The Art of Solitude: Buddhist Scholar and Teacher Stephen Batchelor on Contemplative Practice and Creativity

By Maria Popova (themarginalian.org)

“Give me solitude,” Whitman demanded in his ode to the eternal tension between city and soul, “give me again O Nature your primal sanities!” In those primal sanities, we come to discover that “there is no place more intimate than the spirit alone,” as May Sarton wrote in her stunning 1938 ode to solitude — her hard-earned testimony to solitude as the seedbed of self-discovery, for it is in that intimate place that we see most clearly what our animating spirit is made of. Solitude, Kahlil Gibran knew, summons of us the courage to know ourselves. Elizabeth Bishop believed — a belief I can attest to with my own life — that everyone must experience at least one long period of solitude in life in order to know what we are made of and what we can make of our gifts. “There is only one solitude, and it is large and not easy to bear,” Rilke wrote in contemplating the relationship between solitude, love, and creativity, “but… we must hold ourselves to the difficult.”

The visionary poets knew — as do the visionaries of scientist, as do all persons engaged in lives of creativity or contemplation, which are often one life — how this solitary self-discovery becomes the wellspring of all the meaning-making that makes life worth living, whether we call it art or love. From solitude’s promontory, we peer out into the expanse of existence and train our eyes to look with wide-eyed wonder at the improbable fact of it all. Solitude, so conceived, is not merely the state of being alone but the art of becoming fully ourselves — an art acquired, like every art, by apprenticeship and painstaking devotion to dwelling in the often lonesome inner light of our singular and sovereign being.

Solitude by Maria Popova. (Available as a print.)

Its mastery, delicate and difficult, is what the Buddhist scholar and teacher Stephen Batchelor explores in The Art of Solitude (public library). Celebrating solitude — not the escapist privilege of it but the practice of it against the real world’s pressures — as “a site of autonomy, wonder, contemplation, imagination, inspiration, and care,” he writes:

True solitude is a way of being that needs to be cultivated. You cannot switch it on or off at will. Solitude is an art. Mental training is needed to refine and stabilize it. When you practice solitude, you dedicate yourself to the care of the soul.

Nearly forty years after he first began bridging Western phenomenology and existentialism with Buddhist precepts in his 1983 book Alone with Others: An Existential Approach to Buddhism, Batchelor draws on a lifetime of solitude-mastery — directly, through his own contemplative practice and multiple silent retreats, and indirectly, through his immersion in the lives and works of centuries of solitude-virtuosi ranging from Montaigne to Nietzsche to Ingmar Bergman — to formulate the essence of the inquiry, at once elemental and embodied, at the heart of the art of solitude:

Don’t expect anything to happen. Just wait. This waiting is a deep acceptance of the moment as such. Nietzsche called it amor fati — unquestioning love of whatever has fated you to be here. You reach a point where you’re just sitting there, asking, “What is this?” — but with no interest in an answer. The longing for an answer compromises the potency of the question. Can you be satisfied to rest in this puzzlement, this perplexity, in a deeply focused and embodied way? Just waiting without any expectations?

Ask “What is this?,” then open yourself completely to what you “hear” in the silence that follows. Be open to this question in the same way as you would listen to a piece of music. Pay total attention to the polyphony of the birds and wind outside, the occasional plane that flies overhead, the patter of rain on a window. Listen carefully, and notice how listening is not just an opening of the mind but an opening of the heart, a vital concern or care for the world, the source of what we call compassion or love.

Illustration by Maurice Sendak from Open House for Butterflies by Ruth Krauss.

Echoing Rachel Carson’s trust in the loneliness of creative work — a byproduct of the solitude necessary for creative work, natural and needed, often terrifying and always clarifying — Batchelor adds:

To be alone at your desk or in your studio is not enough. You have to free yourself from the phantoms and inner critics who pursue you wherever you go. “When you start working,” said the composer John Cage, “everybody is in your studio — the past, your friends, enemies, the art world, and above all, your own ideas — all are there. But as you continue painting, they start leaving, one by one, and you are left completely alone. Then, if you are lucky, even you leave.”

