Bio: Egon Schiele

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Egon Schiele
Self-Portrait with Physalis, 1912
Born12 June 1890
Tulln an der DonauAustro-Hungarian Empire
Died31 October 1918 (aged 28)
ViennaAustro-Hungarian Empire
NationalityAustrian
EducationAkademie der Bildenden Künste
Known forPaintingdrawingprintmaking
Notable workSeated Woman with Bent KneesCardinal and NunDeath and the MaidenThe Family
MovementExpressionism

Egon Leo Adolf Ludwig Schiele (German: [ˈeːɡɔn ˈʃiːlə] (listen); 12 June 1890 – 31 October 1918) was an Austrian Expressionist painter. His work is noted for its intensity and its raw sexuality, and for the many self-portraits the artist produced, including nude self-portraits. The twisted body shapes and the expressive line that characterize Schiele’s paintings and drawings mark the artist as an early exponent of ExpressionismGustav Klimt, a figurative painter of the early 20th century, was a mentor to Schiele.

Egon Schiele photographed by Anton Josef Trčka, 1914

Biography

Early life

Schiele was born in 1890 in TullnLower Austria. His father, Adolf Schiele, the station master of the Tulln station in the Austrian State Railways, was born in 1851 in Vienna to Karl Ludwig Schiele, a German from Ballenstedt and Aloisia Schimak; Egon Schiele’s mother Marie, née Soukup, was born in 1861 in Český Krumlov (Krumau) to Franz Soukup, a Czech father from Mirkovice, and Aloisia Poferl, a German Bohemian mother from Český Krumlov.[1][2] As a child, Schiele was fascinated by trains, and would spend many hours drawing them, to the point where his father felt obliged to destroy his sketchbooks. When he was 11 years old, Schiele moved to the nearby city of Krems (and later to Klosterneuburg) to attend secondary school. To those around him, Schiele was regarded as a strange child. Shy and reserved, he did poorly at school except in athletics and drawing,[3] and was usually in classes made up of younger pupils. He also displayed incestuous tendencies towards his younger sister Gertrude (who was known as Gerti), and his father, well aware of Egon’s behaviour, was once forced to break down the door of a locked room that Egon and Gerti were in to see what they were doing (only to discover that they were developing a film). When he was sixteen he took the twelve-year-old Gerti by train to Trieste without permission and spent a night in a hotel room with her.[4]

Academy of Fine Arts

When Schiele was 14 years old, his father died from syphilis, and he became a ward of his maternal uncle, Leopold Czihaczek, also a railway official.[2] Although he wanted Schiele to follow in his footsteps, and was distressed at his lack of interest in academia, he recognised Schiele’s talent for drawing and unenthusiastically allowed him a tutor, the artist Ludwig Karl Strauch. In 1906 Schiele applied at the Kunstgewerbeschule (School of Arts and Crafts) in Vienna, where Gustav Klimt had once studied. Within his first year there, Schiele was sent, at the insistence of several faculty members, to the more traditional Akademie der Bildenden Künste in Vienna in 1906. His main teacher at the academy was Christian Griepenkerl, a painter whose strict doctrine and ultra-conservative style frustrated and dissatisfied Schiele and his fellow students so much that he left three years later.

Klimt and first exhibitions

In 1907, Schiele sought out Gustav Klimt, who generously mentored younger artists. Klimt took a particular interest in the young Schiele, buying his drawings, offering to exchange them for some of his own, arranging models for him and introducing him to potential patrons. He also introduced Schiele to the Wiener Werkstätte, the arts and crafts workshop connected with the Secession. Schiele’s earliest works between 1907 and 1909 contain strong similarities with those of Klimt,[5] as well as influences from Art Nouveau.[6] In 1908 Schiele had his first exhibition, in Klosterneuburg. Schiele left the Academy in 1909, after completing his third year, and founded the Neukunstgruppe (“New Art Group”) with other dissatisfied students. In his early years, Schiele was strongly influenced by Klimt and Kokoschka. Although imitations of their styles, particularly with the former, are noticeably visible in Schiele’s first works, he soon evolved his own distinctive style.

