Etymology: Auctoritas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Representation of a sitting of the Roman Senate: Cicero attacks Catilina, from a 19th-century fresco

Roman SPQR banner.svg
This article is part of a series on the
politics and government of
ancient Rome
Periods
Roman Constitution
Precedent and law
Assemblies
Ordinary magistrates
Extraordinary magistrates
Titles and honours

Auctoritas is a Latin word which is the origin of English “authority“. While historically its use in English was restricted to discussions of the political history of Rome, the beginning of phenomenological philosophy in the 20th century expanded the use of the word.[citation needed]

In ancient RomeAuctoritas referred to the general level of prestige a person had in Roman society, and, as a consequence, his clout, influence, and ability to rally support around his will. Auctoritas was not merely political, however; it had a numinous content and symbolized the mysterious “power of command” of heroic Roman figures.

Noble women could also achieve a degree of Auctoritas. For example, the wives, sisters, and mothers of the Julio-Claudians had immense influence on society, the masses, and the political apparatus. Their Auctoritas was exercised less overtly than their male counterparts due to Roman societal norms, but they were powerful nonetheless.

Etymology and origin

According to French linguist Emile Benvenisteauctor (which also gives us English “author“) is derived from Latin augeō(“to augment”, “to enlarge”, “to enrich”). The auctor is “is qui auget“, the one who augments the act or the juridicalsituation of another.[1]

Auctor in the sense of “author”, comes from auctor as founder or, one might say, “planter-cultivator”. Similarly, auctoritasrefers to rightful ownership, based on one’s having “produced” or homesteaded the article of property in question – more in the sense of “sponsored” or “acquired” than “manufactured”. This auctoritas would, for example, persist through an usucapio of ill-gotten or abandoned property.

Political meaning in Ancient Rome

Politically, auctoritas was connected to the Roman Senate’s authority (auctoritas patrum), not to be confused with potestas or imperium, which were held by the magistrates or the people. In this context, Auctoritas could be defined as the juridical power to authorize some other act.

The 19th-century classicist Theodor Mommsen describes the “force” of auctoritas as “more than advice and less than command, an advice which one may not safely ignore.” Cicero says of power and authority, “Cum potestas in populo auctoritas in senatu sit.” (“While power resides in the people, authority rests with the Senate.”)[2] That is to say, there is a non-committal to a separation of powers, some civil rights, constitutionalism, codified constitutional state and legalist concept of law.

In the private domain, those under tutelage (guardianship), such as women and minors, were similarly obliged to seek the sanction of their tutors (“protectors”) for certain actions. Thus, auctoritas characterizes the auctor: The pater familiasauthorizes – that is, validates and legitimates – his son’s wedding in prostate. In this way, auctoritas might function as a kind of “passive counsel”, much as, for example, a scholarly authority.

More at:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auctoritas

SUNDAY NIGHT TRANSLATION GROUP – 6/9/19

Translators:  Richard Branam, Mike Zonta, Hanz Bolen, Melissa Goodnight

SENSE TESTIMONY:  Hunger for authority can lead to investing it into false representations.

5th Step Conclusions:

1)  Truth is satiation. Truth is enough. Truth is full. Truth invests in Itself, culminates in Itself, represents Itself eternally, with open eyes and open heart.

2)  The Truth of One/Infinite Consciousness/Beingness is exceeding surfeit of informing/empowering Intelligence — always endowing perfectly, every pure and pristine visibility, of its own Immaculate Nature.

3)  Universal Integrity I AM is the Sound Agreeable Instantaneous Presence I AM Powerfully, Knowingly Fulfilling All I Am, All I, We, Thou are.

4)  Truth Being the Unguent Cause of All Investments’, this Fully Satisfying Right to Competency is the Autismiscal Security, Assurance of Supreme Evaluation, Tempering the Indispensable Equipoise, Honestly the Only Androgynous, Individuated Identity that works’ for the Commonwealth of All Concerned.

Why We Underestimate How Fast and Far Democracies Can Fall

The War Against Democracy, and Why We’re Losing It

I woke up the other morning to alarming, disturbing, and absurd news. A member of British parliament, one of the most powerful men in the country — is floating a plan to…suspend Parliament. On the sly. Using a centuries old procedure usually reserved for wars, plagues, and other such happy events.

