All posts by Mike Zonta

Steve Winwood – Higher Love


Steve Winwood – Higher Love
Here are the lyrics again incase
its too fast/slow.

Think about it, there must be higher love
Down in the heart or hidden in the stars above
Without it, life is a wasted time
Look inside your heart, Ill look inside mine
Things look so bad everywhere
In this whole world, what is fair?
We walk blind and we try to see
Falling behind in what could be

Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Wheres that higher love I keep thinking of?

Worlds are turning and were just hanging on
Facing our fear and standing out there alone
A yearning, and its real to me
There must be someone whos feeling for me
Things look so bad everywhere
In this whole world, what is fair?
We walk blind and we try to see
Falling behind in what could be

Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Wheres that higher love I keep thinking of?

Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Bring be a higher love
I could rise above on a higher love

I will wait for it
Im not too late for it
Until then, Ill sing my song
To cheer the night along
Bring it…oh bring it…

I could light the night up with my soul on fire
I could make the sun shine from pure desire
Let me feel that love come over me
Let me feel how strong it could be

Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Bring me a higher love
Wheres that higher love I keep thinking of?

Herman Melville on science

Herman Melville

“Physiognomy, like every other human science, is but a passing fable.”

–Herman Melville (August 1, 1819 – September 28, 1891) was an American novelist, short story writer, and poet of the American Renaissance period. His best known works include Typee, a romantic account of his experiences in Polynesian life, and his whaling novel Moby-Dick. Wikipedia

Akbar of India

Akbar
Portrait of Akbar by Manohar.jpg

Late 16th century portrait of Akbar by Manohar
3rd Mughal Emperor
Reign 11 February 1556 – 27 October 1605
Coronation 14 February 1556 at Kalanaur, Punjab
Predecessor Humayun
Successor Jahangir
Regent Bairam Khan (1556–1560)
Born Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar
15 October 1542
UmerkotRajputana (present-day SindhPakistan)
Died 27 October 1605 (aged 63)
Fatehpur SikriAgraMughal Empire (present-day Uttar PradeshIndia)
Burial Sikandra, Agra
Consort Ruqaiya Sultan Begum
Wives Salima Sultan Begum
Mariam-uz-Zamani
Raziya Begum
Qasima Banu Begum
Bibi Daulat Shad
Issue Fatima Banu Begum
Hassan Mirza
Hussain Mirza
Jahangir
Khanum Sultan Begum
Sultan Murad Mirza
Daniyal Mirza
Shakr-un-Nissa Begum
Aram Banu Begum
Mahi Begum
Full name
Abu’l-Fath Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar
House Timurid
Father Humayun
Mother Hamida Banu Begum
Religion Sunni Islam, Din-e-Illahi

Abu’l-Fath Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar (15 October 1542– 27 October 1605), popularly known as Akbar I(IPA: [əkbər], literally “the great”) and later Akbar the Great, was the third Mughal emperor, who reigned from 1556 to 1605. Akbar succeeded his father, Humayun, under a regent, Bairam Khan, who helped the young emperor expand and consolidate Mughal domains in India. A strong personality and a successful general, Akbar gradually enlarged the Mughal Empire to include nearly all of the Indian Subcontinent north of the Godavari river. His power and influence, however, extended over the entire country because of Mughal military, political, cultural, and economic dominance. To unify the vast Mughal state, Akbar established a centralised system of administration throughout his empire and adopted a policy of conciliating conquered rulers through marriage and diplomacy. To preserve peace and order in a religiously and culturally diverse empire, he adopted policies that won him the support of his non-Muslim subjects. Eschewing tribal bonds and Islamic state identity, Akbar strove to unite far-flung lands of his realm through loyalty, expressed through an Indo-Persian culture, to himself as an emperor who had near-divine status.