Klimt invited Schiele to exhibit some of his work at the 1909 Vienna Kunstschau, where he encountered the work of Edvard MunchJan Toorop, and Vincent van Gogh among others. Once free of the constraints of the Academy’s conventions, Schiele began to explore not only the human form, but also human sexuality. Schiele’s work was already daring, but it went a bold step further with the inclusion of Klimt’s decorative eroticism and with what some may like to call figurative distortions, that included elongations, deformities, and sexual openness. Schiele’s self-portraits helped re-establish the energy of both genres[clarification needed] with their unique level of emotional and sexual honesty and use of figural distortion in place of conventional ideals of beauty. He also painted tributes to Van Gogh‘s Sunflowers as well as landscapes and still lifes.[7]

In 1910, Schiele began experimenting with nudes and within a year a definitive style featuring emaciated, sickly-coloured figures, often with strong sexual overtones. Schiele also began painting and drawing children.[8] Schiele’s self portrait, Kneeling Nude with Raised Hands (1910), is considered among the most significant nude art pieces made during the 20th century.[by whom?] Schiele’s radical and developed approach towards the naked human form challenged both scholars[who?] and progressives alike. This unconventional piece and style went against strict academia and created a sexual uproar with its contorted lines and heavy display of figurative expression.[citation needed] At the time, many[who?] found the explicitness of his works disturbing.

From then on, Schiele participated in numerous group exhibitions, including those of the Neukunstgruppe in Prague in 1910 and Budapest in 1912; the SonderbundCologne, in 1912; and several Secessionist shows in Munich, beginning in 1911. In 1911, Schiele met the seventeen-year-old Walburga (Wally) Neuzil, who lived with him in Vienna and served as a model for some of his most striking paintings. Very little is known of her, except that she had previously modelled for Gustav Klimt and might have been one of his mistresses. Schiele and Wally wanted to escape what they perceived as the claustrophobic Viennese milieu, and went to the small town of Český Krumlov (Krumau) in southern Bohemia. Krumau was the birthplace of Schiele’s mother; today it is the site of a museum dedicated to Schiele. Despite Schiele’s family connections in Krumau, he and his lover were driven out of the town by the residents, who strongly disapproved of their lifestyle, including his alleged employment of the town’s teenage girls as models. Progressively, Schiele’s work grew more complex and thematic, and he eventually would begin dealing with themes such as death and rebirth.[9]

Neulengbach and imprisonment

Together the couple moved to Neulengbach, 35 km (22 mi) west of Vienna, seeking inspirational surroundings and an inexpensive studio in which to work. As it was in the capital, Schiele’s studio became a gathering place for Neulengbach’s delinquent children. Schiele’s way of life aroused much animosity among the town’s inhabitants, and in April 1912 he was arrested for seducing a young girl of 13,[10] below the 14-year-old age of consent.[11]

When the police came to his studio to place Schiele under arrest, they seized more than a hundred drawings which they considered pornographic. Schiele was imprisoned while awaiting his trial. When his case was brought before a judge, the charges of seduction and abduction were dropped, but the artist was found guilty of exhibiting erotic drawings in a place accessible to children. In court, the judge burned one of the offending drawings over a candle flame. The twenty-one days he had already spent in custody were taken into account, and he was sentenced to a further three days’ imprisonment. While in prison, Schiele created a series of 12 paintings depicting the difficulties and discomfort of being locked in a jail cell.[citation needed]

In 1913, the Galerie Hans Goltz, Munich, mounted Schiele’s first solo show. A solo exhibition of his work took place in Paris in 1914.[12]

World War I to death

In 1914, Schiele glimpsed the sisters Edith and Adéle Harms, who lived with their parents across the street from his studio in the Viennese district of Hietzing, 101 Hietzinger Hauptstraße. They were a middle-class family and Protestant by faith; their father was a master locksmith. In 1915, Schiele chose to marry the more socially acceptable Edith, but had apparently expected to maintain a relationship with Wally. However, when he explained the situation to Wally, she left him immediately and never saw him again. This abandonment led him to paint Death and the Maiden, where Wally’s portrait is based on a previous pairing, but Schiele’s is newly struck. (In February 1915, Schiele wrote a note to his friend Arthur Roessler stating: “I intend to get married, advantageously. Not to Wally.”[This quote needs a citation]) Despite some opposition from the Harms family, Schiele and Edith were married on 17 June 1915, the anniversary of the wedding of Schiele’s parents.[citation needed]

Although Schiele avoided conscription for almost a year, World War I now began to shape his life and work. Three days after his wedding, Schiele was ordered to report for active service in the army where he was initially stationed in Prague. Edith came with him and stayed in a hotel in the city, while Egon lived in an exhibition hall with his fellow conscripts. They were allowed by Schiele’s commanding officer to see each other occasionally.[citation needed]

