transformed
hero:  protagonist
protagonist:  first, chief actor
antagonist:  against, opposite actor, 
resolve:  to loosen, release, untie
story:  a lie

3)    Truth being one, there is no opposite, there is no antagonist.  Therefore Truth is the only actor.  Truth being all that is and Truth being mind, therefore Truth is all-knowing.  Truth being all-knowing, there is no unknown world to venture into, so there is no transformation is Reality.  There is no hero in Reality.  There is no rising action, climax, falling action, denouement in Reality.  Thus, Truth is not a story.  There is no conflict in Truth.  There are no knots to untie in Truth.  All is loose, free, untied, released, resolved.

4)    Truth is the only actor. 
Truth is all-knowing. 
There is no transformation is Reality. 
There is no hero in Reality. 
There is no rising action, climax, falling action, denouement in Reality. 
Truth is not a story. 
All is loose, free, untied, released, resolved.

5)    The only True story is that we are already loose, free, untied, released, resolved.

And now I’ll ask ChatGPT:

Me:  Please Translate the following sense testimony: Every story has to have a denouement.

ChatGPT:  Absolutely. I’ll use the same Translation structure we established in the previous example, including the Statement of Being, Sense Testimony, 2½ Word-Tracking, Argument, Summing Up Results, and Establishing the Absolute.

1. Statement of Being

Truth is that which is so. That which is not Truth is not so. Therefore Truth is all that is. Truth being all is therefore only. Truth being only is therefore one. Truth being one is therefore in agreement, at peace, harmonious, atoned.

I think, therefore I am. Since I am and since Truth is all that is, I cannot be outside or other than all that is; therefore my beingness is the same beingness as Truth, or my being is Truth being. Since I am consciousness (self-evident), and since my being is the being of Truth, therefore the being of Truth is consciousness/Mind.

2. Sense Testimony

“Every story has to have a denouement.”

The testimony presents the ending of a story as necessary.

But notice the word “has to.” It introduces necessity: every story is presumed to require a particular kind of resolution, conclusion, or outcome.

The deeper assumption may be:

Life itself is a story, and therefore life must eventually have a denouement.

That raises a fascinating question for Translation:

Does Truth have a plot?

A story has a beginning, development, conflict, and resolution. But Truth, being all that is, cannot have something outside itself that it needs to resolve.

Perhaps the testimony is importing the structure of narrative consciousness into Being.

2½. Word-Tracking

Story

From Latin historia, ultimately from Greek historia, “inquiry, knowledge acquired by investigation.”

A story is an account of events, generally arranged in a meaningful sequence.

It therefore involves selection: some things are included, others left out, and events are connected into a pattern.

Have to

“Have” comes from Old English habban, “to possess, hold.”

“Have to” develops the sense of necessity or obligation.

So the testimony isn’t merely saying that stories often have endings. It says they must.

Denouement

From French dénouement, from dénouer, “to untie, undo a knot,” from de- + nouer, “to knot.”

This is particularly revealing.

A denouement is literally the untying of a knot.

In narrative, it is the resolution of complications after the climax.

So:

Denouement = the untying of the knot.

The testimony therefore assumes that the complications of a story constitute a knot that must eventually be untied.

And that gives us a possible metaphysical question:

Is Being a knot that needs to be untied?

If Truth is all that is, perhaps there is ultimately no knot in Being.

3. Argument

Truth is all that is.

A story is an interpretation of events arranged into a meaningful sequence.

A story therefore has a beginning, a middle, and an ending because narrative consciousness organizes experience in time.

A denouement resolves the complications created by the story.

But Truth itself has no complication requiring resolution.

Truth does not begin and end.

Truth does not need to arrive at a conclusion in order to be Truth.

Therefore the necessity of a denouement belongs to the structure of a story, not to the nature of Truth.

If I believe that every story must have a denouement, I may assume that my own life must eventually produce a satisfying conclusion.

But my Being is not a story.

My Being is Truth being.

Truth does not need a conclusion to complete itself.

I think there is something especially interesting here for the Translator.

We naturally construct stories about ourselves: where we came from, what happened to us, what it means, where it is going, and how it will all turn out.

The desire for a denouement can therefore become a desire for closure.

But perhaps Translation asks us to see that closure belongs to the story, not necessarily to Being.

4. Summing Up Results

Stories have plots; Truth does not.

