Are We Hardwired For Political Beliefs?


Thom talks about how religion impacts the reward centers in our mind and why we often get the same emotions from political ideologies.

Can you talk to Trump supporters? How are political ideologies explained?

******
ABOUT THE PROGRAM
The Thom Hartmann Program is the leading progressive political talk radio show.

Join Thom for political news and comment about Government politics, be it Liberal or Conservative, plus special guests and callers to the program.

******
AUDIO PODCASTS
Audio podcasts of the program are available on subscription at http://www.thomhartmann.com/podcast

******
THOM AS AN AUTHOR

Thom has written and co-written a wide range of books.
Explore his books here: http://amzn.to/2hS4UwY

******
MORE ABOUT THOM:

Website: http://www.thomhartmann.com

Thom on Amazon: http://amzn.to/2hS4UwY

Daily Blog: http://www.thomhartmann.com/thom/blog

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/ThomHartmannP…

Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thom_hartmann

Instagram : http://www.instagram.com/Thom_Hartmann

Subscribe to Thom’s You Tube Channel : http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c…

Why We Don’t Really Want to be Nice


Being ‘nice’ sounds a bit eerie and strange. It shouldn’t really. If you like our films, take a look at our shop (we ship worldwide): https://goo.gl/paVKhY
Join our exclusive mailing list: http://bit.ly/2e0TQNJ
Or visit us in person at our London HQ https://goo.gl/nwOZLS

FURTHER READING

“Setting out to try to become a nicer person sounds like a deeply colourless and dispiriting ambition. In theory, we love niceness of course, but in practice, there appears to be something embarrassingly anodyne, meek, tedious and even sexless about the concept. A nice person sounds like something we would try to be only once every other more arduous and more rewarding alternative had failed…”

You can read more on this and other topics on our blog TheBookofLife.org at this link: https://goo.gl/AH3mv1

MORE SCHOOL OF LIFE

Our website has classes, articles and products to help you think and grow: https://goo.gl/mPptC9

Watch more films on Self in our playlist:
http://bit.ly/TSOLself

SOCIAL MEDIA

Feel free to follow us at the links below:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theschoolofl…
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSchoolOfLife
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theschoolof…

CREDITS

Produced in collaboration with:

Mad Adam Films
http://madadamfilms.co.uk/

Feature Films:

The Truman Show (1998)
Barely Lethal (2015)
Bridget Jones’ Diary (2001)
Monsters Inc (2001)
10 Things I Hate About You (1999)
Trainwreck (2015)
The Life of Brian (1979)
Muppets’ Christmas Carol (1992)
It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)
The Hudsucker Proxy (1994)
Wuthering Heights (2010)
Starter for 10 (2006)
Jane Eyre (2011)
American Honey (2016)
A Room With a View (1985)
The Wolf of Wall Street (2013)
The Social Network (2010)
Office Space (1999)
Dr. No (1962)
The Duke of Burgundy (2014)
Fargo (1996)
Alfie (1966)
50 Shades of Grey (2015)
Honeytrap (2014)
Brave (2012)
About a Boy (2002)
Conan the Barbarian (1982)
The Breakfast Club (1986)
Paddington (2015)

TV Series’:

Friends
The Simpsons
Luther
The American Office
Mad Men

“A BIOLOGIST’S MANIFESTO FOR PRESERVING LIFE ON EARTH” by Edward O. Wilson (sierraclub.org)

An eminent scientist offers a bold vision for preserving Earth’s biodiversity

An emiment scientist offers a bold vision for preserving Earth's biodiversity.

Illustration by Doug Chayka

1

We are playing a global endgame. Humanity’s grasp on the planet is not strong; it is growing weaker. Freshwater is growing short; the atmosphere and the seas are increasingly polluted as a result of what has transpired on the land. The climate is changing in ways unfavorable to life, except for microbes, jellyfish, and fungi. For many species, these changes are already fatal.

Because the problems created by humanity are global and progressive, because the prospect of a point of no return is fast approaching, the problems can’t be solved piecemeal. There is just so much water left for fracking, so much rainforest cover available for soybeans and oil palms, so much room left in the atmosphere to store excess carbon. The impact on the rest of the biosphere is everywhere negative, the environment becoming unstable and less pleasant, our long-term future less certain.

Only by committing half of the planet’s surface to nature can we hope to save the immensity of life-forms that compose it. Unless humanity learns a great deal more about global biodiversity and moves quickly to protect it, we will soon lose most of the species composing life on Earth. The Half-Earth proposal offers a first, emergency solution commensurate with the magnitude of the problem: By setting aside half the planet in reserve, we can save the living part of the environment and achieve the stabilization required for our own survival.

Why one-half? Why not one-quarter or one-third? Because large plots, whether they already stand or can be created from corridors connecting smaller plots, harbor many more ecosystems and the species composing them at a sustainable level. As reserves grow in size, the diversity of life surviving within them also grows. As reserves are reduced in area, the diversity within them declines to a mathematically predictable degree swiftly—often immediately and, for a large fraction, forever.

A biogeographic scan of Earth’s principal habitats shows that a full representation of its ecosystems and the vast majority of its species can be saved within half the planet’s surface. At one-half and above, life on Earth enters the safe zone. Within that half, more than 80 percent of the species would be stabilized.

There is a second, psychological argument for protecting half of Earth. Half-Earth is a goal—and people understand and appreciate goals. They need a victory, not just news that progress is being made. It is human nature to yearn for finality, something achieved by which their anxieties and fears are put to rest. We stay afraid if the enemy is still at the gate, if bankruptcy is still possible, if more cancer tests may yet prove positive. It is our nature to choose large goals that, while difficult, are potentially game changing and universal in benefit. To strive against odds on behalf of all of life would be humanity at its most noble.

2

Extinction events are not especially rare in geological time. They have occurred in randomly varying magnitude throughout the history of life. Those that are truly apocalyptic, however, have occurred at only about 100-million-year intervals. There have been five such peaks of destruction of which we have record, the latest being Chicxulub, the mega-asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs. Earth required roughly 10 million years to recover from each mass extinction. The peak of destruction that humanity has initiated is often called the Sixth Extinction.

Many authors have suggested that Earth is already different enough to recognize the end of the Holocene and the beginning of a new geological epoch. The favored name, coined by the biologist Eugene F. Stoermer in the early 1980s and popularized by the atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, is the Anthropocene, the Epoch of Man.