During the war, Schiele’s paintings became larger and more detailed. His military service, however, gave him limited time, and much of his output consisted of linear drawings of scenery and military officers. Around this time, Schiele also began experimenting with the themes of motherhood and family.[12] His wife Edith was the model for most of his female figures, but during the war (due to circumstance) many of his sitters were male. Since 1915, Schiele’s female nudes became fuller in figure, but many were deliberately illustrated with a lifeless doll-like appearance.[citation needed]

Despite his military service, Schiele was still exhibiting in Berlin. He also had successful shows in ZürichPrague, and Dresden. His first duties consisted of guarding and escorting Russian prisoners. Because of his weak heart and his excellent handwriting, Schiele was eventually given a job as a clerk in a POW camp near the town of Mühling. There, he was allowed to draw and paint imprisoned Russian officers; his commander, Karl Moser (who assumed that Schiele was a painter and decorator when he first met him), even gave him a disused store room to use as a studio. Since Schiele was in charge of the food stores in the camp, he and Edith could enjoy food beyond rations.[13]

By 1917, he was back in Vienna and able to focus on his artistic career. His output was prolific, and his work reflected the maturity of an artist in full command of his talents. He was invited to participate in the Secession’s 49th exhibition, held in Vienna in 1918. Schiele had fifty works accepted for this exhibition, and they were displayed in the main hall. He also designed a poster for the exhibition; it was reminiscent of the Last Supper, with a portrait of himself in the place of Christ. The show was a triumphant success. As a result, prices for Schiele’s drawings increased and he received many portrait commissions.[citation needed]

In the autumn of 1918, the Spanish flu pandemic reached Vienna. Edith, who was six months pregnant, died from the disease on 28 October. Schiele died only three days after his wife. He was 28 years old. During the three days between their deaths, Schiele drew a few sketches of Edith.[14]

Style

Some critics such as Jane Kallir have commented upon Schiele’s work as being grotesque, erotic, pornographic, or disturbing, focusing on sex, death, and discovery. He focused on portraits of others as well as himself. In his later years, while he still worked often with nudes, they were done in a more realist fashion.[12] From a young age, Schiele drew with ‘manic fluency’.[15]

Art critic Martin Gayford wrote in The Spectator: ‘He [Schiele] found his distinctive style very early. His entire oeuvre is that of a young man; most of the work in the first of the two rooms of this densely packed little exhibition dates from 1910–11, when Schiele (1890–1918) was just 20. That helps to explain some tendencies: a half-disgusted preoccupation with sexuality and a similarly queasy fascination with examining his naked self. The male figures mainly seem to have been modelled by the artist, though it is hard to be certain since the head is often not included.’[15]

Kallir and scholar Gerald Izenberg regard Schiele as fluid in sexuality and gender. Kallir says Schiele was “struggling with his own sexual feelings and gender norms” during a historical period of shifting gender expectations, the early women’s movement, and criminalization of homosexuality. Some critics in the 21st century read his artwork as queer.[16][17]

Legacy

Schiele was the subject of the 1980 biographical film Excess and Punishment (aka Egon Schiele – Exzess und Bestrafung), originating in Germany with a European cast that explores Schiele’s artistic demons leading up to his early death. The film was directed by Herbert Vesely and stars Mathieu Carrière as Schiele, Jane Birkin as his early artistic muse Wally Neuzil, Christine Kaufman as his wife, Edith Harms, and Kristina Van Eyck as her sister, Adele Harms. Also in 1980, the Arts Council of Great Britain produced a documentary film, Schiele in Prison, which looked at the circumstances of Schiele’s imprisonment and the veracity of his diary.[18] In 2016 another biographical film was released, Egon Schiele: Death and the Maiden (German: Egon Schiele: Tod und Mädchen).[citation needed]

Joanna Scott‘s 1990 novel Arrogance was based on Schiele’s life and makes him the main figure. His life was also depicted in a theatrical dance production by Stephan Mazurek called Egon Schiele, presented in May 1995, for which Rachel’s, an American post-rock group, composed a score titled Music for Egon Schiele.[19] For The Featherstonehaughs contemporary dance company, Lea Anderson choreographed The Featherstonehaughs Draw On The Sketchbooks Of Egon Schiele in 1997.[20]