Mughal India developed a strong and stable economy, leading to commercial expansion and greater patronage of culture. Akbar himself was a patron of art and culture. He was fond of literature, and created a library of over 24,000 volumes written in SanskritUrduPersianGreekLatinArabic and Kashmiri, staffed by many scholars, translators, artists, calligraphers, scribes, bookbinders and readers. Holy men of many faiths, poets, architects and artisans adorned his court from all over the world for study and discussion. Akbar’s courts at DelhiAgra, and Fatehpur Sikri became centres of the arts, letters, and learning. Perso-Islamic culture began to merge and blend with indigenous Indian elements, and a distinct Indo-Persian culture emerged characterised by Mughal style arts, painting, and architecture. Disillusioned with orthodox Islam and perhaps hoping to bring about religious unity within his empire, Akbar promulgated Din-i-Ilahi, a syncretic creed derived from IslamHinduismZoroastrianism, and Christianity. A simple, monotheistic cult, tolerant in outlook, it centred on Akbar as a prophet, for which he drew the ire of the ulema and orthodox Muslims. Many of his courtiers followed Din-i-Ilahi as their religion as well, as many believed that Akbar was a prophet. One famous courtier who followed this blended religion was Birbal.

Akbar’s reign significantly influenced the course of Indian history. During his rule, the Mughal empire tripled in size and wealth. He created a powerful military system and instituted effective political and social reforms. By abolishing the sectarian tax on non-Muslims and appointing them to high civil and military posts, he was the first Mughal ruler to win the trust and loyalty of the native subjects. He had Sanskrit literature translated, participated in native festivals, realising that a stable empire depended on the co-operation and good-will of his subjects. Thus, the foundations for a multicultural empire under Mughal rule were laid during his reign. Akbar was succeeded as emperor by his son, Jahangir.

Din-i-Ilahi

Akbar holds a religious assembly of different faiths in the Ibadat Khana in Fatehpur Sikri.

Akbar was deeply interested in religious and philosophical matters. An orthodox Muslim at the outset, he later came to be influenced by Sufi mysticism that was being preached in the country at that time, and moved away from orthodoxy, appointing to his court several talented people with liberal ideas, including Abul Fazl, Faizi and Birbal. In 1575, he built a hall called the Ibadat Khana (“House of Worship”) at Fatehpur Sikri, to which he invited theologians, mystics and selected courtiers renowned for their intellectual achievements and discussed matters of spirituality with them.  These discussions, initially restricted to Muslims, were acrimonious and resulted in the participants shouting at and abusing each other. Upset by this, Akbar opened the Ibadat Khana to people of all religions as well as atheists, resulting in the scope of the discussions broadening and extending even into areas such as the validity of the Quran and the nature of God. This shocked the orthodox theologians, who sought to discredit Akbar by circulating rumours of his desire to forsake Islam.

Akbar’s effort to evolve a meeting point among the representatives of various religions was not very successful, as each of them attempted to assert the superiority of their respective religions by denouncing other religions. Meanwhile, the debates at the Ibadat Khana grew more acrimonious and, contrary to their purpose of leading to a better understanding among religions, instead led to greater bitterness among them, resulting in the discontinuance of the debates by Akbar in 1582.  However, his interaction with various religious theologians had convinced him that despite their differences, all religions had several good practices, which he sought to combine into a new religious movement known as Din-i-Ilahi.

Silver square rupee of Akbar, Lahore mint, struck in Aban month of Ilahi

Some modern scholars claim that Akbar did not initiate a new religion but instead introduced what Dr. Oscar R. Gómez calls the transtheistic outlook from tantric Tibetan Buddhism, and that he did not use the word Din-i-Ilahi According to the contemporary events in the Mughal court Akbar was indeed angered by the acts of embezzlement of wealth by many high level Muslim clerics.

The purported Din-i-Ilahi was more of an ethical system and is said to have prohibited lust, sensuality, slander and pride, considering them sins. Piety, prudence, abstinence and kindness are the core virtues. The soul is encouraged to purify itself through yearning of God.  Celibacy was respected, chastity enforced, the slaughter of animals was forbidden and there were no sacred scriptures or a priestly hierarchy.  However, a leading Noble of Akbar’s court, Aziz Koka, wrote a letter to him from Mecca in 1594 arguing that the discipleship promoted by Akbar amounted to nothing more than a desire on Akbar’s part to portray his superiority regarding religious matters.  To commemorate Din-e-Ilahi, he changed the name of Prayag to Allahabad (pronounced as ilahabad) in 1583.

