All posts by Mike Zonta

Interview with Matthew Fox: Essential Writings on Creation Spirituality

Andrew Harvey By Andrew Harvey | May 19, 2023 (tikkun.org)
Matthew Fox: Essential Writings on Creation Spirituality (Orbis, 2022) edited by Charles Burack
[Editor’s Note: Although Tikkun is a Jewish magazine, we also publish Christian and other spiritual wisdom from a wide variety of creative thinkers who share with us a desire to transform the world.
— Rabbi Michael Lerner]

Interview of Matthew Fox by Andrew Harvey regarding the New Book Matthew Fox: Essential Writings on Creation Spirituality (Orbis, 2022) edited by Charles Burack.

Andrew Harvey: Hello.  It is a very great joy for me to be here with you to celebrate the extraordinary book that has just come out, Matthew Fox: Essential Writings on Creation Spirituality, with an excellent introduction by Charles Burack, who oversaw the book.  Matthew, this book is essentially a compendium of everything that you have devoted your life to.  You have been, for me, not just a very great friend and not just a great mentor, but you’ve been in your vast fierceness, your unified burning life, someone who constantly enkindles me and irradiates me and so many others, with the flames of your blazing charity.

The publication of this book, my friends, is far more than just a new book and spiritual event, it is nothing less than the distillation of a lifetime’s passion for love and truth and justice.  And it comes to us at a moment in our tragic and burning world when we need its clarity, its grounded joy, and its summons to sacred action on behalf of the whole glory of creation.

So thank you, Matt, so deeply from the bottom of my heart.

Matthew Fox: Thank you and congratulations on your new book, Love is Everything: A Year with Hadewijch of Antwerp, coming out just this very day, also a special moment.

Andrew Harvey: Hadewich invites us to listen to the great voices of the sacred feminine Christ which is returning.

Matthew Fox: Yes, and you are a perfect megaphone for that important shift in consciousness from the patriarchal version of the masculine to a balance of the healthy sacred feminine along with a healthy masculine, so this is a very special day and I might add that I was honored to write a very short Forward to that book as well, so I feel part of it.

Andrew Harvey: And what a wonderful way to begin, because one of the extraordinary contributions of your book is a new vision, both of the sacred feminine and the sacred masculine.  This enables us to enter the sacred marriage of transcendence and Immanence that really does birth in us the fullness of who we can be and what the full vision of what the creation is.

One of the things you say, and it’s such an arresting and thrilling formulation, is that we need to reimagine the sacred marriage as a fusion of the Green Man and the Black Madonna and it came to me last night reading Hadewich how to reach and thank her for this extraordinary journey that I’ve been on.  That the authentic sacred feminine is also a marriage of the green woman and the Black Madonna of Mary and Kali have someone totally in her being radiant with the freshness and vitality of what Hildegard of Bingen calls be viriditas or “greening power.”  They align themselves with the fierce energy of compassion and the molten sacred energy for transformation of the world.  So with your formulation you’ve changed the whole conversation.

But I want to begin by asking you. Where are we?   This book is coming out in a terrifying moment for the whole human race.

Matthew Fox: That is true, of course, we are literally facing extinction, you know. People are acting up and acting out, and nations are doing so nations led by authoritarian leaders or authoritarian wannabe leaders and climate change, above all, is bearing down on us.  Just this week, as you know, Europe set records everywhere for heat and, of course, where I live here in northern California, we’ve got the Yellowstone Park on fire like never before, and these wildfires are happening all around the world and hurricanes and floods that go with them and the droughts with all the implications for agriculture, so severe.  And, of course, the melting of the glaciers and ice.  Where will we be getting our water in the future?  So this is truly a time to meditate on extinction, at the same time that we do what hope really is as defined by David Orr: “Hope is a verb with the sleeves rolled up.”

We have to go to work, and that includes an inner work which, as you alluded to earlier, includes the balance of the sacred masculine and feminine, but it includes a lot of things and includes a renewed commitment to justice and to carrying on the fight whether we’re talking racial justice or economic justice or gender justice or eco-justice–all these issues are on the table.

And, of course, all this is familiar to readers of Tikkun magazine because Tikkun itself stands for a healing of the of the world and that is the Jewish understanding of redemption–it’s not about some private salvation thing, where you get to heaven climbing on other people’s backs–it’s about the survival of the whole–of the Community, and today the Community is homo sapiens’ version of humanity.

Let us include in our vision of humanity all these striking dangers that face us, but at the same time, we want to embrace what our strong points are as a species.  Yes, we’re discussing our shadow; that’s not a surprise—it appears in 90% of the headlines of our papers and on the Internet every day, but also let us welcome, for example, the Webb telescope–what a marvelous accomplishment as a species!  What other species has done this, that we can bring back into our living rooms and our personal computers the first galaxy and the first stars from 13.8 billion years ago?  From way back then the very universe is speaking to us.  Just that alone is an amazing accomplishment of our intelligence and our curiosity and our willingness to pursue it.

Of course, it was created by people from, I think, over 30 countries and thousands of scientists have contributed to it, so it shows that the human community with a guided and shared purpose can accomplish an awful lot.  So we have to meditate on the good things that our species has brought forth, including the courage and wisdom of Gandhi or Mandela or King or Dorothy Day or Sojourner Truth or Isaiah and Jesus, and the other prophets of the world including Black Elk. Our species is such a mixed bag.  Here we have the Pope going to Canada to confess the sins of the Catholic Church and indigenous children ripped from their families and culture and put into white schools–a horrible, horrible story that is finally coming out.  So we do have to pay attention to the suffering of the world and how are we going to contribute to healing it.  And to survival if that’s still possible given climate change.  If we don’t get honest about it and pull out of denial about what’s really facing us, we will go extinct.

I think that among things we have things going for us is the return of the feminine and the women’s movement has brought that forward and women scholarship for sure and like you say, the recovery of the great women mystics and mysticism itself, by men and women, is a real contribution to bringing forward to what has been a patriarchal era for thousands of years, bringing a balance back.  Like Dorothy Soelle says, mysticism itself is the language for healthy religion and for feminism because it deconstructs the notion of simply a vertical relationship to an all-powerful divinity.  So, our capacity for creativity cannot be underestimated–that’s why I don’t count our species out yet–we are capable of massive transformation, but it’s got to begin in the inside it’s got to begin with a revolution in values; and this, I think, is what mystics offer us and prophets the world over, and certainly Jesus was about that.  So were the prophets who preceded him and those who have come after.  So don’t cut our species out yet if we can see that the handwriting is on the wall if we still have time.  Scientists are saying we have seven years.  If we still have time, we can change our ways profoundly out of necessity–I do think nothing moves the human species like necessity, and the necessity is there, so that’s the kind of time we’re living in and I think we have to dig deep into our souls.

Tikkun needs your support to bring the kind of analyses and information we provide.
Click Here to make a tax-deductible contribution.

Andrew Harvey: I totally agree with you.  There’s a wonderful man named Stephen Jenkinson who says about this time we can either view it as an affliction or an as assignment.  And I think that’s a very sacred distinction, if you view it as an affliction and allow the horror and the chaos and the madness to drive you into either denial or paralysis, then you’re missing the rugged great gift of a time like this, which is precisely what you talked about–the rugged great gift of a time like this, is that it can drive us deeper into our essence. To find that both deathless consciousness and a wholly new level of courage to step out in the middle of this gathering disaster to do everything we can, as wisely as we can to protect the creation, to honor equality, to stand up for harmony and justice in every realm and in every world.

And what’s becoming clear to me, and I know it’s always been clear to you, is that, if we can use this immense global dark night in that way, as an assignment, as an invitation to become the verb of hope with our sleeves rolled up, then we ourselves will be transformed–even transfigured–and the whole human race if it can meet this challenge in that way will go to the next level of our co creative capacity with the divine and a wholly new way of being and doing on every level could be established. 

