21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

Novel Nest

Novel Nest

Sep 5, 2023 (Medium.com)

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

When it comes to exploring the realms of philosophy and spirituality, few individuals carry as much weight and wisdom as Naval Ravikant.

Naval Ravikant is a renowned figure in philosophy and spirituality, celebrated for his profound insights.

In this post, we’ll explore his top 21 book recommendations, each offering a profound journey into the depths of the human spirit and the mysteries of existence.

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

1. “Theory of Everything (The Enlightened Perspective) — Dreamstate Trilogy” by Jed McKenna

Jed McKenna’s “Theory of Everything” is the first installment in his Dreamstate Trilogy, and it’s a literary journey that challenges the very essence of reality. McKenna’s writing takes readers on a relentless exploration of truth, self-discovery, and enlightenment. Ravikant’s endorsement of this book underscores its power to shatter conventional thinking, encouraging readers to question their perceptions and delve into the depths of their consciousness.

“there is no such thing as a rational person. We are emotional creatures with some token capacity for reason.”― Jed McKenna, Jed McKenna’s Theory of Everything: The Enlightened Perspective

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

2. “A Master’s Secret Whispers: For those who abhor noise and seek The Truth about life and living” by Kapil Gupta, MD

Dr. Kapil Gupta’s “A Master’s Secret Whispers” is a quiet yet profound revelation for those who seek truth amidst the cacophony of life. In this book, Dr. Gupta distills his years of experience into a collection of insights that challenge preconceived notions about existence. Naval Ravikant recognizes the value of Gupta’s gentle wisdom, highlighting its potential to provide clarity and peace in a noisy world.

“The false game is to give legitimacy to the notion that there is a hierarchy of importance among human beings.”― Kapil Gupta, A Master’s Secret Whispers: For those who abhor the noise and seek The Truth about life and living

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

3. “Direct Truth: Uncompromising, non-prescriptive Truths to the enduring questions of life” by Kapil Gupta, MD

Continuing his exploration of truth and meaning, Dr. Kapil Gupta presents “Direct Truth.” This book offers unapologetic answers to life’s most profound questions. Ravikant’s endorsement emphasizes the book’s commitment to cutting through the noise of dogma and delivering uncompromising insights that can transform the way readers perceive and navigate the world.

“Why do I get angry when I am insulted? A: Because you entertain the verity of the insult.”― Kapil Gupta, Direct Truth: Uncompromising, non-prescriptive Truths to the enduring questions of life

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

4. “Atmamun: The Path to achieving the bliss of the Himalayan Swamis. And the freedom of a living God” by Kapil Gupta, MD

Dr. Kapil Gupta’s “Atmamun” promises readers a path to achieving the bliss and freedom sought by Himalayan swamis. Through this book, Gupta invites readers to embark on a transformative journey of self-realization. Naval Ravikant’s recognition of this work underscores its potential to guide individuals toward profound states of enlightenment and liberation.

“When the mind thinks that it knows, it creates a story. And it makes the person believe the fairy tale. But when it is confused, it has no story to tell you. So you are, for a brief moment, free to learn the truth. Independent of the mind.”― Kapil Gupta, Atmamun: The Path To Achieving The Bliss Of The Himalayan Swamis. And The Freedom Of A Living God.

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

5. “The Book of Life” by Jiddu Krishnamurti

Jiddu Krishnamurti’s “The Book of Life” is a timeless masterpiece that delves into the fundamental questions of existence, consciousness, and human relationships. Through his profound insights, Krishnamurti encourages readers to embark on an inner journey of self-discovery and personal transformation. Naval Ravikant’s inclusion of this work underscores its enduring relevance in the quest for spiritual understanding and self-realization.

“You only learn when you give your whole being to something. When you give your whole being to mathematics,you learn; but when you are in a state of contradiction, when you do not want to learn but are forced to learn, then it becomes merely a process of accumulation. To learn is like reading a novel with innumerable characters; it requires your full attention, not contradictory attention.”― Jiddu Krishnamurti, The Book of Life: Daily Meditations with Krishnamurti

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

6. “Total Freedom: The Essential Krishnamurti” by Jiddu Krishnamurti

“Total Freedom” distills the essential teachings of Jiddu Krishnamurti into a comprehensive guide for seekers of truth and self-awareness. In this book, Krishnamurti explores the nature of freedom, the limitations of thought, and the path to true understanding. Naval Ravikant recognizes the transformative potential of this book, making it a valuable addition to any spiritual seeker’s library.

“Teaching is not the mere imparting of knowledge but the cultivation of an inquiring mind.”― Jiddu Krishnamurti, Total Freedom: The Essential Krishnamurti

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

7. “Siddhartha” by Herman Hesse

Herman Hesse’s “Siddhartha” is a timeless novel that transports readers to ancient India, following the spiritual journey of Siddhartha, the protagonist. This tale of self-discovery and enlightenment resonates with those seeking deeper meaning in life. Naval Ravikant’s inclusion of this work suggests its power to inspire readers to explore their own paths toward wisdom and illumination.

“Wisdom cannot be imparted. Wisdom that a wise man attempts to impart always sounds like foolishness to someone else … Knowledge can be communicated, but not wisdom. One can find it, live it, do wonders through it, but one cannot communicate and teach it.”― Hermann Hesse, Siddhartha

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

8. “The Book of Secrets: 112 Meditations to Discover the Mystery Within” by Osho

Osho’s “The Book of Secrets” is a comprehensive guide to meditation and self-discovery. Featuring 112 transformative meditations, this book aims to unlock the mysteries of existence and reveal the hidden dimensions of the self. Ravikant’s recommendation highlights its potential to awaken inner wisdom and lead readers toward a more profound understanding of themselves and the universe.

“Only a blind man can easily define what light is. When you do not know, you are bold. Ignorance is always bold; knowledge hesitates. And the more you know, the more you feel that the ground underneath is dissolving. The more you know, the more you feel how ignorant you are.”― Osho, The Book of Secrets

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

9. “The Great Challenge: Exploring the World Within” by Osho

Osho’s “The Great Challenge” invites readers to embark on a profound journey into the depths of their own inner worlds. Through a series of meditations and explorations, Osho guides readers toward self-realization and personal growth. Naval Ravikant recognizes the value of this work in facilitating deep insights and inner transformation.

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

10. “The Way to Love: The Last Meditations of Anthony DeMello” by Anthony DeMello

In “The Way to Love,” Anthony DeMello shares his last meditations on the nature of love and spirituality. DeMello’s profound insights offer a path to cultivating love within oneself and extending it to others. Naval Ravikant’s endorsement emphasizes the book’s power to illuminate the way to a more loving and fulfilling life.

“Of what use is it to be tolerant of others if you are convinced that you are right and everyone who disagrees with you is wrong? That isn’t tolerance but condescension.”― Anthony de Mello, The Way to Love: The Last Meditations of Anthony de Mello

The Ultimate Digital Reading Journal (My First Digital Product)

How I Organize Every Single Book I’ve Read

medium.com

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

11. “The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself” by Michael Singer

Michael Singer’s “The Untethered Soul” is a modern classic that explores the concept of self and invites readers to transcend their inner limitations. Through insightful teachings and practical exercises, Singer guides readers toward a state of inner freedom and self-realization. Naval Ravikant recognizes the book’s potential to liberate individuals from the constraints of the ego and awaken their true selves.

“There is nothing more important to true growth than realizing that you are not the voice of the mind — you are the one who hears it.”― Michael A. Singer, The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

12. “Meditations” by Marcus Aurelius

“Meditations” by Marcus Aurelius is a timeless classic of stoic philosophy and self-improvement. Written as a series of personal reflections and meditations, this work offers wisdom and guidance on living a virtuous and meaningful life. Ravikant’s inclusion of this book highlights its enduring relevance in the pursuit of wisdom and personal growth.

“You have power over your mind — not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.”― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

13. “Love Yourself Like Your Life Depends on It” by Kamal Ravikant

Kamal Ravikant’s “Love Yourself Like Your Life Depends on It” is a powerful testament to the transformative power of self-love. Through his personal journey and reflections, Ravikant shares a simple yet profound practice that can change one’s life. Naval Ravikant’s endorsement underscores the book’s potential to catalyze personal growth, self-compassion, and inner healing.

“This day, I vow to myself to love myself, to treat myself as someone I love truly and deeply — in my thoughts, my actions, the choices I make, the experiences I have, each moment I am conscious, I make the decision I LOVE MYSELF.”― Kamal Ravikant, Love Yourself Like Your Life Depends On It

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

14. “The Tao of Seneca: Practical Letters from a Stoic Master”

“The Tao of Seneca” compiles the wisdom of the Stoic philosopher Seneca into practical letters filled with timeless advice for daily life. This collection offers readers actionable guidance on how to navigate the challenges of existence with wisdom and resilience. Ravikant’s recommendation suggests the book’s value in providing philosophical tools for living a more meaningful and fulfilling life.

“It is not the man who has too little, but the man who craves more, that is poor.”― The Tao of Seneca: Practical Letters from a Stoic Master

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

15. “How to Change your Mind” by Michael Pollan

In “How to Change your Mind,” Michael Pollan explores the transformative potential of psychedelics and altered states of consciousness. Pollan’s investigative journey into the world of psychedelics sheds light on their impact on mental health, spirituality, and human perception. Naval Ravikant recognizes the book’s contribution to expanding our understanding of the mind, consciousness, and spirituality in a rapidly evolving world.