It has been argued that the theory of Din-i-Ilahi being a new religion was a misconception that arose because of erroneous translations of Abul Fazl’s work by later British historians.  However, it is also accepted that the policy of sulh-e-kul, which formed the essence of Din-i-Ilahi, was adopted by Akbar not merely for religious purposes but as a part of general imperial administrative policy. This also formed the basis for Akbar’s policy of religious toleration.  At the time of Akbar’s death in 1605 there were no signs of discontent amongst his Muslim subjects, and the impression of even a theologian like Abdu’l Haq was that close ties remained.

More at:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akbar

“Returning” by Jennifer Berezan


Rebecca Gresham

“ReTurning” ~mantra/chant by Jennifer Berezan recorded in the Oracle Chamber in the Hypogeum at Hal Saflieni, Malta~ a 6000 year old Goddess temple for healing with sound~ http://www.edgeofwonder.com/home; Images: Nicholas Roerich http://www.roerich.org
http://creationdesigns.com/gracemille…

Holy Fools

Foolishness for Christ refers to behavior such as giving up all one’s worldly possessions upon joining a monastic order, or to deliberate flouting of society’s conventions to serve a religious purpose–particularly of Christianity. Such individuals were known as both “holy fools” and “blessed fools”. The term “fool” connotes what is perceived as feeblemindedness, and “blessed” or “holy” refers to innocence in the eyes of God.

The term fools for Christ derives from the writings of Saint PaulDesert Fathers and other saints acted the part of Holy Fools, as have the yurodivy (or iurodstvo) of Eastern Orthodox asceticism. Fools for Christ often employ shocking and unconventional behavior to challenge accepted norms, deliver prophecies, or to mask their piety.

Parallels for this type of behavior exist in non-Christian traditions as well. The Avadhuta (Sanskrit), for example, the Islamic tradition of Qalandariyya and Malamatiyya Sufism and other crazy-wise mystics display similar traits. Nasreddin, of the Sufis, is also an example.

Old Testament

Certain prophets of the Old Testament who exhibited signs of strange behaviour are considered by some scholars to be predecessors of “Fools for Christ”. The prophet Isaiah walked naked and barefoot for about three years, predicting a forthcoming captivity in Egypt Isaiah 20:2,3; the prophet Ezekiel lay before a stone, which symbolized beleaguered Jerusalem, and though God instructed him to eat bread baked on human waste, ultimately he asked to use cow dung instead Ezekiel 4:9-15Hosea married a harlot to symbolize the infidelity of Israel before God Hosea 3.

By the opinion of certain scholars, these prophets were not counted as fools by their contemporaries, as they just carried out separate actions to attract people’s attention and to awake their repentance.

New Testament

A God´s Fool Sitting On the Snow, by Vasily Surikov, 1885

According to Christian ideas, “foolishness” included consistent rejection of worldly cares and imitating Christ, who endured mockery and humiliation from the crowd. The spiritual meaning of “foolishness” from the early ages of Christianity was close to unacceptance of common social rules of hypocrisy, brutality and thirst for power and gains.

By the words of Anthony the Great: “Here comes the time, when people will behave like madmen, and if they see anybody who does not behave like that, they will rebel against him and say: ‘You are mad’, — because he is not like them.”

Paul the Apostle

Part of the Biblical basis for it can be seen in the words of the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 4:10, which famously says:

“We are fools for Christ’s sake, but ye are wise in Christ; we are weak, but ye are strong; ye are honourable, but we are despised.” (KJV).

And also:

“For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God’s sight. As it is written: “He catches the wise in their craftiness.” (1 Corinthians 3:19)
“For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” (1 Corinthians 1:18)
“For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him, God was pleased through the foolishness of what was preached to save those who believe.” (1 Corinthians 1:21)

Western Christianity

The most famous example in the Western church is St. Francis of Assisi, whose order was known for following the teachings of Christ and walking in his footsteps. Thus, upon joining the order, Franciscans gave away all possessions and focused on preaching in the streets to the common man.

Saint Juniper, an early follower of the Franciscan order, was known for taking the doctrine of the Franciscans to the extreme. Whenever anyone asked for any of his possessions, he freely gave them away, including his clothes. He once even cut off the bells from his altar-cloth and gave them to a poor woman. His fellow Franciscans had to watch him closely, and strictly forbade him from giving away his clothes. While such behaviors were embarrassing to his brothers, he was also recognized as a pure example of the Franciscan order and thus esteemed.