Why? To ram through a Brexit that appears to be undeliverable, which keeps getting postponed, because, understandably, once you’re finally teetering on the edge of the precipice of the abyss, jumping off suddenly becomes a whole lot scarier than bellowing about it bravely from afar. So. Suspending parliament? What the? Is there a world war on nobody’s heard about? Is a zombie epidemic ripping through the land? So why literally tear a hole through the fabric of democracy? Because you can.

But he is far from alone. Across the pond, the headlines go something like this: “Trump directs staffers not to comply with Congressional subpoenas.” Or, more accurately, “President instructs regime not to obey law.” The similarities should be obvious.

There is a kind of war on. On both sides of the Atlantic, democracy is under severe, sustained, strategic, deliberate attack. From…within democracy. From the very top of democracy. From the people whose job and task it is, for heaven’s sake, to enact, defend, and safeguard it. From politicians, “leaders”, political parties, lobbyists, even professors. There is a whole extremist infrastructure — from organizations to “thinking” to money waging war on the idea of democracy itself.

But when democracy goes with it…it tends to take civilization, too. A kind of vicious cycle of ruin begins, from which it can take not just decades but much, much longer to escape, sometimes centuries. Whole dark ages, in fact. Yet we often don’t understand just how much we’re giving up when we give up on the hard work of democracy — nor do even the staunchest defenders of democracy often enough understand how fast and hard a democracy can fall.

This newfound axis originates in America. There, a bizarre coterie of “thinktanks”, pundits, politicians, lobbyists, cable news channels, and interest groups have made the idea that democracy — the real thing, as in equality, freedom, and justice for all — is bad, undesirable, dangerous, and burdensome so widespread, so routine, that they managed to power a comedy authoritarian all the way to…the White House. This war is spreading around the globe — and you can see which side is winning pretty easily just by glancing at both sides of the Atlantic.

Now, this may or may not come as no great news to you. But I want you to understand how dire this situation really is.

It’s one thing for a country to have a few extremist representatives — Congresspeople, members of parliament, and so forth. That’s quite alright — as long as they don’t have the lion’s share of power, or even a great deal, really. It happens even in the most sophisticated and mature and robust democracies. And in a way, it tells us something, it has, as American theory would say, “informational value.” It says that there are probably parts of society growing frustrated, their needs unment, who are being ignored. As long as the rest of the democratic process is working, everything is well: that signal can be heard, and those needs can be met.

It’s alright, too, for politicians to have to dally with extremists. Perhaps not full on fascists — there are some ideas beyond the pale of civilized progress. But part of a politicians’ job is to find consensus, and another part is to lead. To do both those things, they will have to truck with all kinds of groups the “other side” probably disagree vehemently with. Socialist, libertarians, conservatives, and so forth. That’s quite alright too. If a politicians won’t meet with such groups — who can she lead? What consensus can she create? So this — a spectrum of “sides”, which is to say preferences, that politicians both lead and manage — is an essential process of democracy, too.

But what’s happening on both sides of the Atlantic couldn’t be more different than the above. The extremists aren’t powerless representatives who merely signal that there are problems in groups or parts or segments of society. They have taken control of the democratic structure and process wholesale. And they aren’t meeting with with groups of different preferences to lead them, or to create consensus between them — they are pandering to the most extreme, backwards, and violent parts of society. What’s happening on both sides of the Atlantic is democracy being suffocated, choked, and violated, before our very eyes.

What does it say when a British cabinet member proposes…suspending parliament? When a President instructs his administration to ignore the law? There are words for these things, which aren’t words, really but, concepts, ideas, warning signals, fire alarms. Such words are authoritarianism, fascism, and extremism. They are democratic breakdown, collapse, and implosion.

When a President instructs his administration to ignore the law, a democracy could hardly be in more dire peril. When a cabinet member proposes suspending parliament, a democracy could hardly be in more dire peril. There are only really a few steps beyond this — and those are the last few, the stuff of dystopian fantasy. Martial law, troops in the streets, papers being checked, and so forth.