This also is being offered to us, on the one hand, the possibility, the real possibility of annihilation and on the other hand, the possibility of a massive birth of a new kind of human race chastened and humbled by tragedy but also awake to the assignment and willing under divine inspiration and divine grace to bring all of the best of what it’s always had available into focus in sacred action and sacred creativity.

Matthew Fox: Well, very well said, and I think that it’s really imperative that we of course, make a choice between, you say, affliction or assignment.  The mystics often talk about the dark night of the soul as a school. 

One thing that I think of these days is the Jupiter One space shot that was the first invention of humans ever to leave the solar system and that, when it looked back on its journey, it took pictures of its journey and the earth was just this tiny dot in the universe.  I think that perspective is so important, and I can’t understand why it cannot convert every human on the planet, to see that.  Because its perspective that this planet is absolutely singular–it’s so unique.  Now we may find other planets with life on them, but will we be able to communicate with them and will there be intelligent life there?

It’s an interesting question and we hope so, but what matters now is that currently this planet Earth is the one that has come to a point where it can sing the praises of the universe that has been birthing for 13.8 billion years.  And we know now it is 2 trillion galaxies big, each with hundreds of billions of stars, and on this particular planet we’ve got elephants and rain forests and giraffes and whales and bumble bees and butterflies and human beings, and I ask: What is it going to take for us to fall in love with this planet and act accordingly, enough to wake ourselves up and to get to work, to save the beauty of this planet, as it currently exists?   I just think such an awareness is so important today because it puts into perspective our national ideologies and our warmongering, our revenge on others, our greed, our religious persecutions, and hatreds and projections and wars of the past.

It is part of everything you and I are saying that this is the next step of evolution is at our door.  Either we’re going to evolve rapidly and undergo deep transformation, or we will go the way of all our other brother and sister hominids such as the Neanderthal and the Denisovans and all these other extinct species we are finding evidence of today—I think they have counted 14 with more to come.  We are the last ones standing, so we have to take that seriously and get moving and transforming.

Andrew Harvey: One source of hope–rugged hope–is that all evolutionary processes in nature do not proceed gradually, they come as a result of a very extreme forced crisis.  So that’s one source of hope and the other sense of hope is something you once said to me, when we were walking in California, you said if we’re capable, as we obviously are, of taking our own race and a great deal of nature to the brink of extinction–if we have that power–we also have the power within us to reverse that disaster because what we’re being shown by the crisis is the staggering power our human agency has.  And if we can turn, you said, to the sources of primordial wisdom and empowerment and drink from those sacred wells and see in the shining water of that well our true face and claim our human divinity, then who knows what we could be capable of.

So those two sources of hope remain open to us, and I want to use the second thing you said to point to one of the very great contributions of your work and the very great inspirations of this book.

Jung wrote in the Red Book something that just leapt off the pages in letters of fire, when I read it, because it summed up so much of what I’ve been doing and so much of what you’ve been doing  because we have different works, but we in so many ways endeavored to do the same thing from the center of our own temperament.  What Jung says is “salvation is the resolution of the task and the task is to restore the primordial ancient in the new so as to birth a new creation.”

And when I read that, I understood why I had spent so many decades trying to understand and trying to live the ancient glory of Rumi, the ancient glory of Kabir, the vision of Transfiguration and Angelus Silesius, the stunning grandeur of Hadewich, because I knew that if I could truly enter into their world and, if I could truly bring back the immense treasures that I found in the world, a treasure far greater than modern spirituality or modern psychology or the very flatland vision of humanity that we live with, then human beings would have available to them the primordially ancient in the disaster of, the new so that they could work with that restored glory to infuse themselves with truth and passion and stamina and nobility and birth a new world.  And you have done exactly the same thing with Aquinas, with Meister Eckhart, with Hildegard of Bingen, and with Julian of Norwich.  One of the really most inspiring parts of your book is the way in which your love for these tremendous pioneers of human divine life.  And what they have given us and how relevant what they have given us to our time is.

So what I’m going to ask you is to do something very difficult, but I know if anybody can do it, you can.

And that is just to speak out of the heart of your love for each one of them and speak about what each one of them has to offer us right now for this journey either into extinction or evolution/transformation.  

 So let’s start with Aquinas, why did Aquinas possess your heart, and so why did you spend so much time on him and what has he to give us now?

Matthew Fox: Before I address that, I would like to affirm your words from Carl Jung by citing these words of David Paladin, who is a native American artist who went through a profound rupture as a young man in a concentration camp during the Second World War.  From this rupture, he became a real shaman and he echoes what you too are saying in his own words very wonderfully.  Here is what he says, “all great truths are only myths that exist momentarily in the evolving greater consciousness.  Like individuals, they die to be reborn fresh and glorious in the minds of each new age.  They may bear resemblance to their forebears, but each brings with it new features of its own and seeks to find its place and meaning in the dancing dream that is the cosmos.”

Andrew Harvey: Wonderful!.  Such reinterpretation revives the ancient truths about life and wisdom.

Matthew Fox: The Bible with its powerful myths and its powerful stories is part of this inheritance, but we have to keep living it anew in every generation.

OK, so now Thomas Aquinas, why does he grab me so much?  First of all, because he insisted on the importance of science for spirituality and for an authentic view of the world, and he paid a real price for that commitment.  He abandoned 800 years of Platonistic theology in the Christian church in favor of Aristotle, and he tells us why—”because Aristotle does not denigrate matter.”  Platonism was very dualistic, and the Christian theologians who clung to Plato like St. Augustine and many more, were deeply dualistic.  Augustine says, for example, that “spirit is whatever is not matter.”

Aquinas was shocked by that and he said “spirit is the elan, the vitality, in everything”–a blade of grass, a  tree, of course in us–it’s everywhere.  So that is a tremendous shift, and Aquinas kind of bore it alone, because the Church was so embedded then in the dualisms of the neo-Platonists that it couldn’t rise above itself and really give credence to the theophany that creation is very good and therefore an original blessing.  Beginning with goodness of creation is so Jewish—of course, Genesis does not begin with human sin but with cosmology and the goodness of creation.

Christian preachers leap in with both galoshes on eager to talk about sin.  But the Bible begins with the whole of creation, not with the human and chapter one of Genesis is about the goodness, and the beauty of creation and it culminates when humans arrive at the end, (which we do in the current scientific creation story today). We arrive and then somehow it’s all “very good” and “very beautiful.”  

Aquinas actually uses the terms “primal goodness” and “original goodness.”  It’s amazing that I got condemned for the word “original blessing”, which simply means “original goodness.” 

Andrew Harvey: They can’t stand the good news.

Matthew Fox: Indeed!  This shows how impoverished patriarchal religion has become in our time that even two popes–not the present one—over 34 years called creation spirituality “dangerous and deviant.”  The roof of the Vatican came off because I dared to write about original blessing.  So Aquinas trusts nature and trusts human nature.  His appreciation of our capacity for creativity and for our immense intelligence is astounding. 

He also recognizes our shadow side, when he says “one human being can do more evil than all the other species put together.”  And this is 800 years before Hitler or Stalin or Pol Pot or Putin that he was saying these things, so the man was amazingly balanced and aware.  He stepped out of the entire history really of Christian theology to interact with the greatest scientists he could find in the 13th century, who was tainted, if you will, because Aristotle was a pagan and he came to the West by way of Islam, because it was in Baghdad that they translated Aristotle into Latin and thereby ushered him into Europe through Spain.  I just admire him for his intellectual courage and quest for truth.  He says that “all truth, whoever utters it, comes from the Holy Spirit” and that “all traditions and all cultures have their prophets” and are seeking truth.  So he is a deep ecumenist long before that term was invoked.

