Rumi: Poet and Sufi mystic inspired by same-sex love

Rumi is a 13th-century Persian poet and Sufi mystic whose love for another man inspired some of the world’s best poems and led to the creation of a new religious order, the Whirling Dervishes. He was born Sept. 30, 1207 in Afghanistan.

With sensuous beauty and deep spiritual insight, Rumi writes about the sacred presence in ordinary experiences. His poetry is widely admired around the world and he is one of the most popular poets in America. One of his often-quoted poems begins:

If anyone asks you
how the perfect satisfaction
of all our sexual wanting
will look, lift your face
and say,
Like this.*

The homoeroticism of Rumi is hidden in plain sight. It is well known that his poems were inspired by his love for another man, but the queer implications are seldom discussed. There is no proof that Rumi and his beloved Shams of Tabriz had a sexual relationship, but the intensity of their same-sex love is undeniable.

Some of his more homoerotic poems were not published in English until The Forbidden Rumi: The Suppressed Poems of Rumi on Love, Heresy, and Intoxication was released in 2006. The volume was forbidden both because of its homoerotic content and because it promotes the “blasphemy” that one must go beyond religion in order to experience God.

Rumi’s life changed when he met a man called Shams

Rumi was born Sept. 30, 1207 in Afghanistan, which was then part of the Persian Empire. His father, a Muslim scholar and mystic, moved the family to Roman Anatolia (present-day Turkey) to escape Mongol invaders when Rumi was a child. Rumi lived most of his life in this region and used it as the basis of his chosen name, which means “Roman.” His full name is Jalal ad-Din Muhammad Balkhi-Rumi.

His father died when Rumi was 25 and he inherited a position as teacher at a madrassa (Islamic school). He continued studying Shariah (Islamic law), eventually issuing his own fatwas (legal opinions) and giving sermons in the local mosques. Rumi also practiced the basics of Sufi mysticism in a community of dervishes, who are Muslim ascetics similar to mendicant friars in Christianity.

Rumi of Persia by Robert Lentz

“Rumi of Persia” by Robert Lentz (TrinityStores.com)

On Nov. 15, 1244 Rumi met the man who would change his life: a wandering dervish named Shams of Tabriz (Shams-e-Tabrizi or Shams al-Din Muhammad). He came from the city of Tabriz in present-day Iranian Azerbaijan. It is said that Shams had traveled throughout the Middle East asking Allah to help him find a friend who could “endure” his companionship. A voice in a vision sent him to the place where Rumi lived.

Meeting of Rumi and Shams
16th-17th century folio
(Wikimedia Commons)

Rumi, a respected scholar in his thirties, was riding a donkey home from work when an elderly stranger in ragged clothes approached. It was Shams. He grasped the reins and started a theological debate. Some say that Rumi was so overwhelmed that he fainted and fell off the donkey.

Rumi and Shams soon became inseparable. They spent months together, lost in a kind of ecstatic mystical communion known as “sobhet” — conversing and gazing at each other until a deeper conversation occurred without words. They forgot about human needs and ignored Rumi’s students, who became jealous. When conflict arose in the community, Shams disappeared as unexpectedly as he had arrived.

Rumi’s loneliness at their separation led him to begin the activities for which he is still remembered. He poured out his soul in poetry and mystical whirling dances of the spirit.

Eventually Rumi found out that Shams had gone to Damascus. He wrote letters begging Shams to return. Legends tell of a dramatic reunion. The two sages fell at each other’s feet. In the past they were like a disciple and teacher, but now they loved each other as equals. One account says, “No one knew who was lover and who the beloved.” Both men were married to women, but they resumed their intense relationship with each other, merged in mystic communion. Jealousies arose again and some men began plotting to get rid of Shams.

One winter night, when he was with Rumi, Shams answered a knock at the back door. He disappeared and was never seen again. Many believe that he was murdered.

Rumi grieved when Shams disappeared

Rumi grieved deeply. He searched in vain for his friend and lost himself in whirling dances of mourning. One of his poems hints at the his emotions:

Dance, when you’re broken open.
Dance, if you’ve torn the bandage off.
Dance in the middle of the fighting.
Dance in your blood.
Dance, when you’re perfectly free.

