Category Archives: Uncategorized

How Not to Dwell on the Past

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

“We can never go back,” bell hooks wrote in her moving reckoning with love. “We can go forward. We can find the love our hearts long for, but not until we let go grief about the love we lost long ago.”

And yet we do go back, over and over. The tragic flaw of our species is the price we pay for the mind’s magnificent ability to move in time: the superpower of prospection that makes us capable of making a plan and making a promise comes bundled with the singular suffering of retrospection: the remorse, the regret, the past romanticized and voided of its own consequence.

It is seductive, this selective time travel. The perfect weekend with the imperfect lover whose ineptitude at love you didn’t yet know would break your heart. The languid summer just before the diagnosis, the disaster, the death. The time you were ten pounds lighter and ten choices freer and ten mistakes less marred in the mirror of the mind. Over and over, the hand of memory reaches back, grasps for the bygone moment when life was simpler or brighter or more redolent with aliveness, forgetting that the only thing for the keeping is the naked now, vulnerable as a newborn, total as eternity.

Art from An Almanac of Birds: 100 Divinations for Uncertain Days, also available as a stand-alone print.

The great challenge, the great triumph, is to make of memory an instrument of presence. That is what Diane Seuss offers in her splendid poem “Weeds,” found in her altogether vivifying collection Modern Poetry (public library).

WEEDS
by Diane Seuss

The danger of memory is going

to it for respite. Respite risks

entrapment. Don’t debauch

yourself by living

in some former version of yourself

that was more or less naked. Maybe

it felt better then, but you were

not better. You were smaller, as the rain

gauge must fill to the brim

with its full portion of suffering.

What can memory be in these terrible times?

Only instruction. Not a dwelling.

Or if you must dwell:

The sweet smell of weeds then.

The sweet smell of weeds now.

An endurance. A standoff. A rest.

Couple with Virginia Woolf on the nature of memory and Oliver Sacks on the necessity of forgetting, then revisit George Saunders on how to live an uregretting life.

The Enemy Outside and the Enemy Within: Audre Lorde’s Antidote to Despair

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

“There is no love of life without despair of life,” Albert Camus wrote between two world wars. There are many species of despair — the private despair of ill health and heartbreak, the public despair we call politics, the existential despair of bearing our transience and our utter insignificance to the life of the cosmos.

In the autumn of 1978, Audre Lorde (February 18, 1934–November 17, 1992) faced several species at once as a grim diagnosis first interrupted, then fortified her work as one the most personal yet most politically consequential voices of the past century. “The shortest statement of philosophy I have is my living, or the word ‘I,’” she had written in the prime of her life, in the bloom of health. Now, she came to hone her philosophy on the sharp edge of her mortality.

“Spring comes, and still I feel despair like a pale cloud waiting to consume me,” she writes at the outset of what became The Cancer Journals (public library) — Lorde’s effort, blazingly successful, “to give form with honesty and precision to the pain faith labor and loving which this period of my life has translated into strength.” Like all translation, however, it was a demanding task, a creative task, a task that required learning a new language of being well enough to channel through it the poetry of being alive.

Audre Lorde

It begins with the stammer of incomprehension that follows every existential shock: She finds herself “not feeling very hopeful these days, about selfhood or anything else.” But soon she discovers that the only way out of that “molten despair” is through.

In consonance with poet May Sarton’s hard-won insistence that “sometimes one has simply to endure a period of depression for what it may hold of illumination if one can live through it, attentive to what it exposes or demands,” Lorde comes to see how it is precisely by allowing the despair that she can reach beyond it:

If I can look directly at my life and my death without flinching I know there is nothing they can ever do to me again. I must be content to see how really little I can do and still do it with an open heart… I must let this pain flow through me and pass on. If I resist or try to stop it, it will detonate inside me, shatter me, splatter my pieces against every wall and person that I touch.

Art from An Almanac of Birds: 100 Divinations for Uncertain Days, also available as a stand-alone print.

