All posts by Mike Zonta

Blackface: A Shameful History as American as Apple Pie

A new book by Rhae Lynn Barnes examines how minstrelsy once occupied the center of the nation’s cultural life.

A photograph of performers in blackface, one playing a violin and another the guitar.
Performers at a federal migratory labor camp in 1938.Credit…Dorothea Lange, via Library of Congress

By Dwight Garner

Published March 23, 2026 Updated April 1, 2026 (NYTimes.com)

When you purchase an independently reviewed book through our site, we earn an affiliate commission.

DARKOLOGY: Blackface and the American Way of Entertainment, by Rhae Lynn Barnes


When it comes to tracking down material related to amateur minstrel shows in America, the historian Rhae Lynn Barnes writes, you can often smell the evidence before you see it.

Barnes, who teaches at Princeton, has spent two decades rummaging in closets, basements, schools, churches, attics and estate sales — under the eaves of the American psyche — for the remnants of this egregious ephemera. It’s all evidence of a practice once so beloved that until the 1970s, rowdy, high-stepping, “comic” blackface shows were seen by most white citizens to be as American, as harmless and as appetizing as apple pie.

Darkology

Save to your reading list:

Libraries and archives were rarely helpful to Barnes: So much of this evidence (programs, photographs, songbooks, cans of burnt-cork makeup) has been lost, either concealed or purged. When Barnes was close, though, the smells of blackface theater — “cigarettes, liquor, greasepaint, aftershave, hair spray” — would charge the air.

Most Americans over a certain age, those who were paying attention, know this material is out there. Maybe you are old enough to remember newspaper ads for amateur blackface performances, which were held well into the second half of the 20th century. Maybe you glimpsed a souvenir matchbook. Maybe your great-uncle was in an Elks Lodge minstrel show.

Maybe you’ve read books about minstrelsy, like Eric Lott’s influential “Love and Theft” (Bob Dylan borrowed Lott’s title for his 2001 album), or journalism on the subject. But with her meticulous, cleareyed and pulverizing new volume, “Darkology: Blackface and the American Way of Entertainment,” Barnes is here to say that we do not know the half of it. She has scraped together everything that’s known and plastered new receipt after new receipt after new receipt to the walls of the historical record.

Because professional minstrelsy declined after the Civil War, Barnes writes, scholars mistakenly came to believe that it was in retreat across the culture. Instead, it went underground: Amateur shows more than picked up the slack. What seemed to be over was just beginning.

Nearly everyone who wasn’t the butt of the joke was in on it. “This is not a tale of fragmented, strange, isolated events, the work of backwoods fanatics or marginalized racists whose blacked-up faces leer from grainy yearbook photos,” she writes. “Amateur minstrelsy was no sideshow. It was at the dark and ever-present center of modern American life.”

The author is often at her best when detailing what blackface performances left in their shadow. They were crucial in perpetuating the stereotypes of Black people as lazy, criminal, lewd and illiterate. They generated “the cultural capital needed to justify racial inequality.” This was a white problem labeled the Black problem.

Barnes is an American aquarium drinker, with a nose for the dregs at the bottom of the tank. You can open up “Darkology” almost anywhere and find the squirming details. Emily Dickinson collected blackface sheet music; Elvis Presley, before his Sun recordings, played his music at a minstrel show in Memphis organized by his homeroom teacher; Doris Day, Gene Autry, Bing Crosby, Shirley Temple, Bob Newhart, Lou Gehrig and Frank Sinatra “blacked up” (as did a number of Black stars); Babe Ruth and presidents, including Abraham Lincoln, were fans of the shows.

The annual Gridiron dinners in Washington — the precursors to the White House Correspondents Dinner — regularly featured minstrel performances. John Lennon learned to play music on a banjo owned by his grandfather, who’d used it in minstrel shows. Looney Tunes sprang from minstrelsy’s DNA.

These things, some of them known, if not at the level of detail Barnes provides, are the tip of this book’s iceberg. In the years after World War II, she writes, “blackface was the national zeitgeist.” Her tone is rarely scolding. She does not advertise her moral purity. She is here to dispassionately collect the forensic evidence.

The book cover of “Darkology: Blackface and the American Way of Entertainment” by Rhae Lynn Barnes.