Rumi danced, mourned and wrote poems until the pressure forged a new consciousness. “The wound is the place where the Light enters you,” he once wrote. His soul fused with his beloved. They became One: Rumi, Shams and God. He wrote:

Why should I seek? I am the same as he.
His essence speaks through me.
I have been looking for myself.

After this breakthrough, waves of profound poetry flowed out of Rumi. He attributed more and more of his writings to Shams. His literary classic is a vast collection of poems called “The Works of Shams of Tabriz.” The Turkish government refused to help with translation of the last volume, which was finally published in 2006 as The Forbidden Rumi: The Suppressed Poems of Rumi on Love, Heresy, and Intoxication.

Rumi went on to live and love again, dedicating poems to other beloved men. His second great love was the goldsmith Saladin Zarkub. After the goldsmith’s death, Rumi’s scribe Husan Chelebi became Rumi’s beloved companion for the rest of his life. Rumi died at age 66 after an illness on Dec. 17, 1273. Soon his followers founded the Mevlevi Order, known as the whirling dervishes because of the dances they do in devotion to God.

___
*“Like This” is quoted from The Essential Rumi, which has translations by Coleman Barks with John Moyne. For the whole poem, visit Rumi.org.
___
Top image credit:
Rumi and Shams together in a detail from “Dervish Whirl” by Shahriar Shahriari (RumiOnFire.com)

___
This post is part of the LGBTQ Saints series by Kittredge Cherry. Traditional and alternative saints, people in the Bible, LGBTQ martyrs, authors, theologians, religious leaders, artists, deities and other figures of special interest to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people and our allies are covered.

Copyright © Kittredge Cherry. All rights reserved.
Qspirit.net presents the Jesus in Love Blog on LGBTQ spirituality.

Kittredge Cherry
Follow

Kittredge Cherry

Founder at Q Spirit
Kittredge Cherry is a lesbian Christian author who writes regularly about LGBTQ spirituality.She holds degrees in religion, journalism and art history.She was ordained by Metropolitan Community Churches and served as its national ecumenical officer, advocating for LGBTQ rights at the National Council of Churches and World Council of Churches.

Blockchain’s Quiet Revolution

Most of us will never use the technology, but we’ll still feel its effects

By  (Medium.com)

In 1970, a scientist at IBM Research named Edgar F. Codd revealed a remarkable discovery that would truly change the world. Though few realized its significance at the time — including IBM, which neglected to commercialize it — the relational model for managing data would spawn an entire industry.

Today, few have heard of relational databases, but everybody seems to be talking about blockchain. Much like Codd’s idea nearly a half century ago, blockchain represents an opportunity to create a new data infrastructure likely to help power businesses for another half-century.

Contrary to current hype, few of us will ever work with a blockchain or even know it’s there. The real revolution will come not from the technology itself, but from its secondary effects in the form of new business models. To understand these, you must first understand how Codd created the data economy in the first place.

Blockchain represents an opportunity to create a new data infrastructure, which will likely help power business for another half-century.

How relational databases changed the world

Imagine taking a trip back to 1980. Ronald Reagan was just elected president, and Terry Bradshaw led the Pittsburgh Steelers to yet another Super Bowl. Just a year before, Larry Ellison and two friends launched the first commercial product based on Codd’s ideas. Two years later, they would change the company’s name to Oracle.

Now, imagine trying to explain to someone in 1980 what they’d need a relational database for. Back then, few people used computers. Mainframes were primarily used for back office tasks and heavy computational jobs like scientific research. Relational databases were hardly relevant to most people’s day-to-day work.

What made relational databases important? They changed how people manage data. They made data fungible. Classical or “flat file” databases worked very much like Excel spreadsheets. They stored data in inflexible columns and rows. People would need to understand exactly how the database was set up to find the information they needed. Anybody who’s tried to understand someone else’s spreadsheet knows what that’s like.

With relational databases, however, all we’d need to know is the query language. With it, we could extract whatever we needed from any database no matter who set it up. That’s why, today, we can hop on a system like the internet and pull data from just about anywhere we want. Relational databases are what made the information age possible, and most people hardly realized it.

Why blockchain matters

Relational databases were designed for centralized computing. Data was stored in a mainframe, and we’d use a terminal — and later a PC — to get information out. For example, executives use ERP software to pull data from far-flung operations and manage business processes more effectively. Marketers access research databases to understand consumers. Salespeople leverage CRM systems to service their customers.