Stories require endings; Being does not.

A denouement unties a narrative knot.

Truth has no knot to untie.

My life may be told as a story, but my Being is not a story.

Truth does not become complete through a conclusion.

Being does not need an ending to be whole.

5. Establishing the Absolute

Several possibilities emerge:

Truth needs no denouement.

Or:

Being does not need a conclusion.

But I particularly like:

Truth is not a story.

And perhaps the most powerful formulation is:

Truth needs no ending to be complete.

There is an interesting relationship here to the Absolute we arrived at in the previous Translation:

Truth is its own audience.

If Truth is its own audience, it also doesn’t require a denouement. It isn’t waiting to discover how the story turns out.

The story says:

“Wait and see how it ends.”

Truth says:

“I am.”

And perhaps that is the deepest Translation:

Truth has no denouement because Truth is already complete in its Being.

Me:  Thank you. I agree with your final 5th step.

ChatGPT:  You’re very welcome. I agree that “Truth needs no ending to be complete” has a particularly strong quality as the fifth step.

It moves beyond merely saying that a story doesn’t need a denouement and points directly to the nature of Being: Truth is already whole. A conclusion cannot add anything to it.

I’ll keep that formulation in mind as we continue these Translations.

Me:   

For information about Translation or other Prosperos classes go to: https://www.theprosperos.org/teaching.

Or, if you have taken Translation class, join us each Saturday for Translation Saturday Meeting at 11 a.m. Pacific time for current, up-to-the-minute Translations on the issues of the day.  Email zonta1111@aol.com for the Zoom link.

m.z.

Quote of the Day: 65 Years Ago, Psychologist Carl Jung Drew a Line Between Our Past Traumas and Our Future—And the Message Is Still Vital Today

Carl Jung’s sentiment was inspired by an unfortunate event in his childhood.

Sep 10, 2026 (Parade.com)

By Alani Vargas

Senior Editor, Lifestyle, Parade

Photo of Swiss psychologist, psychiatrist Carl Jung in the 1950s
Bettmann / Getty Images

There have been so many famous psychologists throughout history, and they’ve all helped shape how we view modern psychology and the inner workings of the mind. There are, of course, more controversial figures like Sigmund Freud, but his ideas still influenced the way people view the field—even if that’s because it inspired them to veer away from his views. And while his career is much more than his connection to the Austrian neurologist, Carl Jung was a psychiatrist, psychotherapist and psychologist who went on to develop his own theories and psychological methods after working alongside Freud. 

Born in Switzerland in 1875, Jung went on to found analytical psychology, which Britannica reports is almost a “response” to Freud’s psychoanalytic concepts. He also developed the idea of the extraverted and the introverted personality, archetypes and the collective unconscious. As the Society of Analytical Psychology (SAP) reported, Jung is “one of psychology’s pioneering figures of the 20th century” and a “radical and inspiring psychologist and thinker who developed… a unique way of understanding the human psyche and its functioning.”

Considering he is the founder of analytical psychology, which focuses on immediate conflicts rather than childhood trauma, per Britannica, our quote of the day feels right up his alley. Jung created this psychoanalytic method to specifically differentiate from Freud’s concepts, which famously hinged on certain neuroses and childhood issues. So while Freud’s psychology might point to your past traumas defining you and explaining every idiosyncrasy of yours, Jung—as today’s quote suggests—doesn’t believe what happened to you has to be who you are.

Related: Quote of the Day: 73 Years Ago, Psychologist Carl Rogers Came to a ‘Conclusion’ About the ‘Good Life,’ and We Can Still Benefit From His Findings

Quote of the Day by Carl Jung

Carl Jung quote, "I am not what happened to me, I am what I choose to become."

“I am not what happened to me, I am what I choose to become.”

This quote is often attributed to his 1961 autobiography, Memories, Dreams, Reflections. While I couldn’t locate the exact quote, something similar is written in the Richard and Clara Winston translation from 1963. In Chapter II, “School Years,” Jung writes:

“But at this moment I came upon myself. Previously I had existed too, but everything had merely happened to me. Now I happened to myself. Now I knew: I am myself now, now I exist. Previously I had been willed to do this and that; now I willed. This experience seemed to me tremendously important and new: there was ‘authority’ in me.”