And yet are any of those things really fantasies? I know that you dismiss them. Sensible people are told they must. But if I told you just five years ago that America would be operating a network of concentration camps, led by an aspiring demagogue, who professes great admiration for figures like Kim Jong-Un, not to mention Vlad Putin…would you have believed me? Or would you have laughed it off as fantasy? If I’d told you just five years ago that Britain would have had something like a collective mental breakdown, a fit of hysteria, a delusional tantrum of self-destruction…and vengefully turned on its biggest trading partner, oldest friends, and strongest allies…would you have believed me? You probably would have dismissed that as fantasy, too.

At every stage of democratic collapse, Americans and Brits have badly underestimated just how far, fast, and ruinously they would fall. That’s no great surprise: people often do. Many revolutions are born with noble ideals…only to peter out into apocalyptic flames. America itself hoped to be a noble nation of the free..but when it came time to write the Constitution, it ended up a slave state, worse still than the Europe it had fled for freedom’s sake. The ironies of history.

And yet the ironies of history are born precisely because all too often, societies don’t understand the reckonings history places before them. Societies are made of people, who are fallible, capricious, shallow things — so perhaps that’s no great surprise.

Yet history tests us in just the same way, over and over again. Will we choose selfishness and greed, or expansiveness and compassion? Will we use violence to attain our ends — or grasp towards them gently? Can we hold each other close, even in lean times — or shall we turn on each other the moment that the night falls, and the winter comes?

The same tests, over and over again. From Egypt to Athens to Rome to…now. To Britain and America now. Do you know when Athenian democracy finally fell? When the Athenians felt threatened and insecure enough to turn to a group of authoritarian strongmen. Even Athenian culture, as vibrant and proud as it was, wasn’t wise enough not to make Socrates drink hemlock. And with the fall of Athenian democracy went all that was true and noble about it: philosophy, art, literature, drama. What we think of as civilization went, too, when democracy went — not to recur for centuries, really.

We underestimate, therefore, the speed and pace and fury with which a democracy can fall. Habitually so. From the very beginnings of time. And we underestimate the stakes, too. “The fall of democracy? So what?”, we seem to say — especially in degenerate times, like these. The Romans had their coliseums and border provinces to conquer and their Neros. We have our Kardashians and Irans and reality TV and Trumps. Degenerate times. “Democracy falling? So what?”

But the truth of the matter is that the fall of democracy takes with it all that we regard as civilized. Civilized: beautiful, true, noble. Noble. Decent. Humane. Cultured. That is because as a democracy falls, so too do all the following things: justice, freedom, dignity, equality, the common good, the future, and the past. What is left? Nothing but this, right now, the moment. And the vicious quest to dominate it. To control everything in it. To own it, full, all the people, all the lives, all the land. To possess — and to take.

Civilization is the opposite impulse, though, and it always has been: to give, to nurture, to nourish, to share. From Athenians sharing great tragedies we still revere in the very first amphitheatres — not Romans revelling in the taking of a life, but Athenians mourning the mythologized end of one — to the first European town squares. Civilization is just this act of standing besides another life, not above it, or below it.

Barbarism, which is the opposite of civilization, is plain to see in America today. The Taliban would be proud of a new spate of laws that punish women with jail time for…miscarriages. Of politicians who aim to ban birth control — and applaud when a new concentration camp is built. You can see American barbarism everywhere — in the regular school shootings, in the way black people are treated, in the casual bigotry and patriarchy of the Ivy League, in the frat-bro rape-culture which informs and shapes the American mind from the day it becomes an adult, in the endless wars and the constant message to be greedy, selfish, and superficial. In Kardashians and Trumps and Bezoses, new ruling dynasties. Folly upon folly. Barbarism on barbarism.

If civilization is the impulse to nourish, to tend, to stand beside, as an equal, then barbarism is it’s negation. It is the impulse, the desire, to enslave, to force, to hurt, to abuse, to harm. It is the burning need for superiority and supremacy, by means of violence, both soft and hard, institutionally, culturally, socially sanctioned violence. Do you see those impulses surging through America today? Through Britain? I do.

And that brings me back to what’s happening on both sides of the Atlantic. What is a President who instructs his administration to ignore the law, and a cabinet member who proposes suspending parliament, really doing? They are taking. They are taking everything for themselves. The word we so casually call “democracy”. But democracy also means civilization — and civilization means all that we, civilized people, have come to treasure and cherish: freedom, justice, equality, truth, knowledge, meaning, happiness, dignity. They are taking all those things away, and replacing them with what history has always tempted fools with: violence, power, dominance, control, supremacy, superiority.