“Our task in life consists precisely in a form of letting go of fear and expectations, an attempt to purely give oneself to the impact of the present.”― Michael Pollan, How to Change Your Mind: What the New Science of Psychedelics Teaches Us About Consciousness, Dying, Addiction, Depression, and Transcendence

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

16. “Striking Thoughts: Bruce Lee’s Wisdom for Daily Living” by Bruce Lee

“Striking Thoughts” by Bruce Lee offers wisdom from the legendary martial artist for daily life and personal growth. This collection of Lee’s insights and philosophies encompasses not only martial arts but also life itself. Ravikant’s inclusion of this work highlights its applicability to both physical and spiritual development, emphasizing the importance of balance and discipline in one’s journey.

“Don’t fear failure. — Not failure, but low aim, is the crime. In great attempts it is glorious even to fail.”― Bruce Lee, Striking Thoughts: Bruce Lee’s Wisdom for Daily Living

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

17. “The Prophet” by Kahlil Gibran

Kahlil Gibran’s “The Prophet” is a poetic masterpiece that imparts profound insights on love, freedom, and spirituality. Written in the form of a poetic prose narrative, this book provides readers with timeless wisdom and universal truths. Naval Ravikant’s endorsement underscores the book’s enduring relevance as a source of guidance and inspiration for generations of seekers.

“Let there be spaces in your togetherness, And let the winds of the heavens dance between you. Love one another but make not a bond of love: Let it rather be a moving sea between the shores of your souls. Fill each other’s cup but drink not from one cup. Give one another of your bread but eat not from the same loaf.”― Kahlil Gibran, The Prophet

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

18. “The Tao of Philosophy” by Alan Watts

Alan Watts’ “The Tao of Philosophy” explores the essence of Taoism and its philosophical implications for modern life. Watts delves into the wisdom of ancient Chinese philosophy, demonstrating its relevance to contemporary thought and self-discovery. Ravikant’s inclusion of this work suggests its value in understanding the profound principles of Eastern philosophy and their practical applications in daily life.

“However, until there is silence of the mind, it is almost impossible to understand eternal life, that is to say, eternal now.”― Alan W. Watts, The Tao of Philosophy

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

19. “Jed McKenna’s Notebook” by Jed McKenna

“Jed McKenna’s Notebook” offers further insights from the author of the “Dreamstate Trilogy.” In this collection, McKenna expands on his teachings, providing readers with deeper understandings of reality, enlightenment, and the human experience. Naval Ravikant recognizes the depth of McKenna’s wisdom and its value in the pursuit of self-realization and personal growth.

21 Best Philosophy & Spirituality Books of All Time According to Naval Ravikant

20. “Jed Talks #1” by Jed McKenna

“Jed Talks #1” by Jed McKenna provides readers with a series of thought-provoking discussions on spirituality and existence. These talks delve into profound topics, offering new perspectives and insights for those seeking truth and self-discovery. Ravikant’s endorsement highlights the transformative potential of McKenna’s teachings, inviting readers to expand their horizons.

21. “Jed Talks #2” by Jed McKenna

“Jed Talks #2” continues Jed McKenna’s exploration of profound spiritual topics, offering additional wisdom and perspectives. These talks delve deeper into the nature of reality and enlightenment, encouraging readers to question their assumptions and embark on their own journeys of self-discovery. Naval Ravikant’s inclusion of this work suggests that it offers further insights into the nature of reality and the path to enlightenment.

I hoped you have found this article useful. If you did, it would be awesome if you gave me a clap or left a response!

If you enjoyed this article and want to support Novel Nest, click this link to get notified whenever I publish something new.

If you enjoyed these book recommendations, check out the rest of my book lists on my blog- https://www.thenovelnest.com/blog

Affiliate Disclaimer: This post features Amazon affiliate links, which means I may earn a small commission if you make a purchase through these links.

Novel Nest

Written by Novel Nest

Discover Non-Fiction and Intellectual Books Recommendations. Find new favorites in our diverse book lists and on our blog: https://www.thenovelnest.com/blog

The Astrology Of 2024 – Jupiter Conjunct Uranus

(astrobutterfly.com)

2024 is brimming with important, once-in-a-lifetime astrological events.

From Pluto moving into Aquarius, to a rare Chiron-North Node conjunction, to the much anticipated Jupiter-Uranus conjunction in Taurus, 2024 promises to be a year to remember! 

2024 is marked by an important elemental shift. Jupiter and Pluto move from Earth signs (Taurus and Capricorn), into Air signs (Gemini and Aquarius). Life will feel a little lighter (and less heavy). 

At a collective level, the focus transitions from tangible and material concerns to intellectual exploration, innovative ideas, and social connections. 

There is A LOT to talk about these important transits in 2024. In this overview I will focus on dates and key aspects, and then closer to the date, I will write an extensive report for each one of them.

Here are the most important transits of 2024:

Pluto enters in Aquarius – January and November 2024

Pluto first moves into Aquarius on January 20th, 2024. Pluto leaves Capricorn hand in hand with the Sun, to mark the transition with a bold statement. The Sun and Pluto literally conjunct at 29° 59’, at the very last frontier of Capricorn. “The king is dead. Long live the king!” 

Pluto makes it to the 2nd degree of Aquarius, and then it turns retrograde on May 3rd, 2024. Pluto stays in Aquarius until September 1st, 2024, when it retrogrades, for the last time, in Capricorn.

September 1st – November 19th, 2024 is our last chance to finish any Pluto in Capricorn unfinished business, so we can move on to the next 20-year chapter of our life: the Pluto in Aquarius chapter (your Aquarius house will give you clues about what’s coming into focus).  

Pluto moves into Aquarius for good on November 19th, 2024. This is when we will get the full scope of what’s about to come.

We, of course, got a taste of Pluto in Aquarius already in 2023 (does AI ring a bell?), and then again in the first 8 months of 2024, but it’s at the end of November – when Pluto moves for good into Aquarius – that we will officially transition into this new era. 

North Node Conjunct Chiron – February 19th, 2024

In February 2024 we have a very important transit: North Node is conjunct Chiron at 16° Aries.

Chiron is our deepest wound, and also the gift that emerges when this wound is embraced and alchemised. 

North Node is a karmic energy – but not the type of “resurfacing of old patterns”- that’s the South Node; the North Node is the opportunity to change our karma, and rewrite our destiny. 

Our ‘deepest wound’ is rarely something we are aware of (at least fully). Our deepest wound is subtle. We were born with it. In most cases, it can be traced generations back. 

So when the North Node meets Chiron, we have a unique opportunity to look at this wound from a different angle, and re-write our karmic patterns. This time we can truly break the cycle. 

Jupiter conjunct Uranus in Taurus – April 21st, 2024

On April 20-21st, 2024, Jupiter is conjunct Uranus at 21° Taurus.

Jupiter conjunct Uranus is an exciting transit in itself. What’s not to be excited about? Jupiter is the great benefic, bringing opportunities for growth and expansion. Uranus is the planet of progress and surprises. 

We have a Jupiter-Uranus conjunction once every 13-14 years, and it’s the only time it happens in Taurus during our lifetime. Jupiter conjunct Uranus promises to bring a very exciting opportunity in the Taurus sector of your chart. 

There’s something magical about this transit. Uranus brings the excitement element, and Jupiter suggests that, while we may not anticipate what Uranus has in store for us, it is likely something positive. Who doesn’t like a bit of celestial optimism? 

But what I really like about this transit is that Venus also gets involved. Approximately 1 month after Jupiter meets Uranus, Venus joins in, conjuncting both Jupiter and Uranus, and activating some really once-in-a-lifetime type of opportunities.

And if that was not enough good news, Jupiter also sextiles Saturn in Pisces

I rarely get overly excited about a transit, but this is one of those transits I’m really excited about.

Of course, just because a transit looks great on paper, this doesn’t mean everyone will win the lotto. 

If you have planets or angles around 21° in Taurus (or Cancer, Virgo, Capricorn and Pisces), you will likely experience the positive manifestations of Jupiter conjunct Uranus. 

If instead, you have planets or angles around 21°in the other fixed signs, this powerful transit might challenge you at first. It’s not that the developments Jupiter and Uranus bring are not positive in essence, but it may not feel that way at first, because change is not always easy, especially for fixed signs. 

Whatever happens (or doesn’t) around the time of this conjunction, pay attention to any messages or downloads you receive. There WILL be opportunities – but you have to seize them, and then say yes to them. 

Jupiter enters Gemini – May 25th, 2024

The last weeks of Jupiter’s stay in Taurus are filled with possibilities and positive influences, but the good news doesn’t end here.

On May 25th, 2024, Jupiter moves into Gemini, and immediately forms an auspicious trine with Pluto in Aquarius, favoring Air-related activities like communication, information, or social connections. 

This Jupiter-Pluto trine creates a fertile ground for exchanging ideas, networking, and expanding intellectual horizons. 

The Beatles during the recording of their album “Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band” at the Abbey Road studio in LondonPhoto Jean-Marie PÈrier, special price, contact us.

If you dream (Jupiter), dream big (Pluto). And make sure you don’t keep this vision for yourself – Gemini likes to talk!

Jupiter in Gemini in general is a transit that favors communication and social activities. Now that you’ve built something great with Jupiter (and Uranus) in Taurus, it’s time to articulate your vision and share your ideas.

It’s incredible how much farther you can go with a ‘little help from your friends’!   

Solar And Lunar Eclipses In 2024

In 2024, we have 4 eclipses, including a first Eclipse in Pisces, which will give us a taste of the upcoming Virgo-Pisces 2025-2026 Eclipse season.

If you have personal planets or angles in a 1-2 degree conjunction with an eclipse, then that peculiar eclipse will influence you at a personal level. 

  • March 25th, 2024 – South Node Lunar Eclipse at 5° Libra 
  • April 8th, 2024 – North Node Solar Eclipse at 19° Aries (conjunct Chiron)
  • September 18th, 2024 – North Node Lunar Eclipse at 25° Pisces
  • October 3rd, 2024 – South Node Solar Eclipse at 10° Libra 

Mercury Retrograde In 2024

In 2024, Mercury goes retrograde in Fire signs (except the August retrograde, when Mercury starts its retrogradation in Virgo but spends most time in Leo). 

