Monthly Archives: January 2018
Crazy Ex-Girlfriend | Without Love You Can Save The World
The CW Television Network
Published on Jan 12, 2018
Watch the music video for “Without Love You Can Save The World”, then watch full episodes of Crazy Ex-Girlfriend FREE on The CW App: http://go.cwtv.com/genCXGyt
SUBSCRIBE: http://go.cwtv.com/YTSubscribe
About CRAZY EX-GIRLFRIEND:
Rebecca Bunch is a successful, driven, and possibly crazy young woman who impulsively gives up everything – her partnership at a prestigious law firm and her upscale apartment in Manhattan – in a desperate attempt to find love and happiness in that exotic hotbed of romance and adventure: suburban West Covina, CA.
Crazy Ex-Girlfriend | Fit Hot Guys Have Problems Too
The CW Television Network
Published on Jan 12, 2018
Watch the music video for “Fit Hot Guys Have Problems Too”, then watch full episodes of Crazy Ex-Girlfriend FREE on The CW App: http://go.cwtv.com/genCXGyt
SUBSCRIBE: http://go.cwtv.com/YTSubscribe
About CRAZY EX-GIRLFRIEND:
Rebecca Bunch is a successful, driven, and possibly crazy young woman who impulsively gives up everything – her partnership at a prestigious law firm and her upscale apartment in Manhattan – in a desperate attempt to find love and happiness in that exotic hotbed of romance and adventure: suburban West Covina, CA.
The Hubble Photo that Changed Astronomy
How to Tell If Someone’s Bluffing: Body Language Lessons from a Poker Pro
By Liv Boeree, International Poker Champion
January 11, 2018 (BigThink.com)
A good poker face can win you a fortune or help you sell a difficult lie, but that term might be leading us all astray. For poker champ Liv Boeree, calling someone’s bluff isn’t about their face at all, it’s often much more about their body as a whole—and one part in particular. “The feet are often the most reliable thing to look at on your opponent because they might be completely stoic in their face but their feet are bouncing around,” she says. We’re all hyper aware of our faces as a primary point of communication, but our bodies are speaking more loudly than we may realize. Typically, “the lower down on the body that you’re looking at, the more reliable the information,” she says. Keep in mind, reading body language is an art not a science, but thanks to Boeree’s years of experience at the poker table she highlights some classic behaviors of bluffers, and reliable strategies for those who want to call them out. Find more from Liv Boeree at www.livboeree.com.
TRANSCRIPT:
Liv Boeree: When it comes to body language, it’s never an exact art. The things I’m going to suggest, they’re all guidelines. But that said there are some certain things that as a poker player I’ll look for. And the most important thing is, first of all, to get a baseline of somebody. It’s impossible to tell whether the behavior someone is showing is meaningful or not if you don’t know how they naturally behave. So the first thing I’ll do when I sit down at the table is look at what my opponents are doing when they’re not in a hand: are they naturally quite gregarious, are they confident when they interact with the waitress, or are they naturally quite quiet and shy? How do they sit? Are they naturally closed off? Are they very languishing”—that kind of thing?
And once I’ve got an idea of their baseline outside of a hand then I look to see how they deviate from that when they’re actually in the middle of playing or in a tense situation. In general what you want to look for in both poker—but also when you’re trying to figure out if someone is lying—is their comfort level, if they seem authentic. As a rule of thumb, humans are actually quite good at picking up authenticity or if someone is being disingenuous. So that’s the thing to look out for, and there are some like classic behaviors that I’ve noticed people do at the table where—if you see them suddenly making a point of making themselves bigger, where they’re naturally sitting like this and now they’re sort of puffing up, that’s more often than not a false confidence that they’re trying to show. Most people do try to stay very constant. So you really do notice a behavior, particularly against someone who seems to play quite regularly, the chances are that they’re aware of their behavior, so they’re probably trying to mislead you.