There are no greater seductive temptations than those, my friends — to be a master of the world, a little king of your very own — and we badly underestimate their allure to the weary, the defeated, the abandoned, while overestimating our society’s resistance to them. How many Americans seem to really care that concentration camps and gestapos now operate in their midst? Why do the Democrats not impeach? Why did women vote for a sexist predator to be President? That is why democracies fall faster and harder than we think, over and over again in human history. From Athens to Rome to now. We severely underestimate the glittering temptations of barbarism — and we badly overestimate just how strong and robust the ideals, norms, values, and institutions of civilization really are: we think they will last forever, all by themselves. But so did the Romans and the Athenians.

“Everything will be fine!” cried the Americans. The Athenians. The Romans. Was it? We human beings have never really understood a difficult truth. Democracy is like an eternal child. As fragile as a summer day.

That brings me, I suppose, to me and you. Are America and Britain still civilized countries? Were they ever? Is there more work to do? Will they become even more uncivilized, and regress backwards into what the rest of the world, laughing, jaw dropped, regards as barbarism? We will see, my friends, we will see.

Umair
June 2019

Releasing the Hidden Blog Posts from The Prosperos Audio Center

COMMENTS ABOUT THE ARCHIVE
AND ABOUT THE TEACHINGS OF
THANE OF HAWAII

Inertia

“There is only this pastless, nameless thing I am become, striving with its entire being against the inertia of its days. . . .”

-Roger Zelazny

Zelazny’s writing is gripping, intense, and full of struggle, like the music of Beethoven. I love it. In this phrase he gives us two sides of a koan : an identity boundless and unconditioned and an inertia of experience that must be struggled with.

More at:  www.theprosperos.com/thewireless

The place for action

“. . . For what is inside of you is what is outside of you,
and the one who fashioned you on the outside
is the one who shaped the inside of you.
And what you see outside of you, you see inside of you;
it is visible and it is your garment.”

– The Thunder, Perfect Mind
Nag Hammadi Library, p.302
from A Gnostic Book of Hours, by June Singer

If we understand this message, which we hear from many sources, it should be clear that any sane response to external events must begin with setting in order what we see inside of ourselves. Outrageous events that we witness in the world – and we witness them every day on the radio or television news, or on our phones – often cry out for action, and often leave us with a sense of despair because we feel we can do nothing.

More at:  www.theprosperos.com/thewireless

Leavening the lump

Eugene Peterson, a very influential voice in defining the role of the pastor in modern America, writes in his memoir about his experience of seminary:

“Daily life at the seminary comprised common prayer in the chapel, common meals in the refectory, common play in the requisite volleyball game on the roof after lunch each day. . . . All of this took place on a quiet side street bordering the maelstrom of noisy, jostling, harried, secular, cutthroat, competitive New York City.

More at:  www.theprosperos.com/thewireless

P M A

An old chestnut from the sales lexicon: Positive Mental Attitude. It is a pretty important asset for a sales person, but there’s a lot more to attitude than being positive or negative. Attitude determines what we see and what we don’t see. It’s very true that a person who cannot see themselves succeeding at something will have a much more difficult time than the person who can. So a lot of motivational exercises address themselves to this problem with tools like visualization and affirmations: one develops PMA.

More at:  www.theprosperos.com/thewireless

The beauty of excellence

One of my favorite things about the apartment which Alana and I have shared for the past 17 years, here in Silver Spring Maryland, is that it has a south facing lanai, and we enjoy being out there in the warmer months.

More at:  www.theprosperos.com/thewireless

“Thus Pallas Athena . . .

. . . She led the way,

And the man followed in the deity’s footsteps.” -Odyssey, Book 5

This statement recurs throughout the Odyssey. Intuition can feel like a glimmering of the divine, and it can lay out a path for us to follow, leading us out of a familiar, comfortable, possibly unpleasant situation, into challenging circumstances, and finally to resolution in the making right (ho’oponopono) of all issues.

Waking up

I have become much too dutiful. A spate of obligations has brought me to a place where, upon waking, my mind is filled with all of the tasks I have for the day. I will return to my practice of reading something uplifting first thing in the morning, before anything else.

MTR O’ahu

A group of new and long-time students got together in mid-March – right before the Spring Equinox – to explore Thane’s method of Metonymy Translation during a two-day class.