“The Little Flowers of Saint Francis of Assisi”, which documents the oral traditions of the Franciscans, told several stories of “Brother Juniper”. The most famous of these is the story of how Brother Juniper cut off the foot of a pig to give it to a sick brother. Upon the sick brother’s request for a pig’s foot, Brother Juniper took a kitchen knife and ran into the forest, where he saw a herd of swine feeding. There, he quickly cut the foot off of one of the swine and carried it back to the brother, leaving the swine to die.

This angered the herdsman, who complained to Saint Francis. Saint Francis confronted Brother Juniper, who joyfully exclaimed, “It is true, sweet father, that I did cut off the swine’s foot. I will tell thee the reason. I went out of charity to visit the brother who is sick.” Brother Juniper likewise explained to the angry herdsman who, seeing the “charity, simplicity, and humility” (Hudleston, 1953) in Brother Juniper’s heart, forgave him and delivered the rest of the pig to the brothers.

Eastern Christianity

 

The Holy Fool or yurodivy (юродивый) is the Russian version of foolishness for Christ, a peculiar form of Eastern Orthodoxasceticism. The yurodivy is a Holy Fool, one who acts intentionally foolish in the eyes of men. The term implies behaviour “which is caused neither by mistake nor by feeble-mindedness, but is deliberate, irritating, even provocative.”

In his book Holy Fools in Byzantium and Beyond, Ivanov described “holy fool” as a term for a person who “feigns insanity, pretends to be silly, or who provokes shock or outrage by his deliberate unruliness.”  He explained that such conduct qualifies as holy foolery only if the audience believes that the individual is sane, moral, and pious. The Eastern Orthodox Church holds that holy fools voluntarily take up the guise of insanity in order to conceal their perfection from the world, and thus avoid praise.

Some characteristics that were commonly seen in holy fools were going around half-naked, being homeless, speaking in riddles, being believed to be clairvoyant and a prophet, and occasionally being disruptive and challenging to the point of seeming immoral (though always to make a point).

Ivanov argued that, unlike in the past, modern yurodivy are generally aware that they look pathetic in others’ eyes. They strive to pre-empt this contempt through exaggerated self-humiliation, and following such displays they let it be known both that their behaviors were staged and that their purpose was to disguise their superiority over their audience.

Fools for Christ are often given the title of Blessed (блаженный), which does not necessarily mean that the individual is less than a saint, but rather points to the blessings from God that they are believed to have acquired.

The Eastern Orthodox Church records Isidora Barankis of Egypt (d. 369) among the first Holy Fools. However, the term was not popularized until the coming of Symeon of Emesa, who is considered to be a patron saint of holy fools. In Greek, the term for Holy Fool is salos.

The practice was recognised in the hagiography of fifth-century Byzantium, and it was extensively adopted in Muscovite Russia, probably in the 14th century. The madness of the Holy Fool was ambiguous, and could be real or simulated. He (or she) was believed to have been divinely inspired, and was therefore able to say truths which others could not, normally in the form of indirect allusions or parables. He had a particular status in regard to the Tsars, as a figure not subject to earthly control or judgement.

The first reported fool-for-Christ in Russia was St. Procopius (Prokopiy), who came from the lands of the Holy Roman Empire to Novgorod, then moved to Ustyug, pretending to be a fool and leading an ascetic way of life (slept naked on church-porches, prayed throughout the whole night, received food only from poor people). He was abused and beaten, but finally won respect and became venerated after his death.

The Russian Orthodox Church numbers 36 yurodivye among its saints, starting from Procopius of Ustyug, and most prominently Basil Fool for Christ, who gives his name to Saint Basil’s Cathedral in Moscow. One of the best-known modern examples in the Russian Church is perhaps St Xenia of Saint Petersburg.

Holy Russia, by Mikhail Nesterov

The Soul of the People, notice the old man in the background, with his arms stretched to heaven, painting by Mikhail Nesterov

Common phrases or epithets

A God’s Fool, by Pavel Svedomsky

Crazy for God

“Crazy for God” is an expression sometimes used in the United States and other English speaking countries to convey a similar idea as “Foolishness for Christ.” It has been especially connected to the Unification Church of the United States. In The Way of God’s Will, a collection of sayings popular among church members, Unification Church founder Sun Myung Moon is quoted as saying: “We leaders should leave the tradition that we have become crazy for God.”