Schiele’s life and work have also been the subject of essays, including a discussion of his works by fashion photographer Richard Avedon in an essay on portraiture entitled “Borrowed Dogs.”[21] Mario Vargas Llosa uses the work of Schiele as a conduit to seduce and morally exploit a main character in his 1997 novel The Notebooks of Don Rigoberto.[22] Wes Anderson‘s film The Grand Budapest Hotel features a painting by Rich Pellegrino that is modeled after Schiele’s style which, as part of a theft, replaces a so-called Flemish/Renaissance masterpiece, but is then destroyed by the angry owner when he discovers the deception.[23] The cover of David Bowie‘s 1979 Lodger album is inspired by Schiele’s self-portraits[24] and an image of Schiele appears on the cover of the 2013 single The Stars (Are Out Tonight).[25]

Julia Jordan based her 1999 play Tatjana in Color, which was produced off-Broadway at The Culture Project during the fall of 2003, on a fictionalization of the relationship between Schiele and the 12-year-old Tatjana von Mossig, the Neulengbach girl whose morals he was ultimately convicted of corrupting for allowing her to see his paintings.[26] The opening chapters of Guy Mankowski‘s 2017 novel An Honest Deceit were cited to be heavily influenced by Schiele’s paintings; in particular his portrayals of his sister, Gertrude.[27]

Art collections

The Leopold MuseumVienna houses perhaps Schiele’s most important and complete collection of work, featuring over 200 exhibits. The museum sold one of these, Houses With Colorful Laundry (Suburb II), for $40.1 million at Sotheby’s in 2011.[28] Other notable collections of Schiele’s art include the Egon Schiele-Museum, Tulln, the Österreichische Galerie Belvedere, and the Albertina Graphic Collection, both in Vienna. Viktor Fogarassy collected works by Schiele, including Dämmernde Stadt.[29]

Nazi-looted art

Egon Schiele had among his admirers many Jewish art collectors whose collections were looted under the Nazis: in Germany from 1933, in Austria from the Anschluss of 1938, and in France from the German occupation of 1940. As a result numerous restitution cases in the 21st century involve artworks by Schiele. Egon Schiele’s Dead City, “Woman in Black Pinafore” (1911) and “Woman Hiding Her Face” (1912) were owned by Jewish cabaret artist and film star Fritz Grünbaum before the Nazis deported him to the Dachau concentration camp.[30][31] Krumau (1916) was owned by Daisy Hellmann until it was seized by Nazis in 1942.[32][33] She first made a restitution claim in 1948 but her heirs were not able to recover the Schiele until 2002: Austria’s Nazi looting organization, the Vugesta, had auctioned Krumau at the Dorotheum in Vienna on 24–27 February 1942, where the Sanct Lucas gallery bought it on behalf of Wolfgang Gurlitt. In 1953, the City of Linz acquired it for the Neue Galerie in Linz.[34] The 1917 painting by Egon Schiele, Portrait of the Artist’s Wife was owned by Karl Mayländer, a Jewish businessman in Vienna who was killed in AuschwitzRobert “Robin” Owen Lehman, the son of Robert Lehman, bought Portrait of the Artist’s Wife (1917) in 1964 from Marlborough Gallery in London.[35] Four Trees / Autumn Allée was owned by Josef Morgenstern who was arrested and deported to Auschwitz, where he was murdered.[36][37]

The art gallery of the Jewish art dealer Lea Bondi Jaray, owner of the famous Portrait of Wally, was seized by the Nazis prior to his escaping to London.[38] Wilted Sunflowers, which had been owned by Jewish art collector Karl Grunwald and seized by Nazis in Strasbourg, was discovered after a private collector took it to Christies for evaluation in 2005.[39][40] Portrait of Wally, a 1912 portrait, was purchased by Rudolf Leopold in 1954 and became part of the collection of the Leopold Museum when it was established by the Austrian government, purchasing more than 5,000 pieces that Leopold had owned. After a 1997–1998 exhibit of Schiele’s work at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City, the painting was seized by order of the New York County District Attorney and had been tied up in litigation by heirs of its former owner who claim that the painting was Nazi plunder and should be returned to them.[41][42]

The dispute was settled on 20 July 2010 and the picture subsequently purchased by the Leopold Museum for US$19 million.[43] In 2013, the museum sold three drawings by Schiele for £14 million at Sotheby’s London in order to settle the restitution claim over its 1914 Schiele painting Houses by the Sea.[44] The most expensive, Liebespaar (Selbstdarstellung mit Wally) (1914/15), or Two lovers (Self Portrait With Wally), raised the world auction record for a work on paper by the artist to £7.88 million.[45] On 21 June 2013 Auctionata in Berlin sold a watercolor from 1916, Reclining Woman, at an online auction for €1.827 million (US$2.418 million). This is a world record for the most expensive work of art ever sold at an online auction.[46][47][48]

More at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egon_Schiele

Paul Gauguin: “I must confess that I am myself a woman.”

