Tag Archives: MRNa

He joined a cancer vaccine trial at UCSF. The results could mark a turning point

By Erin Allday, Staff Writer Aug 23, 2026

Gift Article (SFChronicle.com)

Mark Orwig is examined by Dr. Maria Wei during a follow-up visit at UCSF in San Francisco. Orwig participated in a potentially groundbreaking trial for a novel mRNA cancer vaccine that is reporting exciting outcomes for preventing skin cancer recurrences.Heather Diehl/For the S.F. Chronicle

Mark Orwig, 73, grew up in an era before parents slathered their children with sunscreen and enjoyed a career playing and coaching tennis, spending hours in the sun every day of his adult life.

It wasn’t a surprise, then, when the Moraga resident was diagnosed with a melanoma on his face in 2023. On the surface it was small, about half the size of an eraser head, but potentially deadly. To remove it and make sure they got all of the affected area, surgeons had to carve out a 4-inch chunk of his cheek. And melanomas are notoriously tricky — he still had to contend with the risk that the cancer would recur.

But UCSF, where he was being cared for, had several clinical trials running for melanoma, including one for a cutting-edge treatment involving an mRNA vaccine that Orwig joined. His oncologist, Dr. Adil Daud, was the lead investigator for that trial at UCSF, which was the first site in the United States to test the cancer vaccine technology, developed by pharmaceutical giants Merck and Moderna. 

For the first time, a vaccine that harnesses a patient’s own immune system to fight cancer appears to be working. Doctors say the therapy should be applicable to other types of cancer, with clinical trials already underway.

“This could be an entirely new strategy, both for melanoma but really other cancers as well,” said Dr. Allison Betof, director of the melanoma program at Stanford, who was not involved in the vaccine trial. “There’s a lot of excitement around having a new platform, a totally new approach to treating cancer.”

Daud cautioned that he can’t say for sure whether Orwig benefited from the vaccine. Orwig may have received a placebo, and even if he got the vaccine, it may not have helped him; Daud said the data he’s seen so far is too vague to determine who benefited and how much. And other melanoma treatments that Orwig received have improved dramatically in the time Daud has been an oncologist, even before the mRNA vaccine.

Twenty years ago, he said, life expectancy for someone with Orwig’s diagnosis would have been nine months. Today it’s six years, owing mostly to the development of immunotherapy drugs. Orwig is now three years past his diagnosis, and his most recent scans were all clear.

Skin cancers are the most common type of cancer in the United States. Melanomas make up only about 1% of all skin cancers, but they’re the deadliest. About 100,000 cases are diagnosed in the United States and about 8,500 deaths occur each year, according to the American Cancer Society.

The new therapy uses the same technology that allowed for the rapid production of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which were invented to be used against cancer in the first place. Messenger RNA carries genetic instructions that can train the immune system to recognize and attack a specific target. Scientists have been attempting for decades to make a vaccine that would stop cancer, but have been met with repeated failures to the point that doctors such as Daud were beginning to think it wasn’t possible.

Now, he and others believe that the missing link was the personalization that mRNA vaccines allow. Because the vaccines can be made quickly — within roughly six weeks — they can be developed for patients to better fight their specific cancer. “Technologically it wasn’t possible to do this” until recently, Daud said.

“We’ve been working with cancer vaccines for years and years, and even when there was promising data it fell apart,” Daud said. “This trial required a leap of faith, because a lot of people, including me, thought vaccines would never work. But it was also a leap of technology.”

The latest trial involved about 1,000 patients, all of whom had undergone surgery to remove a melanoma. All participants received the immunotherapy drug Keytruda, and some also received the vaccine, called intismeran. The double-blinded trial compared the Keytruda-only group against those who also got the vaccine.

For patients receiving the vaccine, tumor sequencing data was run through a computer program that identified key attack points. A vaccine was then developed for that patient to teach his or her immune system to fight those targets. Patients received up to nine doses of vaccine over several months.

Merck and Moderna last week announced only broad results from their trial and expect to release more details at a meeting in October. But the top-line results are exciting, oncologists said: Patients who received the vaccine had lower risk of recurrence and spread of their cancer than patients who received Keytruda alone.

“The big caveat is none of us have seen the data yet,” Betof said. But scientists saw promising results from earlier, smaller studies, and “hopefully this is a confirmation” of those results, she said.