In 1979 Unification Church critic Christopher Edwards titled a memoir about his experiences in the six months he spent as a church member: Crazy for God: The nightmare of cult life.

In 2007, author Frank Schaeffer titled his autobiography Crazy for God: How I Grew Up as One of the Elect, Helped Found the Religious Right, and Lived to Take All (or Almost All) of It Back. It tells of his upbringing as the son of a well-known evangelicalminister and his later conversion to the Greek Orthodox Church.

In the same year Stephen Prothero, author and chairman of Boston University‘s Department of Religion, wrote in the Harvard Divinity Bulletin: “I am crazy for people who are crazy for God: people nearly as inscrutable to me as divinity, who leave wives and children to become forest-dwelling monks in Thailand, who wander naked across the belly of India in search of self-realization, who speak in tongues and take up serpents in Appalachia because the Bible says they can.”

On fire for God

“On fire for God” is an expression often used in respect of persons who are engaged in serving God in such a way that their activities reflect a ‘burning’ desire to fulfil their calling. This often manifests itself in what might be regarded as burning passion, such as evangelising (preaching) on the streets.

Modern theology

One of the more recent works in theology is Fools for Christ by Jaroslav Pelikan. Through six essays dealing with various “fools,” Pelikan explores the motif of fool-for-Christ in relationship to the problem of understanding the numinous:

The Holy is too great and too terrible when encountered directly for men of normal sanity to be able to contemplate it comfortably. Only those who cannot care for the consequences run the risk of the direct confrontation of the Holy.

More at:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foolishness_for_Christ

TRANSLATION ADVENTURE 10/15/17

Present were:  Ben Gilberti, Ned Henry, Brian Wallenstein, Bo Lebo, Alex Gambeau, Heather Williams

SENSE TESTIMONY: Madness is rampant

5th STEP CONCLUSIONS:

1) Realization of TRUTH is Here and Now erupting in Consciousness.
2) Truth is the Harmony, balance and wholeness of LOVE being all there is.
3) Truth is the Whole potent power of LOVES energy.
4) Truth is the only Essence thus benevolently, sanely, expressing its eternal Joy/unity as sane, peaceful, healthy, wholesome safe Eternal Life
5) One Mind is always creating reliable understanding in balance.
6) Coming.

“What is Seeking…” by Robert McEwen, HWM

Seekers of Truth~  
 
   ~One of my old friends of years, past lives as well, stopped in for a reading.  She is good at the language of astrology as well, studying and observing her 
role in life and knows, watches her “triggers” and lets go of them.  Some of my astrology includes concepts, but not much.
 
My Astrology is merely wisdom of principles in spirit or consciousness.
Change what is looking and what you look at also changes.
 
   It is transformative and a storm happens in letting go.  We are free all ready.
No need to seek or look for freedom.  
 
A fair witness,
no judging…
Let go and you are free. 
 
  ~She found peace on her own in our session.
I saw it and felt it.
I just pointed and asked questions.
 
She, Felicia, my friend, is awareness, hollow and life flows through and watched.
Peace is there I saw in her all ready.
… her peace when she identified as a woman watching that she in a relationship.
Her desire energy is strong…scorpio planets …and she is not the role, only peace.
I saw her light up in recognizing this on a very deep level.   We had fun and laughed at ourself
as separate beings and let that go.  Trust what you are as consciousness.  
Be and let go of desire of any role.  Honestly, we still secretly want the fairy tale.
When we let go of it…we get something better.
A surprise 
A peace.
A Joy…
 
Heart based astrology is applicable in your cosmic and daily life.
Astrology is a lens, a perspective that offers a vision, a path of our “this life time” path.  It is all there and you have free will 
or choice at each moment.
The work is in observing.
Astrology a tool for watching from a cosmic perspective.
We we observe any thought or thing it changes.
It is like trying to catch a cat … you can’t do it.
Just let the cat alone.
It will then come sit in your lap and purr~
No need for desire and to chase or make anything happen.
Let trying go.
Let your life work itself out.
Life is the 
Teacher.
Not a person.
 