The painting Lesbians of Papeetee, sometimes known as Two Tahitian Women.

“Where do we come from?” “What are we?””Where are we going?”
― Paul Gauguin

“I shut my eyes in order to see.”
― Paul Gauguin

“Art is either revolution or plagiarism”
― Paul Gauguin

“I must confess that I am myself a woman.”
― Paul Gauguin

Eugène Henri Paul Gauguin (June 7, 1848 – May 8, 1903) was a French Post-Impressionist artist. Unappreciated until after his death, Gauguin is now recognized for his experimental use of colour and Synthetist style that were distinct from Impressionism. Toward the end of his life, he spent ten years in French Polynesia. Wikipedia

Book: “The Roots of Consciousness: The Classic Encyclopedia of Consciousness Studies Revised and Expanded”

The Roots of Consciousness: The Classic Encyclopedia of Consciousness Studies Revised and Expanded

Jeffrey Mishlove

Jeffrey Mishlove’s original pathbreaking compendium of learning in the field of parapsychology, The Roots of Consciousness has undergone a significant metamorphosis through major revisions, updating, and synthesis of materials and issues.

The book in its current edition brings the reader new insights, reflecting the enormous changes that the field has undergone in the past two decades as leading theorists have explored phenomena which point to a reality having not three or four but many dimensions.

In this new edition Mishlove gives skeptics room to voice their most sophisticated criticism of parapsychology research and allows researchers their most articulate responses.

The reader will find a clear and unbiased presentation of a wide variety of phenomena long relegated to the realm of the “supernatural,” and of new theories now unifying these phenomena with leading physicists’ understandings of the universe.

(Goodreads.com)

Book: “Spirit Releasement Therapy”

Spirit Releasement Therapy

William J. Baldwin

Spirit Releasement Therapy is a special form of healing which “calls forth” and identifies positive energies that enhance personal growth, and clears negative energies (whether internally generated or externally attached) that restrict personal growth—on levels ranging from cellular consciousness to archangelic realms.

(Goodreads.com)

Ukraine Emergency Translation Group

Translation is a 5-step process of “straight thinking in the abstract.” The first step is an ontological statement of being beginning with the syllogism: “Truth is that which is so. That which is not truth is not so. Therefore Truth is all there is.” The second step is the sense testimony (what the senses tell us about anything). The third step is the argument between the absolute abstract nature of truth from the first step and the relative specific truth of experience from the second step. The fourth step is filtering out the conclusions you have arrived at in the third step. The fifth step is your overall conclusion.

We call it the Ukraine Emergency Translation Group because that is how and when we started, but we welcome Translations about anything. Here is one sense testimony (2nd step) and its corresponding conclusion (5th step) from this week.

2) My survival depends on internal organs over which I have very little influence.
5) Truth effortlessly and naturally flows into all that is within consciousness.

To submit your Translation, email zonta1111@aol.com and we will anonymously publish your sense testimony and conclusion.

For information about Translation or other Prosperos classes go to: https://www.theprosperos.org/teaching

THE STORIES DOCTORS (AND PATIENTS) TELL

Physicians and Patients Stitch Together Narratives to Diagnose and Heal

The Stories Doctors Tell | Zocalo Public Square • Arizona State University • Smithsonian

To provide compassionate care, doctors need to do more than diagnose or treat patients; they also need to make them feel heard. Dr. Jay Baruch, who has worked in an ER for 30 years, explains. Courtesy of Navy Medicine/Flickr (public domain).

by JAY BARUCH | FEBRUARY 1, 2023 (Zocalopublicsquare.org)

The belly pain is so bad that Mrs. Alves*, a woman in her 40s, is worming uncomfortably on the ER stretcher. “I need an answer,” she says. I promise her that pain medicine is on the way. What I can’t promise her—despite countless tests and specialists’ opinions already on record—is the definitive answer. The diagnosis, the root cause of her symptoms, proves elusive. But her distress is real. And when there’s distress, there’s a story.

