Mom Makes Sure Everyone Has Masturbated Before Long Car Ride

April 19, 2018 (theonion.com)

LANARK, IL—Adamant that there would be no unplanned pit stops until her family had reached its destination, local mom Mary Curran reportedly made sure that each of her teenage sons had masturbated to completion Thursday before a long car ride to their grandparents’ house. “It’s going to be three hours—maybe more with traffic—so even if you don’t have to jerk off right this second, you should at least try,” said Curran, hoping to avoid a repeat of their last trip when they barely managed to pull off I-39 in time for her youngest to blow his load into a ditch. “I know you say you just cranked one out, but you say that every time. Please just go and pleasure yourself now so we don’t find ourselves desperately looking for an exit with a Denny’s that will let you jack it without buying anything first.” Curran went on to fault her husband for letting the kids watch so much porn with breakfast.

God Recalls Life-Changing Encounter With 8-Year-Old Boy Who Had Near-Death Experience

April 19, 2018 (theonion.com)

THE HEAVENS—Saying that the incident had a profound effect on Him and that He hasn’t been the same since, God, Our Lord and Heavenly Father, recalled Thursday his life-changing encounter with an 8-year-old boy who had a near-death experience. “I was standing there one day in the brightness of Eternal Life when suddenly, a small boy came walking towards My light,” said the Almighty, explaining that He felt at peace and had no fear, as was nearly always the case, but that He could also see the boy’s small frame on an operating table far below and realized that He was seeing an actual out-of-body experience. “He asked me if I was God and this Heaven, and when I said, ‘Yes, my child,’ a look of total tranquility came over him. I tell you, it was really humbling. Before I could say anything else, the child’s spirit was returned to his body, but the feeling of total serenity still lingered. It made me really appreciate the afterlife, you know?” God added that He took great comfort in knowing that He will see the boy again very soon.

Max Planck on God

Max Planck is universally recognized as the father of modern physics; he formulated one of the most important physical theories of the 20th century – Quantum Theory. He also contributed to the progress of the Theory of Relativity and the study of electromagnetic radiation. Planck is a founder of quantum mechanics.

 

1.  In his famous lecture Religion and Science (May 1937) Planck wrote: “Both religion and science need for their activities the belief in God, and moreover God stands for the former in the beginning, and for the latter at the end of the whole thinking. For the former, God represents the basis, for the latter – the crown of any reasoning concerning the world-view.”

2.  “Religion represents a bond of man to God. It consists in reverent awe before a supernatural Might [Macht], to which human life is subordinated and which has in its power our welfare and misery. To remain in permanent contact with this Might and keep it all the time inclined to oneself, is the unending effort and the highest goal of the believing man. Because only in such a way can one feel himself safe before expected and unexpected dangers, which threaten one in his life, and can take part in the highest happiness – inner psychical peace – which can be attained only by means of strong bond to God and unconditional trust to His omnipotence and willingness to help.”

3.  Planck concluded his lecture Religion and Science (May 1937) with the words: “It is the steady, ongoing, never-slackening fight against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition, which religion and science wage together. The directing watchword in this struggle runs from the remotest past to the distant future.

4.  “Under these conditions it is no wonder, that the movement of atheists, which declares religion to be just a deliberate illusion, invented by power-seeking priests, and which has for the pious belief in a higher Power nothing but words of mockery, eagerly makes use of progressive scientific knowledge and in a presumed unity with it, expands in an ever faster pace its disintegrating action on all nations of the earth and on all social levels. I do not need to explain in any more detail that after its victory not only all the most precious treasures of our culture would vanish, but – which is even worse – also any prospects at a better future.”

5.  “But the value of religion exceeds the individual. Not only every man has his own religion but the religion requires its validity for larger community, for nation, race, and the whole mankind. Since God reigns equally over all countries of the world, the whole world with all its treasures and horrors is subdued to Him.”

6.  Unfortunately, during World War II, in February 1945, Planck’s son Erwin was executed by the Nazis for participation in an unsuccessful attempt to assassinate Adolf Hitler. On 14 March 1945 Planck wrote in a letter to his friend Anton Kippenberg:

“If there is consolation anywhere it is in the Eternal, and I consider it a grace of Heaven that belief in the Eternal has been rooted deeply in me since childhood.