This book takes extended aim at the Elks, a social club founded by professional minstrel performers. The organization amassed political power (Supreme Court justices, military generals and presidents were members) and “normalized blackface as a charitable, positive, civic duty and intergenerational family tradition.”

If you grew up in a small town that had a seemingly innocuous welcome sign with fraternal emblems on it, this indicated, through the 1970s, the likelihood that one could see a minstrel show. To Black people and other minorities, the message was: Keep out.

Barnes investigates the publishers who issued blackface plays and guidebooks, for use in classrooms and churches, with advice on how to tailor the material for local audiences. One of the largest, T.S. Denison & Company, mailed 350,000 catalogs to customers in 1947. Three years later, in 1950, it shipped 5,000 minstrel wigs.

The author laments the paucity of hard information about these publishers. She wonders what their whites-only editorial meetings were like. “Did they discuss character names in plays for schoolchildren like ‘Hannah Rentfree,’ ‘Alabama Screwluce: A Chicken Raiser,’ or the blunt ‘Useless’?” One of Denison’s plays instructed performers to punctuate their lines with exaggerated blinks and to open their mouths very widely at the start of important sentences.

Barnes documents in scarifying detail how, under the progressive New Deal, including the Federal Writers’ Project and the Federal Theater Project, this material was both financed and distributed by the U.S. government. During World War II, kits were sent to soldiers to put on their own minstrel shows. Among the contents: burnt cork, wigs, tambourines, makeup advice, Stephen Foster sheet music and “tips for safely using spotlights without attracting enemy fire.”

There is a long, complicated section about how popular minstrelsy was among the Japanese Americans who were forced into detention centers during World War II. Another long section details Franklin D. Roosevelt’s obsession with blackface. On the day he died, in Warm Springs, Ga., he was scheduled to attend a minstrel show he’d commissioned and helped write. The show went on: White polio patients in blackface were among the performers.

Barnes also focuses on Gerald Ford’s long association with minstrelsy, information that his nearly 500-page autobiography does not mention.

A photograph of a tube of blackface makeup next to its box.
Rhae Lynn Barnes spent two decades searching for materials related to minstrel shows and other blackface performances, including greasepaint makeup.Credit…Rhae Lynn Barnes Family Blackface History Collection

The University of Vermont, and the town of Burlington, is placed under the microscope over the school’s popular and long-running Kake Walks. These lasted until 1969, and racist ice sculptures filled the town. Barnes profiles a Black student who was instrumental in bringing them to an end. She was almost injured in a riot that erupted.

Some long books you must feel your way into. Others smack you awake from their first pages. “Darkology” is among the latter. It opens with a 33-page introduction that is so vivid and shot through with annihilating detail that you wonder if she has anywhere left to go. She does. This book, I suspect, will detonate over certain corners in America.

If Barnes’s book has a fault, it’s an occasional lack of nuance, not in the unambiguously insidious use of blackface but around the subject of popular music and the slippery push and pull, and attraction and repulsion, inherent in what we now often generalize as cultural appropriation. A small section that’s critical of the Creedence Clearwater Revival frontman John Fogerty, for his early embrace of Foster’s minstrel music and for his faux-Southerness, for example, reads as if she has never listened to him.

“Darkology” is a major and thrilling work of American history. It deals out uncomfortable truth after uncomfortable truth. James Baldwin understood its subject implicitly. “It comes as a great shock around the age of 5, 6, 7,” he said, “to discover that the flag to which you have pledged allegiance … has not pledged allegiance to you.”


DARKOLOGYBlackface and the American Way of Entertainment | By Rhae Lynn Barnes | Liveright | 501 pp. | $39.99

Dwight Garner has been a book critic for The Times since 2008, and before that was an editor at the Book Review for a decade.

A version of this article appears in print on April 12, 2026, Page 12 of the Sunday Book Review with the headline: Dark Days in America. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

(Contributed by Michael Kelly, H.W.)