Today, however, computing is no longer centralized, but radically decentralized. We carry smartphones in our pockets that are more powerful than what would have been considered a supercomputer back when relational databases were invented. We use those devices not only to retrieve information, but also to send it to centralized databases, often without knowing we’re doing it.

That creates an information bottleneck that is often insecure for a number of reasons. First, while most commercial databases are encrypted, data needs to be unencrypted for us to use it, which leads to problems like the one with Facebook and Cambridge Analytica. Data is also unencrypted at the source, so firms can access our data and store it without us having any control over it.

The most salient aspect of blockchain is that it functions as a distributed database. Unlike relational databases that house data in one location, blockchain distributes data everywhere at once in a secure form. So we can track data wherever it goes, see what it’s used for and who alters it in any way. This will create a radically more transparent information economy.

With blockchain, we can track data wherever it goes, see what it’s used for and who alters it in any way.

What a killer blockchain app will look like

In a recent conversation I had with Bernie Meyerson, IBM’s chief innovation officer, I asked him what he was most excited about. Thinking he would talk about the Watson program or a futuristic research project, I was somewhat surprised that the first thing he mentioned was his company’s joint venture with Maersk to develop a blockchain infrastructure for global trade.

With everything going on at IBM, from artificial intelligence to developing new computing architectures like quantum computing and neuromorphic chips, shipping seemed a bit lowbrow to me. Nevertheless, once I started digging into the numbers I could see what he meant. Blockchain really can have an extraordinary impact on global trade.

Consider the fact that a 2013 study by the World Economic Forum found that reducing back-office friction in international trade could increase GDP by nearly 5 percent and commerce by 15 percent. Global GDP amounts to nearly $80 trillion, which means you’re talking about a $4 trillion potential impact. If even a fraction of that pans out, it’s huge.

The thing is, nobody is going to buy a product and say, “Wow! This is 5 percent cheaper thanks to blockchain!” The truth is that no one will ever see it. Blockchain, much like the relational databases that came before it, is technology infrastructure. It’s basically to global business what paved roads were to cars — an essential enabling technology, but not a “killer app.”

Blockchain is to global business what paved roads were to cars — an essential enabling technology.

Where to find the next big thing

Over the next decade, we’ll see the impact of blockchain unfold, but it will look a lot more like Oracle and the IBM-Maersk joint venture than the next Google or Facebook. If you don’t work with a relational database now, you probably won’t have much to do with blockchain in the future.

Still, that doesn’t make the impact any less real or exciting. Much like the internet distributed computing, blockchain will distribute secure data. That is likely to radically increase transparency and security while reducing costs. “Disintermediation” is a term we can expect to hear a lot of in the future.

For example, Hu-manity.co is a new startup that plans to give patients more control over their health data. Today, when we sign a consent form for our data to be used for research, we essential give it away. However, with blockchain, we will be able to track it, decide for ourselves how we want our data to be used and even be reimbursed for it.

If you want to know how to profit from blockchain, start looking for information bottlenecks, like global shipping or medical data. Eliminating those bottlenecks is how blockchain will truly change the world.


An earlier version of this article first appeared at Inc.com.

Go to the profile of Greg Satell

WRITTEN BY

Greg Satell

Author of Mapping Innovation, Speaker, Innovation Adviser, @HBR and @Inc Contributor, Publisher- www.DigitalTonto.com - Learn more at www.GregSatell.com.

Why Emotional Excess is Essential to Writing and Creativity

By Maria Popova (brainpickings.org)

anaisnindiary4.jpg?w=680The third volume of Anaïs Nin’s diaries has been on heavy rotation in recent weeks, yielding Nin’s thoughtful and timeless meditations on lifemass movementsParis vs. New Yorkwhat makes a great city, and the joy of handicraft.