God protect and strengthen you for everything that still may come before this insanity in which we are forced to live reaches its end.”

7.  “That God existed before there were human beings on Earth, that He holds the entire world, believers and non-believers, in His omnipotent hand for eternity, and that He will remain enthroned on a level inaccessible to human comprehension long after the Earth and everything that is on it has gone to ruins; those who profess this faith and who, inspired by it, in veneration and complete confidence, feel secure from the dangers of life under protection of the Almighty, only those may number themselves among the truly religious.”

8.  In his major bookWhere Is Science Going? (1932) Planck pointed out:

“There can never be any real opposition between religion and science; for the one is the complement of the other. Every serious and reflective person realizes, I think, that the religious element in his nature must be recognized and cultivated if all the powers of the human soul are to act together in perfect balance and harmony. And indeed it was not by accident that the greatest thinkers of all ages were deeply religious souls.”

9.  “As a physicist, that is, a man who had devoted his whole life to a wholly prosaic science, the exploration of matter, no one would surely suspect me of being a fantast. And so, having studied the atom, I am telling you that there is no matter as such! All matter arises and persists only due to a force that causes the atomic particles to vibrate, holding them together in the tiniest of solar systems, the atom.

Yet in the whole of the universe, there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must, therefore, assume that behind this force there is a conscious, intelligent Mind or Spirit. This is the very origin of all matter.”

10.  To the question of The Observer, “Do you think that consciousness can be explained in terms of matter?” Max Planck replied:

“No, I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”

11.  Planck believed in life after death, he believed in the existence of “another world, exalted above ours, where we can and will take refuge at any time.”

“Farsighted theologians are now working to mine the eternal metal from the teachings of Jesus and to forge it for all time.”

12.  Writing on the complementary relations between science and religion, Max Planck observed: “The one does not exclude the other; rather they are complementary and mutually interacting. Man needs science as a tool of perception; he needs religion as a guide to action.”

Credit: Nobelists.net

Max Planck On God

NOVEMBER 28, 2010

 

How to spot high-conflict people before it’s too late

By Bill Eddy, Co-founder and President, The High Conflict Institute

April 18, 2018 (BigThink.com)

Here’s a fast fact about high-conflict people: life is better when you avoid them. Bill Eddy, mediation expert and president of the High Conflict Institute, describes them not only as difficult but also potentially dangerous. So how can we avoid becoming a target in their path of destruction? First, you have to be able to recognize them, says Eddy. They tend to share these four key characteristics: a preoccupation with blaming others, all-or-nothing thinking, unmanaged emotions, and extreme behaviors. Once you know what you’re dealing with—a textbook high-conflict personality—you can take measures to manage this relationship, whether it’s at home, at work, or beyond. Eddy shares his matter-of-fact methods for withdrawing from these people or, if that’s not an option, for how to resist their conflict lures and disengage from the drama. Bill Eddy is the author of 5 Types of People Who Can Ruin Your Life: Identifying and Dealing with Narcissists, Sociopaths, and Other High-Conflict Personalities

  • TRANSCRIPT

Bill Eddy: What’s interesting is high-conflict personalities seem to—we’ve really boiled it down to four key characteristics. The first and maybe the most stunning is a preoccupation with blaming other people. It’s really, “It’s all your fault,”—and you may have experienced this—“and it’s not at all my fault”. That’s zero. “My part of the problem is zero.” And that’s how high-conflict people talk. And they’ll say, “Don’t you get it? It’s all your fault.”

The second is a lot of all-or-nothing thinking. “Of course it’s all your fault, but my way or the highway.” Solutions to problems are: “There’s all-good people and there’s all-bad people.” So they have this kind of all-or-nothing perspective.

A third is often, but not always, unmanaged emotions. And you may see that; people that just start yelling or just start crying or just storm out of a room—that kind of behavior we’re seeing, but it’s emotions that they’re not managing.

And the fourth is extremes of behavior.

And one thing I talk about in the book ‘Five Types of People’ is this 90 percent rule, that 90 percent of people don’t do some of the things that high-conflict people do. So if you see some shocking behavior and then the person makes an excuse for it, that’s often the tip of the iceberg.