This is the first version of this class as a full two-day event. It was given once before as a one-day event, in Los Angeles in 2007. Various lessons associated with MTR have been presented at Prosperos Assemblies as they’ve been developed. Over the years I have assembled a variety of related information, and when Al Haferkamp asked me to present a full version of the class I felt the time was right, and that I was ready.

Public Speaking Tips

If the only advice you’ve heard on public speaking is to imagine the audience in their underwear, this article’s for you.

  • Whether it’s at school, a funeral, a wedding, or work, most of us have to make a speech at some point in our lives.
  • However, public speaking can be anxiety inducing, and giving a bad speech can make it difficult for your audience to understand your message.
  • By using these 7 speechcraft tactics, you can improve your public speaking skills, feel more confident, and become a more competent orator.

There’s acrophobia, or a fear of heights — this one makes sense since falling from a great height can genuinely hurt you. Thalassophobia, or fear of the sea, also makes sense. Swimming is difficult, and drowning is a real risk. But glossophobia? What possible advantage could there be to a fear of public speaking? Why does delivering a presentation to a large crowd produce the same effect as being charged by a bear?

Fortunately, speechcraft is a skill that can be improved with practical, concrete advice, and confidence in your abilities will hopefully cure your glossophobia. Here’s 7 tips to become a master in speechcraft.

1. Turn your anxiety into excitement

If you’ve ever had the jitters prior to giving a speech, you may also be familiar with how frustrating it is to hear a well-intentioned friend tell you to “just calm down.” As it turns out, calming down might be the exact opposite of what you should do prior to a speech.

Instead, you should try what researchers refer to as “anxiety reappraisal.” Anxiety is a holdover from our past when we needed to get amped up and ready to fight or flee from the jaguar stalking you through the jungle. Anxiety is just an unpleasant form of arousal, so it’s far easier and more effective to channel that energy into a more positive form of arousal: excitement.

Numerous studies have confirmed this effect. When study participants said “I am excited” rather than “I am nervous,” for instance, they performed karaoke better and felt better about their performance; they were seen as more persuasive, confident, and persistent when giving a speech; and they performed better on a math test.

2. Be concise

There’s a reason why the Oscars play music when an actor’s speech drags on a little too long. Some people don’t seem to suffer from a fear of speaking, but rather an excessive love of it. If you focus too much on the act of speaking itself rather than the message, how can you expect your audience to hear your message? When asked what makes for a great speech, John F. Kennedy’s famous speechwriter, Ted Sorenson, gave much the same answer:

“Speaking from the heart, to the heart, directly, not too complicated, relatively brief sentences, words that are clear to everyone. I’ve always said a model of a statement by a leader were the seven words uttered by Winston Churchill on the fall of France — ‘The news from France is very bad.’ That’s how he opened his speech to the country. Very direct, honest, no confusing what he’s saying, but very moving at the same time.”

3. Follow Aristotle’s advice

Aristotle formulated what are known as the modes of persuasion, or three ways to convince your audience of your point: ethos, pathos, and logos.

Ethos refers to one’s character, or credibility. If you’re an established figure in a field or an expert, your audience is more likely to listen to you. If you or somebody else introduces your credentials, then you’re appealing to ethos to convince your audience.

Speeches relying on pathos make the audience feel something, whether that’s hope, love, or fear. It’s a powerful rhetorical tool, but relying solely on pathos to convince your audience can be seen as manipulative.

Appealing to logos is the practice of supplying facts and logical argument in your speech. Although logos can be used in a misleading way, it’s usually the strongest and most direct method of persuading an audience.

Though some speeches feature one of these three modes more heavily than others, most speeches tend to be composed of a mixture the three.

Image source: Wikimedia Commons

4. Pause

Presidential speechwriter James Humes describes this as “strategic delay” in his book Speak like Churchill, Stand like Lincoln. Not only does pausing during a speech give you time to collect your thoughts, it also adds weight to your words. “Before you speak,” writes Humes, “lock your eyes on each of your soon-to-be listeners. Every second you wait will strengthen the impact of your words. Stand, stare, and command your audience, and they will bend their ears to listen.”