The logic for distinguishing the Anthropocene is sound. It can be clarified by the following thought experiment. Suppose that in the far-distant future geologists were to dig through Earth’s crusted deposits to the strata spanning the past thousand years of our time. They would encounter sharply defined layers of chemically altered soil. They would recognize signatures of rapid climate changes. They would uncover abundant fossil remains of domesticated plants and animals that had replaced most of Earth’s prehuman fauna and flora. They would excavate fragments of machines, and a veritable museum of deadly weapons.

3

Biodiversity as a whole forms a shield protecting each of the species that together compose it, ourselves included. What will happen if, in addition to the species already extinguished by human activity, say, 10 percent of those remaining are taken away? Or 50 percent? Or 90 percent? As more species vanish or drop to near extinction, the rate of extinction of the survivors accelerates. In some cases the effect is felt almost immediately. When a century ago the American chestnut, once a dominant tree over much of eastern North America, was reduced to near extinction by an Asian fungal blight, seven moth species whose caterpillars depended on its vegetation vanished. As extinction mounts, biodiversity reaches a tipping point at which the ecosystem collapses. Scientists have only begun to study under what conditions this catastrophe is most likely to occur.

Human beings are not exempt from the iron law of species interdependency. We were not inserted as ready-made invasives into an Edenic world. Nor were we intended by providence to rule that world. The biosphere does not belong to us; we belong to it. The organisms that surround us in such beautiful profusion are the product of 3.8 billion years of evolution by natural selection. We are one of its present-day products, having arrived as a fortunate species of old-world primate. And it happened only a geological eye-blink ago. Our physiology and our minds are adapted for life in the biosphere, which we have only begun to understand. We are now able to protect the rest of life, but instead we remain recklessly prone to destroy and replace a large part of it.

4

Earth remains a little-known planet. Scientists and the public are reasonably familiar with the vertebrates (fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals), mostly because of their large size and immediate visible impact on human life. The best known of the vertebrates are the mammals, with about 5,500 species known and, according to experts, a few dozen remaining to be discovered. Birds have 10,000 recognized species, with an average of two or three new species turning up each year. Reptiles are reasonably well known, with slightly more than 9,000 species recognized and 1,000 estimated to await discovery. Fishes have 34,000 known species and as many as 10,000 awaiting discovery. Amphibians (frogs, salamanders, wormlike caecilians), among the most vulnerable to destruction, are less well known than the other land vertebrates: a bit over 6,600 species discovered out of a surprising 16,000 believed to exist. Flowering plants come in with about 270,000 species known and as many as 94,000 awaiting discovery.

For most of the rest of the living world, the picture is radically different. When expert estimates for invertebrates (such as the insects, crustaceans, and earthworms) are added to estimates for algae, fungi, mosses, and gymnosperms as well as for bacteria and other microorganisms, the total added up and then projected has varied wildly, from 5 million to more than 100 million species.

If the current rate of basic descriptions and analyses continues, we will not complete the global census of biodiversity—what is left of it—until well into the 23rd century. Further, if Earth’s fauna and flora is not more expertly mapped and protected, and soon, the amount of biodiversity will be vastly diminished by the end of the present century. Humanity is losing the race between the scientific study of global biodiversity and the obliteration of countless still-unknown species.

5

From 1898 to 2006, 57 kinds of freshwater fish declined to extinction in North America. The causes included the damming of rivers and streams, the draining of ponds and lakes, the filling in of springheads, and pollution, all due to human activity. Here, to bring them at least a whisper closer to their former existence, is a partial list of their common names: Maravillas red shiner, plateau chub, thicktail chub, phantom shiner, Clear Lake splittail, deepwater cisco, Snake River sucker, least silverside, Ash Meadows poolfish, whiteline topminnow, Potosi pupfish, La Palma pupfish, graceful priapelta, Utah Lake sculpin, Maryland darter.

There is a deeper meaning and long-term importance of extinction. When these and other species disappear at our hands, we throw away part of Earth’s history. We erase twigs and eventually whole branches of life’s family tree. Because each species is unique, we close the book on scientific knowledge that is important to an unknown degree but is now forever lost.

The biology of extinction is not a pleasant subject. The vanishing remnants of Earth’s biodiversity test the reach and quality of human morality. Species brought low by our hand now deserve our constant attention and care.

6

How fast are we driving species to extinction? For years paleontologists and biodiversity experts have believed that, before the coming of humanity about 200,000 years ago, the rate of origin of new species per extinction of existing species was roughly one species per million species per year. As a consequence of human activity, it is believed that the current rate of extinction overall is between 100 and 1,000 times higher than it was originally.

This grim assessment leads to a very important question: How well is conservation working? How much have the efforts of global conservation movements achieved in slowing and halting the devastation of Earth’s biodiversity?

Despite heroic efforts, the fact is that due to habitat loss, the rate of extinction is rising in most parts of the world. The preeminent sites of biodiversity loss are the tropical forests and coral reefs. The most vulnerable habitats of all, with the highest extinction rate per unit area, are rivers, streams, and lakes in both tropical and temperate regions.

Biologists recognize that across the 3.8-billion-year history of life, over 99 percent of all species that lived are extinct. This being the case, what, we are often asked, is so bad about extinction?

The answer, of course, is that many of the species over the eons didn’t die at all—they turned into two or more daughter species. Species are like amoebas; they multiply by splitting, not by making embryos. The most successful are the progenitors of the most species through time, just as the most successful humans are those whose lineages expand the most and persist the longest. We, like all other species, are the product of a highly successful and potentially important line that goes back all the way to the birth of humanity and beyond that for billions of years, to the time when life began. The same is true of the creatures still around us. They are champions, each and all. Thus far.

7

The surviving wildlands of the world are not art museums. They are not gardens to be arranged and tended for our delectation. They are not recreation centers or reservoirs of natural resources or sanatoriums or undeveloped sites of business opportunities—of any kind. The wildlands and the bulk of Earth’s biodiversity protected within them are another world from the one humanity is throwing together pell-mell. What do we receive from them? The stabilization of the global environment they provide and their very existence are gifts to us. We are their stewards, not their owners.

