Why the Dalai Lama’s reincarnation is up for debate

The Dalai Lama is important, so important that he might decide not to come back after his next death.

  • Tibetan monks from all over the world are scheduled to visit India to discuss the issues related to the next reincarnation of the Dalai Lama.
  • Some, including the Dalai Lama himself, have questioned if the institution should be continued.
  • The final decision will have far reaching effects, since China is unlikely to let the monks have the last word on the matter.

The world’s most famous Buddhist, The Dalai Lama, is 83 years old. Questions about his next reincarnation are uncomfortably pressing. However, a planned meeting of Tibetan Monks in India, initially slated for this week, may change the future of the position and Tibetan Buddhism forever by agreeing to not have him come back at all.

Why would they do a thing like that?

The Dalai Lama is not only the spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism but also historically the leader of the Tibetan state. Given the precarious situation in Tibet, most observers maintain it was invaded by China in 1950 and remains under brutal military occupation, the question of who comes next and how that is determined is extremely important for the Tibetan people, the Chinese government, and Tibetan Buddhists all over the world.

The stage has been set for a legitimacy crisis following the death of the current Dalai Lama by the Chinese government, who really don’t like the Dalai Lama and have gone to great lengths to reduce his influence. Two years ago, they blockaded Mongolia after they allowed him to visit. His image is banned in Tibet, and they have called him a “wolf in monk’s clothing” to leave no doubt as to how they feel about him.

The most serious problem was created in 1995 when the second holiest Lama in Tibetan Buddhism, the Panchen Lama, was identified by the Dalai Lama and then arrested by the Chinese government, who declared their own Panchen Lama to replace the six-year-old prisoner. Since the Panchen Lama helps to pick the next Dalai Lama, to control one is to nearly assure control of the other.

In any case, China has already declared their right to pick the next Dalai Lama and requires all high-ranking Lamas to have a permit to reincarnateand will undoubtedly choose their own Lama while announcing the one the Tibetans choose is a pretender who didn’t fill out the paperwork. This isn’t without precedent, as the Qing Dynasty often intervened in the process of finding the next Dalai Lama during the 1700s.

Given the importance of the Dalai Lama to the Tibetan people and the Tibetan Government in Exile, it is understandable why they might want to take steps to assure that the next one isn’t a puppet and is chosen in a way that is theologically satisfying.

How can the Tibetans do that? How does any of this work?

The Dalai Lama you know, Tenzin Gyatso, is the 14th Dalai Lama. He is part of a line of spiritual leaders going back 700 years. Each Dalai Lama is maintained to be the living incarnation of Avalokiteśvara, a Buddhist saint of compassion, who continuously returns to Earth to live a life of service to the Tibetan people. As an enlightened soul, they are not required to reincarnate but chooses to in order to help reduce human suffering. Such beings are called Bodhisattvas and are highly respected in many branches of Buddhism.

The basic details on how the next Dalai Lama is found are well known. After his death, high ranking monks, clergymen, and the Panchen Lama gather for a series of rituals and meditation. These events often take place at holy locations in Tibet. Using the information on where to look they collect from these practices and clues given to them by the sacred sites, they set out to find the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama.

When they think they’ve found him, the holy men subject the child to a series of tests, including having him try to identify which personal items placed in front of him were owned by his previous incarnation, to determine if they got it right. If they did, the new Dalai Lama is enthroned shortly afterward.

As the reincarnation of a Bodhisattva, the Dalai Lama is assumed to have some control over the details of their reincarnations. He could also choose to not select rebirth as a child but to incarnate in an already living person. Tenzin Gyatso has also said he might come back as a woman and has assured he would probably be born in India the next time around; if there is a next time.

What would they do instead?

One thing the monks will consider is if they should alter some of the ritual involved in finding the next Dalai Lama, since getting unrestricted access to the holy sites in Tibet is unlikely. They could just decide to change the rituals so that they don’t need the Panchen Lama or specific locations in Tibet to find the next reincarnation successfully.