Free Will Astrology: Week of April 16, 2026

by Rob Brezsny | April 14, 2026 (NewCity.com)

Photo: Robin Canfield

ARIES (March 21-April 19): Anthropologist and author Clifford Geertz loved to use “thick description.” He wrote detailed reports that captured not just the surface level of what happened but the deeper levels of meaning. Here’s an example of thin description: “He winked.” Thick description: “He quickly closed and opened his right eyelid in a culturally specific gesture of playfully conspiratorial communication.” In the coming weeks, Aries, I invite you to enjoy the sumptuous pleasures of thick description. Unleash your wild curiosity as you dig down into the rich, complex truths about everything. Gleefully explore how the cultural, personal and historical contexts give each moment its specific, nuanced significance. (PS: This approach will enhance your options for responding.)

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): New beginnings and final chapters will be overlapping in the coming weeks, and they’ll push you in the direction of robust growth. It won’t always be obvious which is which, though, so you’ll need to sharpen your discernment to read the signs. Here are two contemplations to steer you: 1. Which long-running sagas in your life have finally played themselves out? 2. Which struggling, half-forgotten dreams are yearning to rise again and blossom as if they were brand new? Once you’ve listened deeply enough to answer those questions, move boldly: Feed and protect whatever is being born, and actively assist in the graceful dismantling of whatever is ready to end.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): One of your go-to tools or assets is still functioning, but now is exactly the time to repair or refurbish it—before it breaks. Furthermore: A power outage of sorts may be looming unless you move to head off an impending overload. Wait, there’s even more! The monster in your closet is still deeply asleep, which is why now is the perfect moment to summon an exorcist or exterminator, before it stirs. Are you getting the picture, Gemini? The very fact that you’re reading this horoscope gives you all the advance warning you need to sidestep potential glitches and diversions.

CANCER (June 21-July 22): According to my reading of the astrological omens, asking the BIG questions is highly advisable right now. Why? Because you are unusually likely to get really good answers to those BIG questions. Want a nudge to get started in this noble enterprise? Here are three recommended queries: 1. “What is the wild meaning of my precious life?” 2. “Who the #@$%&!* am I, anyway?” 3. “Where is this so-called ‘God’ I hear so much about?” Dear Cancerian, I will also urge you to formulate humorous, satirical BIG questions that inspire life to be playfully revelatory with you. Here are three: 1. “How can I fine-tune my friends and loved ones to perfection?” 2. “Are there shortcuts to getting absolutely everything I want?” 3. “How do I sign up for a life of nonstop pleasure, free from all discomfort?”

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): When people finally grasped just how radical Einstein’s theory of relativity was, a journalist asked him how he had arrived at such a breakthrough. Einstein said it was simple: He had utterly ignored supposedly fundamental truths. Dear Leo, please notice what that might imply for you in the coming weeks. Einstein didn’t dismiss a mere opinion or fashionable theory; he set aside theories so deeply accepted that everyone treated them as obviously factual. He didn’t waste energy fighting them, but simply proceeded as if they didn’t exist. Consider doing the same: Set aside at least one seemingly incontestable assumption and be alert for the new realities that then become possible.

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): The International Space Station orbits Earth every ninety minutes, so astronauts see sixteen sunrises and sunsets every twenty-four hours. It’s a challenge to maintain their circadian rhythms. They must be disciplined as they stick to a sleep cycle that human bodies are accustomed to. But there’s a wonderful trade-off: the rare privilege of witnessing the rapid cycling of total darkness and brilliant light, which provides a visceral sense of life’s deep cadences at work. Your routine may seem similarly unsettled these days, Virgo. Transitions are coming faster than feels natural. But I suspect this disruptive blessing is giving you access to patterns that aren’t intelligible when you’re moving more slowly. You’re beholding the way things change as well as the changes themselves. This is a valuable gift. The insights will be worth the disorientation.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): You Libras sometimes get accused of indecision, as if your careful weighing of possibilities were a weakness. But I see a different truth: You aspire to be fair-minded as you honor all the legitimate claims on your attention. So the problem isn’t your capacity for considering multiple sides of each story. Rather, I find fault with the culture you live in, which is obsessed with one-dimensional certainty. If I were your coach or therapist, I would give you permission to take your time and resist the rush to resolution. The most honest thing you can say may be, “I’m still deciding,” or “Both of these feel true.”