Each ecosystem—be it a pond, meadow, coral reef, or something else out of thousands that can be found around the world—is a web of specialized organisms braided and woven together. The species, each a freely interbreeding population of individuals, interact with a set of the other species in the ecosystem either strongly or weakly or not at all. Given that in most ecosystems even the identities of most of the species are unknown, how are biologists to define the many processes of their interactions? How can we predict changes in the ecosystem if some resident species vanish while other, previously absent species invade? At best we have partial data, working off hints, tweaking everything with guesses.

What does knowledge of how nature works tell us about conservation and the Anthropocene? This much is clear: To save biodiversity, it is necessary to obey the precautionary principle in the treatment of Earth’s natural ecosystems, and to do so strictly. Hold fast until we, scientists and the public alike, know much more about them. Proceed carefully—study, discuss, plan. Give the rest of Earth’s life a chance. Avoid nostrums and careless talk about quick fixes, especially those that threaten to harm the natural world beyond return.

8

Today every nation-state in the world has a protected-area system of some kind. All together the reserves number about 161,000 on land and 6,500 over marine waters. According to the World Database on Protected Areas—a joint project of the United Nations Environment Programme and the International Union for Conservation of Nature—they occupied by 2015 a little less than 15 percent of Earth’s land area and 2.8 percent of Earth’s ocean area. The coverage is increasing gradually. This trend is encouraging. To have reached the existing level is a tribute to those who have participated in the global conservation effort. But is the level enough to halt the acceleration of species extinction? It is in fact nowhere close to enough.

The declining world of biodiversity cannot be saved by the piecemeal operations in current use. It will certainly be mostly lost if conservation continues to be treated as a luxury item in national budgets. The extinction rate our behavior is imposing, and seems destined to continue imposing, on the rest of life is more correctly viewed as the equivalent of a Chicxulub-size asteroid strike played out over several human generations.

The only hope for the species still living is a human effort commensurate with the magnitude of the problem. The ongoing mass extinction of species, and with it the extinction of genes and ecosystems, ranks with pandemics, world war, and climate change as among the deadliest threats that humanity has imposed on itself. To those who feel content to let the Anthropocene evolve toward whatever destiny it mindlessly drifts to, I say, please take time to reconsider. To those who are steering the growth of nature reserves worldwide, let me make an earnest request: Don’t stop. Just aim a lot higher.

Populations of species that were dangerously small will have space to grow. Rare and local species previously doomed by development will escape their fate. The unknown species will no longer remain silent and thereby be put at highest risk. People will have closer access to a world that is complex and beautiful beyond our present imagining. We will have more time to put our own house in order for future generations. Living Earth, all of it, can continue to breathe.

This article appeared in the January/February 2017 edition with the headline “Fifty-Fifty.”

Edward O. Wilson is a professor emeritus at Harvard University and a two-time Pulitzer Prize winner. This essay is adapted from Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life, reprinted with the permission of Liveright Publishing Corporation. All rights reserved.

(Contributed by Rick Thomas, H.W., m.)

“Coping with narcissistic personality disorder in the White House” by Nell Ziehl

December 06, 2016 (QZ.com)

Unexpectedly, the post traveled widely, and it became clear that many people are also struggling with how to understand and deal with this kind of behavior in a position of power. Although several writers, including a few professionals, have publicly offered their thoughts on a diagnosis, I am not a professional and this is not a diagnosis. My post is not intended to persuade anyone or provide a comprehensive description of NPD. I am speaking purely from decades of dealing with NPD and sharing strategies that were helpful for me in coping and predicting behavior. The text below is adapted from my original Facebook post.

I want to talk a little about narcissistic personality disorder. I’ve unfortunately had a great deal of experience with it, and I’m feeling badly for those of you who are trying to grapple with it for the first time because of our president-elect, who almost certainly suffers from it or a similar disorder. If I am correct, it has some very particular implications for the office. Here are a few things to keep in mind:

1) It’s not curable and it’s barely treatable. He is who he is. There is no getting better, or learning, or adapting. He’s not going to “rise to the occasion” for more than maybe a couple hours. So just put that out of your mind.

2) He will say whatever feels most comfortable or good to him at any given time. He will lie a lot, and say totally different things to different people. Stop being surprised by this. While it’s important to pretend “good faith” and remind him of promises, as Bernie Sanders and others are doing, that’s for his supporters, so they can see the inconsistency as it comes. He won’t care. So if you’re trying to reconcile or analyze his words, don’t. It’s 100% not worth your time. Only pay attention to and address his actions.

3) You can influence him by making him feel good. There are already people like Steve Bannon who appear ready to use him for their own ends. The GOP is excited to try. Watch them, not him. President Obama, in his wisdom, may be treating him well in hopes of influencing him and averting the worst. But don’t count on it.

4) Entitlement is a key aspect of the disorder. As we are already seeing, he will likely not observe traditional boundaries of the office. He has already stated that rules don’t apply to him. This particular attribute has huge implications for the presidency and it will be important for everyone who can to hold him to the same standards as previous presidents.

5) We should expect that he only cares about himself and those he views as extensions of himself, like his children. (People with NPD often can’t understand others as fully human or distinct.) He desires accumulation of wealth and power because it fills a hole. (Melania is probably an acquired item, not an extension.) He will have no qualms at all about stealing everything he can from the country, and he’ll be happy to help others do so, if they make him feel good. He won’t view it as stealing but rather as something he’s entitled to do. This is likely the only thing he will intentionally accomplish.

6) It’s very, very confusing for non-disordered people to experience a disordered person with NPD. While often intelligent, charismatic, and charming, they do not reliably observe social conventions or demonstrate basic human empathy. It’s very common for non-disordered people to lower their own expectations and try to normalize the behavior. Do not do this and do not allow others, especially the media, to do this. If you start to feel foggy or unclear about why, step away until you recalibrate.

7) People with NPD often recruit helpers. These are referred to as “enablers” in the literature when they allow or cover for bad behavior, and “flying monkeys” when they perpetrate bad behavior on behalf of the narcissist. Although it’s easiest to prey on malicious people, good and vulnerable people can be unwittingly recruited. It will be important to support the good people around him if and when they attempt to stay clear or break away.

8) People with NPD often foster competition in people they control. Expect lots of chaos, firings, and recriminations. He will probably behave worst toward those closest to him, but that doesn’t mean (obviously) that his actions won’t have consequences for the rest of us. He will punish enemies. He may start out, as he has with the New York Times, with a confusing combination of punishment and reward, which is a classic abuse tactic for control. If you see your media cooperating or facilitating this behavior in order to r rewards, call them on it.

