Jordan Peterson’s take on the origins of the Buddha

February 14, 2019 Mike Zonta 4 Comments

In this short video, he compares the outset of Buddhism with the biblical garden.

13 February, 2019 (bigthink.com)

During this class, Jordan Peterson describes how overprotective parenting led to the creation of Buddhism.
Peterson compares the Buddhist origin myth with the story of Eden.
Both tales deal with the onset of consciousness and mortality and therefore are universal in appeal.

Jordan Peterson begins at the outset of the origin myth. Siddhārtha Gautama’s father was a local oligarch in the region of modern-day Nepal. It was prophesied that his child would either become a great political king or spiritual leader. The chieftain would never have a mendicant for a son, and thus built a walled garden to enclose his offspring. This way the young Gautama would only experience the pleasures of life: health, youth, and beauty.

Father purposefully kept son from disease and death, hoping that by showing the future Buddha joy and mirth he would never feel the need to wander around sampling spiritual disciplines, meditating, chanting, and the like. Peterson finds this predictable:

“It’s also in some sense what a good father would do. What do you do with your young children? Well, you don’t expose them to death and decay at every step of the way. You build a protected world for them, like a walled enclosure, and you only keep what’s healthy and life-giving inside of it.”

You wouldn’t bring a three-year-old to a funeral or show a four-year-old The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Peterson continues. Because the Buddha has been raised in good health, however, he seeks what’s beyond the protective confines of that which has blessed him with health. He becomes, like all humans, curious.

Peterson compares this moment with a realization from Doestoevsky’s Notes From the Underground: give people utopia and the first thing they want to do is smash it to pieces “just so something interesting and perverse can happen.” Peterson continues,

“We’re creatures that are designed to encounter the unknown. We want to keep moving beyond what we have, even if what we have is what we want. And maybe that’s partly because we’re oriented towards the future.”

Jordan Peterson during his lecture at UofT. Photo credit: Rene Johnston / Toronto Star via Getty Images

Buddha might have felt confined by a few walls; today, Earth itself seems too restrictive. Jeff Bezos calls us, in honor of Isaac Asimov, “planetary chauvinists,” while Elon Musk declares we must become a “multi-planetary species.” Most likely, a mature Buddha would recommend they both curb their interplanetary enthusiasm and take better care of the planet that birthed us. Still, a young Gautama felt stuffy in his pleasure dome.

Peterson compares what happens next to modern-day China’s Olympics preparation, spray painting grass green and evicting locals to offer an appearance of sterility. Gautama Sr. attempted to make the outside world as safe as his son’s walled garden. He tells the sick and ugly to take a walk. Peterson calls it the snake in the garden theory:

“No matter how much care you take to make things perfect, some of what you’re excluding is going to come back in.”

A chosen route was strewn with flowers; beautiful women lined the road for young Gautama’s chaperoned chariot. But then, as always, the gods intervened. Though Peterson doesn’t mention it, they create an alternate — or in this case, real — route for the Buddha to travel that only the prince and his driver see. And what he saw was old age, disease, and death. That is, he learned about time.

Gautama returns home distressed, though awakened to the nature of reality — in this case, nature. He has finally felt the pain of sentience. Peterson mentions that he’s comforted in the safety of his walled garden, again protected by caretakers who use hugging as an analgesic. Pain reduced, Gautama eventually fixes for his vice. Forget these golden robes, he thinks, I must understand pain and suffering. Peterson notes the parallel with the biblical garden, the onset of consciousness after the tempting fruit is bitten.

In Peterson’s retelling, the Buddha needed six months before venturing out again. In other versions, he sees all the world’s ailments in a single night. Either way, Gautama could never really return to the walled garden. As with all epics, he had set out on his quest; there was no turning back. His father would have a mendicant for a son, one who would, in a strange twist, become a sort of political leader, though that’s rarely discussed.

Interestingly, Peterson never mentions the fact that Buddha himself becomes a deadbeat dad, leaving his family shortly after the birth of his son, Rāhula, who he named for being a “fetter.” Buddha felt his son chained him to a life he no longer wanted to live. Just as his father created his neurosis, we have to wonder what became of Rāhula’s psychological trauma.

4 thoughts on “Jordan Peterson’s take on the origins of the Buddha”

Gwyllm Llwydd says:

February 14, 2019 at 12:07 pm

He is beyond his depth, he has no idea what he is talking about.
Mike Zonta says:

February 14, 2019 at 1:02 pm

Can you elaborate a bit?
Gwyllm Llwydd says:

February 16, 2019 at 10:59 am

By his attempt at mixing metaphors, his limitations are grossly apparent. He cannot get passed biblical examples.

The Hindu creation myth does not jibe with the Jewish/Xian creation myth.

His gross reductionism shows the limitations of his theories along these lines.

In philosophical circles he is considered a hack, and for good reason. This is an excellent example.

Let him stick to telling Incels to clean up their basement rooms in their parents house. He does fine with simple basic stuff. Here, he is way out of his league.
Paul Howell says:

December 13, 2022 at 10:58 am

It’s a shame that Jordan Peterson bases all of his nonsense on Buddhist myths, not from the Buddhist scriptures. And if Derek Beres wants an answer to his short-sighted wondering in his last paragraph about what happened to the Buddha’s son, Rāhula, he just needs to read the suttas, it’s all right there. No need to go off half-cocked.