Along the way, consumed with writing while trying to stay alive, she trembles with the question haunting every artist: “What is this work all for?” But then, upon finishing a novel, she looks back to see it had been a lifeline. In what is by far the most concise, precise manifesto for those of us who process our loves and our losses in writing — or do whatever the world sees as our work — she reflects:

I do not have to win in order to know my dreams are valid, I only have to believe in a process of which I am a part. My work kept me alive this past year, my work and the love of women. They are inseparable from each other. In the recognition of the existence of love lies the answer to despair. Work is that recognition given voice and name.

Calibrating her personal suffering against “the enormity of our task, to turn the world around,” and coming to see that despair “means destruction,” she allows her despair — that is, feels it — then refuses it — that is, refuses to act out of it, to live into it:

How do I fight the despair born of fear and anger and powerlessness which is my greatest internal enemy? I have found that battling despair does not mean closing my eyes to the enormity of the tasks of effecting change, nor ignoring the strength and the barbarity of the forces aligned against us. It means teaching, surviving and fighting with the most important resource I have, myself, and taking joy in that battle. It means, for me, recognizing the enemy outside and the enemy within, and knowing that my work is part of a continuum of women’s work, of reclaiming this earth and our power, and knowing that this work did not begin with my birth nor will it end with my death. And it means knowing that within this continuum, my life and my love and my work has particular power and meaning… It means trout fishing on the Missisquoi River at dawn and tasting the green silence, and knowing that this beauty too is mine forever.

Confucius on mistakes

Depiction of Confucius by Wu Daozi, 8th century CE

“Be not ashamed of mistakes and thus make them crimes.”

~ Confucius

Confucius, born Kong Qiu, was a Chinese philosopher of the Spring and Autumn period who is traditionally considered the paragon of Chinese sages. Much of the shared cultural heritage of the Sinosphere originates in the philosophy and teachings of Confucius. Wikipedia

BornKong Qiu
c. 551 BCE
Zou, Lu (now QufuShandong)
Diedc. 479 BCE (aged 71–72)
Si River, Lu

Stressing Over Something? These 3 Questions Can Help.

You can use them to gain some perspective.

An illustration of a long ladder reaching out of a rippling pool.
Credit…Matt Chase
Jancee Dunn

By Jancee Dunn

May 22, 2026 (NYTimes.com)

Leer en españolSee more of our coverage in your search results.Add The New York Times on Google 

My father has a way of assuming the absolute worst in any situation, whether it’s real or imagined. Therapists call this pattern of thinking “catastrophizing.”

One of my dad’s favorite expressions is “It’s your funeral.” When he visits, he conducts a thorough inspection of my home, which is followed by grim pronouncements.

Last week, he emerged from my basement with a somber expression: “I guarantee you, it’s mold,” he said. “Get that inspected, pronto, or it’s your funeral.”

I don’t envision my funeral quite as often as my father does — but when I’m stressed, my worries escalate, too.

One method I use to corral my spiraling thoughts was developed by Martin Seligman, the director of the Penn Positive Psychology Center and a leading authority on happiness. He studies how people build resilience and has found that how we describe our hardships to ourselves can influence how we view them.

In his decades of research, Dr. Seligman has developed a three-part framework people can use to interpret life’s challenges: permanence, pervasiveness and agency. I find it helpful to pose a question about each one when I’m feeling out of control.

Our brains are wired to focus on negative events more intensely than on positive ones, and they tend to linger in our minds longer. This can make a problem feel as if it’s here to stay — even if it isn’t.

So when patients tell Dr. Seligman that they are anxious about something, he asks whether it is temporary. “Is it just this one situation? Is it going to hurt you only right now?” he asks. “Or is it going to last?’”

Knowing that your problem has an end point can help you shift from a state of emergency to tolerance, even if it’s painful in the meantime, said Eric Zimmer, author of “How a Little Becomes a Lot.”

Zimmer asks himself whether an issue will still bother him in five hours, five days or five weeks. If you determine that something will still worry you in five weeks, Zimmer said, then you can direct energy and resources toward dealing with it.

Sometimes a misstep or a crisis can cause us to generalize, drawing sweeping conclusions from one event. An example, Dr. Seligman said, is telling yourself you’re unlovable after a breakup, as opposed to “‘I never should have hooked up with him to begin with.’”