[…]

Having shut the door, you find yourself alone before a canvas, a sheet of paper, a lump of clay, a computer screen. Other tools and materials lie around, close at hand, waiting to be used. You resume your silent conversation with the work. This is a two-way process: you create the work and then you respond to it. The work can inspire, surprise, and shock you… The solitary act of making art involves intense, wordless dialogue.

Art by Margaret Cook from a rare 1913 edition of Walt Whitman’s Leaves of Grass. (Available as a print)

Drawing a link between the Buddhist notion of nirvana and Keats’s notion of “negative capability” — that spacious willingness to negate the pull of attachments, reactivities, and fixities, to live with mystery and embrace uncertainty — Batchelor observes that contemplative practice trains the ability to see each moment as a chance to start anew, to savor life as ongoing, unfixed, ever-changing and ever capable of being changed. He considers the essential building blocks and ultimate rewards of contemplative practice:

To integrate contemplative practice into life requires more than becoming proficient in techniques of meditation. It entails the cultivation and refinement of a sensibility about the totality of your existence—from intimate moments of personal anguish to the endless suffering of the world. This sensibility encompasses a range of skills: mindfulness, curiosity, understanding, collectedness, compassion, equanimity, care. Each of these can be cultivated and refined in solitude but has little value if it cannot survive the fraught encounter with others. Never be complacent about contemplative practice; it is always a work in progress. The world is here to surprise us. My most lasting insights have occurred off the cushion, not on it.

One of Antoine de Saint-Exupéry’s original watercolors for The Little Prince.

In consonance with poet and philosopher Wendell Berry’s life-tested belief that “true solitude is found in the wild places,” where one is without human obligation,” where “one’s inner voices become audible [and,] in consequence, one responds more clearly to other lives,” Batchelor adds:

By withdrawing from the world into solitude, you separate yourself from others. By isolating yourself, you can see more clearly what distinguishes you from other people. Standing out in this way serves to affirm your existence (ex-[out] + sistere [stand]). Liberated from social pressures and constraints, solitude can help you understand better what kind of person you are and what your life is for. In this way you become independent of others. You find your own path, your own voice.

[…]

Here lies the paradox of solitude. Look long and hard enough at yourself in isolation and suddenly you will see the rest of humanity staring back. Sustained aloneness brings you to a tipping point where the pendulum of life returns you to others.

Complement The Art of Solitude with Hermann Hesse on solitude, hardship, and destiny, then savor Batchelor’s spacious On Being conversation with Krista Tippett.

Free Will Astrology: Week of May 22, 2025

BY ROB BREZSNY | MAY 20, 2025 (NewCity.com)

Photo: Kelly Sikkema

ARIES (March 21-April 19): I think you’re ready to establish new ways of nourishing and protecting what’s valuable to you. Your natural assertiveness will be useful in setting boundaries and securing resources. Your flourishing intuition will guide you to implement adjustments that safeguard your interests while remaining flexible enough to permit legitimate access. Be extra alert, Aries, for when you need to balance security with accessibility. Your best defenses will come from clever design, not brute force. Do what you need to feel secure without feeling trapped.

TAURUS (April 20-May 20): In July 1971, twenty-six-year-old Taurus poet Bernadette Mayer kept a scrupulous diary. Every day, she shot a roll of 35mm film, wrote about the day’s events, and recorded herself reading her accounts. By August 1, she had accumulated 1,100 photos and six hours of readings. One of her goals in doing the project was to learn more about how her memory worked. What was worth remembering, and what wasn’t? She also hoped to gain an objective perspective about her routine rhythm. Years later, she acknowledged that though this was a narcissistic experiment, she had no shame about it. Inspired by Mayer, and in accordance with astrological omens, you might find it worthwhile to lovingly and thoroughly study the details of your daily life for a while. It’s an excellent time to get to know yourself better.