It’s one of the distinctive patterns of the Mercury cycle to retrograde in the same element for approximately a couple of years before moving into another element. 

Mercury retrograde cycles moving from Earth to Fire suggests that our focus is now less on everyday life stuff and resources (Earth) and more on existential questions like Who I am, Why Am I here? What’s my true potential?

This shift to the Fire element encourages us to explore our inner world and reconnect with our vision and spiritual purpose. 

Here are the 3 annual Mercury retrogrades in 2024:

  • April 2nd – April 26th, 2024: Mercury retrograde from 27° Aries to 15° Aries
  • August 5th – August 29th, 2024: Mercury goes retrograde from 4° Virgo to 21° Leo
  • November 26th – December 16th, 2024: Mercury goes retrograde from 22° Sagittarius to 6° Sagittarius

As with any other transit, you will be particularly influenced if you have a personal planet or an angle anywhere on Mercury’s retrograde path, and especially at the degrees of its station. 

Planet Highlight: Jupiter

If in 2023  we had a rather uneventful Jupiter passage through Aries and Taurus (except for the Jupiter-Chiron conjunction in March 2023), in 2024, Jupiter makes A LOT of aspects with other planets.

The succession of these aspects is very interesting. Normally we wouldn’t pay much attention to short-lived transits like Sun or Venus conjunct Jupiter. 

But since these occur at the same time with other important transits like Jupiter conjunct Uranus, Jupiter sextile Neptune, or Jupiter trine Pluto, we are talking now about multiple Jupiter transits happening at once. 

The interplay of these transits amplifies their individual impact, adding context and significance to otherwise more generic influences. This time, things get personal! 

2024 is all about Jupiter! Jupiter is the largest planet in our solar system. Jupiter rules 2 important things 1) our beliefs, i.e. how we make sense of the world, and 2) the ‘world’ itself i.e. our social circles, our neighborhood, those groups of people that define our sense of belonging.

Jupiter is how we fit – or we don’t – in the world. 

In 2024, questions around belonging, social aspirations, or finding our tribe of like-minded people will be more important than ever. 

Here are the most important Jupiter transits in 2024:

  • April 20-21st, 2024 – Jupiter conjunct Uranus 21° Taurus
  • May 18th, 2024 – Sun conjunct Jupiter at 28° Taurus
  • May 23rd, 2024 – Venus conjunct Jupiter at 29° Taurus
  • May 24th, 2024 – Jupiter sextile Neptune 29° Pisces
  • May 25th, 2024 – Jupiter enters Gemini 
  • June 2nd, 2024 – Jupiter trine Pluto at 1° Aquarius 
  • August 14th, 2024 – Mars conjunct Jupiter at 16° Gemini 
  • August 19th, 2024 – Jupiter square Saturn at 17° Pisces
  • September 15th, 2024 – Venus in Libra trine Jupiter at 20° Gemini 
  • October 9th, 2024 – Jupiter turns retrograde 21° Gemini 
  • December 24th, 2024 – Jupiter square Saturn at 14° Pisces

In the first half of the year, Jupiter will have a blast – and so will you (depending, of course, on the details of your natal chart). 

In the 2nd half of the year, Jupiter forms a mutable square with Saturn. This is the first square of the Jupiter-Saturn cycle that began in December 2020, at 0° Aquarius. 

The first square of a synodic cycle is called “Crisis in action”. We are at a crossroads, in need to adapt to the changing environment.

Change is a natural part of life. It’s when we resist it, that we suffer (because we close off and separate from the world). When we pay attention to the signs, we synchronize with the Universe, and we naturally adapt to the ever-changing flow of life. 

In 2024, important astrological events, including a rare North Node-Chiron conjunction, and the star transit Jupiter conjunct Uranus, set the stage for transgenerational healing and exciting opportunities in the Taurus sector of your chart. 

Pluto’s ingress into Aquarius will shift your focus to a completely different area of your life. Pluto in Capricorn is history. There’s something else in need of complete transformation and overhaul. 

Jacob Needleman on fundamentalism

“Basically, it’s I’m right and you’re wrong.”

–Jacob Needleman’s definition of fundamentalism

Jacob Needleman (October 6, 1934 – November 28, 2022) was an American philosopher, author, and religious scholar. Needleman was Jewish and was educated at Harvard University, Yale University, and the University of Freiburg, Germany. He was deeply involved in the Gurdjieff Work and the Gurdjieff Foundation of San Francisco. Wikipedia

The Pernicious Myth of Meritocracy (Why American capitalism is so rotten)

It’s time to banish the absurd idea that people are paid what they’re “worth”
ROBERT REICH DEC 22, 2023 (robertreich@substack.com)

“We renew our resolve that America will never be a socialist country,” Donald Trump has said.

Someone should alert him that America is already a hotbed of socialism. But it’s socialism for the rich. Everyone else is treated to harsh capitalism.

In the conservative mind, socialism means getting something for doing nothing. This pretty much describes General Motors’ receipt of $600 million in federal contracts, plus $500 million in tax breaks, after Trump took office in 2017.

Some of this corporate welfare has gone into the pockets of GM executives. Since then, Chairman and CEO Mary Barra has raked in some $20 million a year in total compensation.

But GM employees are subject to harsh capitalism. (Hopefully, the recent agreement between GM and the UAW will reduce this harshness somewhat.)

The nation’s largest banks have saved an estimated $21 billion a year since Trump’s tax cuts went into effect in 2018, some of which went into massive bonuses for bank executives.

On the other hand, thousands of lower-level bank employees got a big dose of harsh capitalism. They lost their jobs.

Banks that are too big to fail — courtesy of the 2008 bank bailout — enjoy a hidden subsidy of tens of billions a year because they have the backing of the federal government. This hidden subsidy gives Wall Street’s giant banks a huge advantage because everyone dealing with them is guaranteed against loss.

Take away this hidden subsidy, and Wall Street’s bonus pool disappears, along with most profits.

When he was in business, Trump perfected the art of using bankruptcy to shield himself from the consequences of bad decisions — socialism for the rich at its worst — while leaving employees twisting in the wind.

Now, all over America, executives who run their companies into the ground are getting gold-plated exit packages while their workers get pink slips.

Under socialism for the rich, you can screw up big time and still reap big rewards. Equifax’s Richard Smith retired in 2017 with an $18 million pension in the wake of a security breach that exposed the personal information of 145 million customers to hackers.

Wells Fargo’s Carrie Tolstedt departed with a $125 million exit package after being in charge of the unit that opened more than 2 million unauthorized customer accounts.

Whatever happened to the idea of an economic system that allows everyone to get ahead through hard work, and allocates economic gains only to those who deserve them?  

Around 60 percent of America’s wealth is now inherited. Many of today’s super-rich have never done a day’s work in their lives.

Trump’s response was to expand this free lunch by cutting the estate tax to apply only to estates valued at over $22 million per couple.

To the conservative mind, the specter of socialism conjures up a society in which no one is held accountable and no one has to work for what they receive. Yet this is exactly the society Trump and his Republican allies have promoted for the rich.

Meanwhile, most Americans are subject to an increasingly relentless and arbitrary capitalism.

They need stronger safety nets, and they deserve a bigger piece of the economic pie.

If you want to call this socialism, fine. I call it fair.

A FEW YEARS AGO, I was invited to speak to a group of workers at a power plant in northern California who were considering whether to form a union.

One young man who intended to vote against forming a union told me he was “worth” no more than the $14 an hour he was then paid. “I say for these people making their millions, that’s fantastic. I could have done the same thing if I went to school and had the brains for it. I do not, so I’m a laborer.”

The young man apparently had no knowledge of the 1950s, when over 30 percent of the nation’s private-sector workforce was unionized. That gave the nation’s blue-collar workers, like him, enough bargaining power to summon the equivalent (on average, and in today’s dollars) of $30 an hour — even though many hadn’t finished high school.

It wasn’t their brains that accomplished this. It was their bargaining power. But the power of trade unions to negotiate good wages for hourly workers has declined markedly since then. That’s why the young man I met was “worth” no more than $14 an hour.

Yet the notion that you’re paid what you’re “worth” is by now so deeply engrained in the public conscious that many who earn very little assume it’s their own fault. They may even feel ashamed of what they see as a personal failure — a lack of “brains” or a deficiency of character.

The same mythology allows those who earn vast sums to believe they must be extraordinarily clever, daring, and superior. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be doing so well. This reassuring conviction seemingly justifies not only their great wealth but also their high status in society.

They would prefer not to view their money as winnings in an economic contest over whose rules they and others like them have disproportionate influence. And they would prefer the public not see it that way, either.

A decade ago, the hedge fund manager Steven A. Cohen earned $2.3 billion. During his 20 years at the helm of S.A.C. Capital Advisors, he had amassed a fortune estimated to be around $11 billion.

Was he really worth it? In the trivial, tautological sense, he must have been, because that’s what he earned. “[P]rivate hedge fund people only make money because others voluntarily decide that it’s worth it to invest their money with them,” noted Dan Mitchell of the right-wing Cato Institute, in response to my public questioning of Cohen’s pay. 

But there may be a reason people decided to invest their money with Steven A. Cohen that raises a deeper question about his “worth.”

According to a criminal complaint filed by the Justice Department, insider trading at S.A.C. Capital under Cohen’s leadership was “substantial, pervasive, and on a scale without known precedent in the hedge fund industry.” Nine of Cohen’s present or former employees pleaded guilty to using insider information. The firm itself entered a guilty plea and paid a $1.8 billion fine.