The subsequent installment, The Diary of Anais Nin, Vol. 4: 1944-1947 (public library) is an equally rich treasure trove of wisdom on everything from life to love to the art of writing. In fact, Nin’s gift shines most powerfully when she addresses all of these subjects and more in just a few ripe sentences.

anaisnin.jpg?resize=617%2C710

Such is the case with the following exquisite letter of advice she sent to a seventeen-year-old aspiring author by the name of Leonard W., whom she had taken under her wing as creative mentor. Nin writes:

2e292385-dc1c-4cfe-b95e-845f6f98c2ec.pngI like to live always at the beginnings of life, not at their end. We all lose some of our faith under the oppression of mad leaders, insane history, pathologic cruelties of daily life. I am by nature always beginning and believing and so I find your company more fruitful than that of, say, Edmund Wilson, who asserts his opinions, beliefs, and knowledge as the ultimate verity. Older people fall into rigid patterns. Curiosity, risk, exploration are forgotten by them. You have not yet discovered that you have a lot to give, and that the more you give the more riches you will find in yourself. It amazed me that you felt that each time you write a story you gave away one of your dreams and you felt the poorer for it. But then you have not thought that this dream is planted in others, others begin to live it too, it is shared, it is the beginning of friendship and love.

[…]

You must not fear, hold back, count or be a miser with your thoughts and feelings. It is also true that creation comes from an overflow, so you have to learn to intake, to imbibe, to nourish yourself and not be afraid of fullness. The fullness is like a tidal wave which then carries you, sweeps you into experience and into writing. Permit yourself to flow and overflow, allow for the rise in temperature, all the expansions and intensifications. Something is always born of excess: great art was born of great terrors, great loneliness, great inhibitions, instabilities, and it always balances them. If it seems to you that I move in a world of certitudes, you, par contre, must benefit from the great privilege of youth, which is that you move in a world of mysteries. But both must be ruled by faith.

The Diary of Anais Nin, Vol. 4 is brimming with such poetic yet practical sagacity on the creative life and is a beautiful addition to other famous advice on writing like Kurt Vonnegut’s 8 rules for a great story, David Ogilvy’s 10 no-nonsense tips, Henry Miller’s 11 commandments, Jack Kerouac’s 30 beliefs and techniques, John Steinbeck’s 6 pointers, and Susan Sontag’s synthesized learnings.

Souls in Other Selves and the Immortality of the Body


University of California Television (UCTV)
Published on May 26, 2018

(Visit: http://www.uctv.tv/)
0:30 – Foerster Lecture Background
3:02 – Introduction – Paula Varsano
8:52 – Main Talk – Marilyn Strathern
1:12:03 – Audience Questions

Sometimes the soul seems a more precise concept than the body. In this lecture Marilyn Strathern, goes to a place and time where all kinds of beings (including food plants) have souls and where the bodily basis of life is immortalized through cloning. She comments on the way present-day anthropology brings fresh illumination to what we thought we knew. Series: “UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures” [6/2018] [Show ID: 33308]

God Admits There Was Probably A Better Way Of Giving Humans Taste Of Heavenly Bliss Than Opioids

October 3, 2018 (theonion.com)

HEAVEN—Expressing His regret over the damage wrought by the divine substance, Supreme Being and Creator of All Things God admitted Wednesday that He could probably have devised a better way to give humans a taste of heavenly bliss than opioids. “I just wanted man to have a preview of how awesome the afterlife will be—just the briefest glimpse, mind you—but it seems as if I once again gave them an inch and they took a mile,” said the ruler of all the universe in a rare admission of His ill-considered, if well-intentioned, contribution to the crisis-level prescription pain reliever abuse currently afflicting the United States. “It’s the whole knowledge-of-good-and-evil thing all over again, isn’t it? Except this time, I probably should have made, say, oranges feel this amazing instead of picking a physically debilitating and addictive substance.” The Lord also expressed misgivings about interweaving the ineffable fragrance of heaven with that of spray paint fumes.

Why only individual thinking can reunite America

Thinking in teams is destroying American life, says Timothy Snyder, Professor of History at Yale University. A lot of people in the U.S. want to ride the bench for the winning team. They know that things aren’t going well for them personally, but they want to feel like they’re on the right side. But this approach is tearing the country apart. (bigthink.com)

Timothy Snyder: Well, the whole idea of best interests in the question, “Why do people vote against their best interests?” is not an objective thing in nature. It’s one of the very problems in the politics of inevitability, is that we think like economists and we say, “Well, everybody is rational in the narrow economical sense, everybody knows what’s good for them.” And that’s just not true, or rather the ability of people to discern what their interests are depends upon a process of education, which includes not just reasoning mathematically, which is very important, but also it has to include some kind of humanistic side where people learn to criticize or think critically about what they hear, learn to make distinctions among various kinds of media.