This comes after he tells a story about how he was shoved down when he was 12 years old, hitting his head hard against the ground, resulting in constant fainting “fits.” He couldn’t go to school for six months, and while he at first felt “free” (as any kid in that position would), he started to feel like he was “fleeing” from himself and wasn’t actually enjoying it. 

Jung writes that his parents were extremely worried about him, understandably so, and sent him to many doctors who couldn’t figure out what was wrong with him.

One day he overheard his father tell a friend that Jung was in a “sad” position and that he worried that his son would never be able to work and support himself. This upset Jung at first, but then it inspired him to study on his own and become “a serious child.”

His fainting episodes hindered him at first, but he sort of willed himself to stave them off and got rid of them altogether. Because of this, he came to the conclusion that this whole thing was his own making, his own “neurosis” (a term used at the time for disorders caused by anxiety), which made him unable to function academically for months. But he came back more diligent afterward, and inspired his “conscientiousness” not for anyone else but his “own sake.”  

Related: Quote of the Day by Psychologist William James: ‘Wherever You Are It Is Your Own Friends…’ — Those Who Surround You Shape Your ‘World’

Deeper Meaning of Carl Jung’s Quote—Your Past Is Not Your Future

Jung believed that even if you faced trauma and hard times in the past, you don’t have to let them define your future. And while this quote doesn’t apply to every single hardship someone might face (some things require professional help to overcome them, or they might never “right” themselves or go back to the way they were), you can still “choose” who you become by how you deal with something. You get to decide how something defines you, or if it doesn’t. 

Related: Quote of the Day: John Keats on Why Some Life Lessons Only Make Sense With Age

More Quotes from Carl Jung

  • “Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to an understanding of ourselves.”
  • “The world will ask you to become what you are, to fulfill your destiny. If you do not heed this call, you will be compelled to live according to what others see in you.”
  • “You are what you do, not what you say you’ll do.”
  • “The sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.”
  • “Your vision will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams; who looks inside, awakes.”
  • “We must remember that the rationalistic attitude of the West is not the only possible one and is not all-embracing, but is in many ways a prejudice and a bias that ought perhaps to be corrected.”
  • “We walk in shoes too small for us.”

About the author

Alani Vargas

Senior Editor, Lifestyle, Parade

Alani Vargas edits, writes and reports on personal psychology, relationships, beauty, spiritual and metaphysical elements, LGBTQ+ culture, LEGO, trending shopping and travel. She has interviewed licensed psychologists, etiquette experts and top fashion, beauty and fragrance influencers.

(Contributed by Janet Cornwell, H.W., m.)

9/11 – 25th Anniversary: God Angrily Clarifies ‘Don’t Kill’ Rule

Published: September 26, 2001 (TheOnion.com)

NEW YORK—Responding to recent events on Earth, God, the omniscient creator-deity worshipped by billions of followers of various faiths for more than 6,000 years, angrily clarified His longtime stance against humans killing each other Monday.

“Look, I don’t know, maybe I haven’t made myself completely clear, so for the record, here it is again,” said the Lord, His divine face betraying visible emotion during a press conference near the site of the fallen Twin Towers. “Somehow, people keep coming up with the idea that I want them to kill their neighbor. Well, I don’t. And to be honest, I’m really getting sick and tired of it. Get it straight. Not only do I not want anybody to kill anyone, but I specifically commanded you not to, in really simple terms that anybody ought to be able to understand.”

Worshipped by Christians, Jews, and Muslims alike, God said His name has been invoked countless times over the centuries as a reason to kill in what He called “an unending cycle of violence.”

“I don’t care how holy somebody claims to be,” God said. “If a person tells you it’s My will that they kill someone, they’re wrong. Got it? I don’t care what religion you are, or who you think your enemy is, here it is one more time: No killing, in My name or anyone else’s, ever again.”

The press conference came as a surprise to humankind, as God rarely intervenes in earthly affairs. As a matter of longstanding policy, He has traditionally left the task of interpreting His message and divine will to clerics, rabbis, priests, imams, and Biblical scholars. Theologians and laymen alike have been given the task of pondering His ineffable mysteries, deciding for themselves what to do as a matter of faith. His decision to manifest on the material plane was motivated by the deep sense of shock, outrage, and sorrow He felt over the Sept. 11 violence carried out in His name, and over its dire potential ramifications around the globe.