Aquinas also celebrates our human capacity for virtue, he says–this is just an amazing statement and I love it—”miracles are wonderful, but the biggest miracle of all is to live a life of virtue.”  He’s not into some shaboom zoom meaning of miracle changing life—just living life fully and virtuously–that’s the biggest miracle of all.  I just love it because it’s so realistic, but it’s also challenging and, of course, he said that “a mistake about creation results in a mistake about God.”  That so affirms the role of the scientists, those who are seeking for the truth about creation.

So it’s that nondualism that I love about Aquinas, and his bringing intellect and heart together and, of course, he also speaks grounded in the Jewish prophetic consciousness about the importance of justice.  There is a reason why MLK jr. cited him in his iconic “Letter from the Birmingham Jail” for his insistence that human laws that violate the divine mandate of justice are not to be obeyed.  Also, he is given credit for bringing the important value of the common good into Western jurisprudence (from Aristotle).  He is grounded in Jewish consciousness and the Jewish prophets when he says that “truth and justice are the proper objects of the human heart.”

Andrew Harvey: Yes.

Matthew Fox:  Truth does not come exclusively from the head but our hearts and intuition.  Notice how he brings truth and justice together. You can’t have justice without truth, you need to get the facts, and you can’t have justice when denial reigns, you’ve got to bring truth out, and then there is this passion and the heart to support the quest for truth and the struggle for justice.  And of course compassion–Aquinas says that “compassion is the fire that Jesus came to set on the earth.”   And I think that says it all, you know.

Andrew Harvey: Absolutely.  That’s at the heart of sacred activism, that’s at the heart of every kind of human creativity.

Matthew Fox: Yes, it is and it’s at the heart of all religions in the world.

Andrew Harvey: In the world absolutely.

Matthew Fox: The Dalai Lama says, “compassion, is my religion. You can do away with all religion but not with compassion.”  And of course Jesus got his teachings from his Jewish tradition in which we are told, “compassion is the secret name of God.”  And Jesus let the secret out of the bag saying, “Be compassionate like your Creator in heaven is compassionate.”  And compassion is the most frequently used adjective for Allah in the Koran. 

Andrew Harvey: And all the great Hindu sages and Taoist sages–this is the universal message.

Let me ask you about Eckhart because your work on him has been so magnificent and so inspiring to me.  What is it in Eckhart that so thrills you and what do we need to drink from Eckhart’s well right now?

Matthew Fox: Of course, Eckhart stands on the shoulders of Aquinas. He was 15 when Aquinas died, and he had just entered the Dominican order.

During his entire life as a Dominican the Dominicans were fighting for Aquinas’s canonization because originally after he died he was condemned by three bishops, two of them at Oxford, your alma mater.

Andrew Harvey: I apologize for that. 

Matthew Fox: Although Eckhart attended the University of Paris and taught there, it later became clear to him that the academic world was in decline.  They burned a beguine, for example, Marguerette Porrette, at the stake in Paris and when that happened, he shortly afterward fled Paris and never returned.  Instead, he went to Strasbourg and hung out with the beguines there which was a women’s movement and a great threat obviously to many people.

Pope John XXII, who ended up condemning Eckhart a week after he died, also condemned the Beguines 17 different times!  So that’s one thing alone I admire him for, that he was a feminist and he was standing with women, even when it was dangerous–that same pope said that any Franciscan or Dominican who hangs out with beguines will be kicked out of the priesthood.  But that did not slow Eckhart down.

So Eckhart has this wonderful development of the divine feminine.  He says, “what does God do all day long?  God lies on a maternity bed giving birth.”  He also develops an entire philosophy of the artist.  He applies the annunciation story of the angel coming to Mary to give birth to all of us when he says, the artist is to be receptive of the Holy Spirit like Mary was and in that process we give birth.

And it was from Eckhart that I learned the four paths of creation spirituality which take us away from the three paths of Plotinus and Proclus, purgation, illumination and union, into a Jewish view of the world to the Via Positiva—awe, wonder and gratitude.  The Via Negativa of silence and stillness and loss and suffering and grief.  The Via Creativa, our creativity, which distinguishes us as the image of God, and we are called to co-create with divinity.  And then to the Via Transformativa, which is the path of justice and healing, celebration and compassion.

Andrew Harvey: And all those powers that we’ve acquired are dedicated for the transformation of every aspect of life–politics, economics, art, education.  Yes, the key isn’t it.

Matthew Fox: Absolutely and that is our divinization and how we divinize the world. That is tikkun, healing the world.  He says God is needing to be born in us.

Andrew Harvey: When God is born in us and through us that’s how we become humble agents of the creativity of God that longs for the transformation of everything into the living mirror of love and justice.

Matthew Fox: Exactly, and Eckhart has his brilliant sermon on compassion and he’s talking about the soul of compassion and in that sermon and he says What the soul is no one knows. The soul is as ineffable as God is. He says we know a little bit about the soul when it goes out to do its work but not much, and then he says it would take supernatural knowledge to understand it.  Finally, he declares that “the soul is where God works compassion, Amen.”  That’s the last line of his sermon and I think everyone fainted in the Church, because what he is saying is that until we become agents of compassion, we don’t have soul.  Yes, we’re not a full human being.

Andrew Harvey: Carolyn Myss makes the marvelous distinction, criticizing the New Age, between consciousness and conscience.  She says everybody’s talking about consciousness, but you don’t actually have authentic consciousness without conscience, without the conscience that’s born from compassion and the commitment to put your compassion into creative action in every part of your life–that’s when you have real consciousness.

Matthew Fox: Good for her, good.

Andrew Harvey: And that’s an authentic Jewish realization isn’t it because—

Matthew Fox: Absolutely.

Andrew Harvey: True sages never speak about a private pursuit of liberation alone, they always know that the whole purpose of growing in God is to serve the people, with more nobility and humility and precision.  And the creation also.

Matthew Fox: Yes. Eckhart says, “compassion means justice.”   Consider this one other statement from Eckhart also that we don’t want to leave behind.  He says, “every creature is a word of God and a book about God….If I spent enough time with a caterpillar I’d never have to prepare a sermon because one caterpillar is so full of God.”  I think that’s a marvelous way of grounding a creation spirituality, that every being is a theophany, a revelation of the divine and he’s not alone there.  Aquinas before him said, “revelation comes in two volumes– nature and the Bible.”  Not just the Bible contains revelation but nature too you see.  That is creation spirituality and that is the wisdom tradition of Israel.

Andrew Harvey: And Rumi says something I feel every day, when I look at my cat.  “Adore the beloved, and he will reveal to you that each creature that exists is one drop from his river of infinite beauty.”

That’s just the truth.

Matthew Fox: That is creation spirituality for sure.

Andrew Harvey:  You have been working on Hildegard of Bingen for decades, and you have been instrumental in bringing Hildegard back for us and her great work and great paintings and vision.

Matthew Fox: Yes, well, I call Hildegard the grandmother of the Rhineland mystics because she was first in this lineage that we’re naming as “creation spirituality” and being 12th century.  Of course, she was a genius in music, as well as in science and healing and, as you say, she painted and wrote ten books, many of them on science of her day, one of them is devoted entirely to rocks and trees and crystals and so forth.  And also works on healing the body and the psyche.

And she was a powerhouse and a prophet who wrote letters to the Emperor, the Pope, bishops archbishops and Abbotts telling them to man up.  She actually told the Emperor that he was acting like a baby and should man up and work for justice.  She told the pope he was surrounded by evil men who cackle in the night like hens.

Andrew Harvey: Nothing has changed.