5. Speak with a natural rhythm

Widely regarded as one of the best orators of all time, Winston Churchill understood the importance of rhythm when giving a speech. In his article, The Scaffolding of Rhetoric, Churchill writes:

“The great influence of sound on the human brain is well known. The sentences of the orator when he appeals to his art become long, rolling and sonorous. The peculiar balance of the phrases produces a cadence which resembles blank verse rather than prose.”

It’s difficult to listen to somebody who speaks in a monotone; not only is it boring, but it’s also lacking crucial information. Natural speech contains a variety of notes, paces, and rhythms that tell the audience what’s important, what’s not important, when a new topic has begun, when one thought is coming to an end, and so on.

Image source: Evening Standard / Getty Images

6. Compare what is with what could be

In her TED Talk, author and CEO Nancy Duarte described a hidden pattern she found in history’s greatest speeches. Great speeches repeatedly describe the current reality and contrast it with a desired outcome, and then end with a call to action:

“At the beginning of any presentation, you need to establish what is. You know, here’s the status quo, here’s what’s going on. And then you need to compare that to what could be. You need to make that gap as big as possible, because there is this commonplace of the status quo, and you need to contrast that with the loftiness of your idea. So, it’s like, you know, here’s the past, here’s the present, but look at our future.”

7. Follow the rule of three

People like to hear things in groups of threes. In Max Atkinson’s book on oratory, Our Masters’ Voices, Atkison says that three-part lists have “an air of unity or completeness about them” while lists with two items “tend to appear inadequate or incomplete.” Winston Churchill (who is going to be all over any list that has to do with great speaking) once said, “If you have an important point to make, don’t try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time — a tremendous whack.”

In an interview with Big Think, Alan Alda — who became well-known for his gift for public speaking in addition to his acting career — also expressed how his public speaking approach revolves around the number three.

Aristotle on democracy

“Democracy is rule by the poor.”

–paraphrasing Aristotle
Aristotle (384 BCE – 322 BCE) was a Greek philosopher during the Classical period in Ancient Greece, the founder of the Lyceum and the Peripatetic school of philosophy and Aristotelian tradition. Along with his teacher Plato, he has been called the “Father of Western Philosophy”. Wikipedia

Celebrating Two-Spirit Pride — for thousands of years!

Perhaps you have heard the term “Two Spirit” used along with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other terms. If you are not Indigenous, this may have made you think that “Two Spirit” refers to Indigenous people who are lesbian, gay or bi. But being Two Spirit does not necessarily mean that someone is lesbian or gay since it does not refer to sexual preference.

“Two Spirit” is a pan-Indian umbrella term that describes Indigenous people who have mixed or non-binary gender roles. The term first began to gain popularity in the late 1980s and is now used widely throughout Canada and the U.S., and other Indigenous people, such as the Zapotec in Mexico, also recognize the concept.

While the term is relatively new, the concept has existed among hundreds of Indigenous Nations for thousands of years. Some Native Nations have terms for up to 4 or 5 different genders, for instance. Two Spirit people are considered to be nonbinary and to hold sacred elements of both feminine and masculine within them.

These Indigenous understandings came long before and exist outside of the “LGBTQ” terminology that is often used now. A Two Spirit person may be lesbian or gay, but being lesbian or gay does not necessarily make someone Two Spirit.

Two Spirit people have existed for thousands of years. Many tribal nations understood that there were people who were not part of a male/female binary. In fact, some nations believed that there were multiple genders, not just two.

Traditionally, in many tribal nations, Two Spirit people were held in high esteem. They were leaders, warriors, medicine (spiritual) people. They often played a special role with youth, including adopting children and giving special sacred names to babies.

When the Christian Europeans invaded, however, they held Two Spirit people in extreme contempt. Two Spirit people were often killed or forced to hide who they were. The Christian missionaries did their best to teach Indigenous people that being Two Spirit was sinful and wicked, and settler colonial laws and customs forbade the existence of people who were not specifically male or female.

Because of this repression, more and more Native people turned away from their ancient understandings — but not all. However, it became more difficult for Two Spirit people to be who they are, and in many places they had to function in an underground way.

“Two Spirit” is a pan-Indian umbrella term that describes Indigenous people who have mixed or non-binary gender roles.