But another rule of thumb that I like to follow is: the first thing you learn as a kid, usually, when you lie is “liars won’t look you in the eye,” so what do kids do to overcompensate? They’ll look you in the eye. And similarly people are very aware of their faces, this part of their body, if they’re trying to be dishonest, but what they’re not thinking about is the rest of their body. So the lower down on the body that you’re looking at, the more reliable the information is.
So if you think about when you’re excited about something, generally speaking you’ll bounce around and you can’t keep still, and we call it “happy feet” in poker. The feet are often the most reliable thing to look at on your opponent because they might be completely stoic in their face but their feet are bouncing around—it’s usually a sign that they have a really strong hand. But similarly if they’re sort of smiling and chatty but their feet all of a sudden tuck themselves around the table or around the chair legs, something’s up there. So as a rule of thumb, look for the rest of someone else’s body more than their face if you’re trying to figure out if they’re telling you the truth or not.
Human DNA Was Designed by Aliens
Book: “Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control”
Oxford University Press, 2004 – Psychology – 324 pages
The term ‘brainwashing’ was first recorded in 1950, but it is an expression of a much older concept: the forcible and full-scale alteration of a person’s beliefs. Over the past 50 years the term has crept into popular culture, served as a topic for jokes, frightened the public in mediaheadlines, and slandered innumerable people and institutions. It has also been the subject of learned discussion from many angles: history, sociology, psychology, psychotherapy, and marketing. Despite this variety, to date there has been one angle missing: any serious reference to real brains.Descriptions of how opinions can be changed, whether by persuasion, deceit, or force, have been almost entirely psychological.Brainwashing, Kathleen Turner’s fascinating and informative voyage through the subject, is the first to combine the latest findings in social psychology and neuroscience in trying to understand the incredibly complicated workings of the human brain. In elegant and accessible prose, and with abundantuse of anecdotes and case-studies, she looks at the ethical problems involved in carrying out the required experiments on humans, the limitations of animal models, and the frightening implications of such research. Using a thoughtful and comprehensive approach to the subject, Taylor shows the prevalence of brainwashing in the world today, while effectively defusing the fears associated with it.
(Google Books)
“The Brainwashing of My Dad” Trailer
Biography: Gobind Behari Lal
Gobind Behari Lal was an Indian-American journalist and independence activist. A relative and close associate of Lala Har Dayal, he joined the Ghadar Party and participated in the Indian independence movement. He arrived the United States on a scholarship to study at the University of California, Berkeley. Later, he worked as a science editor for the Hearst Newspapers. In 1937, he became the first Indian to win the Pulitzer Prize.[1]
Early life
Gobind Behari Lal was born to Bishan Lal, the Governor of the Bikaner princely state. His mother’s name was Jagge Devi.[2] He obtained B.Sc. and M.A. degrees from the Punjab University at Lahore. He served as an assistant professor at the University from 1909 to 1912.
Lal was the cousin of the Indian nationalist Lala Har Dayal‘s wife, and participated in the Indian independence movement. Har Dayal set up the Guru Govind Singh Sahib Educational Scholarship to encourage Indian students to gain scientific education. Lal began attending the University of California, Berkeley in 1912 on this scholarship.[3] He completed his postgraduate education there.
Career
Lal served as the Science Editor for The San Francisco Examiner from 1925 to 1930. He was the first journalist to use the term “Science Writer” in his byline.[2] He went on to work for other Hearst Newspapers concerns in San Francisco, New York and Los Angeles.[4] Lal wrote on a variety of topics, and interviewed many notable figures, including Albert Einstein, Mohandas K. Gandhi, H. L. Mencken, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Enrico Fermi and Max Planck.[2]
Lal shared the 1937 Pulitzer Prize for Reporting with John J. O’Neill, William L. Laurence, Howard W. Blakeslee and David Dietz. The group won the award for their coverage of science at the tercentenary of the Harvard University.[5]
Lal was one of the founding members of the National Association of Science Writers, and served as the Association’s President in 1940.[2]
Lal died of cancer in 1982 at the age of 92, a few weeks after writing his last article.[4]