GEMINI (May 21-June 20): Gemini writer Raymond Carver (1938–1988) established a reputation as a master of terse minimalism. One critic noted that he practiced the “Theory of Omission”—an approach to writing fiction that mandates the elimination of superfluous narrative elements. But it turns out that Carver’s editor Gordon Lish had a major role in all this. He deleted half of Carver’s original words and changed the endings of half his stories. Years after his death, Carver’s widow, Tess Gallagher, published the original versions, with the omitted material reinstated. I believe the coming weeks will be an excellent time for you to make comparable restorations, Gemini. In every way you can imagine, tell the full story, provide the complete rendition, and offer elements that have been missing.

CANCER (June 21-July 22): Even if you don’t regard yourself as a psychic or prophet, I suspect you now have an uncanny knack for deciphering future trends. Your intuition is operating at peak levels, especially when you focus it on the big picture of your long-term destiny. As long as you’re not overconfident about this temporary bloom of expansive vision, you can trust your ability to see the deep patterns running through your life story. To make the most of this gift, take a loving inventory of where you have been and where you are going. Then devote relaxed meditations to adjusting your master plan.

LEO (July 23-Aug. 22): River deltas form where rivers meet the sea, creating fertile and complex ecosystems that nourish abundant life. Some of my favorites are the Rhône River Delta in France, the Po River Delta in Italy, and the Shinano River Delta in Japan. In the coming weeks, Leo, I will visualize you as the metaphorical equivalent of a river delta. I’ll call you the Leo Delta, trusting you will be inspired to celebrate and cultivate the rich intersections that characterize your life—areas where an array of ideas, paths and relationships converge. Be open to synergizing different aspects of your world: integrating emotions and logic, connecting with diverse people, blending personal and professional goals.

VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): Your natural inclination is to solve problems through detailed planning and careful analysis. On occasion, that process dead-ends in overthinking, though it often works pretty well. In accordance with current astrological omens, however, I suggest an alternative approach for you in the coming weeks. Instead of trying to figure everything out, how about if you simply create a relaxed spaciousness for new things to emerge? Experiment with the hypothesis that progress will come not from doing more, but from allowing more.

LIBRA (Sept. 23-Oct. 22): As they climb, mountaineers carefully assess every handhold and foothold. Unfailing concentration is key. I recommend adopting their attitude in the coming weeks, Libra. You are entering a phase when ascension and expansion will be among your main assignments. The best approach to your adventures is to make steady progress with precision and thoughtfulness. Rushing rashly ahead or taking needless risks could be counterproductive, so be scrupulous about planning and preparation. Trust that the most efficient path to the summit will be via small, deliberate steps. Your winning combination will be ambition leavened with caution.

SCORPIO (Oct. 23-Nov. 21): At age forty-two, Scorpio painter Georgia O’Keeffe left her busy New York art career and traveled to New Mexico for the first time. The landscape’s beauty overwhelmed her. She wandered around the desert for three months, creating no art at all. A few critics accused her of wasting time. She rejected their ignorant misunderstanding of her process, replying, “To see takes time. I had to learn the country first before it would let me paint it.” Her most iconic paintings emerged after this phase of pure observation. I’m recommending a similar period for you, dear Scorpio. While your instincts may tempt you toward a flurry of activity, I believe now is a time to wait and see; to pause and ponder; to muse and meditate.

SAGITTARIUS (Nov. 22-Dec. 21): By the twentieth century, the 483-mile-long Seine River in France was so polluted that most of its fish were gone. But clean-up efforts have been successful. Now there are thirty-two fish species, including the Atlantic salmon. The Seine is also very close to being completely safe for humans to swim. I would love it if you were inspired by this success story to undertake a comparable project in your own life, Sagittarius. What would you most like to see revived and restored? Now is a good time to begin the effort.