To be an emergency physician for nearly 30 years is be humbled again and again by the mysteries of the body and the humans inhabiting them. Mrs. Alves is one of an endless number of patients I’ve seen with the urgent need not just for a diagnosis or treatment of some kind, but to be heard, to have an ear turn its clinical attention to their story.

Stories are not just listened to, they’re constructed, and both tellers and listeners are part of the process. And yet, discussions around doctor/patient communication ignore this fundamental truth.

Healthcare stresses evidence-based practice, clinical decision-making informed by well-designed research studies. However, it’s less interested in scholarship that complicates this paradigm. Knowledge is tied to belief, and the greater our confidence in our beliefs, the more likely we’ll consider it knowledge. Our confidence in our beliefs, experts say, depends less on the quality of the evidence than the coherence of the story constructed in our minds.

The best evidence-informed decisions are useless, if not dangerous, unless we first get the patient’s story right.

In healthcare professionals’ training, a patient’s story is generally shorthand for a medical history—current and past symptoms, medical and surgical problems, and social history. But a medical history isn’t the same as the patient’s story. A detailed description of symptoms can still miss the deep troubles and unspoken needs plaguing a particular person at a specific moment in their life.

I was taught that my job as a doctor was to find the patient’s story—this solid, complete entity—and bring it back by listening diligently, paying attention, and being present. Important practices, but they ignore a central challenge of working with stories—they’re less like polished jewels and more like first drafts.

Patient stories, like all stories, are created out of fragments of information. Deciding which details to include and what to leave out is daunting for writers blessed with quiet and time to revise. Imagine an ER patient in that pressured moment, surrounded by loud noises and strangers, expected to describe experiences that can be complicated, frightening, and embarrassing—and not knowing which details are relevant to their problem and which aren’t.

When we’re listening in this moment and others, doctors are not just receiving information. We’re continuously sorting, prioritizing, and interpreting fragments to create an orderly and coherent narrative. We’re making micro-decisions about which details might be relevant to the problem and discounting others. And our story-making brains don’t need much to construct a believable reality.

 I was taught that my job as a doctor was to findthe patient’s story—this solid, complete entity—and bring it back by listening diligently, paying attention, and being present. Important practices, but they ignore a central challenge of working with stories—they’re less like polished jewels and more like first drafts.

This tendency is demonstrated in a well-known 1944 social psychology study. Researchers Fritz Heider and Marianne Simmel showed subjects a simple animated movie where a large triangle, a small triangle, and a circle moved in and out of an opening and closing rectangle. Then, they asked research subjects to describe what happened. Respondents took these inanimate shapes and described drama, bullying, jealousy, and romance. Only one person told what their eyes observed—geometric objects moving about a screen.

When I played this film for my students, they created confident, specific, and even passionate narratives: a lesbian love story with a disapproving father, a terrified mother and child escaping from an abuser, children’s playground dynamics.

They laughed uneasily, as if catching their mischievous minds in the act. They also learned how subjectivity, assumptions, and their own personal histories contribute to the construction of an apparent objective experience. I illustrated the point with my own narrative mistakes, like the one I made with an uncooperative man with severe back pain and a history of opioid use disorder. I suspected drug-seeking behavior. I thought my words respectful and unbiased, but we began to knock heads. Then, he told me about how he was in recovery, and desperate for other types of treatment to control his pain. He was finally back at work and didn’t want to lose this job. He went on to explain how he could tell from the tone my colleagues and I used that we came into the room with a story fixed in our heads. And to my shame, he was right.

For all the attention given to medical harm in hospitals, or instances where patients felt their needs went unheard by clinicians, doctors rarely examine these situations as narrative missteps.

Narrative is defined in various ways, including a report of connected events and chronology with meaning. A more expansive interpretation draws on the word itself, which is derived from the Latin narrare, which means “to tell” or “to know,” and invites us also to consider narrative’s capacity for knowledge production. Sometimes, the narrative the patient wants us to hear is what’s unsaid. But physicians are poor at picking up on these cues.

Take the older patient who presents to the ER after a fall. The physician asks about the circumstances, including why he fell, his history with falls, and possible injuries. She learns he’s not eating or drinking. He’s not getting around like he used to. He lives alone. She could stop there and move on to the physical exam. Or she could keep him talking.