Matthew Fox: Not a lot has changed.  But she was fierce and was amazingly gifted of course but, again, as a woman, she was well aware that she was a second class citizen in society and the Church, but that did not stop her from accomplishing so much.  For example, she was raised in in a Celtic monastery in Germany but when she became famous with her first book which took her 10 years to write and, by the way, inside her first book, there are 25 paintings and an opera, the oldest opera in the West by 300 years–of course, that’s kind of Celtic too–think of the Book of Kells which also includes stunning art as well as letters and words.  They do paint pictures as they write, I think that they are operating with both hemispheres of the brain and she picked up that idea in her training in the Celtic monastery. 

When her book came out, it became so famous so rapidly that a lot of women wanted to come and study with Hildegard.  (She lived in a bi gender monastery which was common among the Celts where men and women live together though in different parts of the building and get together for prayer and the rest.)  

But the men wouldn’t move over so, to make long story short, she up and left with all of her women nuns and started her own monastery which she designed.  She was like the architect, for it, she hired hundreds of monks to build it for her, and then that got so full that she started a second monastery right across the river.

The fact that she didn’t wait around and left is telling.  We also have the letter from the Abbot to her after she left saying, “Come back, come back and bring the dowries with you!

Andrew Harvey: Dowries?

Matthew Fox: Dowries, yes.  Nuns at that time brought dowries to the monastery with them.  Hildegard’s letter back to the abbot is all about justice and injustice so she felt she was very badly treated.

Andrew Harvey: Hildegard had an organic vision of the whole creation and the whole being’s relationship to the whole creation and of the necessity of serving justice born naturally from that relationship.

Matthew Fox:  Absolutely. She says that we live in a “web of creation” and that if humans out of our greed or arrogance or injustice rupture that web, “God will allow creation to punish humanity.”  She said, “the earth must not be injured, the earth must not be destroyed,” and she talked often about “Mother Earth” who is “the mother of all for in her are the seeds of all.”  She has a beautiful poem about looking at the shining waters and so forth, and how God is present in the shining waters and in the “in the dew that causes the grasses to laugh,” she says.  She paints an erotic relationship between nature and God  The Creator is related to creation as lovers are related to each other, she insists.

She presents a whole new way of looking at ecology, one that is far beyond stewardship or even responsibility–it’s about how we treat one another as lovers; humans, nature and God as lovers.

Andrew Harvey: This transforms your understanding too of what sacred action is because if you continue to think of sacred action as some kind of gloomy duty or some kind of painful service, you’ve missed what Hildegard and the great mystics of sacred activism are offering.  You missed the rapture of lovemaking that comes from lovemaking to justice; just making justice is an erotic glory, it gives joy and gives passion.

Look at that speech of Martin Luther King, you know Hildegard talks about viriditas, the greening power of the Holy Spirit, that is a passionate life force that saturates and inebriates all things.  But if you’re Martin Luther King giving his speech about African Americans coming together, you see his whole body possessed by that viriditas, by that erotic hunger of love to see justice done.

So sacred action is not a duty–it’s a flowing out of an essential lovemaking between us and each other and the whole creation and God in the viriditas or greening power in the whole creation.  Isn’t that one of Hildegard’s great revelations?

Matthew Fox: Definitely.  I have a chapter in my Original Blessing book called “erotic justice,” and I think that’s where wisdom comes in.  The Book of Wisdom in the Bible says, “this is wisdom: to love life” and Audrey Lorde, in her brilliant essay on eros, reminds us that eros is the passion for living that we bring to whatever we do—whether making a table or writing a poem or making love; and certainly to justice making.  To do justice is to seek balance and harmony and fairness, all that is, as you say, not merely a call to cold duty but an invitation to again live out a relationship of love and joy.  It is biophilia trumping necrophilia as Erich Fromm used to ruminate about so much.

Andrew Harvey: Right, there are all kinds of joy that you cannot discover until you live them out in creative action.

Let’s turn in these last moments of our time together to your latest love.  I’m sure you’ve loved her a long time, but this wonderful book that you brought out two years ago on Julian of Norwich: Wisdom in a Time of Pandemic…and Beyond.

Why Julian, why did you devote yourself to Julian at that time, which was during the covid epidemic, and we were talking a lot and I remember the absolute rapture you were having writing the book and that book communicates so much of the essence of everything that you have yourself striven for.  She seems to me, having been so deeply moved by all of your work, that that particular book holds a very special place in my heart because it’s just radiant with celebration and gratitude and joy.  So what was it about Julian that ignited such a passionate inspiration in your soul?

Matthew Fox Fox: Well, first is that she lived through the worst pandemic ever in Europe, the bubonic plague in the 14th century.  She was seven years old when it first hit and then it kept coming back in waves her entire lifetime and she lived into her 80s.   The plague killed between one out of two or one out of three people.

So it was terribly severe and of course they had no science and no vaccine or promise of vaccine and they had no clue where it came from, in fact, we didn’t know until the early 20th century when the mystery was resolved in San Francisco.  They finally found the answer that it was the fleas of rats that would jump into other rats and onto other people, but we didn’t know that until the early 20th century.

The fact that she lived through that pandemic, a pandemic that Thomas Barry says destroyed creation spirituality in the West because it made Europeans so afraid of nature, tells us a lot about the dynamic behind Julian’s writing.  She was bravely going beyond the hysteria of her day and deepening the entire creation spirituality lineage in so doing.  Before, you could trust nature, and there was a theophany or mystical experience with nature, but now there is fear and angst and preoccupation with death and hell and salvation. 

If you look at Christian history since the 15th century, you realize that creation is no longer in the forefront–redemption is along with a preoccupation with guilt and shame.  Religion becomes all about redemption, which is all about how you stay out of hell, because people were so afraid because they saw hell on earth when they saw this disease–it was like AIDS on steroids.  When you got it, you were usually dead in three or four days or even less, and your whole body turned full of puss and sores.. It was scary to people, but not to Julian, even though I think it’s very likely she lost a child and her husband in the pandemic. 

People responded with craziness to the pandemic.  Many men joined flagellation clubs and went from village to village flagellating themselves because they laid the cause of the pandemic on their sins.  Others created scapegoats including Jews, and much antisemitism arose in England, so much that many Jews fled to mainland Europe hoping the antisemitism would be less pronounced there (even though the pandemic was raging there as well). 

Julian, however, did not choose to go down that rabbit hole of fear and hatred of nature and sin as cause of the pandemic and scapegoating and antisemitism at all–instead she opted for the goodness of nature.  And in doing so, she represents the culmination of the creation spirituality lineage from Hildegard to Francis to Aquinas to Mechtild of Magdeburg to Meister Eckhart.  She is at the pinnacle of it, because in her day literally we lost the creation tradition and we went into religion as redemption instead of religion as gratitude for creation, which is its core meaning.  Aquinas says, “the primary meaning of religion is a supreme gratitude and thankfulness” and he even says, “the first and primary meaning of salvation is to preserve things in the good.”  To preserve things in the good is to confess that they are good.  He also declares that the first thing we are grateful for on the Sabbath is “creation itself.”

Julian teaches that “God is the goodness in nature,” and “God is the Father and the Mother of nature” and “God is delighted to be our Father and God is delighted to be our Mother.”  She develops a whole theology of the divine feminine and the motherhood of God more fully than any theologian up to the end of the 20th century.  Not only is God the Creator mother (and father), but Christ too is a “mother,” she says, because he practiced feminine motherly virtues like compassion and taught us do the same.  She displays an amazing balance and, of course, she was the first woman to write a book in English,  

That is significant, for she invented many words in English such as “oneing” which is her definition of the of the mystical experience (Thomas Aquinas used the word “ecstasy” a lot for that experience and Eckhart invented his own word, Durchbruch or “breakthrough.”) Julian also invented the word “enjoy” in English, which is an interesting word to have invented isn’t it?  She is consciously non-dualistic and says “God is in our sensuality” and “in our creation we were knit and oned to God [and] it is a precious oneing.”  And “God has forged a glorious union between the soul and the body” and “God willed that we have a twofold nature; sensual and spiritual.”   This is a long cry from Augustine’s dualisms that have served patriarchy and empire building for so long.