Because that notion of “one’s best interest” is not at all natural, it’s the product of a certain kind of education. And that kind of education can be undone, first of all it can not be done, but it can also be undone, one can deliberately appeal to the parts of the mind which aren’t concerned with the future, with math, with critical thinking, but to the parts of the mind which think in terms of “us and them,” “friend and enemy,” and you can draw people into these cycles. And the less—and this is how it fits together with inequality—the less people see a good future for themselves if they think in terms of interests, the more they’re drawn into a different way of thinking where it’s not about their individual interests, but it’s more about feeling like they’re on the “right team,” they’re on the “right side.”

For a lot of people in the U.S. now I think it’s a little bit like they want to ride the bench for the winning team. They know that things aren’t going well for them personally, but they want to feel like they’re on the right side. And that helps to explain the appeal of someone like a Donald Trump who, of course, himself is a failure but has the skills to present himself as a success and can get people thinking, “Yeah, I want to be on that team. I’m not going to do any better economically, but I’m going to feel better about myself, because I’m on the winning team, I’m on what it feels like the winning team.” So the whole thing about best interests has to be seen as a project.

You have to educate people, you have to take anxiety away by providing certain basic things like schooling and pensions and vacations so people can pause and think a little bit about themselves and their future. If you don’t provide those basic elements of (I would say) political civilization then people are too anxious, it’s hard for them to get their minds around what their interest actually are.

And beyond that if you don’t educate them positively towards thinking with both math and with the humanities they’re not going to get there anyway. So it’s a project. A basic thing that we Americans forget—and a basic thing that politics of inevitability shrouds—is that creating the individual is a project. It takes a lot of work to create an individual. I mean we want to have thinking individuals. We want to have people who know what their best interests are. We want to have people who go thoughtfully into that ballot box, but that’s a project; we’re not born that way.

I mean as a father I can assure you that we are not born that way. I think it’s the noblest and best thing we do, to try to create individuals, but we can’t just leave it to chance, and I think that’s where we go wrong. One of the basic ways we go wrong with the politics of inevitability, we think, “Okay, automatically we’re going to be those kinds of rational people,” but we’re not automatically those kinds of rational people. I mean the irony is if you want to create individuals who can think about their own best interests you have to, as a society, say, “We agree to make it a project to educate and form such individuals.”

Your Horoscopes — Week Of October 2, 2018 (theonion.com)

Libra | Sept. 23 to Oct. 22

A mistake in your will results in the words “Please Take One” being chiseled into your tombstone.

Scorpio | Oct. 23 to Nov. 21

Your name will be mentioned over 40 times in the president’s proposal for a new, nationwide “asshole tax.”

Sagittarius | Nov. 22 to Dec. 21

Years of bad blood between you and the colonel finally boil over, resulting in the bloodiest moonshine war your part of the suburbs has ever seen.

Capricorn | Dec. 22 to Jan. 19

Your refusal to super-size your meal will ultimately result in your starvation.

Aquarius | Jan. 20 to Feb. 18

A genie will grant you a million dollars if you go an entire week without thinking of the word “hoopty.”

Pisces | Feb. 19 to March 20

Your fairy godmother will finally hear your pleas for help. However, her only response will be to appear in the corner and squint ominously.

Aries | March 21 to April 19

You will never achieve your full potential as a person unless you can win your life’s most personal battles. Declare war on polyester/cotton blends.

Taurus | April 20 to May 20

When 14 bodies are discovered in your basement, your usual alibi of “The dog did it” is of absolutely no help—even though it’s actually true this time.

Gemini | May 21 to June 20

You are in for the fight of your life this week when Diana Rigg overhears your catty remarks about the cut of her evening gown.

Cancer | June 21 to July 22

Unspeakable tragedies will strike Cancer this week, but the look on your face will be just priceless.

Leo | July 23 to Aug. 22

Shortly after your impending death, many surprising truths of the afterlife will be revealed to you. It’s not too late to begin praying to the postman.

Virgo | Aug. 23 to Sept. 22

Your community decides to honor your contributions to society by making you part of the new blacktop in the school parking lot.

Consciousness, spirituality, biography, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more