CAPRICORN (Dec. 22-Jan. 19): Until she reached her seventies, Capricorn visual artist Louise Bourgeois was a peripheral figure in the art world, modestly respected but not acclaimed. Then New York’s Museum of Modern Art presented her work in a major show. In response, the New York Times reviewed her work, saying it was “charged with tenderness and violence, acceptance and defiance, ambivalence and conviction.” I bring this to your attention, Capricorn, because I suspect the coming months will also bring you recognition for labors of love you’ve been devoted to for a while—maybe not in the form of fame, but through an elevated appreciation by those whose opinion matters to you.

AQUARIUS (Jan. 20-Feb. 18): The name of the old Talking Heads album is “Stop Making Sense.” One of its many implications is that we periodically derive benefit and relief from being free of the pressure to sound reasonable and be consistent. According to my detailed, logical, in-depth analysis of your astrological omens, now is a perfect time to honor this counsel. I hope you will give yourself a sabbatical from being sensible, serious and overly sane. Instead, please consider a sustained pursuit of pure pleasure, fun foolishness and amazing amusement.

PISCES (Feb. 19-March 20): Be on high alert for fleeting intuitions that flow through your awareness. Really good ideas may rise up only briefly and only once, and you should be ready to catch them in the ripe moment before they fade away. Do you hear my urgency? Pay special attention to passing thoughts or sudden insights. They may contain more value than initially apparent. I will even speculate that seemingly ephemeral inspirations could become foundational elements in your future success. Document your hunches, even if they seem premature.

Homework: What meaningful message could you give to a person you hurt? Newsletter.FreeWillAstrology.com

Pithy advice from “Chicago P.D.”

(Image from imdb.com)

“That which will be has already been.”

–Rev. Frank Rochester (played by Steve Harris) to Sgt. Hank Voight (played by Jason Beghe) in Chicago P.D., Season 7

(Image from NBC.com)

“I don’t want you to be me. That’s my job. I want you to be you.”

–Hank Voight (played by Jason Beghe) to Detective Hailey Upton (played by Tracy Spiridakos) in Chicago P.D., Season 7

“The dangerous consequences of radical empathy unchecked by reason”

View the Dialogue There are multiple books and articles critical of empathy that are coming out. I’ve reach out to all of the authors and asked the dialogue about their criticisms. Most of the critics refuse to talk with me, which I find diminishes the validity of their arguments. I find that most of the criticisms come down to a misunderstanding of the definition of empathy. 

One author critical of empathy, Kevin Waldman, was recently willing to dialogue and we had a wonderful conversation. His article was published in the Chicago Tribune and other newspapers entitled, “The dangerous consequences of radical empathy unchecked by reason.”  Kevin criticizes “radical empathy” on campuses as performative and harmful, leading to the radicalization of students. 

I explained the Wholistic Definition Model of Empathy. In the end, we agreed on the importance of mutual empathy, listening and dialogue in fostering understanding and reducing extremism. I proposed using Empathy Circles to facilitate empathic listening and dialogue, aiming to bridge political and social divides. Kevin now plans to host Empathy Circles at his University to foster constructive dialogue. 

–Edwin Rutsch

Relationship Experts Recommend Saying ‘I Love You’ Even If You Don’t Mean It

Responding With Awkward Pause Or By Changing Subject Said To Make Things Worse

Published: May 20, 2025 (TheOnion.com)

ORLANDO, FL—Emphasizing that it’s just words, after all, a team of relationship experts issued a recommendation Thursday that stressed the importance of saying “I love you” even if you don’t mean it. “It can be stressful when a significant other prompts you to verbalize your affection, but if you immediately say ‘I love you,’ you can avoid making things even more stressful,” couples therapist Randall Woodard told reporters, explaining that sometimes you just have to “fake it until you make it,” and that’s even more true when it comes to expressing love for your partner. “We actually recommend saying ‘I love you’ as soon as possible after meeting someone, regardless of your true feelings. Ultimately, adult relationships are something you have to deal with even if, deep inside, you’re filled with nothing more than a general numbness and you aren’t sure you’re capable of achieving a genuine emotional attachment to another person. The reality is that partners enjoy hearing ‘I love you’ and never know whether you’re saying it sincerely or not.” Woodard went on to offer a reminder that “I love you” is most effective when spoken during a fight, as it essentially functions as a get-out-of-jail-free card.