Julia says “every human has a birthright of joy.”  Thus we are born for joy and we were born from joy.

She is certainly turning her back in her way on original sin and dualistic mindsets, that of course keep patriarchy and empires going.

Andrew Harvey: She never speaks at all about original sin, she never goes on and on about how awful we are. She endlessly encourages us to find within us joy and the blessings that come from our essential divine nature.

Matthew Fox: Exactly.  Her very definition of faith is panentheism when she says “faith is the trust that all things are in God and God is in all things.”  She gets it right that the core meaning of faith is trust and not doctrines.  She’s taking faith out of the arena of piles of doctrines into the arena of practice–to practice trust.  And if we do practice it, amazing things come of that, but it’s not an easy journey and, of course, she was well aware of suffering all around her. But that’s what is astounding about her, that she lived a creation spirituality worldview in spite of all the despair around her and all the suffering around her.  She knew there was something deeper and that depth has everything to do with the marriage of the divine goodness and creation.  “The goodness in creation is God,” she wrote.

Andrew Harvey: That what a gorgeous sentence to end our time, and when you’re describing her you are also describing yourself because you’ve lived now eighty years, and you’ve lived through all the terrible and frightening transformations of these last years, but you have never lost that sacred joy that continues to inspire you to pull yourself out and I bless you for that.

I just want to thank you for everything you’ve given us and everything you’ve given us today, and to say to everyone who’s listening to this:  Please, please make available to yourself Matthew’s new book, Essential Writings of Creation Spirituality which is a compendium of the gorgeous and grounded wisdom that he has pursued in one lifetime.  It’s much more than a book, it’s a source of rugged hope, sacred energy and inspiration for real sacred action, and we all need it like oxygen.  Thank you very, very much.

Matthew Fox: And thank you for your work all these years, Andrew, and congratulations on your new book that came out just today on the mystic of fire, Hadewijch.


Matthew Fox

Rev. Matthew Fox, PhD, author, theologian, and activist priest, has been calling people of spirit and conscience into the Creation Spirituality lineage for over 50 years. His 40 books, lectures, retreats, and innovative education models have ignited an international movement to awaken people to be mystics and prophets, contemplative activists, who honor and defend the earth and work for justice. Seeking to establish a new pedagogy for learning spirituality that was grounded in an effort to reawaken the West to its own mystical traditions in such figures as Hildegard of Bingen, Meister Eckhart and the mysticism of Thomas Aquinas, as well as interacting with contemporary scientists who are also mystics, Fox founded the University of Creation Spirituality. His recent projects include Order of the Sacred Earth and Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox as well as The Cosmic Mass. Fox is recipient of the Abbey Courage of Conscience Peace Award, the Ghandi King Ikeda Award, the Tikkun National Ethics Award and other awards. His most recent books are: Matthew Fox: Essential Writings on Creation SpiritualityJulian of Norwich: Wisdom in at Time of Pandemic—and Beyond; and  The Tao of Thomas Aquinas: Fierce Wisdom for Hard Times.  Other books include Original Blessing; The Coming of the Cosmic Christ; A Spirituality Named Compassion; The Reinvention of Work; and Christian Mystics.  www.matthewfox.org.  www.dailymeditationswithmatthewfox.org.


ABOUT ANDREW HARVEY

Andrew Harvey

Andrew Harvey is an internationally acclaimed writer, poet, translator and mystical teacher. He is the
author of over 40 books, including Son of Man, The Hope, Love is Everything, Turn Me to
Gold and Radical Regeneration 
with Carolyn Baker. He has taught all over the world, given over 20
courses for the Shift Network and is the founder of the Institute for Sacred Activism.

Tarot Card for May 23: The Ten of Wands

The Ten of Wands

The Lord of Oppression is a hard card to come to grips with, for it indicates blocked or thwarted Will. We want something badly, and yet we seem to stand no chance of getting it. We feel frustrated, irritable and disappointed.

If a situation marked by the Ten of Wands goes on for too long, we will begin to feel trapped and deeply unhappy. We will begin to lose faith in ourselves, and our abilities to make our lives into what we want.

There are a couple of things to bear in mind if the influence of the Lord of Oppression is a fairly fleeting one – sometimes we have to wait for the right moment to get our heart’s desire.

However it’s worth bearing in mind, if you ever read on a specific situation, and this card comes up in the final result position, the reading is probably telling you not to waste any more effort on a conflict that you cannot win. Sometimes we are better off just walking away.

The long-term appearance of this card carries a warning with it that you really cannot ignore. If the Ten of Wands is a regular feature of your readings for some time, you are probably hurting yourself more than you care to admit. You are not fulfilling your needs, and you are leaving yourself open to negativity.

Time to get a little bit of Ace energy in there, and sort things out!

The Ten of Wands

(via angelpaths.com and Alan Blackman)

Chinese stand-up comedy warned to toe the line following viral joke about army

Issued on: 20/05/2023 – 18:18 (France24.com)

The rise of stand-up comedy in China is a recent phenomenon which became particularly popular with television viewers during the Covid-19 lockdown period. © Studio graphique France Média Monde

Text by:Sébastian SEIBT

A Chinese comedian was severely punished on Wednesday for making a joke about the People’s Liberation Army and his production company fined roughly two million dollars. This incident demonstrates that Chinese censors are now turning their attention to the small but growing world of stand-up comedy in China, which until now has enjoyed a certain measure of freedom.  

On May 17, Chinese authorities imposed a record fine of 14.7 million yuan ($2.13 million) on the production company that employed comedian Li Haoshi and opened an investigation against him.  

Li, whose stage name is “House”, “seriously insulted the army” and thus dealt a heavy blow to “national honour” and “patriotic feelings”, said the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism which imposed the fine on Shanghai Xiaoguo Culture Media.  

Six words too many 

“This is the first time that a joke about the army has been punished in China,” said Olivia Cheung, a specialist in contemporary Chinese political history at the University of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies. 

This is a severe punishment for a joke that “may seem totally harmless and not necessarily very funny”, said Marc Lanteigne, a Chinese studies professor at the Arctic University of Norway.

The joke in question invoked Li’s two adopted stray dogs chasing a squirrel:  “Normally, when you see dogs, you find them very cute at first. But when I looked at them, six words came to me: ‘Maintain exemplary conduct, fight to win’.” 

Reports do not indicate whether it made the audience laugh. However, what is known is that the scene was filmed and posted on social media, where it triggered an avalanche of comments.  

The problem is that “it is a direct and literal reference to what has been the official slogan of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) since 2013,” said Lanteigne. “Xi Jinping himself came up with the slogan and has used it on numerous occasions to refer to the modern army he established,” said Cheung. 

The first part of the slogan, about discipline, refers to the government’s campaign to bring the army into line in the mid-2010s. “The army had a reputation for being very corrupt before Xi Jinping came to power, and he boasts that he put an end to this and brought discipline back into the ranks,” explained Cheung. 

There is also the idea that the PLA is now “able to win victories” as a result of the modernisation reforms implemented by the Chinese president. “It was, and remains, one of Xi Jinping’s priorities and he believes that the Chinese army now deserves the utmost respect thanks to his efforts,” said Cheung. 