9) Gaslighting—where someone tries to convince you that the reality you’ve experienced isn’t true—is real and torturous. He will gaslight, his followers will gaslight. Many of our politicians and media figures already gaslight, so it will be hard to distinguish his amplified version from what has already been normalized. Learn the signs and find ways to stay focused on what you know to be true. Note: it is typically not helpful to argue with people who are attempting to gaslight. You will only confuse yourself. Just walk away.

10) Whenever possible, do not focus on the narcissist or give him attention. Unfortunately we can’t and shouldn’t ignore the president, but don’t circulate his tweets or laugh at him—you are enabling him and getting his word out. (I’ve done this, of course, we all have… just try to be aware.) Pay attention to your own emotions: Do you sort of enjoy his clowning? Do you enjoy the outrage? Is this kind of fun and dramatic, in a sick way? You are adding to his energy. Focus on what you can change and how you can resist, where you are. We are all called to be leaders now, in the absence of leadership.

SUNDAY NIGHT TRANSLATION GROUP – JANUARY 22

To quote Heather Williams, H.W., M., “Translation is the creative process of re-engineering the outdated software of your mind.” Translation is a 5-step process using syllogistic reasoning to transform apparent man and the universe back into its essential whole, complete and perfect nature.  Through the process of Translation, reality is uncovered and thus revealed. Through word tracking, getting to the essence of the words we use to express our current view of reality, we are uncovering the underlying reality of wholeness.

Sense testimony:

Potential tyrants present an opportunity for democratic control instead.

Conclusions:

1. The monarchy of truth is one people; united, indivisible, stable, regular, dependable, righteous, just and loving.
2.  Infinitely individuated Truth is harmonious sound agreement steering guiding creating all one knowing, all one powerful, all one presence besides which there is none else.
3. To come.

‘Fix you’ music video by Coldplay


When you try your best but you don’t succeed
When you get what you want but not what you need
When you feel so tired but you can’t sleep
Stuck in reverse

When the tears come streaming down your face
When you lose something you can’t replace
When you love someone but it goes to waste
Could it be worse?

Lights will guide you home
And ignite your bones
And I will try to fix you

High up above or down below
When you’re too in love to let it go
If you never try you’ll never know
Just what you’re worth

Lights will guide you home
And ignite your bones
And I will try to fix you

Tears come streaming down your face
When you lose something you cannot replace
Tears come streaming down your face
And I

Tears come streaming down your face
I promise you I will learn from all my mistakes
Tears come streaming down your face
And I

Lights will guide you home
And ignite your bones
And I will try to fix you

America, Donald Trump, and the Triumph of the Lie

A very interesting article from my long time friend, Dale Pendell. Worth the read.

Bright Blessings,
Gwyllm
http://realitysandwich.com/321285/america-donald-trump-and-the-triumph-of-the-lie/

Ω             The Triumph of the Lie               Ω

Ω
The Trump victory represents the Triumph of the Lie.

That public men publish falsehoods
Is nothing new. . . .

Be angry at the sun for setting
If these things anger you.
–Robinson Jeffers

Ω
And Trump’s victory is the triumph of capitalism. For Donald Trump is the perfect capitalist: selfish, vulgar, bigoted, privileged. The worshipper of Mammon and no other gods.

Trump is proof that all it takes to make money is money.

Trump’s entire focus will be on self-aggrandizement.

All things are to be judged by money, and money alone.

Ω
It is ironic that Trump got his victory through the Electoral College, created by the Federalists to protect the government from democracy, because

the people will follow the first demagogue who comes along and inflames their passions.

Or, again, it is not ironic. The program of the anti-democrats was to protect PROPERTY from the masses of the people, where PROPERTY, for the most part, WAS people.

Ω
Triumph of the Lie. We might call the Trump administration our first “post-modern” presidency, where fact and fiction are both just “stories.” As a storyteller myself, that stories are indeed true does not mean that there are no facts, or that there are no lies.

Lies are the weapons of demagogues and tyrants, the self-serving delusions of narcissists, and the enemies of free civil society.

Ω

The United States of America, 2017, is utterly different from Germany of 1933. German power was concentrated in the army. American power is concentrated in corporations: especially banks and financial corporations, oil corporations, and military contractors.

I have resisted the comparisons of Trump to Hitler. Consider: Hitler was an artist, a self-made man, a street brawler and a gifted orator. He was arrested and imprisoned for armed insurrection. He endured a year of prison, wrote a book, got released, and rebuilt the outlawed Nazi Party virtually from scratch until they were powerful enough to meet the Communists on their own blocks and beat them up. There is, in short (I thought), no comparison.

Still, it is eerie how closely Trump has followed Hitler’s play book. And we should not forget that Hitler’s first campaign, once he got a little power, was to muzzle and tame the press.

“They’re all liars,” sayeth the Liar.

Ω
Politicians have always lied, but usually there is some shame when they are caught. When the Lie fully triumphs, lies are told and repeated over and over, even, or especially, if they are obvious falsehoods.

Ω
When Nixon lied; it was deliberate and he knew he was lying. Trump just lies from habit, and for fun. To Trump it’s a game, and shameless. If he gets caught, he shrugs, smiles, and tells some other lie.

Ω
The Lie is poisonous to civic discourse. “Civic discourse” can be critiqued by Marxists as a bourgeois illusion, and by overly cerebral post-modern philosophers as whatever, but what are the options? Kleptocracy (the Russian system, rule by gangsters), or plutocracy (rule by corporations, the Exxon Disneyworld option). Or perhaps hereditary monarchy, which might be the most benign alternative to bourgeois civitas.

Ω
The triumph of the lie is the triumph of division and mistrust.

Lies and nonsensical pronouncements will serve primarily as distractions, that we not see their fingers in the public till.

Watch the money. Follow the money. Money is what matters to Trump and his family. Money will be at the center of much of what Trump does. (And money, perhaps, will be his downfall.)

Lies will distract us from the further erosion of civil liberties, and from the free passes being given to polluters.

Expect daily installments of the spectacle: especially if Trump is caught in some outrageous lie. Another will fall on the heels of the last.