Side effects from the vaccine could be intense but did not appear to be any more dangerous than immunotherapy alone, according to Daud and the companies.

The therapy was tough at times, Orwig said. After each dose he suffered terrible headaches, dizziness, chills and “pretty severe lethargy.” At one point in the winter, he was so fed up being tired and inside that he would set himself up on a lounge chair, no matter how cold, and wrap himself in blankets just for the fresh air.

Daud took that as a positive sign, though, Orwig said. “A placebo is not going to have that kind of reaction, so there’s a good chance you’re not getting the placebo” vaccine, Daud told him.

Orwig said he tries not to dwell on the possibility of a recurrence, and knowing that he did everything in his power to fight the cancer —perhaps most importantly, joining a clinical trial — helps keep the anxiety away.

“I don’t worry about things. I prioritize things. And so with the melanoma it was my priority and I did everything I possibly could, and now it’s out of my hands,” he said. “And I think I gave myself the best chance.”

Aug 23, 2026

Erin Allday

Staff Writer

Erin Allday covers gender and sexuality for the Chronicle. Previously, she was a longtime health writer with a focus on covering infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS and the COVID pandemic. A Southern California native, Erin has lived in the Bay Area since graduating UC Berkeley. She joined the Chronicle in 2006.

Huge Survey Finds the Truth About What mRNA Vaccines Do to the Human Body

“After billions of doses, we now have an extraordinary amount of scientific evidence.”

By Maggie Harrison Dupré

Published Jul 5, 2026 (Futurism.com)

A person wearing an orange short-sleeve shirt is receiving an injection in the upper arm. A healthcare professional wearing white gloves is holding a syringe with one hand and a cotton ball on the injection site with the other hand. The background is blurred with a green circular grid pattern behind the arm.

A comprehensive review found that mRNA vaccines — a popular target of viral vaccine conspiracy theories and medical misinformation in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic — are a resoundingly safe and effective feat of modern medicine.

Published this week in the journal The Lancet, the review confirmed that mRNA vaccines are robustly effective at preventing the spread of infectious diseases like COVID, and show incredible promise for treating diseases like cancer as well. It was conducted by an international team of researchers based in Canada, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and took the drug’s manufacturing, clinical trials, and data from billions of real-world vaccinations into account.

“mRNA vaccines represent a transformative advance in vaccinology,” reads the study, “combining rapid development timelines, scalable manufacturing, and strong immunogenicity with a favorable safety profile.”

The study’s results also dispel the erroneous notion that mRNA vaccines alter human DNA. Instead, as intended, mRNA vaccines provide human cells with what’s basically a limited set of instructions that allow them to momentarily — and safely — replicate a given virus or disease, allowing the body to develop an immune response.

The review also showed that the mRNA shots are safe for sensitive groups like children and pregnant women, and that booster shots are helpful for extending a shot’s efficacy.

“After billions of doses, we now have an extraordinary amount of scientific evidence,” said Dr. Anna Blakney, lead author on the study and an assistant professor of biomedical engineering at the University of British Columbia, in a statement. “This review affirms that mRNA vaccines are a safe and highly effective platform, supported by rigorous testing and real-world monitoring.”

Crucially, the review doesn’t shy away from possible side effects, which do occur. Some people do appear to have had allergic responses, with some takers, most notably young men, experiencing myocarditis after getting an mRNA shot.

“With any new vaccine or medicine, it is important that we clearly and transparently communicate the safety data and rigorous testing that supports their use,” Dr. Manish Sadarangani, a pediatrician and director of the Vaccine Evaluation Center at British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, said in a statement. “This is essential to building public trust, countering misinformation and supporting informed decisions about vaccination.”

But side effects are also a reality of pretty much every drug on the planet, and as the study authors urge, their findings show that negative side effects of mRNA jabs are rare and certainly don’t outweigh the benefits: limiting the spread of infectious disease, reducing instances of severe illness and death, and offering additional protection to those who can’t receive vaccines themselves due to medical reasons.

If you’re hesitant about getting an mRNA vaccination, please don’t listen to podcasters or get your medical advice from social media posts. Listen to scientists — or better yet, consult your doctor.

More on vaccines: Doctors Inject Human Subjects With First Vaccine Designed by AI

Maggie Harrison Dupré

Senior Staff Writer

I’m a senior staff writer at Futurism, investigating how the rise of artificial intelligence is impacting the media, internet, and information ecosystems.