Studies show that patients may cue their negative emotions or their real concerns indirectly. In this case, the man’s family lives out of state, his wife recently died, he’s been grieving, and he won’t leave the apartment that holds a lifetime of memories. He’s not eating because getting up and down the two flights of stairs is not as easy as it once was. This proud man wearing a Navy cap won’t offer up these details, but his vulnerability unspools once he’s asked.

Patients want their physicians to ask questions. Unfortunately, health providers often respond by focusing on logistical or biomedical issues. By neglecting emotional communication, we miss opportunities to express empathy.

Such behavior is often attributed to time constraints, but research shows that when we pick up on patients’ often quiet or even silent cries for help about psychological or social issues, time is often saved.

When we work with stories and recognize the different ways they are constructed and communicated, we begin to appreciate not only their power but their fragility. For patients to tell their stories, they must first overcome the vulnerability that results from admitting fears and insecurities, new frailties, and limitations. And as physicians reaching branch points in the conversation, we must be sensitive to the presence of other directions the narrative might go, and how and why we might be motivated to steer it down a particular path. Is this path safer, or clearly marked, leading to an identifiable destination?

We must be willing to interrogate our story-building process as rigorously as our research methods. What stories are we listening for, what assumptions or beliefs are we bringing into the story, and how are these value judgments influencing the stories we hear?

As I listen to Mrs. Alves crying for an answer, my first instinct is to order more labs and diagnostic imaging. Instead, I take a seat, and ask her not only to describe her pain but the experience of being in pain, and what distressed her enough to come to the ER. She tells me about the specialists who won’t call her back or dismiss her symptoms when tests come back normal. Her doctor is hard to reach. Besides, he thinks it’s all in her head. What she wants from them is what she desires from me: someone willing to listen for a few minutes, who will be curious about the pain, but more importantly, appreciate how it’s disrupted her life. Quality and compassionate patient care are only possible when the physician and patient work from the same story.

*The names in this piece have been changed.

JAY BARUCHis professor of emergency medicine at Alpert Medical School at Brown University. His latest book is Tornado of Life: A Doctor’s Journey Through Constraints and Creativity in the ER.

Random Acts of Kindness Day is February 17, 2023

Participate in the first annual #KindnessExperience on Random Acts of Kindness Day, February 17, 2023! You might just change someone’s life—maybe even your own!
THE KINDNESS EXPERIENCE

This is a simple experiment for individuals to experience the scientific benefits of kindness.

The positive effects of kindness are experienced in the brain of everyone who witnessed the act, improving their mood and making them significantly more likely to “pay it forward.” -Jamil Zaki

Together, we can show the world the amazing impact simple acts of kindness can have on the recipient, the giver and anyone who witnesses it.

IT’S EASY AS 1, 2, 3:
  • Pick your top two kindness ideas and write each one on a separate piece of paper. Put the ideas in a container and randomly select one. Engage as many people as you can… wherever you spend your time!
  • Perform the act of kindness.
  • Share how it went—tag @rakfoundation or email us info@randomactsofkindness.org.

Check out our kindness ideas, calendars (school, work and home) and our brand new kindness poster (see below) to help brainstorm ideas.

MAKE KINDNESS THE NORM ALL YEAR LONG:
  • Check out our kindness resources for SCHOOLWORKPLACE and HOME
  • Sign up to receive a kindness idea every Monday.
  • Join the RAKtivists (Random Act of Kindness activists) community to receive exclusive resources along with behind the scenes pictures/videos of the Random Acts of Kindness Foundation.
  • Print kindness quotes, color and hang up in areas to inspire yourself and others.

To help spread the word, download and share our official participation guide here. We also created a kindness ideas poster and fun coloring page you can download below.

DOWNLOAD POSTER

Download Large 18 x 24″ Size

DOWNLOAD COLORING PAGE

Can you imagine a world where kindness is the norm? That’s the world we want.
That’s why we do what we do. And it requires some intentional actions.

We love connecting people with ideas and resources. We encourage and celebrate acts of kindness.
It’s definitely not normal. But it might be soon. #MakeKindnesstheNorm

Kindness at School
Kindness at Home
Kindness at Work

We also have other resources to inspire you to be kind wherever you are—kindness ideaskindness quotesthe kind blogkindness videos and kindness stories.

Kindness Ideas

Kindness Quotes

The Kind Blog

Kindness Stories

Kindness Videos

ALL of our resources are generously provided for FREE!

(Contributed by Sara Walker)