For years, investors had put their money into S.A.C. Capital — presumably because the firm’s trades on inside information generated huge returns. Had the firm’s insider trading been discovered and prosecuted earlier, those returns would not have been nearly as high, investors would not have put their money there, and Cohen’s wealth would never have amounted to $11 billion (minus the $1.8 billion fine).

In other words, if unions were as strong today as they were six decades ago, the worker I spoke with might well have earned (and therefore been “worth”) $30 an hour instead of $14.

And if the ban on insider trading had been stronger and fully enforced, Steven A. Cohen would not have accumulated (and been “worth”) $11 billion, and his clients would not have “voluntarily decided it was worth it” to invest their money with him.

PEOPLE ARE “WORTH” what they’re paid in the market in the trivial sense that if the market rewards them a certain amount of money, they are assumed to be worth it. Some confuse this tautology for a moral claim that people deserve what they are paid — that America is a “meritocracy.”

The term “meritocracy” was coined by British sociologist Michael Young in his 1958 satirical essay “The Rise of the Meritocracy” to depict a society so wedded to standard measures of intelligence that it ignored many gifted and talented people while overlooking character flaws in those who tested well.

Since then, the term’s meaning has changed to become a positive description of a society in which anyone can make it based on individual merit — through qualities such as natural intelligence, hard work, ambition, and courage — and in which financial rewards are directly proportional to individual effort and ability.

But a moment’s thought reveals factors other than individual “merit” that play a larger role in determining earnings — inheritance, connections, luck, or discrimination in favor of or against someone because of how they look. It turns out that the most important determinant of someone’s future earnings is the earnings of the family they’re born into.

Unless one assumes that these outcomes are just, it does not follow that people deserve what they are paid in any moral sense.

IF THE RULES GOVERNING HOW THE MARKET IS ORGANIZED took full account of the benefits to society of various roles and occupations, some people would be paid far more — and others, far less.

Social work, teaching, nursing, and caring for the elderly or for children are among the lowest-paid professions. Yet evidence suggests that talented and dedicated people in these positions generate societal benefits far out of proportion to their pay.

One such study found that good teachers increase the average present value of their students’ lifetime income by $250,000 per classroom, for example. Presumably, if teaching jobs paid better, they would attract many more such teachers. 

On the other hand, the worth to society of many CEOs, hedge-fund managers, investment bankers, “high-frequency” traders, lobbyists, and high-end corporate lawyers is likely to be far less than they command in the market.

Much of what they do entails taking money out of one set of pockets and putting it into another, in escalating zero-sum activity.

High-frequency traders, for example, profit by getting information a fraction of a second earlier than other traders, necessitating ever-greater investments in electronic systems that give them that tiny edge.

Similarly, squadrons of corporate lawyers are paid substantial sums by their clients because squadrons of corporate lawyers on the other side are paid vast sums to attack them and defend their own clients.

PEOPLE IN THESE PROFESSIONS do not generate discoveries that transform society or create works of art that enrich and deepen human consciousness. Their innovations are financial and tactical — finding new ways to squeeze more money out of a given set of assets, including employees, or to expropriate the assets and incomes of others.

Such contests also use up the time and energies of some of the nation’s most educated young people, whose talents could, one supposes, be put to more socially beneficial uses.

According to research by sociologist Lauren Rivera, some 70 percent of Harvard’s senior class routinely submits résumés to Wall Street and corporate consulting firms. The percentages are similar at other Ivy League colleges.

The hefty endowments of such elite institutions are swollen with the tax-subsidized donations of wealthy alumni, many of whom seek to increase the odds that their own kids will be admitted so they too can become enormously wealthy financiers, management consultants, and corporate executives.

Personally, I could think of a better way for taxpayers to subsidize occupations with more social merit: Forgive the student debts of graduates who choose social work, child care, elder care, nursing, and teaching.  

THE ENORMOUS pay going to the richest members of society is not necessary to get them to do the work they do. Nor does it reflect the societal value of their work. More often than not, their pay is way out of line with the common good.

Meanwhile, the current pay going to the working class is inadequate to provide people the standard of living they desire. It, too, is out of line with the common good.

Claus, Inc.

BY PATRICK ROCKENBACH • DECEMBER 22, 2023

(thesunmagazine.org)

Many humans have long entertained a belief in a benevolent man who enters their homes once a year and leaves gifts for children as a reward for good behavior. Nearly three-quarters of Americans say they typically received Christmas Eve visits from Santa as children, and one in five adults says they are the parent or guardian of a child in their home who believes in Santa, according to a Pew Research Center study published in 2013.

I, too, count myself as a believer, having had my own experience with Santa when I was eight years old. I vividly recall catching a glimpse of a large, bearded man in a red suit pulling things out of a bag in our living room one Christmas Eve. I stood in the doorway and watched him place gifts under the tree and stuff the stockings we had hung on a bookshelf (we didn’t have a fireplace). At one point he stopped his work and seemed to be aware of my presence, so I quickly made my way back to bed.

Since then I have often wondered about the man we know as Santa Claus. Who is he? Why did he take on this role? How does he deliver so many gifts around the world on a single night? There is no lack of published material about him, but as far as I can tell there has been no formal interview with the man who has played such a large role in so many lives.

Until now. Through a long investigation I was able to locate Santa, and after much negotiation with his public-relations team he agreed to meet with me and talk about his life’s work. We decided I would travel to his office, which to my surprise was located not at the North Pole but in the Bahamas. My trip included a series of what seemed to be calculated delays and last-minute changes that I assumed were meant to disorient me so that I could not later divulge his precise location.

When we finally met, it was in a comfortably furnished office in a nondescript cottage with a spectacular view of the ocean. I had envisioned a large man with an ample belly and long white beard, but he was tall and thin with well-trimmed facial hair. He appeared to be in his late fifties and was dressed casually in shorts, flip flops, and a colorful printed shirt that made him look like a tourist. We sat on a terrace overlooking the water, and he smiled and laughed often during our time together. Though he was patient with me, I could also tell that he was holding back some information, either for privacy concerns or to preserve some air of mystery.

I could have continued talking for hours, but an assistant finally signaled that our time was up. Santa stood and stretched, looking past me and into the setting sun. A smile crossed his face, and he leaned over and whispered something in my ear—it’s too personal to share, but it made me smile. He shook my hand, and, laying a finger aside of his nose, he winked and walked away.

Santa sits on the top of a chimney while using a laptop.

Patrick Rockenbach: I don’t think I’ve ever seen an interview with you published before. Why is that?

Santa Claus: I try to keep a low profile, and, as you found out, I’m not easy to reach. But honestly no one has ever asked before.

Patrick: I find that hard to believe.

Santa: I think when you get to a certain status like I have, people see you as unapproachable, or they have already formed an opinion of you, so they don’t bother to ask. Plus there is a segment of the population that doesn’t believe I exist.

Patrick: So why now?

Santa: As the world gets more complicated and everything starts to move so fast, we tend to lose sight of the simple things that bind us all together. I thought it was time to set the record straight that I am a real person and the CEO of a large corporation that does a lot of good in the world.

Patrick: I think referring to yourself as “the CEO of a large corporation” is going to rub some readers the wrong way. Many people feel that commercialism is ruining Christmas.

Santa: I understand. It didn’t start out that way, but at some point the size and scale of what we do just exploded exponentially. It made sense to incorporate. Plus we had to protect our intellectual property and limit our liability.

Patrick: What kind of corporation is it?

Santa: On the surface you’d assume we’d be a goods and services company, but in reality the majority of our holdings are technology related. Our mission is to contribute to peace in the world by promoting collaboration among nations through education, science, culture, and communication.

Patrick: You mentioned technology holdings. I wouldn’t have expected that.

Santa: Most people wouldn’t, but we’ve been part of a great deal of innovation over the years, and that can be very profitable. If you add in all the licensing revenue from my name and likeness, let’s just say we’re a multibillion-dollar corporation.

Patrick: Is that why you are here in the Bahamas?

Santa: The North Pole is great for the brand, and we have a satellite office there, but’s it’s really cold, and we couldn’t ignore the tax advantages any longer.

Patrick: Let’s go back to the beginning. How did you get your start?

Santa: I was born in a small village called Patara, which was Greek at the time but is now part of Turkey. My parents died during an epidemic when I was young. They were very wealthy, and I’m not sure where it came from, but as a result I was able to live a comfortable life.

Most of my memories of them are through the eyes of a child. My father’s hands were big and strong. I can still remember what it was like when he held my hand. It made me feel safe and secure. My mother always had a smile and a big hearty laugh. I think that’s where I got it.

I wish I’d had more time with them and often wonder what they would think of all this. They were hard workers and made a point to help friends and neighbors in need. I have memories of my father quietly handing out money to people he met on the street.

When I was in my thirties, I was appointed Bishop of Myra. Since we were on the coast, I would be asked to pray for the local sailors before they shipped out to sea. I saw how their families struggled while they were gone, so I tried to help out with small amounts of money and gifts for the children.

Patrick: So that’s how the idea of giving started? As a way to honor your parents?

Santa: I’ve never really thought about it, but I guess so. We all look up to our parents and try to make them proud of us. I’m no different.

Patrick: Once you became known for your philanthropic work, how did you deal with the financial nuts and bolts of it?

Santa: [Laughs.] Not very well at first. I can identify with people who win the lottery. Once you have the means to do just about anything you want, you can blow through your cash pretty quickly. My parents left me a sizeable nest egg, but I could tell after a few months that it wasn’t going to last. I was like a dot-com start-up back in the early 2000s. I had a negative cash flow, but unlike some of those businesses, I had no opportunity to monetize. I was giving stuff away, and you can’t build a sustainable business that way.

Patrick: It’s so strange to hear you talk like that. When people think of Santa Claus, they just assume everything is “magic.”

Santa: I know, but unfortunately I didn’t have any magic. All I had was a rapidly diminishing bank account and insatiable demand. You know the old saying about necessity being the mother of invention. That was the story of my early years. If it didn’t exist, I had to make it up.