So it’s preoccupation with blaming others, all-or-nothing thinking, unmanaged emotions, and extreme behaviors. That seems to be the pattern for high-conflict personalities. People that have those we call high-conflict people. But, by the way, don’t tell them that you think that—that’ll blow up in your face.

So target of blame seems to be why these folks can become so difficult. If you’re the target of blame your life may be ruined by one of these folks, and that’s what people need to become aware of. So the target of blame—each of these five high-conflict personalities tends to zero in generally on one person. It could change over time but they see that person as the cause of all their problems. And so they want to control that person or eliminate that person or destroy or humiliate that person. It’s a fixation on one person, and all of their life problems they emotionally focus on that person. So you don’t want to be one of those folks.

How to avoid being a target of blame? First of all, if you see warning signs of this behavior don’t get too close to such a person. You may be a friend, but don’t be the closest friend. You may be a co-worker, but don’t be the closest co-worker. Because what seems to happen is the people they get really close to are the ones that are most at-risk of becoming their targets of blame.

But it could be anybody. They tend to target intimate others and people in authority. So this could be boyfriends, girlfriends, husbands, wives, parents, children, co-workers, neighbors they get close to. It also could be police, it could be a government agency or government official, it could be their boss, it could be the company owner. So they tend to focus on intimate others and/or people in authority.

Now the way to avoid becoming a target of blame is not getting too close to them but also not engaging in conflict with them. They often invite conflict, like they’ll say outrageous things and you may feel like you’ve got to persuade them that they’re wrong, and that’s what I call a “forget about it”. Just forget about it. You’re not going to change their mind. If they’re a difficult person, a high-conflict person, this is who they are, and you may not really even exist for them. So if you argue with them they’re not going to change. So save yourself the trouble.

But when people challenge them is often when they turn against you, and they see you in their all-or-nothing eyes as “all bad”. And so you don’t want to have that kind of relationship.

So if you’re in a personal relationship, family relationship, neighbor, co-worker, et cetera, you can manage relationships with these folks, but usually at an arm’s length, and don’t make it too confrontational. Don’t say they have a high-conflict personality. Don’t argue with them or try to convince them. Don’t try to give them insight into themselves. You can just say, “Oh well, that’s interesting. Hey, I’ve got to go now.” Something like that.

Movie Review: ‘The Rider’

by   April 19, 2018 (thehoya.com)

HIGHWAY MAN FILMS

The opening scene of “The Rider” sets the tone for the entire movie: Viewers see horse trainer and rodeo star Brady Blackburn’s stapled skull under harsh lighting, matching the scene’s gruesome mood. Blackburn is played by Brady Jandreau, who serves as the inspiration for the film’s true story. Directed by Chloé Zhao, the film explores themes of identity and recovery from trauma, starring an untrained lead with a personal investment in the story.

Despite doctors’ warnings to quit riding after he falls off a horse and suffers a traumatic brain injury, Blackburn struggles to let go of his passion for rodeo. Viewers learn a central symptom of Blackburn’s injury is regular complex seizures, which cause his hand to “lock”; the symptom serves as a tactful metaphor for Blackburn’s reluctance to let go of his grip on his horseback riding dreams.

Blackburn’s story is one of perseverance and bravery: He is determined to make a name for himself. Blackburn clearly possesses not only the skills — he is the only one capable of training a number of unruly horses — but also the passion needed to succeed at this high level. Tragically, however, Blackburn is forced to follow a new path, getting an entry-level job at a grocery store — the only job he could qualify for without a high school degree.

Zhao juxtaposes the former rodeo star’s old life with his new one when a young rodeo fan approaches a shelf-stocking Blackburn for a photo. The stark comparison between past and present is clearest in that moment. Despite his difficult circumstances, Blackburn’s spirit is never fully put out. While others would retreat and mope, he does not give up, remaining confident and determined.

“The Rider” focuses on the larger theme of identity: Blackburn tells his sister God created each person with a specific purpose. His purpose was to ride. When horseback riding is no longer an option for him, the hero feels stuck in a whirlwind, unsure of what to do. The psychological effects of this uncertainty are profound, as Blackburn comparing himself to an injured horse that gets put down.