Ω
Debord’s “Spectacle” has been fulfilled: images have assumed hegemony. This spectacle is the hypnosis of earth-denial normalized.

The task of our art is to invert that. To de-normalize.

Ω
Guy Debord outlined the Society of the Spectacle fifty years ago. With the Triumph of the Lie and the ubiquity of mediated communication, have we entered “post-spectacular society?”

The question, in post-spectacular society, is “Do Bodies Matter?”

The tycoons, the Liars, and the Earth Deniers are betting that they don’t. This may be their fatal mistake.

Ω
The Trump Administration, if it can’t be somehow stopped, will be worse than any of us wish to imagine. Corruption will be rampant. Great numbers of people will be brutalized through economics. Civic duty will be replaced by predation and the clear-cutting of the commons.

Ω
He’s a liar. He’s not going to change. He’s just going to tell more lies.

Ω Ω An Assessment of the Present Danger      Ω

Ω Ω
Let’s make a first pass attempt at triage, to prioritize present dangers. For starters:

1) Long term damage to the life of the sentient beings of planet Earth, all beings bipedal, furry, scaly, finny, winged, wriggling, or green and rooted.

That is, there is danger to their lives, the lives of their progeny, the viability of their gene pool, and the viability of their habitats.

2) Damage of geological scale to the planet Earth: planetary scale pollution, human destruction of global habitat, climate change of geologic time scale: tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years.

3) Damage to the social fabric of the human communities of planet Earth, including the American republic. By, first, the disruption of all traditional economies by global corporate capitalism, and, concurrently, the destruction of traditional values by the amoral machinations of “the market.”  And by lies.

By allowing money to be the rule of all things, the demonic forces of greed, lies, and coercion inevitably tend to give the most predatory persons and cartels free access to the public trust. The rise of authoritarian regimes leads to the seizure of the commons by the powerful and the monetization of public lands, public airspace, every public marketplace, and to the sort of vast corruption we are more used to in “third-world” countries.

Ω Ω
Massive extinctions and repeated decimations are already underway. This massive death is abetted by pressures from high birth rates in “developing” countries and by high consumption rates in the “developed” countries. Continued carbon burning and global warming will lead to widespread degradation of life, and the destruction of much that is beautiful. Human predation from hunger, from poverty, or from greed are eliminating large wild mammals from the planet Earth.

Ω Ω
Plutocratic state capitalism is destroying the peoples, cultures, resources, and health of the whole planet Earth. Monetization of every resource, of every aspect of culture, of, in fact, ethics and morality, will indeed warp human life into a war of all against all.

Ω Ω Ω                The Worship of Idols and False Gods               Ω Ω Ω

Ω Ω Ω   
Of immediate threats to life on planet Earth, nuclear war and nuclear accidents are certainly near the top of the list. But global corporatism is not far behind.

It is the nature of a corporation, under current charter, to maximize monetary profit. That is its sole morality. A corporation is the spirit of greed given a body. Buddhists call the entities of limitless craving pretas—“hungry ghosts.” Zen students give the hungry ghosts small offerings out of compassion, even knowing they can never be satisfied. But to conjure forth the spirits of greed and craving, and then by magical writs to give them corporeal body and immortality, and then to release them out of the magic circle to prey and feed on the world of sentient beings–that is daylight madness.

Ω Ω Ω   

What reason does such a hungry spirit have to spare anything? It is not a human being. It is not a sentient being. It is the spirit of greed given the power to hire human servants and to grow and self-replicate. Until that charter is changed by law or revolution, palliative measures, at best, buy a little time.

Ω Ω Ω   

Thales, our first philosopher, proved the fallacy of “The Market” 2500 years ago by cornering the supply of olives, and then charging exorbitant prices.

Is that honest work? Or is it more like stealing lunch money from the little kids?

By the logic of The Market: why give medical care to the poor at all? No money there!

It is poverty that gives money power, coercive power. That in desperation for money men will do anything. (Or, said another way, that everything has its price.)

Ω Ω Ω   

Money is also a phantasm. We have given it so much power that now we are its slaves. We created “economy,” which should be housekeeping, but instead is a poisonous lash on our backs, wielded by the “invisible” slavemaster’s hand. All the nations of planet Earth are now ensnared within its web. Fundamentally, none of it is “necessary.” We could invent a different system.

Money does not represent time, wealth, or anything–other than itself. Economists accept money as a given, as a fact of nature, that’s their job, but it’s not. Money is a recent bit of cultural fabrication, like the state.

Ω Ω Ω   

Never forget that it is poverty that gives money power. Without poverty, money would still have value, but not the coercion of thralldom.

Ω Ω Ω   

Any society based on monetary profit will tend to be predatory and destructive, even without state corporatism. To mitigate this tendency to predation, societies develop morays, traditions, and shame.

Children are taught to share, to be a part of the larger social unit, to perform ritual and caretaking duties. Selfish greed is the mark of a sociopath.

Ω Ω Ω   

With state corporatism, that is, with a system based upon entities dedicated to growth and profit without regard to the welfare of others, all futures are dim. Ruination of the fields and the utter depletion of the commons is an inevitable result. Do the math.

ΩΩΩΩ  Why (sadly) the Election Doesn’t Matter, And Why (sadly) It Does  ΩΩΩΩ

Ω Ω Ω Ω

The Democrats are as much to blame here as the Republicans: they are both partners in supporting corporate hegemony. A Democratic victory would not have helped in addressing these core problems. In Ken Knabb’s words:

Obama’s smooth, genial persona enabled him to get away with war crimes, massive deportations, and all sorts of corporate compromises (not a single criminal banker prosecuted) with few people paying attention and fewer still protesting.
–Ken Knabb

Not to mention Obama’s vigorous prosecution of whistleblowers—far beyond what George W. Bush did.

Ω Ω Ω Ω

The US has a long record of using its national power, both diplomatic and armed, to support and protect corporate interests—over fifty interventions in Latin America in a hundred years.

Ω Ω Ω Ω

In the last fifty years, the Democratic Party, aside from the Sanders insurgency, which was put down, has shown little interest in confronting corporate power. Neo-liberal pundits will give reasoned explanations that inequality is not a problem as long as those at the bottom are rising also. Which they are not. And which argument would be false anyway.

Since the Clinton presidency, the Democrats have been the best Republicans on the block.