Patrick: Didn’t the Church help you out?

Santa: No. I was doing all this on the side. Nicholas, Bishop of Myra, by day and mysterious gift giver by night.

Patrick: Like Clark Kent and Superman.

Santa: More like Bruce Wayne and Batman. I don’t have superpowers. Most of what I do is built on technology.

Patrick: So you needed an alias. Is that where Santa Claus came in?

Santa: I go by many names. Santa Claus is just one of them. You can google it, but much of my legend in the United States is based on the 1823 poem “A Visit from St. Nicholas” [commonly known as “The Night before Christmas”—Ed.]. Toss in some Norman Rockwell paintings, a few movies, and a series of Christmas specials back in the 1960s and you’ve got what I’d call the modern idea of Santa Claus in the US.

Patrick: Before we go on, I have to say—you look very good for a man who is over 1,700 years old.

Santa: Thank you. I try to work out, watch what I eat.

Patrick: It’s got to be more than that.

Santa: Let’s just say that I have access to some cutting-edge medical technology and leave it at that.

Patrick: I think an obvious question to ask here is one about distribution. There are so many people in the world. The number of presents you have to deliver is beyond comprehension.

Santa: True, but not every person participates. Our target audience is children twelve and under. One thing that we have seen over the years is how the idea of giving has expanded and some people act in my name, which removes them from our process.

Giving is kind of like a snowball. It starts small but just keeps growing and growing. Sometimes I think it’s too much, but when you see someone take the time to think of another person it can’t be a bad thing, right? Gift giving between adults has just exploded in the last hundred years or so. I think some of it has to do with additional disposable income. That didn’t exist for much of history.

Patrick: Why is twelve the cutoff age?

Santa: We’ve found that once a child hits their teenage years, things start to change. Maybe it’s puberty, but the ability to believe in things you can’t see really drops off at that point. There are exceptions, of course; the age is different depending on the country. But you have to draw the line somewhere.

Patrick: You refer to “we” quite a bit. How large is this organization?

Santa: [Laughs.] I have a lot of help. We have specialists in research and development, IT, purchasing, marketing, human resources, accounting and finance, and so many others I don’t even remember. I’d hate to be onstage at some awards show; I know I’d forget someone’s name.

Patrick: But you’re Santa Claus—your job is to remember everyone’s name.

Santa: I’m over a thousand years old; it happens. That’s where technology comes in. That’s the real Christmas magic. Several decisions we made early on had a huge impact. First was to treat every country in the world as a unique franchise—like how McDonald’s has a Big Mac in every country but also includes local flavors. That also allows me to outsource. Second was to limit the size and scope of the operation. We deliver only to children. Third was to run on an opt-in model versus an opt-out model.

Patrick: Let’s take those one at a time. I think most people think of one Santa Claus, not multiple versions that vary by country.

Santa: Remember, when I first started out it was just in my village, so it was possible to sustain a one-man operation. As word began to spread, the volume increased, and so did the requests for special orders. I had to bring in some help, or I never would have survived.

Patrick: Is that where the elves come in?

Santa: I prefer to refer to them as associates. There are really two groups: production and distribution. The “elves” assist with production. I have outsourced the actual delivery to a number of “alternate versions” of myself.

Patrick: Like the mall Santas?

Santa: They are part of the public-relations team, but I also have individuals who make personal appearances on Christmas Eve in homes around the world. The actual persona of the individual depends on the local custom. For example, in the United States it’s Santa Claus. In Germany it’s Der Weihnachtsmann, and it’s Father Christmas in the United Kingdom. It helps to keep things more personal and also gives back to the local economies. I also make some personal appearances and deliver gifts myself every year. I think it’s important for me to stay connected.

Patrick: But you do not personally visit all of the children of the world on Christmas Eve?

Santa: I’m afraid not. That would be impossible.

Patrick: Frankly that’s a little disappointing.

Santa: I think the idea of children around the world being united by an annual event, regardless of how it happens, is pretty fantastic. The fact that it is not a single person that carries out the process is irrelevant. It still happens. There are so few things that unite us anymore. It’s comforting that so many share this common experience.

Patrick: Getting back to the process—What did you mean by opt in or opt out?

Santa: We have a standard contract that allows parents to opt in to the concept of Santa Claus. In exchange for presents for the child, they agree to allow access to the home, limit our liability, and propagate the legend. It’s a win-win: we continue to build our base, and the parents get years of good behavior from their child.

The key is that they have to opt in to participate. If we set it up as an opt out, that would have meant we had to accept almost every child into the program, which would have been a nightmare.

Patrick: So some children are just excluded? That doesn’t seem fair. Why do the parents get to decide?

Santa: Parents make many decisions for their children. This is no different.

Patrick: Why would a parent not participate? It’s free stuff for their kids.

Santa: There are a number of reasons. Some don’t like the terms and conditions of the contract—mostly lawyer types that don’t like to grant access and waive liability. Others don’t like the idea of exchanging gifts for good behavior.

A few parents decide to take on the responsibility themselves—they act in my name so that we can concentrate on helping other people. There may be a few holes in the process, but we’ve gotten pretty good at making sure we don’t miss anyone.

Patrick: That means millions of people know about this and no one talks. How is that possible?

Santa: We have very solid nondisclosure language in the contract, and there are some pretty significant penalties if someone violates the agreement. We also have technology that wipes the memory from the parent once their child’s participation in the program ends. I’d rather not get into details, but it’s kind of like when someone is able to take control of your computer remotely.

Patrick: That sounds like mind control. If that’s true, you have access to literally millions of people that you could make do anything you wanted without their knowledge.

Santa: You make it sound very sinister. It’s not like that. We have to have the support and consent of parents, but not always their full knowledge of the details, or we couldn’t continue.

Patrick: Kind of like a dictator.

Santa: That’s a little extreme. All of this is laid out in the contract; no one is forced to participate. I am the face of the organization, but we have a board of directors that approves all decisions and a very structured risk-and-compliance group that ensures we follow our corporate code of conduct and adhere to our mission statement.

The process we have today was built over many years with very strict testing and controls. If something didn’t work, we either improved it or abandoned it.

Patrick: How do you track the children’s behavior over an entire year?

Santa: In the beginning it was much easier. It was a small village, and everyone knew each other, so you heard things. The challenge came once word started to spread that there was this guy giving away free stuff. It got out of control pretty fast. I had to build a process to identify who qualified and who didn’t. Parents have to monitor behavior as part of their contract.

Patrick: “You better watch out / you better not cry / you better not pout”—it seems like you are encouraging children to hold their emotions in check.

Santa: I think it’s important for children to be able to express themselves, but the goal is to try and reinforce positive behavior. It was a little difficult at first. Who am I to say what’s good and what’s bad? Fortunately, there are some universal truths that cross all cultures, and we are dealing with kids here, so I tried to keep it simple and base it on the golden rule: do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

Patrick: “He sees you when you’re sleeping / he knows when you’re awake / he knows when you’ve been bad or good”—that sounds like Big Brother.

Santa: It sounds much more intrusive than it actually is. Frankly it is a little unrealistic to watch someone 24/7, so we rely on some proprietary algorithms to identify peak times of naughty behavior and then randomly sample children during those windows.

In recent years we also have a trove of information available through social media. We built a popular free social-networking website that allows registered users to create profiles, upload photos and video, send messages, and keep in touch with friends, family, and colleagues. You’d be amazed how much information people are willing to share.

Patrick: Are you talking about Facebook?

Santa: I can’t confirm or deny that.

Patrick: Even with social-media data, you only use a sample of behavior. Couldn’t a child end up on the wrong list?

Santa: [Shrugs.] It’s possible but not likely. Our technology is state of the art, and we have a number of protocols in place to weed out false positives for both naughty and nice behavior. The National Security Agency has been coming to us for years.

Patrick: That’s a little scary, especially for people concerned about privacy.

Santa: It’s no different from signing up for a club membership at the grocery store. Yes, you do give up some personal information, but most people feel the payoff is worth it in the long run. If they change their mind at any point, they can opt out.

Patrick: Do many opt out?

Santa: Not many. It’s a pretty good deal.

Patrick: How do you make all the toys?

Santa: I have always had assistance in the production of the actual toys. The first “elves” were really just people around the village. I would send out requests to the local merchants, and they would provide whatever the children were asking for. That’s where much of my family fortune went: paying the merchants for the toys. That’s when I realized that if this was going to be a long-term project, I’d have to make changes.

Patrick: So did you travel to some exotic location and find a group of people that you transported to your shop at the North Pole to help?

Santa: I think you are confusing me with Willy Wonka and the Oompa-Loompas. It’s not as exciting as that. I started to ask for volunteers to donate goods. I appealed to their sense of giving and was able to convince the local authorities to give them a break on their taxes. It was the equivalent of a nonprofit today.

Patrick: But you said earlier that you are a corporation.

Santa: That came much later as we expanded. We still operate as a nonprofit in a sense. We don’t have shareholders and I certainly don’t keep any of the profits; they go back into the operation and fund what is a large endowment that helps us to continue operating. In addition to the gifts we give at Christmas, we also help to fund a number of other charities throughout the year.

Patrick: Who actually makes the toys then?

Santa: We subcontract that out.

Patrick: To whom?

Santa: We receive a request from a child. Once we verify the child is on the nice list, we search for the best deal on the item they are requesting. We review options from various retailers and identify the best match for the best price. Because we purchase in huge quantities, we are able to get a bulk discount.

Patrick: That sounds like Amazon.

Santa: [Laughs.] There’s a reason for that. Our model was developed by one of our associates, and when we found out how well it worked, we decided to roll it out to the general public.

Patrick: Are you saying Amazon’s business model came from you?