Perhaps most impressive about the film is its cast. Jandreau, star of the film, had no previous acting experience. Yet, his raw emotion and authenticity shine through in his character. Jandreau undoubtedly draws on his own struggles in his performance, as the actor suffered a similar real-life accident

The dynamics between the actors are also unparalleled: Tim Jandreau, Brady Jandreau’s father, plays Blackburn’s father in the film, and sister Lilly Jandreau plays his autistic sister.

Lane Scott, another untrained actor, plays Brady Blackburn’s best friend and fellow rodeo star who suffered an even more serious injury than the main character. The relationship between the two is touching, with each encouraging the other despite an unspoken knowledge that, due to their injuries, their lives would not be the same.

The obviously close real-life relationships translate onto the screen perfectly in a way that could not have been replicated had Zhao chosen unrelated, trained actors. The composition of the film adds to its authenticity; as a result, the film never feels manipulative or exploitative. The incredible sense of realness draws viewers in and keeps them captivated for the full 105 minute running time. “The Rider” resonates with its audience not through dramatic scripted conflicts, but through raw emotion. Blackburn is a man of few words, but the words he does say are never wasted.

Anyone who has been knocked off their path or forced to adapt after an unexpected change can relate to Blackburn, giving the film a wide-reaching appeal. “The Rider” is not simply a story of a horseback rider: It is a story of hope and resilience in the face of struggle.

Queer professor looks at intersectionality

by Brian Bromberger (ebar.com)

One scholar who seeks to define intersectionality is Marla Brettschneider, Ph.D. She is a professor of political philosophy with a joint appointment in political science and women’s studies at the University of New Hampshire.

Queer and Jewish, Brettschneider is an expert on diversity politics. Her books include “Jewish Feminism and Intersectionality,” which was also the title of her March 27 lecture at the Center for LGBTQ and Gender Studies in Religion’s Jewish Queeries series in Berkeley. Brettschneider, 54, also spoke with the Bay Area Reporter.

In her lecture, Brettschneider defined intersectionality, a term first coined by legal scholar Kimberle Crenshaw, as looking critically at multiple aspects of identity, oppression, and justice politics together. For example, one views racism, patriarchy, classism, and anti-Semitism, simultaneously, rather than as either/or or single entities.

Crenshaw developed her theory discussing black feminism, realizing that being black and a woman were not independent social stratifications but interactive ones, as they reinforce each other. So it’s not just race, or just class, or just gender, or just sexuality but all of them at the same time. Their combined weight is far greater than the sum of their individual parts and they have their most deleterious impact on marginalized people in society.

Brettschneider noted how this paradigm has long been in use under different terms such as multiculturalism, and identity politics by feminists and others on the left, but more systematized under Crenshaw’s depiction. Jews have been very active in using these models, both in the academy and in activism, yet Brettschneider observed how there is almost no scholarship that takes Jewish experience and matters of concern seriously in intersectionality work.

“Since my book went to press, lack of attention to Jews in intersectionality work has become increasingly joined with anti-Israel/anti-Zionist ideas and actions, as well as a persistent anti-Semitism,” she said. “This exclusion has worked against intersectionality because Jews’ experience as a minority, marginalized, and usually diasporic peoples has much to offer. This experience, wisdoms, and organizing strategies (for good and for ill) can be of much use for many other groups in their own specificities and also in solidarity.

“However, much more insightful and careful analysis is needed that questions privilege and Christian hegemony, to understand a variety of ways that politics and power dynamics operated. It is also potentially deadly, not only for Jews, but for all of us, to leave Jews out of analyses of white Christian supremacy,” Brettschneider added. “Yes, because of Trumpian policies, more people are talking about white supremacy, but they are not often understanding that white supremacy has always actually operated as white Christian supremacy.”

Brettschneider was adamant that “when you work on issues of identity, oppression, and justice politics and leave out any matters of gender and sexuality, anything about LGBTQ people, perspectives, and issues, you will not only get a partial picture but what you do get will be skewed, given any exclusions of this sort. And you will likely be engaged in reproducing modes of cisgender heteronormativity even if that is not your intention.”