Ω Ω Ω Ω

That said, the Republicans seem bent on accruing short term monetary profits by selling off all public investments and programs, and then putting day to day expenses on the national credit card. That’s their absurd idea that government should be a business—a business that enriches tycoons.

We must remember Gary Snyder’s admonition that the first rule of business is that we are in business for our health.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
That said, with Trump the despoiling of the fields and the raiding of the public treasury and attack on the public weal will move into high gear.

And we should resist.  We should resist the despoilers. For planet Earth we should resist. For the beauty of planet Earth we should resist the ugliness.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
The rise of right-wing nationalism (characterized by racism, xenophobia, and authoritarianism and generally “might makes right” ethos) in America, England, Europe, and around the world is the embrace of the death drive by the desperate, akin to panic spending by those on the verge of bankruptcy. With continued depletion of resources, continued degradation of the environment ( the “commons”), and greater and greater economic division between the super-rich and ninety percent, this trend will probably continue. Just a hunch.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
Historically, emergency powers have been the tipping point upon which more than one republic has toppled. Hitler used the Reichstag fire to imprison tens of thousands of his political enemies, gut organized labor, and shackle the press. Osama bin Laden’s attack on the World Trade Center enabled the Bush Administration to invade Iraq, a country not involved with the attack, to create a huge, new, security force, and to initiate massive surveillance on American citizens.

A narcissistic authoritative personality such as Donald Trump would have no scruples in suspending civil liberties, if, say, there were another terrorist attack—say in Washington D.C., at the Congress or at the White House.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
It may be difficult to gauge the relative danger of world nuclear stockpiles of 1000 vs. 5000 vs. 15,000 warheads. But the threat is directly correlated to which direction the number is moving. If the world nuclear powers are saying “this is crazy, let’s reduce the number of nuclear weapons,” the threat of nuclear catastrophe is a lot less than if  all sides are building more, which implies that someone thinks that they can get an edge. “You can destroy us ten times over, but I can destroy you 100 times over.”

Ω Ω Ω Ω
Journalists, especially in the mainstream media, will face some tough choices: to call a lie a lie and forget about that raise, or, perhaps, decide, in the interests of “balanced” journalism to present the lie as one of two “differing viewpoints.”

Large monetary and professional rewards will be offered to anyone with a bullhorn willing to give the new gang a break.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
The myth of growth is so pervasive that it passes unnoticed. Who does not express “grow the economy” as an admirable goal?

Growth is an adolescent thing. With maturity, growth should be inward. Capitalism is an economic system stuck in adolescence.

It’s not about replacing bad people. It’s the system, stupid.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
The erosion of civic values and their replacement by corporate values will logically put predators into power, where “predators” mean those who got rich screwing other people. While corruption has never been rare in government, under corporate predators corruption will be vast, open, and shameless, hidden in plain sight by lies, and only limited, if limited at all, by laws and courts, no longer by custom, shame, or “decency.”

Ω Ω Ω Ω
Why should we care?  Anarchists may object: it’s not my job to support the capitalist state in its death throes.  Buddhists may object: you can only save the world one person at a time, yourself. Marxist critique may say that the worse it gets, the sooner the revolution will come. All these arguments have some merit, and the historical crimes of America are indeed great. Still.

It is not to defend America, nor the capitalist state that I stand up, but that corruption not be “just the way things are,” and that the last living giraffe not die in some billionaire’s private game reserve.

Ω Ω Ω Ω
Is There Hope?

From the standpoint of large, wild mammals? From the standpoint of tens of thousands of other species?  Little.

For doing something that is beautiful and true, in standing up to the Lie?

Yes, if we stand together.

For dispelling the incorporated hungry ghost? In changing the assumptions and aim of the economy? In breaking the spell of money?

Hey,
nobody home.

Or hey, ho,

still we will be merry.

ΩΩΩΩΩ        The Way of Mindful Transgression        ΩΩΩΩΩ

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
The great challenge of Mindful Transgression is to answer a lie with something that is not a lie.

Even if that answer creates awkwardness, or obstruction, or dissonance.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
The specific ways for each of us to resist depends a lot on individual temperament. But you have to do something, and the Theater of Resistance, by its nature, provides manifold opportunities for personal growth—that is, to do things you’ve never done before.

Maybe that’s as simple as personally visiting the office of your local Member of Congress, as Michael Moore and Robert Reich suggest.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Massive demonstrations will be absolutely necessary. Massive demonstrations are needed to show support for lawmakers to resist Trump and his minions. Massive demonstrations are needed to show Trump that the majority of Americans do not support him. Massive demonstrations are needed to express our mourning—where we can all wear black arm bands.

“Sad.”  You betcha.

Massive demonstrations are for us, to create an “us,” and to banish loneliness and alienation.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Some of our “hipper” intellectuals have said that demonstrating doesn’t do any good. That is absolutely untrue. ANY time large numbers of people take to the streets, it is significant. In the last thirty years massive peaceful demonstrations have brought down a dozen governments around the world. Massive peaceful demonstration may be the ONLY way to bring down a repressive or corrupt regime.

That is why freedom of assembly is usually curtailed even before freedom of speech. We have to get out there, with or without a parade permit.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Some will not help us. Some deem politics to be an impure or useless endeavor. Don’t let them shame you. Art is a higher calling.

And while “truth,” “higher truth,” “ultimate truth,” or “fundamental truth” may be subtle and difficult to discern, lies are not.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Not everyone has the temperament for the Practice of Everyday Subversion—that’s probably good. And no wonder. Most sensible people would opt for serenity.

But for the creatively inclined, mindful everyday subversion is intimately linked with artistic expression.

Make it beautiful.

Make it a situation.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Joe Hill said: organize!

Find an affinity group. Or start one.

(Or, for us loner types, join whatever group is marching by that you like the looks of.)

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
We need puppeteers to fight the puppets. We need public theater and inspired “situations.” We need some poets to get up on their soap boxes. We need more public art. We need some vibrancy and the courage to speak truth.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
We need a lot more MINDFUL TRANSGRESSION. Mindful transgression is the ancient and primordial practice of all great buddhas and bodhisattvas. Some have called mindful transgression the art of drawing reality to a fine point. Others have called it the art of lifting a flower. For some it is finding exactly the right moment to knock over a vase of water.