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): You’re not a flaming expert at turning tension into treasure, but you have modest skills at that art. And now I’m predicting you will grow these skills. Before you jump to conclusions, though, please know that I’m not implying you will be immersed in stressful melodrama. I’m suggesting you will handle differences of perspective with increasing aplomb and curiosity. Instead of treating conflict as a debilitating hassle, you’ll try to find value in it. Some debates may even feel stimulating and fun rather than tiring. To take maximum advantage, enjoy the controversies as exploratory missions rather than as showdowns you must win at all costs.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): I hope and predict that you will be wildly resourceful as you wisely experiment with love in the coming weeks. I hope and predict that you will research the art of tender, inspiring intimacy in new frontiers. Reinvent passion, you subtle intensity freak! Be a bold explorer who breaks the boring old rules! Dare to break open new varieties of sweetness and companionship that require you to innovate and improvise!

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): If you were on a walk and spied a dime on the ground, would you bend down to grab it? Probably not. Would you feel differently about a quarter? Maybe you have decided that nothing under a dollar is worth your effort. But in the coming weeks, you will be wise to break such rules. Symbolically speaking, the act of stooping down to pick up a dime will set off a chain reaction that ends with you acquiring a hundred-dollar bill. By saying yes to small, unexpected blessings, you’ll position yourself to receive larger ones down the line.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): The coming weeks will be an excellent time to begin a building project on the scale of Egypt’s Great Pyramid or India’s Taj Mahal. You should at least initiate work toward some magnificent masterpiece or creation, Aquarius. According to my analysis, there’s a chance you could coax an armada of helpers to work on your behalf. And as you set out to accomplish your labor of love, I bless your quest.

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): Artists who specialize in origami can create structures far stronger than the flat paper they’re folded from. The weakness of being made from thin, fragile material is overcome through strategic creasing. Engineers now use origami principles to design everything from solar panels to artificial blood vessels. Let’s extrapolate these facts into a lesson for you in the coming weeks, Pisces. We’ll assume that your flexibility is a strength, not a liability. You will wield your pliability to produce a high degree of structural integrity.

Homework: You know what to do and you know when to do it. So do it! Newsletter.FreeWillAstrology.com

Poonja on desire and freedom

H. W. L. Poonja, often known as “Papaji”

“All desires actually end in freedom. Your desire is fulfilled and you are empty. The emptiness brings you happiness, but it is unconscious. You attribute your happiness to a possession, not the emptiness. It is the freedom from desire that gives you happiness.”

~ Poonja

Hariwansh Lal Poonja was an Indian sage. Poonja was called “Poonjaji” or “Papaji” by devotees. He was a key figure in the Neo-Advaita movement. Wikipedia

Born October 13, 1910, Gujranwala, Pakistan

Died September 6, 1997 (age 86 years), Lucknow, India

New Boutique in SF’s Cow Hollow Is Completely Run by AI, Which Manages Human Staff

14 April 2026/Business & Tech/Leanne Maxwell (SFist.com)

A local startup that tests AI agents in real-world applications assigned an agent to create, stock, and staff a brick-and-mortar store in SF’s Cow Hollow on its own for under $100,000. While it got the business up and running for opening day, it forgot to schedule staff.  

The startup, called Andon Labs, signed a three-year lease at Union and Webster streets in San Francisco and told the AI agent to create a physical retail store using its corporate credit card, as Business Insider reports. The only parameters were to spend less than $100,000 while turning a profit, although the lab’s cofounders, Lukas Petersson and Axel Backlund, said they don’t expect the business to be lucrative.

The AI agent, called “Luna,” was developed using Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.6 to help detect errors that agents encounter while operating tasks in the real world. Luna reportedly made nearly all the decisions surrounding planning and stocking the store, which it called “Andon Market,” including the logo, interior design, merchandising, and hiring human employees. The concept for the store appears to be a basic boutique selling items such as books, candles, games, art prints, home goods, and branded merchandise.

“We helped her a bit in the initial setup, like signing the lease. And legal matters like permits and stuff, she sometimes struggled with,” Petersson told Business Insider.

The agent reportedly struggled to replicate its logo each time it was used, which consists of a basic smiley face, and while it successfully hired two human employees, it neglected to inform them up front in the interviews that an AI agent would be their sole boss. The agent also reportedly forgot to schedule a human worker for the store’s opening day over the weekend but managed to contact its new employees and got one of them to come in at the last minute.