They are also open to more radical options, however. One proposal that has been making the rounds is that the system of reincarnation should be replaced with one of nomination. The Dalai Lama himself endorsed the idea in an interview with Nikkei. Saying “one elder, truly popular and respected, can be chosen as Dalai Lama. I think sooner or later, we should start that kind of practice.”

He has also suggested that he might not come back at all as the institution is getting old. He once told the BBC:

There is no guarantee that some stupid Dalai Lama won’t come next, who will disgrace himself or herself….That would be very sad. So, much better that a centuries-old tradition should cease at the time of a quite popular Dalai Lama.

If he decides to come back, the Dalai Lama will have plenty of issues to deal with right out of the gate. The question of how and if he should be the one to deal with them must be settled now. While few of the ideas above are pleasant ones, they may be the only things that can maintain the spiritual independence of Tibetan Buddhism.

Researchers Just Turned On the World’s Most Powerful Computer Designed to Mimic a Human Brain

Neuromorphic computing just got a big boost with a million-core supercomputer that took over a decade to build.
Researchers in the UK turned on the most powerful supercomputer designed to mimic the human brain for the first time last week, marking a big step toward replicating the power of the brain with silicon.

Using computers to mimic the brain, also known as neuromorphic computing is a rapidly growing area of computer science research that focuses on developing system architectures and specialized computer chips that replicate the way the human brain processes information. Not only will this allow neuroscientists to create unprecedented models of the brain, but it will also allow roboticists to create robots that can navigate complex environments using computer vision.

One of the biggest technical challenges in this regard is creating hardware that can handle the massive parallel processing capacity that defines the fleshy computer in our skulls. The Manchester supercomputer consists of one million processor cores that are capable of performing 200 trillion operations per second and has been under construction at the University of Manchester since 2006.

At the heart of the machine is a special computer chip that consists of 18 tightly-packed processor cores. Over 55,000 of these chips were linked together to endow the supercomputer with a million processor cores altogether that are coordinated using a new type of computer design known as a “Spiking Neural Network Architecture” (SpiNNaker).

The architecture of the 18-core SpiNNaker chips.

The architecture of the 18-core SpiNNaker chips. Image: University of Manchester


In the human brain, neurons communicate with each other through brief flashes, or “spikes,” of electrochemical energy. Individual spikes don’t contain much information, but when hundreds of millions of spikes are happening simultaneously, it enables the sophisticated information processing that allows you to understand this sentence.

The SpiNNaker supercomputer borrows from the brain’s design insofar as the processor cores send billions of small packets of information to tens of thousands of destinations within the system. This is different from the way a normal computer routes information, which usually involves much larger packets of information because they must also tell the system how to route the information. The SpiNNaker supercomputer is able to drastically reduce packet size because the transmission of information is handled by the custom chips.

Put more simply: if normal computers are like sending mail through the postal service—complete with sending and receiving addresses, and a stamp—the SpiNNaker supercomputer is like sending mail if everyone had their own dedicated postman who knows the routes so well there’s no need to address the mail.


Read More: The Man Who’s Building a Computer Made of Brains

“SpiNNaker completely re-thinks the way conventional computers work,” Steve Furber, a computer scientist at the University of Manchester, said in a statement. “We’ve essentially created a machine that works more like a brain than a traditional computer, which is extremely exciting.”

Furber and his colleagues aim to eventually model up to a billion neurons in real time using the SpiNNaker supercomputer. While this is significantly more neurons than any other computer is capable of modeling today, it still represents only one percent of the human brain’s 100 billion neurons.

Still, there is a great deal researchers can learn with the SpiNNaker supercomputer. One of its most promising use cases is modeling isolated brain networks. The computer has already been used to create an 80,000 neuron model of the cortex, the outer layer of the brain responsible for processing sensory information. It has also been used to control a robot that can process visual information in real time to navigate a complex terrain.

“Neuroscientists can now use SpiNNaker to help unlock some of the secrets of how the human brain works by running unprecedentedly large-scale simulations,” Furber said.