In all of our spiritual practices, active presence in the world is the most challenging. Encounters in the dojo, or in the ashram, are more like rehearsals. Some never take their practice to the street. I’ve known Zen teachers who never interact with outsiders. We can only try to teach our teachers by example.

We take a stand against invisibility. Is being invisible more fundamentally “spiritual” than wearing a bright clown nose?

There is certainly an art to moving through the world invisibly. We can only be thankful that the Buddha was not among those who practiced it.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Robert Aitken told me how Thich Nhat Hahn would practice “blocking” on sidewalks in Manhattan. Just by walking slowly.  Then if two or three others were to join them, and they walked abreast, they would pretty much block the whole sidewalk.

Thinking of the highly annoying people who get into the fast lane and then drive slow, I asked: “Why is it more enlightened to go slow than to go fast?”

Aitken answered: “I don’t think Thich Nhat Hahn’s purpose was enlightenment; I think his purpose was just to cause trouble.”

And there you have it.

Maybe it’s easier to get away with if you wear orange robes.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
We are trained to be mannerly. That is, not to offend. That is, not to create a ruckus. That is, not to question authority. (And maybe especially, spiritual authority.)  Don’t raise a stink. Don’t make others uncomfortable. Don’t draw attention to yourself. Just fit in. This is the way of social harmony.

Or is it?

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Mindful Transgression is speaking the truth about the Emperor. And, given a chance, to the Emperor.

And Mindful Transgression is a path of “personal self cultivation,” … some realms of expression are difficult to master, or even glimpse, sitting on a cushion.

Bestowing bliss in the marketplace does not necessarily mean handing out candy and saying things that make everyone feel good.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
Mindful Transgression: you have to be ready to give your time, because people will react.

If you transgress with anger it will fail, and will hurt your own psyche and soul. But if you can make it a gift, creating awkwardness can be liberating.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
At the bank (where, in several steps, I was taking out my money and transferring it to a credit union, which, listen, at best is just slightly less culpable of rape and pillage) the young, well-scrubbed clerk, a poor kid with an MBA for all I knew, working for peanuts, asked me if there was anything else he could do for me.

I asked him if it was true that Wells Fargo invested in private prisons. A mystified look came over his face. “Look,” I said, “I know it’s none of your doing. But is it true that the Wells Fargo corporation invests in private prisons?”

He didn’t know. But he called over his supervisor. And, after further discussion, me saying “I read it in an article on the internet, I’m just trying to find out if it is true,” the supervisor called her boss.

It ended up being quite a to-do, the question ratcheting its way up the chain of command. You have to be ready to give some time to your art.

And I wanted to maintain my good relations with the clerks—it wasn’t their doing. But that turned out to be difficult. They got defensive. They felt that they personally had to defend the corporation. And that gave us something else to talk about.

They finally came up with some evidence that Wells Fargo had divested itself of private prison stocks. I had to accept that, at least for the moment. I thanked them all profusely.

With further research, I found public corporate records showing that Wells Fargo still had private prison stock. But I thought it was a good day’s work. I hadn’t really been prepared for the seriousness of the reaction of the bank employees, and I wasn’t completely comfortable with being the lead actor in the spotlight for so long.

But still.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
You say, “demonstrating, civil disobedience, will only play into the hands of power. It will give them the excuse for mass arrests.”

If we fear that, the threat alone has triumphed.

It’s like thinking you can change the mind of a liar with facts, or with reason, or by appealing to their better nature.

You say, “Look, you are calling them “they,” that is the root of ignorance. Until you transcend the we-they paradigm you will only make things worse.

You may be right. After we put out the fire, we can talk about that further.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
To repeat. Without massive resistance to the pirates, and massive support for those willing to stand up against them, damage to the earth, to her peoples, animals, and cultures, will be far worse, far more abusive, far uglier, that any of us can now imagine.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
This is not the time to sit it out. Get off you cushions, you zennies. Come out of your retreat centers, you spiritual seekers. Stand up in your taverns you spirituous  drinkers. Plot dissent in your vapors, you legalized hashishans. C’mon kids, it’s gonna be YOUR world. Show us how.

Civilly, say no. Politely, stand your ground. Or obstruct. Or disrupt.

“Free country!”       Remember that?

We do it for our sleep, and that our dreams have joy.

Ω Ω Ω Ω Ω
General Strike and Block Party:

or, perhaps,    Block Party first.           In the streets.

Or, as Falstaff said,
a play . . .

extempore.

Dale Pendell is a widely published author and poet. A consultant for herbal product development and botanical surveys, and a computer scientist, he founded Kuksu: Journal of Backcountry Writing and cofounded the Primitive Arts Institute. He lives in Penn Valley, CA.

“Everybody loves you when you’re dead”


They crucify you when you get it wrong
When things are fine they put you ahead
They laugh at you with your trousers down
They pick the stones and aim them at your head

When you’re alive they won’t care what you said
What you deserve and all the blood you bled
It doesn’t matter what you try to hide
The sun comes out and then the truth is read

Your fans will love you when you’re alive
But the wreaths are laid by the rest instead
When you’re alive they won’t care what you said
What you deserve and all the blood you bled

‘Cause everybody loves you when you’re dead
Kneel and pray by the side of your bed
And everybody loves you when you’re dead
Kneel and pray just like your momma said

When you’re alive they won’t care what you said
What you deserve and all the blood you bled
You’ll turn in your grave at what’s gonna be said
You’ll finally be appreciated

‘Cause everybody loves you when you’re dead
‘Cause everybody loves you when you’re dead

Written by David Greenfield, Brian John Duffy, Jean Jacques Burnel, Hugh Alan Cornwell • Copyright © EMI Music Publishing, Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC, Universal Music Publishing Group
* * * * * 

Also great book title:  Everyone Loves You When You’re Dead: Journeys into Fame and Madness by Neil Strauss

“Judgment Day: What Price Security?” by Suzanne Deakins, H.W., M.

Moving into 2017 we are faced with a lot of dangerous ideas. Not the least in the present equation of worry is the new president who seems to be determined to display a kind of prejudice that is frightening. His very presence on the national level has unleashed a tsunami of hate and prejudice of the worse kind on every minority group.

There is more than just the danger of loosing what I consider our basic rights at stake. In the wake of 9/11 the Patriot Act was established. This act by congress was supposed to give law enforcement the ability to share information to help avoid acts of terrorism.