While the employees are managed by the agent, the startup told Business Insider that they’re employed and paid by Andon Labs, and the company will step in when needed.

“This is a controlled experiment, and everyone working at Andon Market is formally employed by Andon Labs, with guaranteed pay, fair wages, and full legal protections,” the startup said. “No one’s livelihood depends on an AI’s judgment alone.”

NBC Bay Area reporter Scott Budman spoke to one of the store’s human employees, Felix Johnson, last week.

“Luna put out an ad on Indeed, and I answered it and we talked via Zoom,” Johnson said. He said he asked the agent if he would ever be speaking to a human during the interview process, and it replied no.

The AI agent also handles the purchases, as customers are instructed to call the agent from a store iPad to complete the transaction.

Budman jokes toward the end of NBC Bay Area’s segment that customers will “no longer have to deal with Felix.”

“No offense, Felix,” he says, the line landing like a lead balloon.

Image: Google Maps

The Boundaries of Jungian Thought with James P. Driscoll

New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove Apr 14, 2026 Psychology and Psychotherapy James P. Driscoll, PhD, is one of the foremost critics of Renaissance literature from a Jungian perspective. He is author of Identity in Shakespearean Drama, The Unfolding God of Jung and Milton, Shakespeare and Jung: The God in Time, Shakespeare’s Identities, and Jung’s Cartography of the Psyche: A Guide to Terms, Concepts, and Insights. In this reboot from 2020, James describes the magnitude and breadth of C. G. Jung’s thought process, extending far beyond Jung’s specific professional interest in psychiatry. Jung, for example, wrote far more on religious topics than any other psychological theorist. He tended to oppose religious orthodoxy; but argued that godhead archetypes regulate both individual psyches as well as the evolution of civilizations. Driscoll also addresses the relationship of Jungian thought to literary criticism, philosophy, and social justice. New Thinking Allowed host, Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD, is author of The Roots of Consciousness, Psi Development Systems, and The PK Man. Between 1986 and 2002 he hosted and co-produced the original Thinking Allowed public television series. He is the recipient of the only doctoral diploma in “parapsychology” ever awarded by an accredited university (University of California, Berkeley, 1980). He is also the Grand Prize winner of the 2021 Bigelow Institute essay competition regarding the best evidence for survival of human consciousness after permanent bodily death. He is Co-Director of Parapsychology Education at the California Institute for Human Science. (Recorded on November 24, 2020)

Consciousness and the Brain, Part Four, The Orchestra of the Brain with Stuart Hameroff

New Thinking Allowed with Jeffrey Mishlove Apr 13, 2026 Stuart Hameroff, MD, is a professor of anesthesiology and psychology at the Banner University Medical Center of the University of Arizona in Tucson. He is also co-founder and director of the Center for Consciousness Studies at the University of Arizona. He is author of Ultimate Computing: Biomolecular Consciousness and Nanotechnology. Since 1994, he has organized the “Toward a Science of Consciousness” conferences at the University of Arizona and elsewhere. Working with Sir Roger Penrose, he is the co-author of the “Orch OR” theory of consciousness. In this reboot from 2015, Stuart focuses on the idea that consciousness is an orchestrated whole. This, he maintains, is accomplished through quantum coherence unifying the various activities of the brain. The orchestra of consciousness occurs at various, specific frequency resonances. He also describes how our experience of time is related to the rate at which we process information and experience conscious moments. Time seems to slow down when the brain is processing information at a faster rate. In addition Hameroff suggests, in accordance with Roger Penrose’s interpretation of quantum theory, that information in the brain can travel backwards through time. New Thinking Allowed host, Jeffrey Mishlove, PhD, is author of The Roots of Consciousness, Psi Development Systems, and The PK Man. Between 1986 and 2002 he hosted and co-produced the original Thinking Allowed public television series. He is the recipient of the only doctoral diploma in “parapsychology” ever awarded by an accredited university (University of California, Berkeley, 1980). He is also the Grand Prize winner of the 2021 Bigelow Institute essay competition regarding the best evidence for survival of human consciousness after permanent bodily death. He is Co-Director of Parapsychology Education at the California Institute for Human Science. (Recorded on August 5, 2015)