Santa: I would not be able to confirm or deny that.

Patrick: That’s not what I expected to hear. The common belief is that you have elves in a workshop making handmade toys.

Santa: We do some things internally, but the vast majority of items come from companies like Nintendo, Microsoft, and Apple. Technology has advanced too much over the years. There is no way we could make an Xbox or an iPad. We have to go straight to the source. Plus we have to be very aware of copyright and trademark infringement.

Patrick: How do you deliver all these gifts in one night?

Santa: We have an operation that offers a complete suite of online services for shipment preparation, package tracking, rates, and tools tailored to the needs of international shippers and small businesses.

Patrick: That sounds like FedEx. Did they copy you as well?

Santa: I can’t confirm or deny that.

Patrick: What about the reindeer and the sleigh?

Santa: There was a time when I used a sleigh pulled by reindeer, but as the list grew larger, it just wasn’t possible to maintain that. The reindeer are now just for show, part of promotion and marketing.

We’ve built distribution centers in or near all major cities. When a gift enters a hub, the shipping address is scanned and entered into the tracking system. The gift eventually reaches a truck sent out for local delivery.

Patrick: Now that really sounds like FedEx. If you used an army of FedEx drivers to deliver presents on one day, that would overwhelm the system.

Santa: You don’t really think all of those deliveries are made in a single night? Obviously some are made on Christmas Eve, but that doesn’t mean we have to move everything around the world in a single night. We receive letters and gather information year-round to monitor what toys will be in demand. We use proprietary software to predict what a child will want and then pre-stage the products around the world.

Patrick: Isn’t there some risk in trying to predict what children will want? What if you’re wrong?

Santa: It happens. We have a massive inventory of unwanted toys. I can’t tell you how many ZhuZhu Pets we have in storage. Fortunately things are cyclical, and there is always demand for nostalgia items. Give it some time, and a toy becomes popular again. When that happens, we either put the product back into rotation or we sell it through an online auction and shopping website.

Patrick: Sounds like eBay.

Santa: [Silence.]

Patrick: This unwanted inventory—is that where the story of the Island of Misfit Toys comes from?

Santa: [Laughs.] Many of those Christmas specials have some truth to them.

Patrick: Let’s talk about that for a minute. You have been celebrated in story and song for hundreds of years. How do you feel about these portrayals?

Santa: We have a very good publicity department.

Patrick: So all of that is part of the process?

Santa: Of course. Any corporation needs publicity if it’s going to continue to grow. We need people to believe, and for that, we have stay in the public eye. Our client base continuously turns over. If we lose a generation of children, it would put us at risk.

Patrick: I’m sorry to be cynical, but that sounds like an answer from a Fortune 500 executive.

Santa: If we want to continue providing gifts to children and keep the spirit of Christmas alive, we have to be practical. I started this many years ago because I saw a need in my community, and that need stills exists today. We had a good thing going in my village, and we could have kept it small, but it was something that needed to be shared.

I’ve dedicated my life to this idea of helping those in need. For most corporations giving back is just a tax break. Our company truly believes in our mission, and everyone is on board or else they don’t last long. I’m a big believer in the idea that it is better to give than receive.

Patrick: Still, in an operation as big as you describe, there have to be employees who are just going through the motions.

Santa: Every year I visit different areas of the company disguised as an entry-level employee to discover how things work. If I see anything that deviates from our core beliefs, I take immediate action to correct it.

Patrick: Several times in our conversation you have referenced the harvesting of personal data. In today’s environment where privacy and data sharing is such a concern, do you see that changing?

Santa: We are very careful with all our data, and we don’t share information with anyone. Our security system is state of the art. Our internal protocols make it virtually impossible for anyone to use our data even if they were able to access it.

We also remove all personal indicators from our data once a child leaves the program. I can no longer tell you what you received for Christmas on any given year. We keep the general information to help us with our distribution patterns, but everything else is scrubbed.

Patrick: What’s your favorite toy to deliver?

Santa: I love giving bicycles. They just represent freedom to me. You don’t see it as much today, but there was a time where, when you gave a child a bicycle, you were giving them the world. They could go anywhere and do anything. It’s a shame that a child can’t roam the streets on their own and explore anymore. Now it is more about the latest gadget: gaming systems, phones, things like that. I’d rather see a child use their imagination than lose themselves in a virtual world someone else created. I’m sure that makes me sound old-fashioned, but there is great value in an idle mind.

Patrick: But you’ve incorporated technology into your business model quite a bit, from what you’ve told me.

Santa: Some of the virtual reality games are incredible. I guess I’m just old school. Why do you need virtual reality when actual reality is right there? I like things that you can touch. Give me a doll or wagon any day.

Patrick: Do you have any regrets?

Santa: How does that Sinatra song go? “Regrets, I’ve had a few”? I’ve made mistakes over the years. You make the best decision you can with the information you have at the time. I don’t like the idea of rewriting history. Study it, learn from it, and then move on. Tomorrow is just around the corner.

Patrick: What about children of your own? Do you regret not having any?

Santa: I do have children. Millions of them.


Photograph of Patrick Rockenbach.

PATRICK ROCKENBACH lives in Whittier, California, with his wife and three sons. He spends his days working in the financial-services industry but has always dreamed of being a writer. This is his first publication. It only took fifty years to achieve.

US student, 14, wins award for developing soap to treat skin cancer

Heman Bekele was inspired by Ethiopian workers laboring under the sun, and wanted to help ‘as many people as possible’

Edward Helmore 25 Oct 2023 (TheGuardian.com)

Herman Bekele, 14, from Annandale in Virginia. Photograph: Andy King/Discovery Education

A middle-school teen has been named “America’s top young scientist” after developing a bar of soap that could be useful in the treatment of melanoma, a skin cancer that is diagnosed in about 100,000 people in the US each year and kills approximately 8,000.

A New York street scene.

Heman Bekele, a 14-year-old ninth grader from Annandale, Virginia, won the award after beating out nine other finalists.

“Curing cancer, one bar of soap at a time,” he said in his submission. “I have always been interested in biology and technology, and this challenge gave me the perfect platform to showcase my ideas,” he added.

He pitched his idea for a soap – the “skin cancer treating soap” – made from compounds that could reactivate dendritic cells that guard human skin, enabling them to fight cancer cells. In a video to the 3M Young Scientist Challenge, Bekele said he believed “that young minds can make a positive impact on the world”.

Bekele’s idea came from living in Ethiopia to the age of four where, he told the Washington Post, he had seen people constantly working under the hot sun: “I wanted to make my idea something that not only was great in terms of science but also could be accessible to as many people as possible.”

His mentor at 3M, Deborah Isabelle, described the teen to the outlet as “focused on making the world a better place for people he hasn’t necessarily even met yet”.

According to American Cancer Society (ACA), skin cancer is the most common of all cancers, with melanoma accounting for only 1% but causing the majority of skin cancer deaths.

The society says the rates of melanoma have been rising rapidly over the past few decades, particularly among women over 50, and it is more than 20 times more common in white people than in Black people. At the same time, melanoma mortality rates have declined over the past decade because of advances in treatment.skip past newsletter promotion

Sign up to First Thing

Free daily newsletter

Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/anchor?ar=1&k=6LdzlmsdAAAAALFH63cBVagSFPuuHXQ9OfpIDdMc&co=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cudGhlZ3VhcmRpYW4uY29tOjQ0Mw..&hl=en&type=image&v=u-xcq3POCWFlCr3x8_IPxgPu&theme=light&size=invisible&badge=bottomright&cb=tp1zhrl0uec5Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

After winning the award, Bekele told the judging panel he hoped to turn the soap into a “symbol of hope, accessibility and a world where skin cancer treatment is within reach for all”.

Book: “The Immortality Key: Uncovering the Secret History of the Religion with No Name”

The Immortality Key: Uncovering the Secret History of the Religion with No Name

Brian C. Muraresku

A groundbreaking, controversial dive into the role psychedelics have played in the human experience of the Divine throughout Western history, and the answer to a 2,000 year old mystery that could shake the Church to its foundations.

The Immortality Key connects the lost, psychedelic sacrament of Greek religion to early Christianity—exposing the true origins of Western Civilization. In the tradition of unsolved historical mysteries like David Grann’s Killers of the Flower Moon and Douglas Preston’s The Lost City of the Monkey God, Brian Muraresku’s 10-year investigation takes the reader through Greece, Germany, Spain, France and Italy, offering unprecedented access to the hidden archives of the Louvre and the Vatican along the way.

In The Immortality Key, Muraresku explores a little-known connection between the best-kept secret in Ancient Greece and Christianity. This is the real story of the most famous human being who ever lived (Jesus) and the biggest religion the world has ever known. Today, 2.4 billion people are Christian. That’s one third of the planet. But do any of them really know how it all started?

Before Jerusalem, before Rome, before Mecca—there was Eleusis: the spiritual capital of the ancient world. It promised immortality to Plato and the rest of Athens’s greatest minds with a very simple formula: drink this potion, see God. Shrouded in secrecy for millennia, the Ancient Greek sacrament was buried when the newly Christianized Roman Empire obliterated Eleusis in the fourth century AD.

Renegade scholars in the 1970s claimed the Greek potion was psychedelic, just like the original Christian Eucharist that replaced it. In recent years, vindication for the disgraced theory has been quietly mounting in the laboratory. The rapidly growing field of archaeological chemistry has proven the ancient use of visionary drugs. And with a single dose of psilocybin, the psycho-pharmacologists at Johns Hopkins and NYU are now turning self-proclaimed atheists into instant believers. No one has ever found hard, scientific evidence of drugs connected to Eleusis, let alone early Christianity. Until now.

Armed with key documents never before translated into English, convincing analysis, and a captivating spirit of quest, Muraresku mines science, classical literature, biblical scholarship and art to deliver the hidden key to eternal life, bringing us to what clinical psychologist William Richards calls “the edge of an awesomely vast frontier.”