“I tried to put it in the simplest possible terms for you people, so you’d get it straight, because I thought it was pretty important,” said God, called Yahweh and Allah respectively in the Judaic and Muslim traditions. “I guess I figured I’d left no real room for confusion after putting it in a four-word sentence with one-syllable words, on the tablets I gave to Moses. How much more clear can I get?”

“But somehow, it all gets twisted around and, next thing you know, somebody’s spouting off some nonsense about, ‘God says I have to kill this guy, God wants me to kill that guy, it’s God’s will,’” God continued. “It’s not God’s will, all right? News flash: ‘God’s will’ equals ‘Don’t murder people.’”

Worse yet, many of the worst violators claim that their actions are justified by passages in the Bible, Torah, and Qur’an.

“To be honest, there’s some contradictory stuff in there, okay?” God said. “So I can see how it could be pretty misleading. I admit it—My bad. I did My best to inspire them, but a lot of imperfect human agents have misinterpreted My message over the millennia. Frankly, much of the material that got in there is dogmatic, doctrinal bullshit. I turn My head for a second and, suddenly, all this stuff about homosexuality gets into Leviticus, and everybody thinks it’s God’s will to kill gays. It absolutely drives Me up the wall.”

God praised the overwhelming majority of His Muslim followers as “wonderful, pious people,” calling the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attacks rare exceptions.

“This whole medieval concept of the jihad, or holy war, had all but vanished from the Muslim world in, like, the 10th century, and with good reason,” God said. “There’s no such thing as a holy war, only unholy ones. The vast majority of Muslims in this world reject the murderous actions of these radical extremists, just like the vast majority of Christians in America are pissed off over those two bigots on The 700 Club.”

Continued God, “Read the book: ‘Allah is kind, Allah is beautiful, Allah is merciful.’ It goes on and on that way, page after page. But, no, some assholes have to come along and revive this stupid holy-war crap just to further their own hateful agenda. So now, everybody thinks Muslims are all murderous barbarians. Thanks, Taliban: 1,000 years of pan-Islamic cultural progress down the drain.”

God stressed that His remarks were not directed exclusively at Islamic extremists, but rather at anyone whose ideological zealotry overrides his or her ability to comprehend the core message of all world religions.

“I don’t care what faith you are, everybody’s been making this same mistake since the dawn of time,” God said. “The Muslims massacre the Hindus, the Hindus massacre the Muslims. The Buddhists, everybody massacres the Buddhists. The Jews, don’t even get me started on the hardline, right-wing, Meir Kahane-loving Israeli nationalists, man. And the Christians? You people believe in a Messiah who says, ‘Turn the other cheek,’ but you’ve been killing everybody you can get your hands on since the Crusades.”

Growing increasingly wrathful, God continued: “Can’t you people see? What are you, morons? There are a ton of different religious traditions out there, and different cultures worship Me in different ways. But the basic message is always the same: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Shintoism… every religious belief system under the sun, they all say you’re supposed to love your neighbors, folks! It’s not that hard a concept to grasp.”

“Why would you think I’d want anything else? Humans don’t need religion or God as an excuse to kill each other—you’ve been doing that without any help from Me since you were freaking apes!” God said. “The whole point of believing in God is to have a higher standard of behavior. How obvious can you get?”

“I’m talking to all of you, here!” continued God, His voice rising to a shout. “Do you hear Me? I don’t want you to kill anybody. I’m against it, across the board. How many times do I have to say it? Don’t kill each other anymore—ever! I’m fucking serious!”

Upon completing His outburst, God fell silent, standing quietly at the podium for several moments. Then, witnesses reported, God’s shoulders began to shake, and He wept.

Quantum Consciousness Theory

Aperture Feb 22, 2026 Aperture Podcast Take your personal data back with Incogni! Use code APERTUREDEAL at the link below and get 60% off an annual plan: http://incogni.com/aperturedeal There is a quiet embarrassment at the center of modern quantum physics. It is rarely mentioned outside academic circles, and when it is, it is often softened with abstractions or confusing mathematical language. But the problem itself is pretty blunt. According to our most successful physical theory, reality does not fully exist until it is observed. 00:00 Quantum Consciousness Theory 11:13 The Physical Mechanism 20:39 The Connection to The Universe 27:10 Radical Alternatives 35:18 Synthesis Listen to Aperture on Spotify: https://bit.ly/aperturepod

Consciousness, spirituality, biography, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more

Bathtub Bulletin