Tarot Card for May 21: The Prince of Swords

The Prince of Swords

On a day ruled by the Prince of Swords it will be our inner world we need to direct our attention towards. We need to study our thoughts, and allow them the time to extend. Too often a thought crosses our mind and we are unable to give that thought the room to grow and develop until it achieves its maximum potential – and because this happens very often we fail to live up to ourselves too.So try to set time aside for quiet inner contemplation when the Prince of Swords is having an influence. Think about your own opinions on given topics, not necessarily personal ones… but more general issues as well. You know, often we fail to converse with ourselves even to the extent that we converse with our acquaintances. We take for granted what we think and what we know, even though our opinions may not have been revised in years.As constantly growing individuals, our opinions certainly will change on some subjects… and if we don’t give ourselves the time to check them out every now and again, we can become alienated from our own development. This can lead to all kinds of problems – see the EightNine and Ten of Swords for examples of this.Ask yourself questions like… what’s your favourite food? When did you last eat it? Which was your happiest holiday so far? Why? What’s your current favourite garment in your wardrobe? Why? What happy memories do you have of the last week? What’s the best thing that happened this year so far?In having this conversation with yourself, you will almost certainly come across things that you had not placed much importance on before… and these things will have slid into your subconscious mind… from where they could later surface unexpectedly.Get to know yourself, and then stay in close contact… you’re the very best friend you could ever have – make friends with yourself!!

Affirmation: “I look within, and grow to understand myself.”

(Angelpaths.com)

How Powerful a Force is Thought?

Rethinking the role of the observer in shaping the universe

THOM HARTMANN MAY 21, 2025

The question of whether human consciousness can influence the physical world has fascinated scientists and philosophers for centuries. In recent years, Dean Radin and his team at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) have conducted groundbreaking experiments to explore this possibility.

One of their most intriguing studies involved using the internet to test whether individuals could remotely influence the behavior of photons in a classic double-slit experiment—a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. The findings challenge traditional notions of separation between mind and matter, suggesting that consciousness might play a direct role in shaping reality.

To appreciate the significance of Radin’s work, it helps to understand the double-slit experiment. In this setup, photons—particles of light—are fired at a barrier with two slits. When unobserved, the photons behave like waves, passing through both slits simultaneously and creating an interference pattern on a screen behind the barrier.

However, when a measuring device observes which slit a photon passes through, the interference pattern disappears, and the photons behave like particles. This phenomenon, known as wave-particle duality, has puzzled physicists for decades and raises profound questions about the role of observation in determining physical reality.

Radin and his team sought to take this experiment one step further by investigating whether human consciousness alone could influence the behavior of photons. In their study, participants were instructed to focus their attention on the double-slit apparatus and “will” the photons to behave as particles rather than waves.

Remarkably, instead of requiring physical presence, this experiment allowed participants from around the world to participate remotely via the internet. Using a sophisticated interface, individuals directed their intentions toward the apparatus, attempting to collapse the wave function into a particle-like pattern.

The results were extraordinary. Statistical analysis revealed that when participants focused their attention on the experiment, the interference pattern diminished, indicating a shift toward particle-like behavior.

This effect, though subtle, was consistent enough to suggest that human consciousness had a measurable impact on the photons’ behavior. Control periods, during which no one was directing their attention at the apparatus, showed no significant deviations from the expected interference pattern, further validating the findings.