Challenging disrespect

By the 20th century, some Two Spirit people from reservations left for the cities where there were lesbian and gay communities. Some of them founded urban Native groups, such as Gay American Indians (GAI) in San Francisco, and many of them faced anti-Indigenous racism in the cities, as well. Sometimes white people even told them that Native people could not possibly be lesbian or gay or Two Spirit due to some bizarre stereotypical views held by non-Natives. It could be difficult for Two Spirit people to feel completely at home anywhere.

But increasingly, more and more Two Spirit people have let their families and tribes know who they really are. If they are not treated with respect, they challenge this, especially when it was their own tribal tradition to honor Two Spirit people.

During the 2016-2017 Standing Rock encampments to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline, Two Spirit people banded together and worked on many projects. Two Spirit people at Standing Rock played a very important spiritual role and tried to do everything in a good way to bring healing to the thousands of people gathered there.

With leadership provided by people like Candi Brings Plenty, this was a very important step forward in the overall Native struggle. When some Native people at camp were not accepting of them, others strongly challenged this and reminded everyone of their traditional cultures.

Sometimes non-Native people refer to themselves as Two Spirit. That is disrespectful, since it is an appropriation of a distinctively Indigenous concept and term.

During this month of June 2019, and throughout the year, Pride parades and powwows will celebrate Two Spirit people, from Saskatoon to the Bay Area to the Navajo Pride Parade. Honoring Two Spirit people is an important part of decolonization — washing settler colonial ideas out of our brains and returning to deeper understandings that existed long before the rise of patriarchy, capitalism, settler colonialism and the European invasion of Indigenous lands.

(Submitted by Gwyllm Llwydd.)

Everything is Here to Help YOU

May 21, 2019 (divination.com)

By Matt Kahn

A common spiritual trope is that we should get rid of ego. The word can even make us cringe or feel guilty. We try to suppress parts of ourselves, but to operate in the world we need a personal sense of self. When kept in its place, a healthy ego is extremely useful. It helps us get things done and express the unique gifts of who we are.

Ego can feel separate, unloved, and threatened, afraid of intimacy and afraid to let love in. On the useful side, its basic job is to defend us. We can allow it to relax its guard, feel less separate, and support our higher selves. But to insist on “no ego” is just an egoistic mentality struggling with itself. We can approach all ego actions with openness instead of judgment and channel them to serve the heart through authentic engagement and love. Whether you are coming from ego or from your heart is the central question regarding lasting fulfillment in life.

Khan defines ego as “the imaginary identity of an overstimulated nervous system.” He characterizes an overstimulated nervous system as having a closed heart, a noisy mind, low self-esteem, with an ego that runs things like an overcontrolling commander-in-chief.

We can learn to engage and integrate the ego as a competent lieutenant, who helps us get our needs met, while taking direction from the higher self. Gradually, we can unravel and heal our battered nervous systems. The keys are radical acceptance, compassion (including self-compassion), honesty and emotional receptivity. Just like its fears, the ego cannot be defeated, cured, or overcome. It evolves through our commitment to love ourselves and each other. When we let ourselves feel grief, rage, terror and other emotions, we can free the ego to better serve our soulful hearts.

The ego is only capable of conditional love and tends to be transactional, and that’s OK under many circumstances. When the immature ego, weak and conflicted, is in control, however, it blocks fulfillment. According to spiritual mystic Matt Kahn, the ego can be thought of as the “soul in incubation.” We process ego stages of development in trying to attain security, pleasure and power. It’s only when we get stuck on one of these three lower levels of consciousness that the ego’s control bites us. (Eckhart Tolle refers to this as the “pain body.”) The soul, or higher self, is a wave on the cosmic sea, connected to all. Unconditional love comes via the soul, via a heart-centered higher consciousness.

Whether we know why or how, everything is here to help us in making the transition from ego-centered to heart-centered. “While the ego judges each feeling solely on how painful or pleasant it is, the soul views each emotion while it lasts as an opportunity to love itself,” writes Kahn. Instead of fighting our ego, let’s learn to embrace it, listen to it and from that, grow and learn. In truth, through all the changes we can’t control, through all the pain and suffering of its dissatisfactions, the ego is evolving to serve the heart. Although it hurts sometimes, love is our only fulfillment and more than worth the price.

Matt Kahn is a spiritual teacher, healer and author. I had the good fortune to interview Matt Kahn on my Pathways Podcast and to attend his three-day retreat in Portland Oregon.