Featuring a Foreword by Graham Hancock, the New York Times bestselling author of America Before: The Key to Earth’s Lost Civilization.

(Goodreads.com)

The Only Truly Exciting Part of Google’s Gemini Announcement

It’s the part of the model no one’s talking about, yet it could change everything

Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith

Published in The Generator

Dec 10, 2023 (Medium.com)

Illustration by the author via DALL-E

This week, Google announced their new Gemini generative AI system, which is their most powerful Large Language Model ever, and is clearly intended to compete with OpenAI’s GPT-4. A version of Gemini is now available to test via Google’s Bard system.

The announcement came via a hype-filled blog post that might win a record for the most superlatives in a product announcement. The word “most” appears 16 times in the post, “best” shows up 5 times, and there are a whopping 55 total superlatives in the approximately 2,600-word announcement.

One page of Google’s announcement even says, hyperbolically, “Welcome to the Gemini Era.”

Clearly, Google would like you to know this is a Really Big Deal!

Is it?

In my initial testing of Gemini — which is now integrated into Google Bard — I’m underwhelmed. So are other prominent creators, and the likes of TechCrunch.

While I’m not overly impressed by Gemini today, though, there is one part of Google’s Gemini announcement that’s truly exciting — and that could be a true game-changer for the future of generative AI.

What is Gemini?

Gemini is Google’s most advanced “frontier model.” Essentially, it’s the company’s answer to OpenAI’s hugely successful GPT-4, or perhaps even its highly-secretive future model Q*.

On paper, Gemini looks amazing. It’s a natively multimodal model, which means it can process text, video, images, music, and more, right out of the box. It can reportedly code better than earlier models and beats GPT-4 on a variety of industry benchmarks.

In practice, though, there are some issues. Firstly, it’s unclear how much of Gemini actually exists. Reporting by TechCrunch reveals that many of Gemini’s demo videos may have been faked.

While it appears that an intermediate version of Gemini (more on that later) does indeed exist, its highest-powered Gemini Ultra— and the only one with truly multimodal capabilities — may or not may be a real piece of software.

Even in my testing of the current version of Gemini, the model’s true purpose is clear. Gemini is excellent at retrieving live information and synthesizing it into articles and answers. It does this quickly— much faster than ChatGPT. For creating in-depth content, having a compelling conversation, or being funny, though, it falls way short of ChatGPT.

That suggests that Google is building Gemini for one true purpose: search.

To be fair, Google isn’t exactly cagey about this. Their announcement mentions how Gemini has already led to a 40% speed improvement for their Search Generative Experience, and how it will continue to power more of their core Search product.

That’s scary news for web publishers since it means Google’s ability to generate their own content will get better and better. But given that Gemini looks to be optimized primarily for search, it’s unlikely to effectively compete with non-search LLMs like GPT-4 and ChatGPT for non-search purposes. OpenAI can breathe a sigh of relief on that front.

So if Gemini is being built mainly for Google, do we need to care about it?

Yes — because buried deep in the Gemini announcement, there’s one piece of extremely exciting news that could drastically change how LLMs are deployed and used.

Gemini’s Most Interesting Flavor

Gemini isn’t actually a single model. As Google’s announcement makes clear, Gemini comes in three flavors.

They are:

  • Gemini Ultra
  • Gemini Pro
  • Gemini Nano

Gemini Pro is the model that’s available now though Google Bard.

Much ado has been made about Gemini Ultra, the purported “ChatGPT Killer” that’s slated to come out sometime in 2024, but which TechCrunch’s reporting reveals may or may not actually exist.

Hardly anyone has focused much love on Gemini Nano, though. That’s a shame, because it’s the most interesting part of the whole announcement.

Gemini Nano is a Large Language Model that’s optimized to run on the tiny processors in smartphones.

That’s a huge deal. Today’s large language models are power-hungry monsters designed for use in massive data centers, far away from the prying eyes of consumers and environmentalists.

It’s been reported that a single query to ChatGPT can consume as much as 10 watt-hours of electricity . That’s equivalent to running an LED lightbulb for an hour. A query can also reportedly gulp as much as 100ml of water, which is used to cool the servers powering the model. That’s as much as half of glass of water, per query.

In the relentless, relentless drive for more power, companies have thus far focused on pushing LLMs’ capabilities are far as possible, building the most powerful model at all costs. In this cutthroat competition, energy efficiency and the environment often go by the wayside.

The Ghost of Gordon Moore

In that way, the development of LLMs parallels the path that computer processors followed in the earlier days of the industry. For decades, the gospel of the processor world was Moore’s Law.

Created by computer scientist Gordon Moore, the law dictated that the number of transistors on a single chip would double every two years. Basically, this meant that every two years, computer chips’ speed and power would also double.

And faithfully, for almost 50 years, they did.

Scientists got better and better at squeezing more transistors onto a single chip, and as a result, processors got faster. I remember buying a Pentium 2 in the late 1990s and feeling like it was a huge step forward.

A few years later, the Pentium 3 came out, and it was another game-changer. Video games ran faster, I could run more complex programs like Photoshop, and web browsers were less laggy.

There was a problem with Moore’s law, though, and more broadly with the obsessive hunt for speed. Processors kept getting faster, but they also used progressively more power.

Running a computer with a Pentium 3 was basically like having a tiny space heater in your bedroom. If my mid-2000s PC was doing some really hard work, I’d often have to open a window in my Philadelphia bedroom to let out the heat it generated.

At a certain point, it was clear that computers were good enough, and there was no need to add more power. Instead, companies went in a totally different direction.

Instead of making computers faster and faster, chipmakers Intel and AMD started focusing on making them more efficient.

The smartphone was a huge driver of the shift. Where before people accessed computers via massive desktops that plugged into the wall and guzzled almost limitless amounts of power, in the new era processors had to be efficient enough to avoid running down the batteries of tiny smartphones.

That prompted a shift in thinking that rippled through the industry. Processors indeed got massively more efficient, with very little sacrifice in terms of performance.

They also became more specialized, with dedicated chips taking over specific functions. And the move toward efficiency spilled over from the smartphone world and into data centers. Today, companies trip over themselves to build faster and lower-energy smartphone chips, but also to make the flagship processors for data centers more efficient and cooler.

That’s been a huge boon to the environment — with data centers using less power and emitting less CO2 on a per-calulation basis than ever before — and to users, who can enjoy a full day of smartphone use between recharges.

Efficiency Comes to LLMs

With Google’s announcement of the nanoscale version of their Gemini system, the same shift in thinking from power to efficiency appears to be coming to the world of generative AI.

And, unsurprisingly, as is often the case in AI, this move has been turbocharged.

Rather than taking decades as it did for computer chips, it’s only taken a few years for AI companies to wise up to the fact that more powerful isn’t always better.

Gemini Nano reportedly achieves useful results with only 1.8 billion parameters, a tiny fraction of the number in frontier models like ChatGPT.

That means that Nano won’t be able to perform the high-end AI capabilities we expect from models like ChatGPT. But it will be able to do a heck of a lot more than today’s smartphone chips can in the AI space.

This has huge implications for where and how we use AI. Currently, AI voice interfaces like Siri and Alexa don’t actually do any processing themselves. Rather, they hand off our voice queries to a giant data center, where the actual AI processing work is done.

Phone-sized models like Nano could change that completely. Instead of handing off data to a distant server, models like Nano could process it right on our own phones. This would make using generative AI faster because there wouldn’t be the lag required for data to make its there-and-back trip.

But it would also make it far more secure, as we wouldn’t have to share our data and even our voices with cloud computers in order to have useful AI work done.

If the same spillover that happened in the mobile device world also comes to the world of generative AI, the shift to more efficient models could make using generative AI overall far less damaging to the environment. As with computer chips, efficiency improvements meant for smartphones could make AI data centers more efficient, too.

That could also finally make LLMs profitable. It’s a dirty secret in the AI industry that the economics of today’s LLMs make zero sense. OpenAI charges only $20 per month for its Pro service, while a single query on ChatGPT can cost as much as $0.36 to process.

AI companies today are following a classic tech play; burn through money in the short term with a wildly unprofitable service, in order to gain market share, and then later either scale back or raise prices to grasp at some semblance of profitability.

Sometimes that model works — often it doesn’t.

If models like Gemini Nano can run on a phone, though, that suggests that future LLMs can get far more efficient and far less costly to run. Making LLMs faster and cheaper to operate would lower the cost of running them for providers like OpenAI, bringing the monthly charge to consumers more in line with their actual costs.

For the long-term sustainability of the generative AI industry, that’s a big deal. And makes a ton of sense that Google would be the company leading this charge. Unlike OpenAI, it’s not trying to blitzscale a startup.

Instead, the company is looking to use generative AI at scale within its own search products. It doesn’t do a ton of good if using large language models at scale drives Google into the red.

Given the success of the Android operating system, Google also has a strong incentive to build more efficient large language models. If Nano is initially only available on Android, which already appears to be the case, that’s another incentive for users to choose Android over iOS.

The Future of Tiny Models

As LLM efficiency improves, this could enable even more radical capabilities. In the parlance of computer science, AI could move further towards the “edge”, ending up integrated into a much broader range of products.

Imagine medical devices like an implanted pacemaker with an onboard LLM that could spot worrying trends in a user’s vital signs, and predict a heart attack well in advance.

Tiny LLMs could lead to better self-driving cars, or machines like better wind turbines that could spot signs of mechanical wear well in advance and notify their operators, avoiding costly breakdowns.

Of course, there are major risks to smaller LLMs too. An armed drone with an onboard LLM that could navigate without human assistance would be a powerful weapon during wartime. Surveillance cameras with integrated LLMs could interpret their own footage in real-time, making them a highly efficient tool of oppression.