These results challenge the traditional boundaries between observer and observed, suggesting that consciousness is not merely a passive bystander but an active participant in the unfolding of physical events.

Radin’s work aligns with interpretations of quantum mechanics that posit a fundamental role for the observer in shaping reality. It also resonates with the idea that the universe is deeply interconnected, with consciousness serving as a bridge between the mental and physical realms.

Expanding on these findings, Radin and his colleagues propose that if consciousness can influence photons in a double-slit experiment, it might also affect other particles and waves throughout the universe.

This idea raises profound questions about the scope of human and non-human influence on the cosmos. Could every particle in existence be subject to the subtle intentions of conscious beings?

If so, this implies a level of agency and interconnectedness that challenges the materialist view of the universe as a purely mechanistic system.

One possible explanation for these effects lies in the concept of entanglement. In quantum mechanics, entangled particles remain interconnected regardless of distance, such that the state of one particle instantly influences the state of the other.

Radin’s work suggests that consciousness itself might be a kind of universal entanglement, capable of influencing matter across space and time.

This perspective opens up fascinating possibilities for understanding phenomena such as synchronicity, psychic experiences, and the placebo effect, all of which might involve subtle interactions between mind and matter.

Critics of this research often point to the small effect sizes and the difficulty of replicating such studies. They argue that the observed results could be due to statistical anomalies, experimental biases, or uncontrolled variables.

Radin and his team have addressed these concerns by employing rigorous protocols, including randomized controls and extensive data analysis. While the effects are indeed subtle, their consistency across multiple experiments lends credibility to the hypothesis that consciousness influences physical systems.

The implications of Radin’s findings are profound and far-reaching. If consciousness can influence particles at the quantum level, it suggests that human intentions might play a role in shaping not only individual events but also larger systems. This idea aligns with ancient spiritual traditions that emphasize the power of thought and intention to affect reality.

It also raises ethical and philosophical questions about our responsibility as conscious beings. If our minds influence the fabric of the universe, what kind of reality are we collectively creating?

Radin’s research also invites speculation about the role of non-human consciousness in influencing matter.

If consciousness is a universal phenomenon, as some theories propose, then it might not be limited to humans. Animals, plants, and even ecosystems could contribute to the shaping of reality through their own forms of awareness. This perspective aligns with indigenous worldviews that regard all life as interconnected and imbued with spirit.

Another intriguing implication is the potential for technology to harness the power of consciousness. If human intention can influence quantum systems, it might be possible to design devices that amplify or channel this effect for practical applications.

Such technologies could revolutionize fields like medicine, energy, and communication, enabling us to interact with the physical world in ways that were once considered science fiction.

At its core, Radin’s work challenges us to rethink the nature of reality and our place within it. It suggests that consciousness is not a byproduct of the brain but a fundamental aspect of the universe, capable of influencing matter at the most basic level.

This perspective bridges the gap between science and spirituality, offering a unified view of existence in which mind and matter are deeply intertwined.

Egregore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the esoteric concept. For the album by Smak, see Egregor (album).

An egregore (also spelled egregor; from French égrégore, from Ancient Greek ἐγρήγορος, egrēgoros ‘wakeful’) is a concept in Western esotericism of a non-physical entity or thoughtform that arises from the collective thoughts and emotions of a distinct group of individuals.[1][2][3]

Overview

In magical and other occult traditions, it is typically seen as having an independent existence, but in other kinds of esotericism, it is merely the collective mind of a religious community, either esoteric or exoteric. In the latter sense, as a collective mind, the term collective entity, preferred by René Guénon, is synonymous with egregore.[1] See the usage overview below.