Robert McEwen H.W, M.
Mentor
503 706-0396
Robert

“Consciousness, conscious, of consciousness” by Robert McEwen, HWM

~Every apparent form and thought has its roots in infinite mind, cosmic heart that we live move and have our being.
Between Thought and appearance of form is conscious conscious of consciousness.
Timeless and nameless the invisible essence, understanding of Truth of what appears, that will always change..
It is temporal, be it healthy or we are resisting and causing pain.  Thoughts and forms are always changing like clouds.
Beingness is creative at all time, birth and death flows and appears in mind.  The appear to be there to know the God
of it.  Form and formless relate with each other.
The dance of life.
There is nothing to strive for or to get ride of.
Acceptance of the apparent limitation, is the first step
to taking action.  Then there is peace.
No disease.
Attachments to form or formless, both are a lie.
The attachment is what is fucked up.
That is the mis~identification.
It is neither Truth or a lie.
Non~dual, a peace now.
There is no mind.
No words, only experience that also changes.
That is constant.
Do not try to hold your shape.
You can’t do it!
You got to laugh…cry, release from any and all.
That is the lesson of here.The body is not good or bad,
spiritual or non~spiritual.  It is changing all the time.
You can’t kill or die as consciousness.
You are in no time or space as consciousness conscious of consciousness.
You are everywhere at once in at the same time.
Separation dissolves.
Consciousness of separateness melts.

Robby Baba McEwen~
robbystarman@aol.com
503 706-0396

Thomas Merton on our True v our False Self

Thomas Merton

“Mental health is an ongoing process of dedication to reality at all costs.”

— M. Scott Peck, from “The Road Less Traveled,” pp. 51

Every one of us is shadowed by an illusory person: a false self.

This is the person that I want myself to be but who cannot exist, because God—because Truth, Light—knows nothing about him. And to be unknown to God is altogether too much privacy.

My false and private self is the one who wants to exist outside the reach of God’s will and God’s love— outside of reality and outside of life. And such a self cannot help but be an illusion.

We are not very good at recognizing illusions, least of all the ones we cherish most about ourselves—the ones we are born and raised with and which feed the roots of sin. For most of the people in the world, there is no greater subjective reality than this false self of theirs, which cannot exist. A life devoted to maintaining and expanding this false self, this shadow, is what is called a life of sin.

All sin starts from the assumption that my false self, the self that exists only in my own egocentric desires, is the fundamental reality of life around which everything else in the universe is ordered. Thus I use up my life in the desire for pleasures and the thirst for experiences, for power, honor, knowledge, feeling loved, in order to clothe this false self and construct its nothingness into something objectively real. And I wind experiences around myself and cover myself with pleasures and glory like bandages in order to make myself perceptible to myself and to the world, as if I were an invisible body that could only become visible when something visible covered its surface.

To be a saint means to be my true self. Therefore the problem of sanctity and salvation is in fact the problem of finding out who I truly am and of discovering my true self, my essence or core.

Trees and animals have no problem. God makes them what they are without consulting them, and they are perfectly satisfied.

With us it is different. God leaves us free to be whatever we like.

We can be ourselves or not, as we please. We are at liberty to be real, or to be unreal. We may be true or false, the choice is ours. We may wear now one mask and now another, and never, if we so desire, appear with our own true face.

But we cannot make these choices with impunity.

Causes have effects, and if we lie to ourselves and to others, then we cannot expect to find truth and reality whenever we happen to want them.

If we have chosen the way of falsity we must not be surprised that truth eludes us when we finally come to need it and that confusion reigns.

– Thomas Merton, abridged and adapted from “New Seeds of Contemplation

(theplacesthatscareyou.wordpress.com)

Book: “Back to Basics Management — The Lost Craft of Leadership”

Back to Basics Management explains the difference between business administration and business management, how this distinction has been obscured, and the need to revive the craft of leadership in management. It is an invaluable book for every conscientious manager, detailing the tools used in effective management, and it offers concise and comprehensive guidelines for developing and refining primary leadership skills including Creative Listening, Decision Making, Managing Change, Managing Motivation, Managing Time, Managing Delegation, Body Language, Managerial Coaching and Training, Communication Skills, and Managerial Goal Setting.

(sfpl.bibliocommons.com)