Each identity one is exploring can situate differently power-wise, she noted. For example, a gay black man operates at different political positions, so gay and black might be disadvantages, but man is not. Still, each identity makes the other possible as they co-create each other.

She applies the same criteria to the #MeToo movement, as “we need to work on multiple levels with multiple axis of identities, impressions, in a multi-community and multi-issue justice movement.

“We have a lot of experience back from the 1980s in the feminist movement working between seeing the truth and individual testimony with complex ways in which we understand and challenge truth such that it’s not as simple as experience equals truth, which is a presumption sometimes of critics who then seek to challenge the validity of individual testimony,” she said.

Jews have long recognized that social justice is one of the main concerns that make them Jewish, so they can provide acute analyses of power and oppression, having been repeatedly dismantled throughout their long history, she noted.

One audience member brought up the issue of the Parkland, Florida school shooting and revitalization of the gun control debate, especially the recent March for Our Lives.

Brettschneider reminded the audience that the slogans used at the march, such as “Never Again” or “We Will Remember,” were first used as awareness for Holocaust victims and survivors. Also, seven of the 17 shooting victims were Jewish, and she said that there is evidence that shooter Nicholas Cruz may have been hunting for Jews, a fact not well-known, but a significant one in any intersectional analysis of this tragedy. So, she explained, with its wealth of historical examples, its organizational experience, and political public response, Jews have much to offer in how to deal with this catastrophe.

Another audience member remarked how the needs of a black child are often set against those of a white child, seen as a competition, that meeting the black child’s needs somehow takes away from those of a white child, with such hierarchies of oppression being used to delegitimize marginalized people by giving into an irrational fear that there is not enough room or resources for all of us.

But Brettschneider argued that people can be expansive for everyone if they are willing to see the world through multiple lenses through various communities, “supporting and challenging one another with humility and in solidarity,” she said. “Joining our collective wisdom and experiences will be crucial in building an effective resistance movement against Trump and his policies.”

Groupthink vs. Group Dynamics

This is what Wikipedia says about Groupthink:

Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints by actively suppressing dissenting viewpoints, and by isolating themselves from outside influences.

Groupthink requires individuals to avoid raising controversial issues or alternative solutions, and there is loss of individual creativity, uniqueness and independent thinking. The dysfunctional group dynamics of the “ingroup” produces an “illusion of invulnerability” (an inflated certainty that the right decision has been made). Thus the “ingroup” significantly overrates its own abilities in decision-making and significantly underrates the abilities of its opponents (the “outgroup“). Furthermore, groupthink can produce dehumanizing actions against the “outgroup”.

More at:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink

The following are excerpts from “GROUP DYNAMICS AND THE ART OF LEADERSHIP”:

1. Leadership is a function of the group, not of any individual. The group is conceived as an independent, self-directing organism. A number of functions must be performed in its service if it is to operate efficiently, of which the leadership functions are one type. It is more accurate to refer to “leadership functions” than to refer to “a leader”. For the leadership functions may at times be performed by several or all of the group members, as well as by a designated “leader”.

2. Leadership is responsible for establishing the climate of the group. The climate of the group is determined largely by the person who helps organize it. His actions can produce an atmosphere of competition and hostility, formality and reserve criticism and threat, or permissiveness and freedom. If he regards himself as an authority or as possessing some kind of superiority, his actions are likely to be of a directing type, and the group climate will be authoritarian. The group members will certainly feel somewhat restricted in what they can or cannot do, at least until they get the approval of the leader.

3. Leadership helps the group to define its purposes and objectives. One method found useful in determining group objectives is to conduct a problem-census in which the members of the group state the problems they are concerned about that might be considered by the group. These can be listed, priorities can be assigned to them, and general objectives can be drawn from them. The leader is free to express his own needs as the needs of a member of the group, not as the desires of a superior.

4. Leadership helps the group to organize itself. When the group defines its objectives, it really is taking the first step in organizing itself, since a group’s objectives greatly influence its form of organization. For example, a group that exists primarily for the purpose of receiving instruction is likely to put more emphasis on the role of resource leadership than would a group that exists for the purpose of social fellowship.

More at:  http://bathtubbulletin.com/group-dynamics-art-leadership-courtesy-prosperos/

Consciousness, spirituality, biography, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more