In the apocryphal Book of Enoch, the term referred to angelic beings known as watchers,[4][5] and was also used by associated (Enochian) traditions to refer to the specific rituals and practices associated with these entities.[6] Some other literary and religious works, such as The Manuscript Found in Saragossa, have also made references to these angelic beings.[7]

Variant descriptions

As independent angelic being

Main article: Watcher (angel)

Egregores are quite independent entities in the Book of Enoch, and there was then no notion that they arose from a collective. In literature, especially older literature, “egregores” have often been straightforward references to these Enochian entities. This is the case in Jan Potocki’s novel The Manuscript Found in Saragossa, which calls egregores “the most illustrious of fallen angels”.[7] The French author Victor Hugo, in La Légende des siècles (1859) (“The Legend of the Ages”), also uses the word égrégore, first as an adjective, then as a noun, while leaving the meaning obscure.[8]

As spiritual elite

The Traditionalist School philosopher Julius Evola, in his Revolt Against the Modern World, referred to an elite of spiritually aware people, who keep Tradition alive,[8][9] as “those who are awake, whom in Greek are called the εγρῄγοροι”,[9] apparently alluding to the Watchers,[8] and the most literal sense of their name, which is “wakeful” or “awake”.

As group mind

In esotericism, “egregore” has been used to denote a “group mind”[2] or “collective consciousness” of a religious community. René Guénon said, “the collective, in its psychic as well as its corporeal aspects, is nothing but a simple extension of the individual, and thus has absolutely nothing transcendent with respect to it, as opposed to spiritual influences, which are of a wholly different order”.[1] This usage was followed by Gnosis magazine[2] and by Olavo de Carvalho,[10] and, according to Guénon, began with Éliphas Lévi.[1]

As independent magical being arising from collective mind

Thought form of Charles Gounod‘s music, according to Annie Besant and C.W. Leadbeater in Thought Forms (1901)

See also: Tulpa

Some authors seem to have merged the esoteric concept with the Enochian concept to arrive at an idea of “spiritual entities” that “feed off the thoughts and energy of a unified multitude”,[11] as the website Occultist.net described it, while nevertheless having more of a life of their own; their more specific features and powers depend on the author. Kate Strong, writing for the newsletter “Know Thyself, Heal Thyself”, called egregores “symbols, ideas, or ideals that exist in the collective psyche of a group of people and are thought to have an autonomous existence”.[12] This usage seems to have come largely from the Meditations on the Tarot. The concept of a tulpa is similar, as Gary Lachman[13] and Mark Stavish[8] noted.

In occult and magical thought

In Meditations on the Tarot

The Meditations on the Tarot describe the Antichrist as “an egregore, an artificial being who owes his existence to collective generation from below“. Elsewhere, the book calls egregores “demons engendered by the collective will and imagination of nations”.[14] The book cites, but does not completely agree with, the usage of Robert Ambelain in his La Kabbale pratique. Ambelain defined the egregore as “a force generated by a powerful spiritual current and then nourished at regular intervals, according to a rhythm in harmony with the universal life of the cosmos, or to a union of entities united by a common characteristic nature”. The author of the Meditations on the Tarot calls this passage from Ambelain “a definition which leaves nothing more to be desired”, but disagrees with Ambelain’s description of CatholicismFreemasonry, and Protestantism as egregores.[14]

In the work of Gary Lachman

Gary Lachman follows the usage of the Meditations on the Tarot in his book Dark Star Rising, which also suggests that Pepe the Frog may be an egregore in this sense—or a tulpa, which Lachman sees as a similar phenomenon.[13] In the usage of Lachman and of the Meditations on the Tarot, “there are no ‘good’ egregores, only ‘negative’ ones”.[13] Lachman cited Joscelyn Godwin’s The Golden Thread, which itself cited the Meditations on the Tarot,[15] as a source for the idea that, while a religious (or other) group who creates an egregore can “rely” on it as “an efficacious magical ally”, “the egregore’s help comes at a price”,[13] since, as Godwin put it, its creators must thenceforth meet the egregore’s “unlimited appetite for their future devotion”.[15][13]

More at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egregore

Consciousness, spirituality, biography, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more