To harness your spiraling thoughts, Zimmer suggests asking yourself: Is this problem really affecting every single aspect of my life? What areas remain unaffected and positive?

When we are in the midst of a difficult situation, “we can get so myopically focused that it looks enormous,” Zimmer said.

Instead, he said, “zoom out and look at the whole picture.”

Before he had his podcast, Zimmer started a solar energy business that eventually folded. At first, he told himself he was a failure. But when he asked himself if this problem was pervasive, he realized that he wasn’t a failure — it was his business that had failed.

Dr. Seligman originally thought that personalization — the belief that negative events are all our fault — determined how a person viewed and weathered problems. But now he believes that agency, or the ability to take actions and make decisions that affect our lives, is a more important factor.

After you have acknowledged an ordeal, Dr. Seligman said, you can ask yourself, “‘What can I plan to do about it?’”

Pinpoint what is within your control — write it down if it helps — to figure out where you have agency, he said. For the most part, Dr. Seligman added, there is “almost always” something that you can find.

When Zimmer is brainstorming solutions to an issue, he tries to see it as a puzzle instead of a problem, a concept he learned from the music producer Quincy Jones. “It allows me to think that in many cases, there is indeed a solution,” Zimmer said. “I just need to find it.”

When it comes to my smelly basement, my dad has worn me down. I’m going to do what he suggests and call a mold guy: “Puzzle” solved.

(Contributed by Michael Kelly, H.W.)

Word-built world: sati (in Buddhism)

  • Google AI

In Buddhism, sati (a Pali word) translates directly to mindfulness or awareness. It is a fundamental mental quality that involves keeping one’s attention anchored in the present moment. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Here is a breakdown of its meaning, role, and practice in Buddhist philosophy:

Core Meaning and Psychology

  • Literal Translation: The word originally means “memory” or “to remember.” In practice, it means remembering to maintain awareness of the present moment without drifting into distraction.
  • Objective Observation: Sati allows you to see things exactly as they are right now. It is a lucid, non-judgmental awareness that observes thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations without reacting to them with desire or anger.
  • The Opposite of Forgetting: It acts as an antidote to mental drifting, preventing the mind from falling into autopilot, confusion, or forgetfulness. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Role in Buddhist Teachings

  • The Eightfold Path: It is the seventh element, known as Right Mindfulness (Sammā-sati). It serves as the bridge between mental concentration and liberating wisdom.
  • Factors of Enlightenment: It is the very first of the Seven Factors of Enlightenment, acting as the trigger that activates all other qualities like investigation, energy, and joy. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

How it is Practiced (The Four Satipaṭṭhānas)

The primary method for developing sati is outlined in the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta (The Discourse on the Establishing of Mindfulness), which instructs practitioners to maintain continuous awareness across four domains: [1, 2, 3, 4]

  1. Mindfulness of the Body (Kāya): Awareness of the breath, physical postures (walking, sitting, standing), and bodily sensations.
  2. Mindfulness of Feelings (Vedanā): Noting whether experiences feel pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral as they arise.
  3. Mindfulness of the Mind (Citta): Observing the current state of the mind (e.g., whether it is anxious, calm, distracted, or concentrated).
  4. Mindfulness of Mental Realities (Dhammas): Observing how psychological patterns and Buddhist truths—like impermanence—operate within your direct experience. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

To help narrow this down, are you interested in how to practice mindfulness meditation, its connection to the Four Noble Truths, or how it differs from modern secular mindfulness?