There’s also the broader question of whether everything needs to be smart. I’m already dubious about whether my toaster needs Wi-Fi. I’m pretty sure it doesn’t need an embedded brain-like intelligence that allows it to think deeply about whether my toast is done or not.

Despite these risks, Google’s move toward building more efficient AI is an important one. The environmental consequences alone are significant enough to make Gemini Nano one of the most exciting AI announcements of the year.

The fact that the development of a nanoscale model is coming from a company as big as Google — which will certainly actually execute on it, given their business case for efficiency in mobile and search — is also a big deal.

Gemini Ultra, with its snazzy (and possibly non-existent) multimodal capabilities is cool. But it ultimately has far less promise than Gemini Nano.

As best, Gemini Ultra will be a formidable competitor to ChatGPT.

But at its best, Gemini Nano could save millions of tons of CO2 emissions, give generative AI a long-term business reason to exist — and radically change how and where we interact with AI.

I’ve tested thousands of ChatGPT prompts over the last year. As a full-time creator, there are a handful I come back to every day. I compiled them into a free guide, 7 Enormously Useful ChatGPT Prompts For Creators. Grab a copy today!

Thomas Smith

Written by Thomas Smith

·Editor for The Generator

CEO of Gado Images | Content Consultant | Covers tech, food, AI & photography | http://bayareatelegraph.com & http://lifetechshorts.com | tom@gadoimages.com

Escaping the Prison of Your Mind

Luka Bönisch

Luka Bönisch

Published in The Taoist Online

4 days ago (thetaoist.online)

Image by the author

If you’re anything like me (and because you’re here, I assume you are), you have, at some point in your life, had a distinct feeling of being a prisoner — a prisoner of your own mind.

Everything I wanted from that point on was to escape this prison.

But because the prison of the mind was everything I believed myself to be, escaping seemed like a hopeless, straight-up impossible task.

It’s not.

The issue is that our minds seem like our most private experience. Our minds seem, in fact, so private that most of us live as if our minds are what we are.

Therefore trying to escape our minds then becomes trying to escape from ourselves.

When I want to escape the prison of the mind, the next issue is that I assume there is a me that can escape the mind.

But what exactly is this me? How is it different from the mind?

Assuming this me would be successful in his mental prison break, what would be left?

As we can see, this whole trying to escape your mind act becomes quite a shaky endeavor when we question our well-meaning intentions.

So before we try to saw on any bars of our prison cell, let’s study the prison blueprint. Let’s make sure we’re not being fools and escape into yet another prison cell.

What Is the Prison of The Mind?

Image by the author

What do we mean when we talk about a prison of the mind?

Experientially you’re very familiar with it. The prison of your mind is repetitive thoughts that evoke painful emotions, which, in turn, turn your experience into a miserable one.

Sometimes, of course, there are pleasant emotions that make you forget the prison. This, however, just adds to the misery because you feel like you’re constantly alternating between heaven and hell.

Generally, it’s the feeling of being a victim of your thoughts and emotions without a way out.

This is the normal state of being of almost everyone.

Some people spend a lot of time numbing themselves to the reality of this by using substances, socialization, entertainment, complaining about everything and everyone, and so on.

Other people are so painfully aware of it that they are beyond being able to avoid this suffering.

You are in one of four scenarios right now:

  1. You are oblivious to the prison and have yet to become fully aware of the bars enclosing you.
  2. You are fully aware of the prison but haven’t realized the nature of the prison and thus haven’t been able to initiate the escape.
  3. You are fully aware of the prison and are on your way out.
  4. You are no longer in prison.

Now is a good time to point back at yourself and ask, where am I right now?

Am I in prison? Am I out of prison? Or, am I perhaps so busy complaining about my cell mates and the interior design that I haven’t fully realized my predicament?

Wherever you are right now, know it’s exactly where you need to be. But also know that nothing is permanent (except perhaps impermanence).

If the prison does not yet feel like a prison to you, then there is no need to force it into being. After all, this isn’t something you can avoid forever. Sooner or later we all become the protagonists of our own prison break.

Pretty cool, huh?

The Mental Prison Break

Image by the author

So far we have superficially identified what the prison of the mind is. In a nutshell, it’s general discontent about existence.

Now, how do we escape this prison?

We don’t.

You’ve tried, haven’t you?

You have engaged in all kinds of physical, psychological, and spiritual gymnastics in the hopes of a glimpse of freedom. And although some of it has probably given you a momentary sense of relief and happiness, nothing lasted.

After you were done meditating or praying or breath-working you opened your eyes just to see that the walls were still there.

Or are they?

Everything you have done so far to escape didn’t work because it was all based on a wrong premise.

There is no you to escape nor is there a mental prison to escape from.

Both — the you and the prison — are imaginary acts. And this is the key to escaping: understanding that there is no escape because there was never anyone incarcerated.

The Maelstrom

Image by the author

One of the reasons why we have such trouble realizing the truth of our predicament is the maelstrom of our minds. In the words of a dictionary, a maelstrom is a violently confused or dangerously agitated state of mind.

Although confusion and agitation are our daily bread and butter, there is another important factor disrupting our clear seeing.

For this, another definition of the word maelstrom is useful: any large or violent whirlpool.

Because our mental content is plentiful and seems to move in a swirling manner, we assume that there is something or rather someone aka “me” at the center of it.

So the two reasons we don’t see that there is actually no one trapped inside our minds are:

  1. The mental content is so abundant, intense, and engaging we are fully absorbed by it, and therefore lack a clear detached view.
  2. The swirling and repetitive motion of our minds (which is based on conditioning) makes it seem self-evident that there must be someone at the center of all the swirling and repetition.

But speaking of maelstroms, we know there is no entity at the center.

Maelstroms are not created by someone swirling around like crazy. They occur when opposite currents collide and create a circular vortex.

Those opposite currents are the positive and negative, the attractions and aversions, the joys and fears of your life. And those didn’t come from a center; they came from the environment.

In other words, the you you think you are is the result of programming you were not actively involved in.

Who was actively involved?

Everyone and everything you have ever come into contact with; every little thing that has ever happened in and around you played its part.

Now this doesn’t mean that you should wallow in your emotional excrements. You acknowledge it and flush it down. Whirlpools are simply a side-effect of flushing, meaning the whirlpool is present because the process of flushing is in full force.

Although it might seem like there is an overwhelming amount of emotional garbage, the good thing about maelstroms is that there are large and strong enough to suck down entire ships.

So our puny little egos shouldn’t be a problem.

Or to say it less obscurely, all your emotional garbage digests itself when you stop trying to hold on to it.

Life Is an Optical Illusion

Image by the author

To realize that what we are is not a mentally imprisoned self (note: not a self in any kind of form), we need a shift in perception.

We need to shift out of identification with the mental content that makes up the prison of the mind into becoming aware of the background.

This shift is like the duck-rabbit optical illusion.

In the beginning, you see only the rabbit. So you stare and stare until, eventually, you see the duck. After that, you can always see it and you can’t unsee it; you can freely switch between rabbit and duck.

How do we go about seeing the duck?

First, instead of constantly meddling with the mental content in the hope of escaping, we stop.

We don’t do anything.

All we do is observe our actions, thoughts, and emotions.

If this is too much in the beginning, start by watching only your actions. Then, after you got the hang of that, progress to watching your thoughts. And then, when you’re able to watch your thoughts consistently, start watching your emotions and your subtle mood shifts.

With time, you will realize that you are not in control of your actions, thoughts, and emotions.

Sure, it seems that way. But you will know without a doubt that there is no self at the center of all this activity.

You can confirm this at any point by simply looking for this apparent imprisoned self.

Where is this you that is the protagonist of all thoughts, emotions, actions, decisions, desires, etc.?

It’s nowhere to be found.

If you can’t find it in your own immediate experience, then who can?

No one can find your self for you, not even you because it doesn’t exist as such. It’s a fata morgana. It’s your mind’s answer to its strong aversion to non-existence.

Stop being so entranced by the rabbit’s quick movements and pay attention to the duck. When you’re able to see both — the rabbit and the duck — as the expression of one and the same, then you’ll break out of the prison of your mind.

The Story About the Prison of The Mind

Image by the author

This whole notion of a “you” that somehow needs to escape its own mental experience is a story you’ve been telling yourself.

It’s not an actuality.

And the more you do to improve or heal or ascend or whatever to become a “free being,” the more you are keeping this story alive.

This doesn’t mean that you can’t keep doing those things. But forget about it at least for a moment.

If you could for a moment just stop telling the same old story that’s been going on autopilot, then what do you actually know? If you stop living in your imagination for a moment and come back to your immediate experience, then what is actually here?

What we are talking about now is not a long hard process. I’m simply inviting you to stop believing the incessant story in your mind for a second and take one honest look at what’s really going on.

What if you would stop imagining this happy-ever-after fairytale place you’ve been subconsciously trying to get to?

What if you would stop projecting meaning and importance onto every little thought and emotion?

What if you would stop villanizing the mind and start seeing what it is — the substance of everything?

The mind is not a prison because the mind is all there is.

There are no bars, or walls, or wardens, or prisoners. Nothing’s keeping you inside because there is no inside. Neither is there an outside.

It’s all mind. And yet, there is no mind anywhere.

You’ve been playing a game with yourself. A game that kept you busy and entertained. A game that made you strive for anything but what is already here.

But here is all you have and all you have been striving for is right here.

Congratulations, you have escaped the prison of your mind.

If you enjoyed this article, you’ll love my free ebook: The Art of Effortless Living

Luka Bönisch

Written by Luka Bönisch

·Writer for The Taoist Online

Writing is my weapon for self-destruction. Check out my awesome newsletter: https://mindfulled.com/wakeupwednesday/

Consciousness, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more