The crime of insulting Xi Jinping 

Li thus tripped up twice over. First, he made the mistake of joking “about a subject that affects the president personally”, said Cheung. Second, he compared the army to dogs. This is a risky choice, as these animals are seen in China as “cute but dirty, and better not to have too many around”, said Lanteigne. This is not the kind of metaphor that the government wants to see being used in any sort of media to describe the military.  

However, some Chinese people felt that imposing a two million dollar fine was excessive and took to social media to question the “double standards” demonstrated by the authorities, reported the New York Times. These internet users recalled that a company selling false negative Covid-19 test certificates during the lockdown period was only fined the equivalent of $10,000 dollars.

“It’s clear that this is not just about punishing the comedian for his joke, but about making an example of him for everyone in order to establish a new red line that must not be crossed,” said Lanteigne. 

He sees this punishment as part of a “tightening of restrictions on freedom of expression in recent years”. China has long had a reputation for being heavy-handed when it comes to censorship, but it “began cracking down even harder during the health crisis”, added Lanteigne.  

The Chinese authorities realised during the height of the Covid crisis that there were still issues with their information control strategy. Censorship failed to silence the people of Shanghai, who were confined for more than two months in the spring of 2022 and criticised the authorities in the viral video “Voices of April”

In this respect, stand-up comedy was still a haven of relative freedom of expression in China. This form of humour only recently burst onto the Chinese media scene. For a long time, stand-up comedy was perceived as less dignified than other traditional forms of live performance, as it “is considered a Western import”, explained Lanteigne. 

Thwarted freedom of expression in Chinese stand-up 

As a result, there were only a few dozen stand-up clubs in the country where comedians could perform in 2018, wrote the China Daily, the Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper. In other words, not enough to worry Beijing. Since then, they have rapidly increased in number, with comedians performing on 179 stages across the country. 

One of the reasons for the craze is the popularity of television shows like “Rock & Roast”, which make millions of viewers laugh every week. China’s “zero-Covid” policy has been a boon for comedians, who are now popular with TV stations eager to brighten up the lives of Chinese people under confinement, reported the Financial Times

Li has benefited from the buzz, appearing several times on “Rock & Roast”, helping to “make him a star”, according to the New York Times. 

Daily newsletterReceive essential international news every morningSubscribe

This star status made him the ideal target for Beijing to get its message across. The authorities used to tolerate “caustic” humour “as long as the criticism was aimed at local authorities and referred to the minor administrative hassles of everyday life”, said Lanteigne. 

But when it comes to subjects of national importance – such as the military – comedians are now required to “abide by laws, maintain ethical values and provide the public with nutritious spiritual food”, said the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism. 

This record fine is, in a way, the price of the success of stand-up comedy in China. Comedians’ voices did not carry far when there were only a few hundred of them in 2018. But now that there are officially more than 10,000, Beijing has decided to designate them as actors of official propaganda, as are the state media and film industries. 

Li was hit hard by this new reality. Despite his apology, the China Association of Performing Arts, the body that manages live performance in China, has called for a total boycott of all his shows. 

The First Water Is the Body

Artwork by James Lee Chiahan

THE FIRST WATER IS THE BODY

by Natalie Diaz

CONTRIBUTOR BIOS

May 18, 2023

The Colorado River is the most endangered river in the United States—also, it is a part of my body.

I carry a river. It is who I am: ‘Aha Makav. This is not metaphor.

When a Mojave says, Inyech ‘Aha Makavch ithuum, we are saying our name. We are telling a story of our existence. The river runs through the middle of my body.

So far, I have said the word river in every stanza. I don’t want to waste water. I must preserve the river in my body.

In future stanzas, I will try to be more conservative.

The Spanish called us, Mojave. Colorado, the name they gave our river because it was silt-red-thick.

Natives have been called red forever. I have never met a red Native, not even on my reservation, not even at the National Museum of the American Indian, not even at the largest powwow in Parker, Arizona.

I live in the desert along a dammed blue river. The only red people I’ve seen are white tourists sunburned after staying out on the water too long.

‘Aha Makav is the true name of our people, given to us by our Creator who loosed the river from the earth and built it into our living bodies.

Translated into English, ‘Aha Makav means the river runs through the middle of our body, the same way it runs through the middle of our land.

This is a poor translation, like all translations.

In American imaginations, the logic of this image will lend itself to surrealism or magical realism—

Americans prefer a magical red Indian, or a shaman, or a fake Indian in a red dress, over a real Native. Even a real Native carrying the dangerous and heavy blues of a river in her body.

What threatens white people is often dismissed as myth. I have never been true in America. America is my myth.

Jacques Derrida says, Every text remains in mourning until it is translated.

When Mojaves say the word for tears, we return to our word for river, as if our river were flowing from our eyes. A great weeping is how you might translate it. Or a river of grief.

But who is this translation for and will they come to my language’s four-night funeral to grieve what has been lost in my efforts at translation? When they have drunk dry my river will they join the mourning procession across our bleached desert?

The word for drought is different across many languages and lands. The ache of thirst, though, translates to all bodies along the same paths—the tongue, the throat, the kidneys. No matter what language you speak, no matter the color of your skin.

We carry the river, its body of water, in our body.

I do not mean to imply a visual relationship. Such as: a Native woman on her knees holding a box of Land O’ Lakes butter whose label has a picture of a Native woman on her knees holding a box of Land O’ Lakes butter whose label has a picture of a Native woman on her knees . . .

We carry the river, its body of water, in our body. I do not mean to invoke the Droste effect—this is not a picture of a river within a picture of a river.

I mean river as a verb. A happening. It is moving within me right now.

This is not juxtaposition. Body and water are not two unlike things—they are more than close together or side by side. They are same—body, being, energy, prayer, current, motion, medicine.

The body is beyond six senses. Is sensual. An ecstatic state of energy, always on the verge of praying, or entering any river of movement.

Energy is a moving river moving my moving body.

In Mojave thinking, body and land are the same. The words are separated only by the letters ‘ii and ‘a: ‘iimat for body, ‘amat for land. In conversation, we often use a shortened form for each: mat-. Unless you know the context of a conversation, you might not know if we are speaking about our body or our land. You might not know which has been injured, which is remembering, which is alive, which was dreamed, which needs care. You might not know we mean both.

If I say, My river is disappearing, do I also mean, My people are disappearing?

How can I translate—not in words but in belief—that a river is a body, as alive as you or I, that there can be no life without it?

John Berger wrote, True translation is not a binary affair between two languages but a triangular affair. The third point of the triangle being what lay behind the words of the original text before it was written. True translation demands a return to the pre-verbal.

Between the English translation I offered, and the urgency I felt typing ‘Aha Makav in the lines above, is not the point where this story ends or begins.

We must go to the place before those two points—we must go to the third place that is the river.

We must go to the point of the lance entering the earth, and the river becoming the first body bursting from earth’s clay body into my sudden body. We must submerge, come under, beneath those once warm red waters now channeled blue and cool, the current’s endless yards of emerald silk wrapping the body and moving it, swift enough to take life or give it.

We must go until we smell the black root-wet anchoring the river’s mud banks. We must go beyond beyond to a place where we have never been the center, where there is no center—beyond, toward what does not need us yet makes us.

What is this third point, this place that breaks a surface, if not the deep-cut and crooked bone bed where the Colorado River runs—a one-thousand-four-hundred-and-fifty-mile thirst—into and through a body?

Berger called it the pre-verbalPre-verbal as in the body when the body was more than body. Before it could name itself body and be limited, bordered by the space body indicated.

Pre-verbal is the place where the body was yet a green-blue energy greening, greened and bluing the stone, red and floodwater, the razorback fish, the beetle, and the cottonwoods’ and willows’ shaded shadows.

Pre-verbal was when the body was more than a body and possible.

One of its possibilities was to hold a river within it.

A river is a body of water. It has a foot, an elbow, a mouth. It runs. It lies in a bed. It can make you good. It has a head. It remembers everything.

If I was created to hold the Colorado River, to carry its rushing inside me, if the very shape of my throat, of my thighs is for wetness, how can I say who I am if the river is gone?

What does ‘Aha Makav mean if the river is emptied to the skeleton of its fish and the miniature sand dunes of its dry silten beds?

If the river is a ghost, am I?

Unsoothable thirst is one type of haunting.

A phrase popular or more known to non-Natives during the Standing Rock encampment was, Water is the first medicine. It is true.

Where I come from we cleanse ourselves in the river. I mean: The water makes us strong and able to move forward into what is set before us to do with good energy.

We cannot live good, we cannot live at all, without water.

If we poison and use up our water, how will we clean our wounds and our wrongs? How will we wash away what we must leave behind us? How will we make ourselves new?

To thirst and to drink is how one knows they are alive and grateful.

To thirst and then not drink is . . .

If your builder could place a small red bird in your chest to beat as your heart, is it so hard for you to picture the blue river hurtling inside the slow muscled curves of my long body? Is it too difficult to believe it is as sacred as a breath or a star or a sidewinder or your own mother or your beloveds?

If I could convince you, would our brown bodies and our blue rivers be more loved and less ruined?

The Whanganui River in New Zealand now has the same legal rights of a human being. In India, the Ganges and Yamuna Rivers now have the same legal status of a human being. Slovenia’s constitution now declares access to clean drinking water to be a national human right. While in the United States, we are teargassing and rubber-bulleting and kenneling Natives trying to protect their water from pollution and contamination at Standing Rock in North Dakota. We have yet to discover what the effects of lead-contaminated water will be on the children of Flint, Michigan, who have been drinking it for years.

America is a land of bad math and science. The Right believes Rapture will save them from the violence they are delivering upon the earth and water; the Left believes technology, the same technology wrecking the earth and water, will save them from the wreckage or help them build a new world on Mars.

We think of our bodies as being all that we are: I am my body. This thinking helps us disrespect water, air, land, one another. But water is not external from our body, our self.

My Elder says, Cut off your ear, and you will live. Cut off your hand, you will live. Cut off your leg, you can still live. Cut off our water, we will not live more than a week.

The water we drink, like the air we breathe, is not a part of our body but is our body. What we do to one—to the body, to the water—we do to the other.

Toni Morrison writes, All water has a perfect memory and is forever trying to get back to where it was. Back to the body of earth, of flesh, back to the mouth, the throat, back to the womb, back to the heart, to its blood, back to our grief, back back back.

Will we remember from where we’ve come? The water.

And once remembered, will we return to that first water, and in doing so return to ourselves, to each other?

Do you think the water will forget what we have done, what we continue to do?

Natalie Diaz, “The First Water Is the Body” from Postcolonial Love Poem. Copyright ©2020 by Natalie Diaz. Reprinted with the permission of The Permissions Company, LLC, on behalf of Graywolf Press, graywolfpress.org.

Emergence Magazine (hello@emergencemagazine.org)

What It Takes to Grow: Pioneering Psychoanalyst Karen Horney on the Key to Self-Realization

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

The measure of growth is not how much we have changed, but how harmoniously we have integrated our changes with all the selves we have been — those vessels of personhood stacked within the current self like Russian nesting dolls, not to be outgrown but to be tenderly incorporated. True growth is immensely difficult precisely because it requires befriending the parts of ourselves we have rejected or forgotten — what James Baldwin so memorably called “the doom and glory of knowing who you are and what you are”; it requires shedding all the inauthentic personae we have put on in the course of life under the forces of convention and compulsion; it requires living amicably with who we have been in order to fully live into who we can be.

Those delicate and often difficult fundaments of true growth are what the German psychoanalyst Karen Horney (September 16, 1885–December 4, 1952) examined in the final years of her life in her uncommonly insightful book Neurosis and Human Growth: The Struggle Toward Self-Realization (public library).

Karen Horney

A generation before Joan Didion observed that “character — the willingness to accept responsibility for one’s own life — is the source from which self-respect springs,” Horney writes:

A person can grow, in the true sense, only if he* assumes responsibility for himself.

Noting that a fulfilled and fulfilling life necessitates “the liberation and cultivation of the forces which lead to self-realization,” she considers the well-spring of that ultimate ideal in relation to growth:

You need not, and in fact cannot, teach an acorn to grow into an oak tree, but when given a chance, its intrinsic potentialities will develop. Similarly, the human individual, given a chance, tends to develop his particular human potentialities. He will develop then the unique alive forces of his real self: the clarity and depth of his own feelings, thoughts, wishes, interests; the ability to tap his own resources, the strength of his will power; the special capacities or gifts he may have; the faculty to express himself, and to relate himself to others with his spontaneous feelings. All this will in time enable him to find his set of values and his aims in life. In short, he will grow, substantially undiverted, toward self-realization.

One of Margaret C. Cook’s illustrations for a stunning rare edition of Leaves of Grass. (Available as a print.)

Growth is only possible when the self being realized is the authentic self — “the real self as that central inner force, common to all human beings and yet unique in each, which is the deep source of growth.” And yet it can be maddeningly difficult to discern that real self beneath the costume of shoulds, beneath the armors donned in our confrontations with reality, beneath all the personae learned in the course of adapting to the world’s demands and assaults. E.E. Cummings knew this when he observed that “to be nobody-but-yourself — in a world which is doing its best, night and day, to make you everybody else — means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight.” From the moment we are born, we begin morphing that tender real self to the pressures of our emotional and physical environment — a process of adaptation that is also the beginning of our lifelong process of self-alienation, marked by an ongoing tyranny of shoulds — our parents’, our culture’s, our own. Horney considers the path to liberation and self-possession:

All kinds of pressure can easily divert our constructive energies into unconstructive or destructive channels. But… we do not need an inner strait jacket with which to shackle our spontaneity, nor the whip of inner dictates to drive us to perfection. There is no doubt that such disciplinary methods can succeed in suppressing undesirable factors, but there is also no doubt that they are injurious to our growth. We do not need them because we see a better possibility of dealing with destructive forces in ourselves: that of actually outgrowing them. The way toward this goal is an ever increasing awareness and understanding of ourselves. Self-knowledge, then, is not an aim in itself, but a means of liberating the forces of spontaneous growth.

In this sense, to work at ourselves becomes not only the prime moral obligation, but at the same time, in a very real sense, the prime moral privilege. To the extent that we take our growth seriously, it will be because of our own desire to do so. And as we lose the neurotic obsession with self, as we become free to grow ourselves, we also free ourselves to love and to feel concern for other people.

Art by Sophie Blackall from Things to Look Forward to

Growth, then, is not something we do only for and by ourselves, but something we do for and with others — a testament to the fact that human connection is “a root-factor of ordinary human growth.” And yet we alone are responsible — to ourselves and to others — for undertaking the process and following through with its unfolding. A century after Nietzsche considered the path to finding yourself, insisting that “no one can build you the bridge on which you, and only you, must cross the river of life,” Horney writes:

Only the individual himself can develop his given potentialities. But, like any other living organism, the human Individuum needs favorable conditions for his growth “from acorn into oak tree”; he needs an atmosphere of warmth to give him both a feeling of inner security and the inner freedom enabling him to have his own feelings and thoughts and to express himself. He needs the good will of others, not only to help him in his many needs but to guide and encourage him to become a mature and fulfilled individual. He also needs healthy friction with the wishes and wills of others. If he can thus grow with others, in love and in friction, he will also grow in accordance with his real self.

Neurosis and Human Growth is a revelatory read in its entirety. Complement this fragment with poet, philosopher, and activist Edward Carpenter on love, pain, and growth and poet Robert Penn Warren on the paradox of “finding yourself,” then revisit philosopher Amélie Rorty on the seven layers of selfhood.

May Sarton on the Art of Living Alone

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

“There is no place more intimate than the spirit alone,” the young May Sarton (May 3, 1912–July 16, 1995) wrote in her stunning ode to solitude — the solitude she came to know, over the course of her long and prolific life, as the seedbed of creativity.

Living alone can be deeply rewarding and deeply challenging. It is not for everyone. It is not for those who romanticize its offerings of freedom and focus, but excise its menacing visitations of loneliness and alienation. It is not for those who find silence shattering. It is especially not for those who hunger for another consciousness to validate their experience and redeem their reality. It is only for the whole.

In her elder years, living alone on the coast of Maine and savoring a renaissance of creative energy after a long depression, Sarton returns to the subject of what solitude is and is not on the pages of her boundlessly rewarding journal The House by the Sea (public library).

May Sarton

Looking back on her life, she writes:

Solitude, like a long love, deepens with time.

But what solitude brings to a person is shaped by what the person brings to solitude. One August day, life brings Sarton a prompt to consider the art of living alone and the necessary preconditions for making of solitude not a resignation but a rapture:

Yesterday I had a letter from a young woman who is living alone, a film maker of some reputation. She wants to do a film on people who live alone, and will come next week to talk about her plans. I gather she has some doubts about the solitary life. I told her that I feel it is not for the young (she is only thirty-three). I did not begin to live alone till I was forty-five, and had “lived” in the sense of passionate friendships and love affairs very richly for twenty-five years. I had a huge amount of life to think about and to digest, and, above all, I was a person by then and knew what I wanted of my life. The people we love are built into us. Every day I am suddenly aware of something someone taught me long ago — or just yesterday — of some certainty and self-awareness that grew out of conflict with someone I loved enough to try to encompass, however painful that effort may have been.

Complement with the Buddhist scholar and teacher Stephen Batchelor on the art of solitude, Emerson on what solitude really means, and a contemporary field guide to how to be alone, then revisit Sarton on gardening and creativityhow to cultivate your talenthow to live openheartedly in a harsh world, and her stunning poem about the relationship between presence, solitude, and love.

Love and Fear: A Stunning 17th-Century Poem About How to Live with the Transcendent Terror of Love

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

Love is both the tenderest mirror and the cruelest. How much and how well we show up for love reflects what we believe ourselves worthy of. What we desire reflects what we believe we deserve. What we long for reflects both our limitations and our restless yearning to transcend them. In love’s mirror, we are revealed to ourselves, stripped of the ego’s flattering self-image, our vulnerabilities and inadequacies laid bare — a revelation laced with the sublime, both beautiful and terrifying to the bone.

Art by Sophie Blackall from Things to Look Forward to

How to live with the transcendent terror of love is what the seventeenth-century metaphysical poet, priest, and musician George Herbert (April 3, 1593–March 1, 1633) explores in one of his poems — poems composed in the hope that they might “turn to the advantage of any dejected poor soul.” Reaching across space and time the way only art can, the poem’s final line went on to inspire the final line of Derek Walcott’s superb “Love After Love,” composed nearly four centuries later.

LOVE
by George Herbert

Love bade me welcome; yet my soul drew back,
            Guilty of dust and sin.
But quick-eyed Love, observing me grow slack
    From my first entrance in,
Drew nearer to me, sweetly questioning
            If I lack’d anything.

“A guest,” I answer’d, “worthy to be here:”
            Love said, “You shall be he.”
“I, the unkind, ungrateful? Ah, my dear,
            I cannot look on Thee.”
Love took my hand and smiling did reply,
            “Who made the eyes but I?”

“Truth, Lord; but I have marr’d them: let my shame
            Go where it doth deserve.”
“And know you not,” says Love, “Who bore the blame?”
            “My dear, then I will serve.”
“You must sit down,” says Love, “and taste my meat.”
            So I did sit and eat.

Complement with David Whyte’s poem “The Truelove” and Robert Graves’s “Advice to Lovers,” then revisit the great Zen teacher Thich Nhat Hanh on how to love and Hannah Arendt on how to live with the fundamental fear of love’s loss.

Margaret Wise Brown on having a loving way with words

“There is a loving way with words and an unloving way. And it is only with the loving way that the simplicity of language becomes beautiful.”
–MARGARET WISE BROWN

Margaret Wise Brown (May 23, 1910 – November 13, 1952) was an American writer of children’s books, including Goodnight Moon and The Runaway Bunny, both illustrated by Clement Hurd. She has been called “the laureate of the nursery” for her achievements. Wikipedia

Tarot Card for May 22: The Prince of Cups

The Prince of Cups

Men represented by this card are complex and powerful beings. They are self-contained – even secretive – giving an impression of calmness and serenity. However under that veneer they can often be intense and volatile. They tend to hide their deepest passions, and to protect them fiercely.

They are often creative – artistically or musically inclined, and have deep involvement in these areas. Many of the more successful artists and musicians in our lives would come up as a Prince of Cups.

Emotionally they can sometimes be turbulent and moody, but can also often hide their emotions and refuse to share them with others. However, having a highly developed sensitivity to emotional ups and downs, they will identify yours even before you have. Talking to somebody like this about emotional matters is usually a rewarding experience, because they are highly perceptive and use their intuition readily.

If this card comes up to indicate an alteration in a person’s behaviour, it will generally indicate a man moving into a new romantic relationship and feeling somewhat troubled by this. The Knight is the card that comes up to indicate a man happily falling in love.

Look for surrounding cards to clarify whether any misgivings are justified – for instance, the Moon or the Seven of Cups would be warnings of danger; also look at whether cards like the Seven of Swords or the Seven of Disks come up – these may indicate inner personal worries that will only cause problems if allowed to.

The Prince of Cups

(via angelpaths.com and Alan Blackman)

Book: “The Experience Machine: How Our Minds Predict and Shape Reality”

The Experience Machine: How Our Minds Predict and Shape Reality 

by Andy Clark (Author)

A brilliant new theory of the mind that upends our understanding of how the brain interacts with the world

“This thoroughly readable book will convince you that the brain and the world are partners in constructing our understanding.” —Sean Carroll, New York Times bestselling author of The Biggest Ideas in the Universe: Space, Time, and Motion

For as long as we’ve studied human cognition, we’ve believed that our senses give us direct access to the world. What we see is what’s really there—or so the thinking goes. But new discoveries in neuroscience and psychology have turned this assumption on its head. What if rather than perceiving reality passively, your mind actively predicts it?


Widely acclaimed philosopher and cognitive scientist Andy Clark unpacks this provocative new theory that the brain is a powerful, dynamic prediction engine, mediating our experience of both body and world. From the most mundane experiences to the most sublime, reality as we know it is the complex synthesis of sensory information and expectation. Exploring its fascinating mechanics and remarkable implications for our lives, mental health, and society, Clark nimbly illustrates how the predictive brain sculpts all human experience. Chronic pain and mental illness are shown to involve subtle malfunctions of our unconscious predictions, pointing the way towards more effective, targeted treatments. Under renewed scrutiny, the very boundary between ourselves and the outside world dissolves, showing that we are as entangled with our environments as we are with our onboard memories, thoughts, and feelings. And perception itself is revealed to be something of a controlled hallucination.

Unveiling the extraordinary explanatory power of the predictive brain, The Experience Machine is a mesmerizing window onto one of the most significant developments in our understanding of the mind.

(Amazon.com)