This new act allowed agencies to snoop on our emails, record and listen to phone calls, investigate our financial records without a court order. It allows the law enforcement such as the FBI to collect all kinds of personal records, such as the use of the library, Internet sites visited, and much more. It uses abstractions to defines terrorism and acts of terrorism thus leaving the definitions up to those enforcing the laws and allowing law enforcement to come to their own conclusions. Terrorism is so ill defined that it allows any act that seems to be endangering (note the seems to be) U.S.A. security to be an act of terrorism. This could mean such acts as gathering to protest a government action, writing an article such as this that would cause concern etc. The U. S. freedom of expression has been put in jeopardy by this act.

The security laws that have been enacted have allowed our lawmakers and enforcers to commit acts of inhumanity on fellow citizens and citizens of other countries. The prevention of terrorism and enforcement of national security has left us in a place of 180 degrees from our beginnings of a democracy. Where law was supposed to protect our freedoms our lawmakers now enact laws to take away our freedoms in guise of protecting us.

On November 30, 2015 it was revealed that the FBI had been collecting, Internet complete browser history including IP addresses of anyone you corresponded with, any on line purchases you made and the list goes on including any subscriptions you have over the Internet and others who take the same subscription. The FBI has collected screen names, account numbers etc. I am assuming this would also include medical records posted in your accounts with groups such as Providence Medical, and of course a record of all telephone numbers store on line including your phone.

It is a slippery slope a government travels when it begins to take away freedoms in the name of national security. History is full of the violence enacted upon citizenry when it disapproved or felt differently than the leaders. The Patriot Act allows payment for those reporting to the government anyone or group they deem as potential or actual terrorist.

January 2nd 2017 the Republican Party voted to significantly curtail the power of the independent ethics office. This was one more nail in the coffin of freedom for our citizens.

The GLBTQ community is easily seen as an alternative. It may be seen and is seen by certain citizens as a threat. The answers to rectifying this situation, is not violence against leaders. We must think differently than those leaders who have enacted upon this country these harmful laws that are silently stripping away our freedoms. You cannot solve or resolve a problem by the same thinking and actions that created it. The 2020 campaign starts now. Get involved helping to generate solutions that will bring true freedom to all people. Volunteer your help and money to help defeat the growing decline of freedom. No one person holds an answer; it is our combined efforts where we stop classifying each other in terms of political parties, genders, and nationalities. Freedom taken from one group is taken from us all. We are of one consciousness, mind, and body of humanity. Our differences are nothing more than the infinite variety of life expressing itself.

“The Power of Learning by Doing” by FRANK WILCZEK (wsj.com)

From the Beatles to Einstein, the key to creativity is often going for it and learning from your mistakes

The Beatles perform on ‘The Ed Sullivan Show,’ New York, Feb. 9, 1964.
The Beatles perform on ‘The Ed Sullivan Show,’ New York, Feb. 9, 1964. PHOTO:ASSOCIATED PRESS

January 18, 2017

My high-school rock band never amounted to much, but I learned a lesson from the Beatles that would serve me well later. As I remember it, I was watching one of their early press conferences on television, and a reporter asked, “How much do you practice your instruments?” John Lennon answered, with a smile, “Never.” A gasp, mixed with chuckles, passed through the press gaggle. Lennon explained, “We just work on new songs and perform.”

In trying (unsuccessfully) to document this memory, I came across a similar statement from Ringo Starr. “I don’t believe in practicing really,” he said. “I learned to play with a group, and I believe that I progressed more with them in five weeks that I would have in six months rehearsing by myself in an attic.”

I also found Lennon’s explanation of how he and Paul McCartney became songwriters. As teens, Lennon said, they would sit for hours “eyeball to eyeball” at McCartney’s house, armed with cheap acoustic guitars, and just do it: “Practically every Buddy Holly song was three chords,” Lennon said, “so why not write your own?”

When I decided in graduate school to switch from math to physics, I took that message— of learning by doing—to heart. My fellow graduate students spent most of their time studying, trying to ensure that they had a firm foundation before trying to build anything new.

My approach was different. I hadn’t taken many physics courses, so my preparation had gaping holes. I could manipulate the physics equations as abstract mathematical symbols, but I often had only vague notions about what the symbols meant. Conversely, if you told me about a situation in the physical world, I might have trouble figuring out which equations applied.

Nevertheless, I resolved to leap right to the frontiers of research. I found a great thesis adviser, David Gross of Princeton University, and an important problem, and I went for it. I picked a subject area where nobody really knew what they were doing, so I didn’t start so far behind. I learned or improvised what I needed as I went along, made lots of mistakes—and got my thesis done quickly.

It isn’t the only time I’ve profited from a learn-by-doing approach. Hatching a new scientific concept is always an adventure. It’s a bit like deciding to have a baby: You don’t know quite how it’s going to turn out. In all of my major physics insights, I got some things wrong early on and failed to nail all the easy (in hindsight) consequences. But I always trusted that good ideas, like healthy babies, would survive some blunders, grow up and thrive.

Einstein’s construction of his general theory of relativity is probably science’s supreme example of learning by doing. From the moment that he formulated special relativity in 1905, Einstein realized that it wasn’t compatible with Newton’s theory of gravity, so a new theory was required. In 1907, he began working to find it.

Einstein started by tackling relatively simple problems, using general principles and likely guesses. Those exercises taught him that the new theory would bring in the curvature of space and time, and that he’d need some new math to describe it.

Starting in 1912, he began playing with different equations. Einstein’s work in these years was marked by false starts and outright errors. He spoke of “years of groping in the dark for a truth that one feels but cannot express.” Only in late 1915 did Einstein arrive at the theory that we still use today.

The fear of making mistakes is a great barrier to creativity. But if you’re ready to learn from them, mistakes can be your friend. As I have often advised students, “If you don’t make mistakes, you’re not working on hard enough problems—and that’s a big mistake.”

Or as the Danish mathematician Piet Hein put it in one of his rhyming aphorisms, “Problems worthy of attack / Prove their worth by hitting back.”

Recently, I found a fortune cookie that may have said it best of all: “The work will teach you how to do it.”

(Contributed by Melissa Goodnight, H.W., M.)

Consciousness, sexuality, androgyny, futurism, space, the arts, science, astrology, democracy, humor, books, movies and more