Spacetime Is The Memory Of A Self Knowing Universe | Federico Faggin

Essentia Foundation Jan 23, 2026 Our follow-up with CPU inventor Federico Faggin on    • Quantum Information Panpsychism Explained …   sponsored by Consensus AI: the AI powered science search engine with access to 220+ million studies. Click: https://get.consensus.app/essentia for a free trial of Consensus Pro and 30% discount on a yearly plan (offer until 3-31-26) In this conversation with Hans Busstra, the legendary CPU inventor explains his quantum theory of consciousness in more detail and outlines some of his novel ideas, to be presented in his upcoming new book. He discusses, for instance, how we should regard our material universe: “spacetime and matter are the permanent memory of the experience of the self knowing of One.” For a scientific elaboration of Federico’s theory, see: “Hard Problem and Free Will: an information-theoretical approach,” Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano and Federico Faggin: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.06580 Federico’s book “Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers, and Human Nature”: https://www.collectiveinkbooks.com/es…

Our previous videos with Federico Faggin: •    • Groundbreaking Consciousness Theory By Mic…     • Quantum Consciousness Debate: Does the Wav…  
   • Interview with idealist physicist and inve…  0:00

Introduction 4:31 Who are we truly as humans? 5:52 Why do we often feel separated? 7:35 Is the ego part of the ‘Seity’, the conscious field that we are? 8:31 Spacetime as One that knows itself… 9:55 Federico’s cosmology in contrast to the Big Bang story 15:37 John Wheeler’s participatory universe, and consciousness in relationship to our material universe 18:51 Why Einstein couldn’t make the leap to accept quantum reality 20:04 Quantum collapse as a free will decision of quantum fields 20:50 Hans gives a recap of his understanding of the drone metaphor 25:22 Where is the self-knowing of One coming from? 27:13 The first time that One knows itself 28:09 The identity of a Seity 28:42 Self-knowing as the true Big Bang 31:43 Any new knowing is a creation 33:37 Federico’s view on body, mind, and spirit 33:57 How to distinguish between mind and spirit? 36:15 Spacetime as the overlap between spirit and body 37:29 There is no past 40:11 Think of our shareable reality as the display of a quantum computer 41:24 Federico’s hypothesis of what dark matter is 43:07 About our materialist bias 44:33 How can we explain life as randomness? 45:51 To what extent do you need a transcendent experience? 47:42 On the object/subject divide people think they can uphold 50:49 Has your experience of oneness become a place you can revisit? 52:07 What is your response to people saying mystics and gurus already knew all of this? 52:47 About our sponsor: Consensus AI 56:35 The rubber hand experiment 59:39 What mechanism could be at play in out-of-body experiences (OBEs)? 1:02:11 On the ethical implications of Federico’s theory 1:03:26 On spirituality vs religion 1:04:58 There is no ontological evil 1:06:41 How this theory has affected Federico’s own life 1:08:30 Is everything ‘meant to be’? 1:12:10 Our incarnation as an equation simulated under different conditions 1:14:05 Federico’s thought compared to Christianity 1:17:48 On the dangers of AI 1:18:50 Why conscious AI is a fantasy 1:22:40 AI is not the beginning of a new era, but it marks the beginning of one 1:24:10 Federico’s hopes and fears 1:25:09 What is happiness? 1:27:37 How to discern when we take spiritual experiences more seriously 1:31:46 The help Federico sought after his own transformative experience 1:33:07 The hide and seek of the universe Ethics statement: Essentia Foundation accepts sponsorships to help us create more and better content but is editorially completely independent and not affiliated with its sponsors. We only accept sponsorships that are compatible with our mission and scientific standards.

Copyright © 2026 by Essentia Foundation. All rights reserved.

Military Education And Masculinity In The U.S. with Jasper Craven [begins at 12:50]

The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder Streamed live 116 minutes ago The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder For Memorial Day, author Jasper Craven joins to discuss his book on military education in the US, “God Forgives, Brothers Don’t.” Buy the book here: https://www.simonandschuster.com/book… Become a Majority Report member: https://fans.fm/majority/join

Story of the Week: Enough

Enough 


At a party given by a billionaire on Shelter Island, the late Kurt Vonnegut informs his pal, the author Joseph Heller (author of Catch 22), that their host, a hedge fund manager, had made more money in a single day than Heller had earned from his wildly popular novel Catch 22 over its whole history. Heller responds, “Yes, but I have something he will never have . . .Enough.”

Attributed to John C Bogle (1929 – 2019)
American Investor, Founder of Vanguard  

AN OPPORTUNITY FOR DAILY REFLECTION BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE SCHOOL OF PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY